scholarly journals The Use of Active Melioidosis Detect TM in Early Diagnosis of Melioidosis in Hospital Tengku Ampuan Afzan and Hospital Sultanah Nur Zahirah

2020 ◽  
Vol 18 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Wan Nurliyana Wan Ramli
Keyword(s):  
Positive Predictive Value ◽  
Negative Predictive Value ◽  
Sensitivity And Specificity ◽  
Predictive Value ◽  
Point Of Care ◽  
Rapid Test ◽  
High Specificity ◽  
Culture Method ◽  
Lower Sensitivity ◽  
Spot Urine

Introduction: Melioidosis is endemic in Malaysia and an important cause of sepsis. Current gold standard for diagnosis is by culture method,but its long procedure will delay the treatment leading to hospital-related mortality.Thus,a good rapid test is needed to reduce its mortality burden. Recently, Active Melioidosis Detect (AMD) have been shown to be useful. Objectives: (1)To measure the sensitivity and specificity of AMD. (2)To study the sensitivity and specificity of early morning urine AMD compared to spot urine AMD. Materials and method: A prospective crosssectional study of clinically suspected melioidosis patients in HTAA and HSNZ from April until December 2018. Blood and urine samples were tested with AMD. Test results were analysed for sensitivity, specificity,positive predictive value and negative predictive value. Results: A total of 89 patients were included in this study.The mean age is 52 years old, and 56.3% were male gender.64% of patients have diabetes mellitus.11 patients have positive blood culture for Bukholderia pseudomallei, 4 of them were tested positive for AMD.3 of them presented with septic shock (3.4%), however none died.The sensitivity of the AMD was 36.4% ([95% CI 12.4 to 68.4]) and the specificity was 66.7% ( [95% CI 46.0 to 82.8]) in all samples, with positive predictive value of 30.7% and negative predictive value of 72%.Blood samples have lower sensitivity of 9.1% ([95% CI 4.8 to 42.9]) with high specificity of 100% ([95% CI 84.5 to 100]). Urine spot samples have higher sensitivity compared to serum and morning urine, with 36.4% ([95%CI 12.4 to 68.4]) and specificity of 88.9% ([95% CI 69.7 to 97.1]). Conclusion: From this pilot study, this test requires further evaluation before incorporating as point of care assay.

scholarly journals Evaluation of sensitivity and spesitivity as COVID–19 screening method

2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (4) ◽  
pp. 758
Author(s):  
Atikah Nurhesti ◽  
Solikhah Solikhah ◽  
Siti Nur Djannah
Keyword(s):  
Positive Predictive Value ◽  
Negative Predictive Value ◽  
Sensitivity And Specificity ◽  
Predictive Value ◽  
Close Contact ◽  
Screening Method ◽  
Rapid Test ◽  
Antibody Test ◽  
Screening Tests ◽  
Rapid Antibody

Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is caused by the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). Antibody rapid test is one of the COVID-19 screening tests that can be used in the community. The accuracy of the rapid antibody methods needs to be appropriately assessed, it is necessary to carry out a diagnostic accuracy study using a pairwise sensitivity and specificity analysis. This research aimed to assess the sensitivity and specificity of COVID-19 rapid tests, also assesses positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV) of the rapid antibody test as a method of screening for COVID-19 in Sleman Regency, Indonesia. In total, 118 respondents who have contact with COVID-19 patients and have symptoms were enrolled in this study. The study was conducted on 118 patients who had been in contact with confirmed COVID-19 118 patients who met the close contact criteria were conducted a rapid antibody test. 64.41% patients were reactive. Real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT PCR) as a gold standard was also carried out for all patients and 63.56% affirmed positive for COVID-19. The sensitivity value was 97.33%, and the specificity value was 93.02%, while the positive predictive value (NPP) was 96.05%, and the negative predictive value (NPN) was 95.24%. These results meet the minimum recommendations for the screening method.

