scholarly journals KOMPARASI METODE ANALYTICAL HIERARCHY PROCESS (AHP) DAN SIMPLE ADDITIVE WEIGHTING (SAW) DALAM PENENTUAN SKALA PRIORITAS PROYEK PEKERJAAN (Studi Kasus : CV. EUK Samarinda )

2019 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 13
Author(s):  
Achmad Jaya Adhi Nugraha
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Analytical Hierarchy Process ◽  
Project Selection ◽  
Selection Method ◽  
Ahp Method ◽  
A Priority ◽  
Simple Additive Weighting ◽  
Decision Making Model ◽  
Hierarchy Process ◽  
Better Than

Semua proyek pekerjaan yang dikeluarkan oleh PT. PLN (Persero) Wilayah Samarinda secara resmi diumumkan melalui e-procurement. Masalah yang muncul adalah bagaimana CV. EUK dapat menentukan tawaran proyek pekerjaan mana yang layak untuk dikerjakan sehingga secara tidak langsung dapat mempengaruhi kenaikan harapan pada Laba Kotor yang akan diterima. Masalah ini juga terkait langsung bagaimana menentukan penjadwalan proyek kerja yang dilakukan pada skala prioritas. Metode AHP diterapkan untuk menentukan Skala Prioritas Kerja yang akan dipilih dengan B / C Analysis sebagai model pengambilan keputusan. Diharapkan penerapan metode ini secara tidak langsung dapat meminimalkan keterlambatan dalam penyelesaian pekerjaan dan meningkatkan harapan penerimaan Laba Kotor. Sebagai pembanding digunakan metode SAW. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa metode AHP jauh lebih baik daripada metode SAW, dan mampu menunjukkan kelemahan metode pemilihan proyek yang digunakan CV. EUK sejauh ini.All job projects issued by PT. PLN (Persero) Area Samarinda is officially announced through e-procurement. The problem that arises is how the CV. EUK can determine which job project bid is feasible to work so that it can indirectly affect the increase of expectation on Gross Profit to be received. This problem is also directly related to how to determine the scheduling of work projects undertaken on a priority scale. The AHP method is applied to determine the Work Priority Scale to be selected with B / C Analysis as a decision-making model. It is hoped that the implementation of this method can indirectly minimize the delay in the time of completion of the work and increase the expectation on the acceptance of Gross Profit. As a comparison used SAW method. The results showed that AHP method is much better than SAW method, and able to show weakness of project selection method used CV. EUK so far. 

scholarly journals Analisis Kinerja Menggunakan Balance Scorecard Berdasarkan Metode Hitung Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) Di Puskesmas Astanagarib Kota Cirebon

2020 ◽  
Vol 14 (2) ◽  
pp. 110-119
Author(s):  
Widya Jati Lestari ◽  
Marsani Asfi ◽  
Fitri Sihombing
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Performance Appraisal ◽  
Balanced Scorecard ◽  
Analytical Hierarchy Process ◽  
Business Processes ◽  
Balance Scorecard ◽  
Ahp Method ◽  
The Balanced Scorecard ◽  
Hierarchy Process ◽  
Goals And Objectives

