scholarly journals Guttaflow Bioseal as Monocone Obturation Technique: A Scanning Electron Microscopy Study

2021 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Mustaffa M ◽  
Nordin N ◽  
Embong SNH ◽  
Mohd Ibrahim MS
Keyword(s):  
Surface Area ◽  
Root Canal ◽  
Microscopy Study ◽  
Electron Microscopy Study ◽  
Filling Material ◽  
Gutta Percha ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Group 2 ◽  
Scanning Electron ◽  
Group 1

INTRODUCTION: This study compared the obturated surface area, the extrusion of root filling material beyond the apical foramen and the duration of obturation procedure in single-rooted mandibular premolar using monocone obturation technique. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The root canal of twenty single-rooted mandibular premolars were prepared, and then divided into two groups; Group 1 (GuttaFlow Bioseal (GFB) and a gutta-percha (GP) cone) and Group 2 (RoekoSeal Automix root canal sealer and a GP cone). The obturation procedure was timed and the obturation radiograph was taken after the procedure. The roots were sectioned perpendicularly and the surfaces were observed under scanning electron microscope. The images were transferred to the SketchAndCalc Area Calculator software for evaluation of the obturated surface area. RESULTS: The median score of obturated surface area in Group 1 and 2 at the apical was 86.51 and 83.00, at the middle was 90.48 and 87.35 and at the coronal was 93.00 and 83.39, respectively. The extrusion of root filling material between two groups did not show statistically significant difference. The mean duration of obturation in Group 1 and 2 was 149.50 and 137.60, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The obturated surface area at the apical and middle root regions in Group 1 and 2 was comparable but at the coronal region, Group 1 showed 11.5% better coverage. The extrusion of root filling material in Group 1 and 2 was equivalent. Obturation procedure in Group 1 took 8.6% longer than in the Group 2.

scholarly journals GuttaFlow Bioseal as Monocone Obturation Technique in Curved Root Canals: A Scanning Electron Microscopy Study

2021 ◽  
Vol 15 (2) ◽  
pp. 42-59
Author(s):  
Musliana Mustaffa ◽  
◽  
Hajar Ar Rahmah Nasri ◽  
Insyirah Kamarulzaman ◽  
Mohamad Shafiq Mohd Ibrahim ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Surface Area ◽  
Root Canal ◽  
Current Approach ◽  
Filling Material ◽  
Sem Images ◽  
Root Canals ◽  
Gutta Percha ◽  
Curved Root Canals ◽  
Scanning Electron ◽  
Group 1

The obturation quality of GuttaFlow Bioseal in curved root canals is not commonly investigated although there has been a current approach toward utilizing this material in extracted molars in recent years. This study assessed the obturated surface area, extrusion of root filling material beyond the apical foramen and duration of obturation procedure in curved root canals using monocone obturation technique. Access cavity was prepared in 20 human mandibular molars. Root canals with curvature of more than 10 as determined according to Schneider’s method were included. Samples were prepared using Hyflex CM rotary files and divided into two groups (n=10): Group 1 [gutta-percha cone and GuttaFlow Bioseal] and Group 2 [gutta-percha cone and RoekoSeal Automix root canal sealer]. The duration of obturation procedure was recorded and obturation radiographs were taken. Samples were bisected and the mesial roots were sectioned horizontally to obtain 3 root segments; apical, middle and coronal. All resected roots were mounted on brass stubs, sputter-coated with thin platinum coating and observed under scanning electron microscope (SEM) at 70x magnification. The SEM images were transferred to the SketchAndCalc Area Calculator software. No statistically significant differences in the obturated surface area and extrusion of root filling material were observed between Group 1 and 2, irrespective of the status of root canal curvature. Duration for obturation in severe root canal curvatures between Group 1 and 2 were statistically significant. Obturated surface area and extrusion of root filling material were not affected by the root canal curvature, however duration for obturation using GuttaFlow Bioseal in severe root canal curvatures was slightly longer.

scholarly journals To Evaluate and Compare the Efficacy, Cleaning Ability of Hand and Two Rotary Systems in Root Canal Retreatment

2013 ◽  
Vol 14 (3) ◽  
pp. 440-444 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jyoti Sachdeva ◽  
Chetan R Patil ◽  
Venugopal Thangala ◽  
Pabbati Ravi Kumar ◽  
Akash Krishna
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Significance ◽  
Root Canal ◽  
Gutta Percha ◽  
Visual Scoring ◽  
Root Canal Retreatment ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Group 3 ◽  
Group 2 ◽  
Hand Instrumentation ◽  
Group 1