scholarly journals Agreement in the diagnosis of dental fluorosis in central incisors performed by a standardized photographic method and clinical examination

2009 ◽  
Vol 25 (5) ◽  
pp. 1017-1024 ◽  
Author(s):  
Carolina Castro Martins ◽  
Loliza Chalub ◽  
Ynara Bosco Lima-Arsati ◽  
Isabela Almeida Pordeus ◽  
Saul Martins Paiva
Keyword(s):  
Positive Predictive Value ◽  
Negative Predictive Value ◽  
Clinical Examination ◽  
Predictive Value ◽  
Gold Standard ◽  
Dental Fluorosis ◽  
Digital Camera ◽  
High Specificity ◽  
Photographic Method ◽  
Pediatric Dentists

The aim of this study was to assess agreement in the diagnosis of dental fluorosis performed by a standardized digital photographic method and a clinical examination (gold standard). 49 children (aged 7-9 years) were clinically evaluated by a trained examiner for the assessment of dental fluorosis. Central incisors were evaluated for the presence or absence of dental fluorosis and were photographed with a digital camera. Photographs were presented to three pediatric dentists, who examined the images. Data were analyzed using Cohen's kappa and validity values. Agreement in the diagnosis performed by the photographic method and clinical examination was good (0.67) and accuracy was 83.7%. The prevalence of dental fluorosis was reported to be higher in the clinical examination (49%) compared with the photographic method (36.7%). The photographic method presented higher specificity (96%) than sensitivity (70.8%), a positive predictive value (PPV) of 94.4% and a negative predictive value (NPV) of 77.4%. The diagnosis of dental fluorosis performed using the photographic method presented high specificity and PPV, which indicates that the method is reproducible and reliable for recording dental fluorosis.

scholarly journals Clinical Performance of the Spot Vision Photo Screener before and after Induction of Cycloplegia in Children

2019 ◽  
Vol 2019 ◽  
pp. 1-7 ◽  
Author(s):  
Konuralp Yakar
Keyword(s):  
Positive Predictive Value ◽  
Negative Predictive Value ◽  
Predictive Value ◽  
Clinical Performance ◽  
High Specificity ◽  
Screening Criteria ◽  
Predictive Values ◽  
Before And After ◽  
Sensitivity Specificity ◽  
Vision Screener

Aim. To compare the clinical performance of the Spot Vision Screener used to detect amblyopia risk factors (ARFs) in children before and after induction of cycloplegia; the children were referred because they met the screening criteria of the American Association for Pediatric Ophthalmology and Strabismus (AAPOS). Methods. The Spot Vision Screener and a standard autorefractometer were used to examine 200 eyes of 100 children aged 3–10 years, before and after cycloplegia induction, in terms of ARFs. Sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values for the detection of significant refractive errors were measured using the AAPOS referral criteria. It was explored that Spot Screener data were affected by cycloplegia. The extent of agreement between cycloplegic/noncycloplegic photoscreening data and cycloplegic autorefraction measurements was assessed using Wilcoxon and Spearman correlation analyses. Results. The Spot’s sensitivity was improved from 60.9% to 85.3% and specificity from 94.9% to 87.4% with cycloplegia compared to cycloplegic standard autorefractometer results. The positive predictive value of Spot was 75.7%, and the negative predictive value was 90.4% without cycloplegia. With cycloplegia, the positive predictive value of Spot was 63.6% and the negative predictive value was 95.8%. Conclusions. The Spot Screener afforded moderate sensitivity and high specificity prior to cycloplegia. The sensitivity and negative predictive value improved after induction of cycloplegia. Examiners should be aware of the effects of cycloplegia on their findings.

scholarly journals EVALUATION OF LEUKOCYTE ESTERASE REAGENT STRIPS TEST IN THE DIAGNOSIS OF SPONTANEOUS BACTERIAL PERITONITIS IN CHILDREN WITH CIRRHOSIS

