scholarly journals Validitas Instrumen Penilaian Kemampuan Berpikir Tingkat Tinggi tentang Materi Tumbuhan untuk Peserta Didik SMA/MA Kelas X

2020 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. 47-54
Author(s):  
Lastri Maisari ◽  
Rahmawati Darusyamsu ◽  
Des M
Keyword(s):  
High School ◽  
Plant Material ◽  
Thinking Skills ◽  
Assessment Instruments ◽  
Average Value ◽  
Level Of Difficulty ◽  
Good Differentiation ◽  
High Level ◽  
Distinguishing Features

ABSTRACT. Assessment in the 2013 curriculum places more emphasis on cognitive assessment possessed by students. Assessment instruments made by teachers at daily tests are generally still at the C1-C3 cognitive level, instruments that can be used to train students' abilities are at the C4-C6 level. This study aims to produce instruments for assessing higher order thinking skills on Plant material for high, reliable, high school/MA grade X students, difficulty levels, distinguishing features and good quality options. This study uses 4-D models. Which consists of the stages define, design, develop and disseminate. The disseminate stage was not carried out. The subjects of this research were 34 students of SMAN 7 Padang. The validity test results show logically valid questions with an average value of 3.27 with valid criteria. The average practicality value of 98.61% with very practical question criteria, the reliability of the questions is 0.85, and the level of difficulty of the questions between 0.29 to 0.67 with moderate criteria, as well as the questions have a good difference in power and good quality of question options. From the research it can be concluded that an instrument of assessment of high-level thinking ability about Plant material for high-school/MA grade X students has been produced which is valid, reliable, has a moderate level of difficulty, good differentiation and good quality options. ABSTRAK. Penilaian dalam kurikulum 2013 lebih menekankan kepada penilaian kognitif yang dimiliki peserta didik. Instrumen penilaian yang dibuat oleh guru pada ulangan harian umumnya masih berada pada tingkatan kognitif C1-C3, instrumen yang dapat digunakan untuk melatih kemampuan peserta didik berada pada tingkatan C4-C6. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menghasilkan instrumen penilaian kemampuan berpikir tingkat tinggi pada materi Tumbuhan untuk peserta didik SMA/MA Kelas X  yang valid, reliabel, tingkat kesukaran sedang, daya pembeda dan kualitas option yang baik. Penelitian ini menggunakan model yaitu 4-D models. Yang terdiri  dari tahap define, design, develop dan disseminate. Tahap dessiminate itu tidak dilakukan.  Subjek penelitian ini yaitu 34 orang siswa SMAN 7 Padang. Hasil uji validitas menunjukkan soal valid secara logis dengan rata-rata nilai yaitu 3,27 dengan kriteria valid. Nilai rata-ra praktikalitas 98,61% dengan kriteria soal sangat praktis, reliabilitas soal yaitu 0,85, serta tingkat kesukaran soal antara 0,29 sampai 0,67 dengan kriteria sedang, serta  soal memiliki daya beda yang baik dan kualitas option soal yang baik. Dari penelitian dapat disimpulkan telah dihasilkan instrumen penilaian kemampuan berpikir tingkat tinggi tentang materi Tumbuhan untuk peserta didik SMA/MA kelas X yang valid, reliabel, tingkat kesukaran sedang, daya pembeda yang baik dan kualitas option  yang baik.

scholarly journals An Analysis of High Order Thinking Skills Aspects on the Assessment Instruments Environmental Change Topic for the 10th GradeSenior High School Students

2020 ◽  
Vol 5 (4) ◽  
pp. 1
Author(s):  
Masyitoh Masyitoh ◽  
Yuni Ahda ◽  
Indra Hartanto ◽  
Rahmawati Darussyamsu
Keyword(s):  
High School Students ◽  
Creative Thinking ◽  
Thinking Skills ◽  
Assessment Instrument ◽  
Learning Ability ◽  
Assessment Instruments ◽  
School Students ◽  
Average Value ◽  
High Level ◽  
High Level Thinking

