scholarly journals Primary Productivity of Phytoplankton of Mahakali River, Nepal

BIBECHANA ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 14 ◽  
pp. 98-102
Author(s):  
Vinod Kumar Mahasetha
Keyword(s):  
Primary Production ◽  
Water Temperature ◽  
Primary Productivity ◽  
Net Primary Production ◽  
Gross Primary Production ◽  
Mean Value ◽  
Production Value ◽  
Lentic Water

Present paper describes primary productivity of Mahakali river at four stations. The two years mean of net primary production was 96.80 mgC/m3/day. The  net primary production value of Mahakali river was less due to the low water temperature and less phytoplanktonic growth. Two years mean value of gross primary production of Mahakali river was 176.29 mgC/m3/day, which is less than lentic water. It shows that the river is oligotrophic but developing a tendency as going towards mesotrophic.BIBECHANA 14 (2017) 98-102

scholarly journals Primary Production and Fish Yield Estimation in the Meghna River System, Bangladesh

2005 ◽  
Vol 18 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
K.K.U. AHMED ◽  
S.U. AHMED ◽  
G.C. HALDAR ◽  
M.R.A. HOSSAIN ◽  
T. AHMED
Keyword(s):  
Primary Production ◽  
Water Temperature ◽  
Negative Correlation ◽  
Net Primary Production ◽  
Gross Primary Production ◽  
Euphotic Zone ◽  
River System ◽  
Significant Negative Correlation ◽  
Fish Yield ◽  
The Mean

This study was carried out in four selected stations (Mohonpur, Kaligonj, Charludua and Daulatkhan) in the Meghna river system, Bangladesh between the latitude 22°35.494Ñ N - 23°23.987 N and longitude 90°35.793 E - 90°49.061Ñ E. Average net primary production (NPP) and gross primary production (GPP) (gC·m3 ·h) in the euphotic zone of the Meghna river were 0.089 ± 0.021 and 0.161 ± 0.025 respectively. The rate of conversion of GPP into NPP ranged between 48.17 and 62.63% with an average of 54.72%. The mean ratio of NPP to GPP (NPP:GPP), NPP:Respiration and average percent respiration rate to GPP were 0.549 ± 0.060, 1.251 ± 0.320 and 45.04 ± 6.02% respectively. The mean photosynthetic production for the day (gC·m3 ·day) and year (gC·m3 ·yr) were 1.930 and 704.45 respectively. Annual computed fish yield in relation to gross carbon synthesis was 7.0 kg fish·m3 ·year. The actual production of fish from the Meghna river is accounted about 0.21% of the estimated production. The gross energy production (Kcal energy·m3 ·day) by the producers was estimated about 18.0. The NPP of phytoplankton established a high significant negative correlation (r = -0.975; p < 0.01) with water temperature and low, but a definite negative correlation existed (r = -0.767) between GPP and water temperature.

Energy and nutrients

2019 ◽  
pp. 161-176
Author(s):  
Richard T. Corlett
Keyword(s):  
Primary Production ◽  
Forest Ecology ◽  
Net Primary Production ◽  
Ecosystem Respiration ◽  
Gross Primary Production ◽  
Nitrogen And Phosphorus ◽  
New Information ◽  
Tropical Forest Ecology ◽  
Toxic Concentrations

This chapter deals with the ecology of Tropical East Asia from the perspective of water, energy, and matter flows through ecosystems, particularly forests. Data from the network of eddy flux covariance towers is revealing general patterns in gross primary production, ecosystem respiration, and net ecosystem production, and exchange. There is also new information on the patterns of net primary production and biomass within the region. In contrast, our understanding of the role of soil nutrients in tropical forest ecology still relies mostly on work done in the Neotropics, with just enough data from Asia to suggest that the major patterns may be pantropical. Nitrogen and phosphorus have received most attention regionally, followed by calcium, potassium, and magnesium, and there has been very little study of the role of micronutrients and potentially toxic concentrations of aluminium, manganese, and hydrogen ions. Animal nutrition has also been neglected.

scholarly journals How drought severity constrains gross primary production(GPP) and its partitioning among carbon pools in a <i>Quercus ilex</i> coppice?