2015 ◽  
Vol 52 (3) ◽  
pp. 195-199 ◽  
Author(s):  
Naser HONAR ◽  
Bita GERAMIZADEH ◽  
Seyed-Mohsen DEHGHANI ◽  
Gholamreza KALVANDI ◽  
Iraj SHAHRAMIAN ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Positive Predictive Value ◽  
Negative Predictive Value ◽  
Ascitic Fluid ◽  
Predictive Value ◽  
Spontaneous Bacterial Peritonitis ◽  
Rapid Test ◽  
Dipstick Test ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Bacterial Peritonitis ◽  
Strip Test

BackgroundSpontaneous bacterial peritonitis is defined as an ascetic fluid infection without an evident intra-abdominal surgically treatable source. Spontaneous bacterial peritonitis is one of the severe complications in patients with cirrhosis and ascites. Without early antibiotic treatment, this complication is associated with high mortality rate; therefore, early diagnosis and treatment of spontaneous bacterial peritonitis is necessary for survival. Leukocyte esterase reagent can rapidly diagnose the spontaneous bacterial peritonitis.ObjectiveThis study aimed to find out the diagnostic accuracy of leukocyte esterase dipstick test for the diagnosis of spontaneous bacterial peritonitis.MethodsA single centered hospital-based cross-sectional study was conducted during July 2013 to August 2014 on children with cirrhotic liver disease and ascites who were admitted in the Department of Pediatric Gastroenterology in Nemazee Hospital affiliated to Shiraz University of Medical Sciences (Iran). All patients underwent abdominal paracentesis, and the ascitic fluid was processed for cell count, leukocyte esterase reagent strip test (Combiscreen SL10) and culture. Spontaneous bacterial peritonitis was defined as having a polymorphonuclear count (PMN ≥250/m3) in ascitic fluid. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value of leukocyte esterase test were calculated according to the formula.ResultsTotally, 150 ascitic fluid sample of cirrhotic male patients (53.2%) and their mean age (4.33±1.88 years) were analyzed. Biliary atresia (n=44, 29.4%) and idiopathic neonatal hepatitis (n=29, 19.3%) were the most frequent etiology of cirrhosis. Also, abdominal pain (68.6%) and distension (64%) were the most common presenting complaint. Of all cases, 41patients (27.35%) were diagnosed to have spontaneous bacterial peritonitis (PMN ≥250/mm3). Sensitivity and specificity of leukocyte esterase reagent test according to PMNs ≥250mm3 were 87.80% and 91.74%, also on ascitic fluid culture results were 88.23% and 77.44%. Positive predictive value and negative predictive value of this test in PMNs ≥250mm3 were 80% and 95.23% and in cases with positive culture 33.33% and 98.09% were obtained, respectively. Efficiency of leukocyte esterase reagent test in diagnosing spontaneous bacterial peritonitis, according to PMNs ≥250mm3 and culture results were 90.66% and 78.66%.ConclusionThe leukocyte esterase strip test may be used as rapid test for diagnosis of spontaneous bacterial peritonitis due to its high diagnostic validity.

Sensitivity and Specificity of Histoplasma Antigen Detection by Enzyme Immunoassay

2015 ◽  
Vol 51 (5) ◽  
pp. 306-310 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lauren Cunningham ◽  
Audrey Cook ◽  
Andrew Hanzlicek ◽  
Kenneth Harkin ◽  
Joseph Wheat ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Confidence Interval ◽  
Positive Predictive Value ◽  
Enzyme Immunoassay ◽  
Negative Predictive Value ◽  
Sensitivity And Specificity ◽  
Predictive Value ◽  
Kappa Coefficient ◽  
Urine Samples ◽  
Specificity And Sensitivity ◽  
Antigen Assay