ABSTRACT Aim To evaluate and compare the efficacy, cleaning ability of hand and two rotary systems in root canal retreatment. Methodology Sixty extracted premolars were retreated with following systems: Group 1—ProTaper Universal retreatment files, Group 2—ProFile system, Group 3—H-file. Specimens were split longitudinally and amount of remaining gutta-percha on the canal walls was assessed using direct visual scoring with the aid of stereomicroscope. Results were statistically analyzed using ANOVA test. Results Completely clean root canal walls were not achieved with any of the techniques investigated. However, all three systems proved to be effective for gutta-percha removal. Significant difference was found between ProTaper universal retreatment file and H-file, and also between ProFile and H-file. Conclusion Under the conditions of the present study, ProTaper Universal retreatment files left significantly less guttapercha and sealer than ProFile and H-file. Clinical significance Rotary systems in combination with gutta-percha solvents can perform superiorly as compared to the time tested traditional hand instrumentation in root canal retreatment. How to cite this article Shivanand S, Patil CR, Thangala V, Kumar PR, Sachdeva J, Krishna A. To Evaluate and Compare the Efficacy, Cleaning Ability of Hand and Two Rotary Systems in Root Canal Retreatment. J Contemp Dent Pract 2013;14(3):440-444.

scholarly journals EFFICACY OF MAXWIRE® ALLOY FILE IN REMOVING THE REMAINS OF ROOT CANAL FILLING MATERIAL IN VITRO

2018 ◽  
Vol 28 (2) ◽  
pp. 46-51
Author(s):  
Martin Hashemi ◽  
Miglė Mackevičiūtė
Keyword(s):  
Root Canal ◽  
Statistical Significance ◽  
Filling Material ◽  
Root Canal Filling ◽  
X Ray ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Group 2 ◽  
Endodontic Retreatment ◽  
Group 1

Today it is more and more preferred to preserve teeth with promising prognosis rather than to extract them. The efficiency and the precision of retreatment files to remove filling material are important factors of successful treatment. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficiency of MaxWire® alloy file in removing root canal filling material after retreatment with endodontic retreatment instruments. Distal roots of twenty human mandibular molars with single and straight canals were selected for this study. All canals were instrumented up to #40/.04 with Bio-race system and apical preparation was finished with Kfile #50/.02. Obturation was performed using lateral condensation technique with ADSEAL sealer. Radiographs were performed in buccolingual and mesiodistal directions with periapical X-ray after obuturation. Teeth were randomly divided into two groups with ten teeth in each. Group 1: removal of root canal filling material was performed using D-race system. Group 2: removal of root canal filling material was performed using D-race system following XP endo Finisher R instrument. Radiographs were performed after retreatment. Residual material was calculated in percentage left in canals. Statistical significance between the two groups were analyzed with t-test. Remnants of root canal filling material was observed in both groups: 38.90% in Group 1 and 13.71% in Group 2, respectively. There was a significant difference between the groups in term of the total root canal filling material (p<0.05). MaxWire® alloy file significantly increased the amount of removed root canal filling material after retreatment with endodontic retreatment instruments.

scholarly journals The assessment of the filling material remaining on root canal walls after using protaper universal rotary retreatment system with or without a solvent

2016 ◽  
Vol 62 (4) ◽  
pp. 204-208
Author(s):  
Sînziana Adina Scărlătescu ◽  
◽  
Irina Maria Gheorghiu ◽  
Stana Păunica ◽  
Paula Perlea ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Root Canal ◽  
Filling Material ◽  
Universal System ◽  
Root Canals ◽  
Group 4 ◽  
Gutta Percha ◽  
Ah Plus ◽  
Group 2 ◽  
The Times ◽  
Group 1

The purposes of retreatment are to eliminate the cause for failure of initial endodontic treatment and to preserve the tooth as well. The aim of this study is a comparative evaluation of efficacy of Protaper rotaty retreatment instruments for gutta-percha removal with or without solvents specific both to the sealer and gutta-percha. Materials and methods: Forty single-rooted extracted teeth were randomly divided into 4 groups according to different methods of retreatment. The teeth were prepared with Protaper Universal system (Dentsply-Maillefer, Ballaigues, Switzerland) and filled using lateral condensation of gutta-percha and AH Plus (Dentsply DeTrey, Konstanz, Germany). All root canal fillings were removed using Protaper Universal Retreatment system (Dentsply-Maillefer, Ballaigues, Switzerland). During the retreatment procedure, in group 1 Resosolv (Pierre Rolland, Merignac, France) was used; in group 2 eucalyptol was used, in group 3 Endosolv E (Septodont, Paris, France) was used and in group 4 no solvent was used. The times required for retreatments and radiographycal evaluation after retreatment were recorded. Results: All root canals showed filling material remnants and group 1 with specific solvent for AH Plus recorded the shortest time. Conclusions: Although it is not possible to eliminate the entire filling material on the canal walls, the duration of retreatment was reduced by the use of a solvent specific to the sealer compared with a gutta-percha solvent or no solvent.

scholarly journals Scanning Electron Microscopy Analysis of the Anterior Capsulotomy Edge: A Comparative Study between Femtosecond Laser-Assisted Capsulotomy and Manual Capsulorhexis

2018 ◽  
Vol 2018 ◽  
pp. 1-6 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniele Tognetto ◽  
Chiara De Giacinto ◽  
Alberto Armando Perrotta ◽  
Tommaso Candian ◽  
Alessandro Bova ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Electron Microscopy ◽  
Scanning Electron Microscopy ◽  
Femtosecond Laser ◽  
Comparative Study ◽  
Surface Irregularity ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Group 2 ◽  
Cut Surface ◽  
Scanning Electron ◽  
Group 1