2014 ◽  
Vol 11 (23) ◽  
pp. 6855-6869 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. Rambal ◽  
M. Lempereur ◽  
J. M. Limousin ◽  
N. K. Martin-StPaul ◽  
J. M. Ourcival ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Primary Production ◽  
Water Deficit ◽  
Eddy Covariance ◽  
Quercus Ilex ◽  
Net Primary Production ◽  
Gross Primary Production ◽  
Carbon Fluxes ◽  
Stem Growth ◽  
Drought Severity ◽  
Mediterranean Ecosystem

Abstract. The partitioning of photosynthates toward biomass compartments plays a crucial role in the carbon (C) sink function of forests. Few studies have examined how carbon is allocated toward plant compartments in drought-prone forests. We analyzed the fate of gross primary production (GPP) in relation to yearly water deficit in an old evergreen Mediterranean Quercus ilex coppice severely affected by water limitations. Carbon fluxes between the ecosystem and the atmosphere were measured with an eddy covariance flux tower running continuously since 2001. Discrete measurements of litterfall, stem growth and fAPAR allowed us to derive annual productions of leaves, wood, flowers and acorns, and an isometric relationship between stem and belowground biomass has been used to estimate perennial belowground growth. By combining eddy covariance fluxes with annual net primary productions (NPP), we managed to close a C budget and derive values of autotrophic, heterotrophic respirations and carbon-use efficiency (CUE; the ratio between NPP and GPP). Average values of yearly net ecosystem production (NEP), GPP and Reco were 282, 1259 and 977 g C m−2. The corresponding aboveground net primary production (ANPP) components were 142.5, 26.4 and 69.6 g C m−2 for leaves, reproductive effort (flowers and fruits) and stems, respectively. NEP, GPP and Reco were affected by annual water deficit. Partitioning to the different plant compartments was also impacted by drought, with a hierarchy of responses going from the most affected – the stem growth – to the least affected – the leaf production. The average CUE was 0.40, which is well in the range for Mediterranean-type forest ecosystems. CUE tended to decrease less drastically in response to drought than GPP and NPP did, probably due to drought acclimation of autotrophic respiration. Overall, our results provide a baseline for modeling the inter-annual variations of carbon fluxes and allocation in this widespread Mediterranean ecosystem, and they highlight the value of maintaining continuous experimental measurements over the long term.

scholarly journals Carbon Balance in Salt Marsh and Mangrove Ecosystems: A Global Synthesis

2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (10) ◽  
pp. 767 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniel M. Alongi
Keyword(s):  
Organic Carbon ◽  
Primary Production ◽  
Salt Marshes ◽  
Dissolved Inorganic Carbon ◽  
Net Primary Production ◽  
Ecosystem Respiration ◽  
Soil Depth ◽  
Gross Primary Production ◽  
Coastal Ocean ◽  
Microbial Decomposition

Mangroves and salt marshes are among the most productive ecosystems in the global coastal ocean. Mangroves store more carbon (739 Mg CORG ha−1) than salt marshes (334 Mg CORG ha−1), but the latter sequester proportionally more (24%) net primary production (NPP) than mangroves (12%). Mangroves exhibit greater rates of gross primary production (GPP), aboveground net primary production (AGNPP) and plant respiration (RC), with higher PGPP/RC ratios, but salt marshes exhibit greater rates of below-ground NPP (BGNPP). Mangroves have greater rates of subsurface DIC production and, unlike salt marshes, exhibit active microbial decomposition to a soil depth of 1 m. Salt marshes release more CH4 from soil and creek waters and export more dissolved CH4, but mangroves release more CO2 from tidal waters and export greater amounts of particulate organic carbon (POC), dissolved organic carbon (DOC) and dissolved inorganic carbon (DIC), to adjacent waters. Both ecosystems contribute only a small proportion of GPP, RE (ecosystem respiration) and NEP (net ecosystem production) to the global coastal ocean due to their small global area, but contribute 72% of air–sea CO2 exchange of the world’s wetlands and estuaries and contribute 34% of DIC export and 17% of DOC + POC export to the world’s coastal ocean. Thus, both wetland ecosystems contribute disproportionately to carbon flow of the global coastal ocean.