High level learning ability (HOTS) is the ability of students to be critical and creative thinking skills. In 2013, students were required to be able to receive information and remember it, but students must be able to solve the problems they faced with the knowledge they needed. Based on observations, the instruments used by teachers are still at the level of C1-C3, while for high-level thinking abilities students must be able to think at the C4-C6 level. This study aims to analyze the ability of high-level thinking of students on material changes in the environment. The assessment instrument used is an instrument of assessment of high-level thinking ability that is valid, practical, reliable and has good quality items. The instrument is said to be valid if the instrument can measure what should be measured. The practicality of the assessment instrument depends on how easily the instrument is used to assess students' abilities. Reliable means that the instrument gives the same results when tested in the same group at different times. An instrument that has good quality items is an instrument that has a moderate level of difficulty and sufficient differentiation, good and very good. Based on the results of the test questions, the average value of students is 41.37 which is still categorized as low. The low level of students' high-level thinking skills can be improved by familiarizing students with higher-order thinking and using scientific learning models.

scholarly journals The Development of Authentic Assessment Instruments on Drama Text Learning for Students of Class VIII in Junior High School 6 Tebing Tinggi

2019 ◽  
Vol 2 (3) ◽  
pp. 312-332
Author(s):  
Yanti Gultom ◽  
Biner Ambarita ◽  
Syahnan Daulay
Keyword(s):  
High School ◽  
Junior High School ◽  
Junior High ◽  
Authentic Assessment ◽  
Assessment Instrument ◽  
Assessment Instruments ◽  
Text Learning ◽  
Average Value ◽  
Class Viii

This study aims to know the development of authentic assessment instruments on drama text learning for students of class VIII in Junior High School 6 Tebing Tinggi. This study used random sampling. The sample were 32 student and 3 teacher. The quality of authentic assessment instruments in drama text learning is obtained from the results of validation and assessment given by material experts, expert evaluations, teacher responses, and student responses. The result shows that the average value of the student's pretest was 68.56. Based on the average value of the student pretest data, it can be concluded that the ability of students does not experience a significant high increase and has not reached KKM. Learning by using authentic assessment instruments on drama text learning gained an average of 80.97. The lowest student score is 70 and the highest was 98. Based on the average value of student posttest data, it can be concluded that the ability of students to experience a significant increase was high and reaches KKM as expected. The effectiveness of the assessment instrument developed was 80.97% and the effectiveness before using the valuation instrument was 68.56%. Therefore, the level of students' ability to answer drama text questions increases after the product of authentic assessment instruments in drama text learning was applied in learning.

scholarly journals Analyzed Quality of Senior High School Biology Olympiad Questions at West Sumatera, Riau, Jambi, and Bengkulu in 2018

2019 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
pp. 142-150
Author(s):  
Eka Aghnia Syarif ◽  
Syamsurizal Syamsurizal
Keyword(s):  
High School ◽  
Quantitative Analysis ◽  
Descriptive Study ◽  
Senior High School ◽  
High School Biology ◽  
School Year ◽  
A Value ◽  
Level Of Difficulty ◽  
Distinguishing Features

The aim of this study to determine the quality of items in terms of analysis : 1) the validity of content and empirical, 2) reliability, 3) level of difficulty, 4) distinguishing features, and 5) the function of detractors. This research is a descriptive study. The sample was a set of biology olimpic question for senior high school year 2018/209 in West Sumatera, Riau, Jambi, and Bengkulu. Quantitative analysis was performed by using Anates, while for the qualitative analysis carried out by the study table. Based on the results of data analysis, the result for the review of aspects : 1) the validity of the content 52.5% are invalid matter, 2) reliability, the test has a value of 0.6 belong to the category enough, 3) the level of difficulty, 1,6% classified as very easy matter, 1,6% easy, 36.6% about the medium, 41,6% about the difficult, and 18.3% about the very difficult, 4) different power, 65% of matter which is classified as very bad, 28.5% about the relatively ugly, 6.6% about enough, and 0% items good, 5) function options, for options that are not qualified humbug is 36.6% and the quality is 63,3%. It can be concluded that the end of the senior high school biology olympiadquestions at West Sumatera, Riau, Jambi, and Bengkulu in 2018 through the 4.0 version of Anates program not meet both criteria.

