Greater decision uncertainty characterizes a transdiagnostic patient sample during approach-avoidance conflict: a computational modeling approach
Background: Imbalances in approach-avoidance conflict (AAC) decision-making (e.g. sacrificing rewards to avoid negative outcomes) are considered central to multiple psychiatric disorders. We used computational modeling to examine two factors often not distinguished within model-free analyses of AAC: decision uncertainty (DU) and sensitivity to negative outcomes vs. reward (emotional conflict; EC).Methods: A previously-validated AAC task was completed by 477 participants, including healthy controls (HCs; N=59), individuals with substance use disorders (SUDs; N=159) and individuals with depression and/or anxiety (DEP/ANX; N=260) disorders without SUDs. Using an active inference model, we estimated individual-level values for a model parameter (β) reflecting DU as well as another reflecting EC. Analyses were also repeated in a subsample propensity matched on age and general intelligence.Results: The model showed high accuracy (73%). As further validation, parameters correlated with reaction times and self-reported task motivations in expected directions. EC further correlated with self-reported anxiety during the task (r=0.32, p<0.001), while DU correlated with self-reported difficulty making decisions (r=0.45, p<0.001). Compared to HCs, both DEP/ANX and SUDs showed higher DU in the propensity matched sample (t=2.16, p = .03; and t=2.88, p = .005, respectively), with analogous results in the full sample; SUDs also showed lower EC in the full sample (t=3.17, p=0.002). Limitations: This study is limited by clinical sample heterogeneity and an inability to examine learning.Conclusions: These results suggest that reduced confidence in how to act, rather than increased emotional conflict, may explain maladaptive approach-avoidance behaviors in psychiatric disorders.