Variability in carbon exchange and light utilization among boreal forest stands: implications for remote sensing of net primary production

1998 ◽  
Vol 28 (3) ◽  
pp. 375-389 ◽  
Author(s):  
Scott J Goetz ◽  
Stephen D Prince
Keyword(s):  
Remote Sensing ◽  
Primary Production ◽  
Boreal Forest ◽  
Populus Tremuloides ◽  
Net Primary Production ◽  
Gross Primary Production ◽  
Total Carbon ◽  
Simple Relationship ◽  
Carbon Exchange ◽  
Forest Stands

Variability in carbon exchange, net primary production (NPP), and light-use efficiency were explored for 63 boreal forest stands in northeastern Minnesota using an ecophysiological model. The model was initialized with extensive field measurements of Populus tremuloides Michx. and Picea mariana (Mill.) BSP stand properties. The results showed that the proportion of total carbon assimilation expended in autotrophic respiration (i.e., the respiration to assimilation ratio, R/A) was significantly different for the two tree species and this explained much of the variability in the amount of net production per unit absorbed photosynthetically active radiation (APAR), referred to as PAR utilization ( epsilonn). This is the first known study to directly link variability in respiratory costs to epsilonn. Total assimilation per unit APAR ( epsilong) was much less variable than epsilonn and was not significantly different between species. Greater stomatal control on some moisture stressed sites accounted for most of the variability in epsilong. The lack of a simple relationship between light harvesting and net carbon gain indicates that estimation of net primary production with satellite remote sensing requires additional information on respiration costs; however, evidence for convergence in epsilong can be used to simplify the remote sensing of gross primary production over large areas.

Simulation of Mediterranean forest carbon pools under expected environmental scenarios

2010 ◽  
Vol 40 (5) ◽  
pp. 850-860 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Chiesi ◽  
M. Moriondo ◽  
F. Maselli ◽  
L. Gardin ◽  
L. Fibbi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Primary Production ◽  
Environmental Changes ◽  
Net Primary Production ◽  
Gross Primary Production ◽  
Central Italy ◽  
Forest Carbon ◽  
Simulation Approach ◽  
Two Factors ◽  
Vegetation Carbon ◽  
The Impact

Simulating the effects of possible environmental changes on the forest carbon budget requires the use of calibrated and tested models of ecosystem processes. A recently proposed simulation approach based on the use of the BIOME-BGC model was applied to yield estimates of present carbon fluxes and pools in Tuscany forests (central Italy). After the validation of these estimates against existing ground data, the simulation approach was used to assess the impact of plausible climate changes (+2 °C and increased CO2 concentration) on forest carbon dynamics (gross primary production (GPP), net primary production (NPP), and relevant allocations). The results indicate that the temperature change tends to inhibit all production and allocation processes, which are instead enhanced by the CO2 concentration rise. The combination of the two factors leads to a general increase in both GPP and NPP that is higher for deciduous oaks and chestnut (+30% and 24% for GPP and +42% and 31% for NPP, respectively). Additionally, vegetation carbon is slightly increased, while total soil carbon remains almost unchanged with respect to the present conditions. These findings are analyzed with reference to the Tuscany forest situation and previous studies on the subject.

scholarly journals Leaf Area Index identified as a major source of variability in modelled CO<sub>2</sub> fertilization

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Qianyu Li ◽  
Xingjie Lu ◽  
Yingping Wang ◽  
Xin Huang ◽  
Peter M. Cox ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Primary Production ◽  
Leaf Area Index ◽  
Leaf Area ◽  
Net Primary Production ◽  
Gross Primary Production ◽  
Vegetation Types ◽  
Cable Model ◽  
Co2 Fertilization ◽  
Area Index ◽  
Leaf Level

Abstract. The concentration-carbon feedback factor (β), also called the CO2 fertilization effect, is a key unknown in climate-carbon cycle projections. A better understanding of model mechanisms that govern terrestrial ecosystem responses to elevated CO2 is urgently needed to enable a more accurate prediction of future terrestrial carbon sink. We calculated CO2 fertilization effects at various hierarchical levels from leaf biochemical reaction, leaf photosynthesis, canopy gross primary production (GPP), net primary production (NPP), to ecosystem carbon storage (cpool), for seven C3 vegetation types in response to increasing CO2 under RCP 8.5 scenario, using the Community Atmosphere Biosphere Land Exchange model (CABLE). Our results show that coefficient of variation (CV) for the CABLE model among the seven vegetation types is 0.15–0.13 for the biochemical level β, 0.13–0.16 for the leaf-level β, 0.48 for the βGPP, 0.45 for the βNPP, and 0.58 for the βcpool. The low variation of the leaf-level β is consistent with a theoretical analysis that leaf photosynthetic sensitivity to increasing CO2 concentration is almost an invariant function. In CABLE, the major jump in CV of β values from leaf- to canopy- and ecosystem-levels results from divergence in modelled leaf area index (LAI) within and among the vegetation types. The correlations of βGPP, βNPP, or βcpool with βLAI are very high in CABLE. Overall, our results indicate that modelled LAI is a key factor causing the divergence in β values in CABLE model. It is therefore urgent to constrain processes that regulate LAI dynamics in order to better represent the response of ecosystem productivity to increasing CO2 in Earth System Models.