The objective of this study was to evaluate the sensitivity and specificity of an antigen enzyme immunoassay (EIA) on urine samples for the diagnosis of histoplasmosis in dogs. This retrospective medical records review included canine cases with urine samples submitted for Histoplasma EIA antigen assay between 2007 and 2011 from three veterinary institutions. Cases for which urine samples were submitted for Histoplasma antigen testing were reviewed and compared to the gold standard of finding Histoplasma organisms or an alternative diagnosis on cytology or histopathology. Sensitivity, specificity, negative predictive value, positive predictive value, and the kappa coefficient and associated confidence interval were calculated for the EIA-based Histoplasma antigen assay. Sixty cases met the inclusion criteria. Seventeen cases were considered true positives based on identification of the organism, and 41 cases were considered true negatives with an alternative definitive diagnosis. Two cases were considered false negatives, and there were no false positives. Sensitivity was 89.47% and the negative predictive value was 95.35%. Specificity and the positive predictive value were both 100%. The kappa coefficient was 0.9207 (95% confidence interval, 0.8131–1). The Histoplasma antigen EIA test demonstrated high specificity and sensitivity for the diagnosis of histoplasmosis in dogs.

scholarly journals Performance of the New Automated Latex Immunoturbidometric Assay in the Diagnosis of Heparin Induced Thrombocytopenia: A Single Institution Experience

Blood ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 4689-4689
Author(s):  
Sriman Swarup ◽  
Somedeb Ball ◽  
Nimesh Adhikari ◽  
Anita Sultan ◽  
Khatrina Swarup ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Positive Predictive Value ◽  
Negative Predictive Value ◽  
Sensitivity And Specificity ◽  
Predictive Value ◽  
Serotonin Release ◽  
Small Sample ◽  
Second Phase ◽  
Heparin Induced Thrombocytopenia ◽  
Study Population ◽  
Release Assay

Introduction: Heparin induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) is a severe prothrombotic condition, usually triggered by exposure to heparin products. It is characterized by platelet activation induced by the formation of antibodies to the platelet factor 4 (PF4)/ heparin polyanion complexes. Diagnostic algorithm includes clinical scoring (4T score) alongside serological test for detection of these antibodies (HIT-Ab), while serotonin release assay (SRA) remains the gold- standard for confirmation. The automated latex immunoturbidometric assay (LIA) has recently been FDA approved as a screening tool for HIT and is a potential alternative to the conventional particle immunofiltration assay (PIFA) for time-sensitive detection of HIT-Ab to guide treatment considerations. We recently introduced LIA in our institution. In this study, we present our experience with LIA in comparison to PIFA in the diagnosis of HIT. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed the charts of all the patients on whom a PIFA was ordered between March 2017 and March 2018 in our hospital. We collected information on the results of the PIFA and SRA (if available). We replaced PIFA with LIA for HIT screening. Then, we introduced a structured protocol for diagnosis of HIT in our institution by incorporating 4T scoring alongside LIA order in the electronic medical record (EMR), in December 2018. We reviewed the EMR of all the patients on whom HIT-Ab test (LIA) was ordered between January and June of 2019, and collected similar information as before. All the data were compiled in a single master excel sheet for calculation of performance characteristics (sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values) for both PIFA and LIA. A patient was considered to have the diagnosis of HIT if the result of SRA was available and positive. Results: In the first phase, a total of 31 orders for SRA was noted against 170 PIFA orders. Five patients had a positive SRA, of whom two were PIFA negative. Half the patients with a negative SRA result were positive for PIFA. Hence, the sensitivity and specificity of PIFA test for our study population were noted to be 60% and 50%, respectively. PIFA had a positive predictive value (PPV) of mere 18.75% for the diagnosis of HIT, whereas the negative predictive value (NPV) was found to be 86.66%. Introduction of structured protocol for HIT diagnosis substantially reduced the number of inappropriate SRA orders in the second phase. On review of data for six months with the new HIT-Ab test LIA, SRA was ordered in only eight patients, to go with 69 orders for the LIA. The result of LIA was positive in all three patients with a positive SRA, whereas it was false positive in four instances. Only one patient was negative for both LIA and SRA during this period. LIA was found to be 100% sensitive and 20% specific for the diagnosis of HIT in our sample. PPV and NPV for LIA were 42.85% and 100%, respectively. Conclusion: The sensitivity and specificity of LIA were found to be 100% and 20%, respectively, in our study population, which is different from the earlier report (Warkentin et al. 2017). The small sample size is a limitation of our study. Higher PPV and NPV for LIA, with its quick turnaround time, make it a useful alternative for the time-sensitive determination of post-test probability for HIT in patients. [HIT- Ab- Heparin Induced Thrombocytopenia Antibody, PIFA- Particle Immunofiltration Assay, LIA- Latex Immunoturbidometric Assay, SRA- Serotonin Release Assay, +ve- Positive, -ve - Negative, PPV- Positive Predictive Value, NPV- Negative Predictive Value] Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