Abstrak - Metode pengukuran kinerja perusahaan dengan menggunakan Balanced Scorecard merupakan strategi untuk meningkatkan produktivitas, tingkat efisiensi, dan persaingan. Penilaian kinerja mengolah masukan menjadi keluaran atau penilaian dalam penyusunan kebijakan, program dan kegiatan yang dianggap penting serta berpengaruh pada pencapaian sasaran dan tujuan .Hasil dari penilaian kinerja ini menjadi dasar penilaian keberhasilan dan kegagalan pelaksanaan kegiatan sesuai dengan sasaran dan tujuan yang telah ditetapkan. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui sistem pengukuran kinerja di Puskesmas Astanagarib Kota Cirebon berdasarkan Balance Scorecard. Pembobotan elemen kinerja dilakukan dengan metode Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP). Pengumpulan data diawali dengan penilaian terhadap visi, misi, dan strategi puskesmas. Data yang diperoleh kemudian diolah dengan metode AHP. Pengumpulan data tiap perspektif menggunakan kuesioner, wawancara dan data dari Puskesmas. Metode AHP menerapkan pengambilan keputusan berdasarkan sejumlah kriteria dan alternatif yang dipilih berdasarkan pertimbangan semua kriteria dalam bentuk hierarki. AHP menerapkan metode analisis dan sintesis yang membantu proses pengambilan keputusan dan membantu dalam menetapkan prioritas-prioritas dan membuat keputusan berdasarkan aspek kualitatif dan kuantitatif yang harus dipertimbangkan. Tahapan analisis dibuat dalam bentuk aplikasi yang dapat memudahkan analisis kinerja Puskesmas. Dari hasil perhitungan dapat disimpulkan bahwa pengukuran kinerja di Puskesmas Astanagarib dengan menggunakan metode Balanced Scorecard dan metode hitung Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) menunjukkan bahwa kinerja di Puskesmas tersebut sudah baik, dinilai dari tiga perspektif yang diukur dengan bobot 0,39 untuk proses bisnis internal, pembelajaran dan pertumbuhan 0,22. Hasil evaluasi kinerja Puskesmas cukup baik dengan skor 0,99. Abtract - The method of measuring company performance using the Balanced Scorecard is a strategy to increase productivity, efficiency levels, and competition. Performance appraisal processes input into outputs or assessments in the formulation of policies, programs and activities that are considered important and have an effect on the achievement of goals and objectives. The results of this performance appraisal form the basis for assessing the success and failure of implementing activities in accordance with predetermined goals and objectives. This study aims to determine the performance measurement system at the Astanagarib Health Center Cirebon City based on the Balance Scorecard. The weighting of the performance elements is carried out using the Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) method. Data collection begins with an assessment of the vision, mission, and strategy of the puskesmas. The data obtained were then processed using the AHP method. Collecting data for each perspective using a questionnaire, interviews and data from the Puskesmas. The AHP method applies decision making based on a number of criteria and alternatives selected based on the consideration of all criteria in a hierarchical form. AHP applies analysis and synthesis methods that assist the decision-making process and assist in setting priorities and making decisions based on qualitative and quantitative aspects that must be considered. The stages of analysis are made in the form of applications that can facilitate analysis of the performance of Puskesmas. From the calculation results, it can be concluded that the performance measurement at the Astanagarib Health Center using the Balanced Scorecard method and the Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) calculation method shows that the performance at the Puskesmas is good, judged from three perspectives measured with a weight of 0.39 for internal business processes. learning and growth 0.22. The results of the Puskesmas performance evaluation are quite good with a score of 0.99. Keywords— AHP; internal business processes; learning and growth; performance.

scholarly journals THE POLYVOCALITY IN ACTION: EMBODYING THE EPIPHANY ON PUBLIC HOUSING CONUNDRUM

2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (4) ◽  
pp. 1396-1417
Author(s):  
Resi Ariyasa Qadri ◽  
Amrie Firmansyah
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Public Housing ◽  
Tacit Knowledge ◽  
Analytical Hierarchy Process ◽  
Multi Criteria Decision Making ◽  
Housing Provision ◽  
The Public ◽  
The Government ◽  
Decision Making Model ◽  
Hierarchy Process

Purpose of the study: This paper aims to elaborate on how the institutional logic of public housing provision transforms from the old logic into the new logic. By encapsulating tacit-knowledge from the shift, this study focuses on how to explicate a model of multi-criteria decision-making for executing official residence projects in Indonesia. This research also aims to recuperate the future of the public residency field. Methodology: The methodology employed was a mixed method. The qualitative method was firstly applied by utilizing semi-structured interviews to build a decision-making model. Later, a quantitative method was implemented to improve the consistency of the model by using the Analytical Hierarchy Process protocols. Thirteen project representatives and ten decision-makers were being involved as the main informants. Google Sheets web-based software was applied for analyzing survey results by making use of a mathematical model for the Analytical Hierarchy Process. Main Findings: The result indicates that land not used as paddy field, fair house price, safe from flood location, serene ambiance, and developer experience has played a significant part in affecting buying decisions for residency projects. To carry out the new method, the total scores of the AHP calculation should be above 50. Otherwise, the government shall opt for the old mechanism. Applications of this study: The paper contributes to the public sector accounting field in the area of asset management and public housing procurement. The paper also gives a strong basis for the field to make use of the model of Indonesia's public housing provision. The government can adopt the research framework for choosing the new model or the old one. Novelty/Originality of this study: This study might be the only one of its kind. The research was using a multi-method to achieve the objectives. To generate a multi-criteria decision-making model, grounded data of excessive interviews were abstracted. Then the abstracted tacit-knowledge was tested with AHP to provide a consistent model.