The Carbon Cycle

2019 ◽  
pp. 129-158
Author(s):  
Han Dolman
Keyword(s):  
Carbon Cycle ◽  
Primary Production ◽  
Ocean Circulation ◽  
Net Primary Production ◽  
Gross Primary Production ◽  
Carbon Stocks ◽  
Climate Feedback ◽  
Fossil Fuel Burning ◽  
Thermal Maximum ◽  
Natural Carbon

The chapter first shows carbon dioxide variability over long geological timescales. The current stocks and fluxes of carbon are then given, for the whole planet and for the atmosphere, ocean and land separately. The main flows of carbon in the ocean, through the biological pump (via uptake through photosynthesis) and the physical pump (via involving chemical transformation uptake in water and production of carbonate), and on land, through photosynthesis (Gross Primary Production) and respiration leading to Net Primary Production, Net Ecosystem Production and Net Biome Production and through the storage of carbon in biomass, are described. Next, carbon interactions during the Paleocene–Eocene Thermal Maximum and glacial–interglacial transitions, thought to involve changes in ocean circulation and upwelling, are examined. The key changes from anthropogenic perturbation of the natural carbon cycle are shown to be due to fossil fuel burning and land-use change (deforestation). The effects of the carbon–climate feedback on temperature and carbon stocks are also shown.

Site-level evaluation of satellite-based global terrestrial gross primary production and net primary production monitoring

2005 ◽  
Vol 11 (4) ◽  
pp. 666-684 ◽  
Author(s):  
David P. Turner ◽  
William D. Ritts ◽  
Warren B. Cohen ◽  
Thomas K. Maeirsperger ◽  
Stith T. Gower ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Primary Production ◽  
Net Primary Production ◽  
Gross Primary Production ◽  
Production Monitoring

scholarly journals Is NPP proportional to GPP? Waring’s hypothesis 20 years on

2019 ◽  
Vol 39 (8) ◽  
pp. 1473-1483 ◽  
Author(s):  
A Collalti ◽  
I C Prentice
Keyword(s):  
Standard Deviation ◽  
Primary Production ◽  
Net Primary Production ◽  
Gross Primary Production ◽  
Secondary Compounds ◽  
Forest Stand ◽  
Stand Age ◽  
Plant Tissues ◽  
Autotrophic Respiration ◽  
Central Value

Abstract Gross primary production (GPP) is partitioned to autotrophic respiration (Ra) and net primary production (NPP), the latter being used to build plant tissues and synthesize non-structural and secondary compounds. Waring et al. (1998; Net primary production of forests: a constant fraction of gross primary production? Tree Physiol 18:129–134) suggested that a NPP:GPP ratio of 0.47 ± 0.04 (SD) is universal across biomes, tree species and stand ages. Representing NPP in models as a fixed fraction of GPP, they argued, would be both simpler and more accurate than trying to simulate Ra mechanistically. This paper reviews progress in understanding the NPP:GPP ratio in forests during the 20 years since the Waring et al. paper. Research has confirmed the existence of pervasive acclimation mechanisms that tend to stabilize the NPP:GPP ratio and indicates that Ra should not be modelled independently of GPP. Nonetheless, studies indicate that the value of this ratio is influenced by environmental factors, stand age and management. The average NPP:GPP ratio in over 200 studies, representing different biomes, species and forest stand ages, was found to be 0.46, consistent with the central value that Waring et al. proposed but with a much larger standard deviation (±0.12) and a total range (0.22–0.79) that is too large to be disregarded.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document