scholarly journals Diagnostic accuracy of point-of-care lung ultrasound in COVID-19

2020 ◽  
pp. emermed-2020-210125
Author(s):  
Svenja L Haak ◽  
Iris JE Renken ◽  
L Cara Jager ◽  
Heleen Lameijer ◽  
Brigitta (Britt) YM van der Kolk
Keyword(s):  
Positive Predictive Value ◽  
Diagnostic Accuracy ◽  
Negative Predictive Value ◽  
Predictive Value ◽  
Point Of Care ◽  
Trauma Centre ◽  
Point Of Care Ultrasound ◽  
Current Standard ◽  
Cardiopulmonary Disease ◽  
Pulmonary Manifestations

BackgroundA promising modality for diagnosing pulmonary manifestations of COVID-19 in the emergency department (ED) is point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) of the lungs. The currently used PCR as well as chest X-ray and CT scanning have important disadvantages. The aim of this study is to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of POCUS in patients with suspected pulmonary manifestations of COVID-19 in the ED.MethodsThis prospective diagnostic accuracy study was conducted at the ED of our non-academic level 1 trauma centre (Isala, Zwolle, the Netherlands). Patients were enrolled between 14 April and 22 April 2020. Patients (aged ≥16 years) with suspected COVID-19 presenting to the ED underwent POCUS. All patients received current standard of care, including PCR (naso-oropharyngeal swab). Outcome of POCUS was compared with PCR or CT scan outcome to determine diagnostic accuracy. Diagnostic accuracy measures were calculated using 2×2 contingency tables.Results100 patients were eligible to participate in this study, data of 93 patients were analysed. 27 (29%) patients were found positive for COVID-19 by PCR or CT. POCUS had a sensitivity of 89% (95% CI 70% to 97%), specificity of 59% (95% CI 46% to 71%), negative predictive value of 93% (95% CI 79% to 98%) and positive predictive value of 47% (95% CI 33% to 61%). In a subgroup of patients without previous cardiopulmonary disease (n=37), POCUS had a sensitivity of 100% (95% CI 70% to 100%), specificity of 76% (95% CI 54% to 90%), negative predictive value of 100% (95% CI 79% to 100%) and positive predictive value of 67% (95% CI 41% to 86%).ConclusionPOCUS of the lungs could serve as a valuable, radiation-free tool for excluding pulmonary manifestations of COVID-19 in patients in the ED at the point of assessment, especially in patients without previous cardiopulmonary disease.Trial registrationDutch Trial Register, No: NTR8544.

ROLE OF MRI IN DIAGNOSIS OF ROTATOR CUFF TEAR ASSUMING ARTHROSCOPY AS GOLD STANDARD

2019 ◽  
Vol 3 (9) ◽  
Author(s):  
Dr. Chaturbhuj Prasad Swarnkar ◽  
Dr. Shiv Raj Meena
Keyword(s):  
Rotator Cuff ◽  
Positive Predictive Value ◽  
Negative Predictive Value ◽  
Shoulder Pain ◽  
Sensitivity And Specificity ◽  
Predictive Value ◽  
Gold Standard ◽  
Shoulder Joint ◽  
Rotator Cuff Tears ◽  
Arthroscopic Findings