scholarly journals GIS-SUPPORTED MAPPING OF SUITABLE PARKING AREAS USING AHP METHOD: THE CASE OF KONYA

2021 ◽  
Vol XLVI-4/W5-2021 ◽  
pp. 51-56
Author(s):  
T. Alkan ◽  
S. S. Durduran
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Information System ◽  
Analytical Hierarchy Process ◽  
Site Selection ◽  
Multi Criteria Decision Making ◽  
Situation Analysis ◽  
Ahp Method ◽  
Criteria Weights ◽  
Suitable Site ◽  
Hierarchy Process

Abstract. The increase in the number of vehicles with the increasing population has caused the problem of parking insufficiency. This problem necessitate situation analysis of existing parking areas and site selection analyses for new parking areas. It is possible to make suitable site selections with spatial analysis supported by Geographic Information System (GIS). In this study, available parking areas in Selçuklu district of Konya province were evaluated and suitable parking areas were determined in line with the needs. The criteria affecting the parking areas site selection were determined and the importance levels of the criteria were detected by using the Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) which is one of the Multi-Criteria Decision Making (MCDM) methods. Density analyses were carried out with GIS and suitable parking areas map was produced considering the criteria weights obtained.

scholarly journals Pemilihan Merek Beras yang Diminati Konsumen Studi Kasus CV Beras Alami Menggunakan AHP

2019 ◽  
Vol 19 (1) ◽  
pp. 147-154
Author(s):  
Agus Salim ◽  
Baginda Oloan Lubis
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Analytical Hierarchy Process ◽  
Staple Food ◽  
Ahp Method ◽  
Expert Choice ◽  
Voting System ◽  
Staple Foods ◽  
Hierarchy Process ◽  
Selection Of

Rice is one of the staple foods of society in general, the need for rice supply is increasing every year. The increasing population in the Jababeka area is a threat to staple food supplies. To determine the selection of Rice Brands, it takes rice criteria in order to determine the best quality of rice, and increase sales. So that it can meet consumer needs for rice. In the selection of rice brands at CV Beras Alami  uses a voting system, this is clearly less valid in its election because it is subjective. Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) method is used as a method for decision making, as a solution in selecting rice brands in CV Beras Alami. The Expert Choice application is used as a support system to facilitate the selection of rice brands that are in demand by consumers. The results can be known during the 2018 period that rice is widely consumed is Garuda Utama.

scholarly journals Estimating Suitable Starch Extraction from Mango Seeds Using Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) Method

2020 ◽  
Vol 1010 ◽  
pp. 471-476
Author(s):  
Nur'Aishah Ahmad Shahrim ◽  
Norshahida Sariffudin ◽  
Hafizah Hanim Mohd Zaki ◽  
Ahmad Zahirani Ahmad Azhar
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Analytical Hierarchy Process ◽  
Extraction Method ◽  
Extraction Methods ◽  
Decision Making Process ◽  
Distillation Method ◽  
Ahp Method ◽  
Analytic Hierarchy ◽  
Mango Seed ◽  
Hierarchy Process

The mango seed was extracted to starch via distillation, alkaline, sedimentation and centrifugation methods. Based on the analysis, different starch extraction methods resulted in different proximate composition, physicochemical, morphological, structural, functional and thermal properties of starch. As such, it is necessary to choose a suitable starch extraction method to fabricate starch-based film for packaging application. Therefore, in this study, Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) method was applied for performing the decision-making process. Based on the AHP method, it was found that, the best alternative for starch-based films is distillation method.

Analisis Hybrid DSS untuk Menentukan Lokasi Wisata Terbaik

2021 ◽  
Vol 5 (2) ◽  
pp. 238-246
Author(s):  
Annisak Izzaty Jamhur Nisa ◽  
Radius Prawiro ◽  
Novi Trisna
Keyword(s):  
Decision Support ◽  
Analytical Hierarchy Process ◽  
Location Decision ◽  
Ahp Method ◽  
Tourist Attractions ◽  
West Sumatra ◽  
To Come ◽  
Simple Additive Weighting ◽  
The Many ◽  
Hierarchy Process

Tourism is an activity carried out by humans to a place alone or together to have fun to get rid of the burden of thoughts that were previously acquired. The Mandeh area is a leading tourist area in West Sumatra which has 10 alternative tourist attractions. With the many tourist locations in the area, tourists are confused about what places to visit in the Mande area. In this study, a combined analysis or Hybrid Decision Support System (DSS) was carried out using a combination of the Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) method with the Simple Additive Weighting (SAW) method. The purpose of this research is to be able to combine AHP and SAW methods in one DSS analysis and then be able to recommend the decision results to tourists in the form of the best tourist locations in the Mandeh area. With the recommendation, it can increase the interest of tourists to come and increase the opinions of tourist location owners and the surrounding community. The result of this research is to obtain a recommendation for the best tourist location decision in the Mande area of ​​West Sumatra, namely the location of Manjunto Beach with the highest value of 0.895.