Purpose. To compare the capsule edges ultrastructure obtained by two femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery (FLACS) platforms and manual continuous curvilinear capsulorhexis (CCC) using scanning electron microscopy (SEM). Setting. Eye Clinic, University of Trieste, Italy. Design. Experimental comparative study. Methods. 150 anterior capsules were collected and divided into three groups as follows: Group 1 (50 capsules) obtained with manual CCC, Groups 2 and 3 (each with 50 capsules) obtained with the Catalys Laser and the LenSx Laser, respectively. All samples were imaged by means of SEM and regularity of the cut surface, and thickness of the capsule edge were evaluated and compared. Results. All femtosecond laser (FSL) capsules were perfectly circular, whereas some alteration of the circular shape was observed in the manual ones. Group 1 showed a smooth and regular capsule edge without any surface irregularity, conversely Groups 2 and 3 showed postage-stamp perforations on the capsule edge. The cut surface irregularity value in Group 2 was 1.4 ± 0.63, while it was 0.7 ± 0.49 in Group 3 (p<0.05). Group 1 had a significantly lower thickness of the capsule edge than the FSL groups (p<0.05). No statistically significant difference in the capsule edge thickness between the FSL groups was found (p=0.244). Conclusions. Despite the presence of slight cut surface irregularities, both FSL capsulotomies showed a better geometry and circularity than the manual ones. Capsulotomy specimens obtained using both FSL capsulotomies showed laser-induced alterations of the capsule edge when compared with smooth and regular edges obtained using manual CCC.

scholarly journals The Effect of Root Canal Irrigation with Combination of Sodium Hypo-chlorite and Chlorhexidine Gluconate on the Sealing Ability of Obturation Materials

2014 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
pp. 184-187 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hamed Homayouni ◽  
Nima Moradi Majd ◽  
Heidar Zohrehei ◽  
Behrad Mosavari ◽  
Mamak Adel ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Root Canal ◽  
Chlorhexidine Gluconate ◽  
Smear Layer ◽  
Fluid Filtration ◽  
Layer Removal ◽  
Gutta Percha ◽  
Sealing Ability ◽  
Group 3 ◽  
Group 2 ◽  
Group 1

Objectives: The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of the precipitate that was formed by combining Sodium Hypochlorite (NaOCl) and Chlorhexidine Gluconate (CHX) on the sealing ability of root canal obturation materials. Materials and Methods: The fluid filtration method was conducted on a total of 100 roots. Samples were randomly divided into two control (n=5) and three experimental groups (n=30). The samples in group 1 were irrigated with 1.5 mL of 2.5% NaOCl, and then the smear layers of the teeth were removed by 17% EDTA, while the specimens of group 2 were irrigated by 1.5 mL of 2.5% NaOCl and 1.5 mL of 2% CHX; after the smear layer removal, a final flush with 1.5 mL of 2.5% NaOCl was performed. The samples of group 3 were irrigated the same as group 1 but after the smear layer removal canals were irrigated again with 1.5 mL of 2.5% NaOCl and then a final flush with 1.5 mL of 2% CHX was performed. Teeth were obturated with gutta-percha and AH26 sealer and after seven days, microleakage was evaluated by the fluid filtration technique. The results were analyzed by the ANOVA and Tukey's test. Results: The samples in group 3 had significantly greater microleakage compared to teeth in group 1, 2 (p<0.05), and the specimens in group 1 showed significantly less amount of microleakage than samples in group 2, 3 (p<0.05). Conclusion: The presence of the precipitate that is formed due to interaction between NaOCl and CHX has negative effect on the sealing ability of gutta-percha and AH26 sealer.

scholarly journals Efficacy of ProTaper Retreatment System in Root Canals Obturated with Gutta-Percha Using Two Different Sealers and GuttaFlow

2011 ◽  
Vol 2011 ◽  
pp. 1-5 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jaya Siotia ◽  
Shashi Rashmi Acharya ◽  
Sunil Kumar Gupta
Keyword(s):  
Area Ratio ◽  
Variance Test ◽  
Root Canals ◽  
Gutta Percha ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Ah Plus ◽  
Group 3 ◽  
Group 2 ◽  
Silicon Based ◽  
Group 1

Objective. To compare the efficacy of ProTaper retreatment files in removing three different obturating materials.Study Design. Forty-five human, single-rooted premolars were divided into three experimental groups. Group 1 was obturated with gutta-percha and AH Plus sealer, Group 2 was obturated with gutta-percha and zinc oxide eugenol sealer, and Group 3 was obturated with GuttaFlow. Retreatment was done using the ProTaper universal rotary retreatment files. Root halves were visualized using magnifying loops at 3X magnification and optical stereomicroscope at 10X magnification. Images were analyzed using AutoCAD 2004 software to calculate area of the remaining debris in the canal. For statistical analysis were used variance test and ANOVA.Results. Total debris/canal area ratio between the three groups showed a statistically significant difference (P<0.001).Conclusion. ProTaper retreatment system did not produce completely clean canals in any of the groups. However, it had the best efficacy towards removing silicon based obturating material GuttaFlow.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document