Background- Rotator cuff tears are one of the most common causes of shoulder pain for which patients seek treatment. As in our daily work, the shoulder joint is the most frequently used, there is higher chance of having shoulder joint injury. The aim of the study is to compare the efficacy of MRI in diagnosing shoulder pathologies in comparison to arthroscopy, considering arthroscopy as the gold standard. Methods- 30 Patient with suspected rotator cuff injury patients, between 18-80 years of age was included in the study. MRI of the shoulder joint was done followed by shoulder arthroscopy. The data collected was analysed for the significant correlation between MRI of shoulder and arthroscopic findings by kappa statistics. Results- The accuracy of MRI in diagnosis of rotator cuff partial tears, was 90%, while sensitivity and specificity was 100.00%, 78.57% and positive predictive value was 84.21% and negative predictive value was 100.00% and accuracy of MRI in diagnosis of rotator cuff full tears, was 86.67%, while sensitivity and specificity was 63.64%, 100.00%) and positive predictive value was 100.00% and negative predictive value was 82.61% in our study. Conclusion- Our study demonstrates a high sensitivity and specificity for the MRI diagnosis of both partial and full thickness rotator cuff tears and good correlation with arthroscopic findings. Keywords: Rotator cuff, Shoulder pain, Arthroscopy, MRI.

Impact of Changes in Intraoperative Somatosensory Evoked Potentials on Stroke Rates After Clipping of Intracranial Aneurysms

Neurosurgery ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 70 (5) ◽  
pp. 1114-1124 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert T. Wicks ◽  
Gustavo Pradilla ◽  
Shaan M. Raza ◽  
Uri Hadelsberg ◽  
Alexander L. Coon ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Positive Predictive Value ◽  
Negative Predictive Value ◽  
Sensitivity And Specificity ◽  
Predictive Value ◽  
Intracranial Aneurysms ◽  
Fisher Exact Test ◽  
Stroke Rate ◽  
Unruptured Aneurysms ◽  
Ruptured Aneurysms ◽  
Postoperative Stroke

Abstract BACKGROUND: Somatosensory evoked potential (SSEP) monitoring is used during intracranial aneurysm surgery to track the effects of anesthesia, surgical manipulation, and temporary clipping. OBJECTIVE: To present the outcomes of 663 consecutive patients (691 cases) treated surgically for intracranial aneurysms who underwent intraoperative SSEP monitoring and to analyze the sensitivity and specificity of significant SSEP changes in predicting postoperative stroke. METHODS: Of 691 surgeries analyzed, 403 (391 anterior circulation, 12 posterior circulation) were unruptured aneurysms and 288 (277 anterior, 11 posterior) were ruptured. Postoperatively, symptomatic patients underwent computed tomography imaging. Positive predictive value, negative predictive value, sensitivity, and specificity were calculated with a Fisher exact test (2-tailed P value). RESULTS: Changes in SSEP occurred in 45 of 691 cases (6.5%): 16 of 403 (4.0%) in unruptured aneurysms and 29 of 288 (10%) in ruptured aneurysms. In unruptured aneurysms, reversible SSEP changes were associated with a 20% stroke rate, but irreversible changes were associated with an 80% stroke rate. In ruptured aneurysms, however, reversible changes were associated with a 12% stroke rate, and irreversible changes were associated with a 42% stroke rate. The overall accuracy of SSEP changes in predicting postoperative stroke was as follows: positive predictive value, 30%; negative predictive value, 94%; sensitivity, 25%; and specificity, 95%. CONCLUSION: Intraoperative SSEP changes are more reliable in unruptured aneurysm cases than in ruptured cases. Whereas irreversible changes in unruptured cases were associated with an 80% stroke rate, such changes in ruptured cases did not have any adverse ischemic sequelae in 58% of patients. This information is helpful during the intraoperative assessment of reported SSEP changes.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document