scholarly journals Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Model Evaluating the Performance of Vietnamese Commercial Banks

2017 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
pp. 132 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dinh Xuan Cuong ◽  
Hoang Thi Hien ◽  
Tran Long
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Analytical Hierarchy Process ◽  
Commercial Banks ◽  
Decision Model ◽  
Evaluation Model ◽  
Multi Criteria Decision Making ◽  
Proposed Model ◽  
Decision Making Model ◽  
Hierarchy Process ◽  
Research Show

The commercial banks (CBs) performance evaluating has been a necessary problem in currently integration trend and usually implemented by a committee of experts under criteria selected. Therefore, it is considered as a Multi - Criteria Decision - Making model (MCDM). Nowadays, there have been many researches proposing various standards and models to evaluate and rank CBs. But in Vietnam, the number of studies related to the Vietnamese banking evaluation model have still been limited. As a result, this study develops a multi-criteria decision model integrating Fuzzy Analytical Hierarchy Process (FAHP) and Fuzzy the Technique for Order of Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (FTOPSIS). The proposed model has evaluated and ranked five Vietnamese commercial banks including CTG, VCB, BIDV, TCB and MB. The paper revealed their ranks. Besides, the results of the research show that the Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) model is suitable for applying it to the process evaluating bank performance.

The Consequence Assessment of Gas Pipeline Failure due to Corrosion

2015 ◽  
Vol 227 ◽  
pp. 225-228 ◽  
Author(s):  
Libriati Zardasti ◽  
Norhamimi Mohd Hanafiah ◽  
Norhazilan Md Noor ◽  
Yahaya Nordin ◽  
Ahmad Safuan A. Rashid
Keyword(s):  
Risk Assessment ◽  
Decision Making ◽  
Analytical Hierarchy Process ◽  
Assessment Method ◽  
Ahp Method ◽  
Natural Gas Pipelines ◽  
Consequence Assessment ◽  
Inspection And Maintenance ◽  
Pipeline Failure ◽  
Hierarchy Process

In this paper, a qualitative consequence assessment method for damaged urban natural gas pipelines is proposed. It focuses on identifying reputation loss factors according to stakeholders’ (investors, customers, employees, and communities) perceptions. The analytical hierarchy process (AHP) method is applied to prioritize these factors. Results show that the loss of customer confidence ranks as the highest contributor to an operator’s reputation loss due to a pipeline accident. Thus, better risk assessment of pipeline damage due to corrosion will be achieved with the inclusion of reputation loss in the consequence assessment. Hence, decision making in pipeline repair, inspection, and maintenance can be improved as well as a company’s annual profit margin.

scholarly journals PRIORITISING SUSTAINABILITY FACTORS FOR AUSTRALIAN COMMUNITY BUILDINGS’ MANAGEMENT USING ANALYTICAL HIERARCHY PROCESS (AHP)

2018 ◽  
Vol 24 (1) ◽  
pp. 37-50 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pushpitha KALUTARA ◽  
Guomin ZHANG ◽  
Sujeeva SETUNGE ◽  
Ron WAKEFIELD
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Analytical Hierarchy Process ◽  
Australian Community ◽  
Multi Attribute Decision Making ◽  
Building Components ◽  
Community Buildings ◽  
Decision Making Model ◽  
Hierarchy Process ◽  
Pair Wise Comparison ◽  
Comparison Data

The essence of Australian community buildings’ sustainable management drives through a previously established decision-making structure with four sustainability aspects and accompanying 18 criteria. Informed decisions are supported with a decision-making model that generates sustainability impacts of building components based on this decision-making structure. Building components’ individual impacts can be assigned using a numbering scale incorporated with linguistic terms. However, similar importance given to each aspect or criterion is arguable when the combined effect is considered. Hence, they should be given different weightings and their combination with individual impacts will produce final sustainability impacts. For calculating weightings, the study uses Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP), widely used technique in Multi Attribute Decision-Making (MADM). The study also conducted an industry-wide questionnaire across Australian local councils because pair-wise comparison data is essential for weighting calculation. This paper presents the survey data and analysis results that captured weightings of sustainability aspects and criteria.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document