IMPACT OF STUDENT TEAMS ACHIEVEMENT DIVISION BASED ON HYBRID LEARNING AND JIGSAW TOWARD HIGH ORDER THINKING SKILL VOCATIONAL HIGH SCHOOL

2020 ◽  
Vol 4 (3) ◽  
pp. 560
Author(s):  
Arief Rahman Yusuf ◽  
Sandi Kurniawan ◽  
Eddy Sutadji ◽  
Imam Sudjono
Keyword(s):  
High School ◽  
Student Learning ◽  
Hybrid Learning ◽  
Thinking Skills ◽  
High Order ◽  
Learning Activities ◽  
Vocational High School ◽  
Average Value ◽  
Student Teams ◽  
High Order Thinking

The background of the research is the low assessment of high order thinking skills of students due to the conventional methods used by the school. The aims of this study are: (1) how student learning activities when using hybrid learning Student Teams Achievement Division (STAD) and jigsaw, (2) how student learning activities when taught using the direct learning model, and (3) the effect of hybrid learning Student Teams Achievement Division (STAD) and jigsaw towards high order thinking skills. This study used a quasi experimental nonequivalent control group design with the sample of 50 students from a population of vocational high school students in Ponorogo. Data collection techniques used instruments in the form of high order tests and non-test instruments in the form of observation sheets. Data analysis used was independent sample t-test. The results showed: (1) the use of Student Teams Achievement Division (STAD) based on hybrid learning and jigsaw made 28% of students were very active, 28% of students active, and 44% of students quite active in the learning process, this was evidenced by an average value of 70.56, (2) the use of direct learning models in learning made 24% of students quite active, 36% of students less active, and 40% of students passive in the learning process, which can be seen from the acquisition of an average value of 51.52, and (3) there was a significant effect of Student Learning Achievement Division (STAD) based on hybrid learning and jigsaw on students' high order thinking skills.

Analisis Soal Matematika Tipe Higher Order Thinking Skills (HOTS) Tingkat SMP

2020 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 112-129
Author(s):  
Lelly Oktafiana ◽  
Iis Holisin ◽  
Himmatul Mursyidah
Keyword(s):  
Power Level ◽  
Thinking Skills ◽  
Higher Order Thinking Skills ◽  
National Examination ◽  
Class Viii ◽  
Valid Test ◽  
Grade Material ◽  
Data Collection Technique ◽  
High Level

This study aims to describe the quality of the 2018 Mathematics National Examination (UN) in the HOTS types at the junior high level in terms of the level of validity, reliability, problem differentiation power, level of difficulty and distractor. This type of research is a descriptive study. The research was conducted at SMP Muhammadiyah 4 Surabaya and SMP Negeri 13 Surabaya for students in class VIII. The data collection technique used is a test. The test was taken from the 2018 math UN questions in odd semester VIII grade material including HOTS type. The number of UN mathematics questions in 2018 in the odd semester VIII class material consisted of 12 questions with 25% including LOTS types and 75% including HOTS types. The results showed: (1) 100% valid test questions, (2) high question reliability, (3) good problem differentiation power, (4) the difficuly level of the question 77,77% categorized as moderate and 2 question 22,23% are categorized as difficult, (5) there are 2 questions with one of the answer options do not work.

scholarly journals THE APPLICATION-BASED ANALYSIS OF QUESTIONS ITEM QUALITY IN JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL

2020 ◽  
Vol 6 (2) ◽  
pp. 140-148
Author(s):  
Rabiatul Adawiah
Keyword(s):  
High School ◽  
Junior High School ◽  
Junior High ◽  
Answer Sheet ◽  
Evaluation Study ◽  
Poor Quality ◽  
Multiple Choice Questions ◽  
Civics Education ◽  
Level Of Difficulty

The activity of analyzing the items is one of the obligations for each teacher in an effort to improve the quality of the questions. However, for Civics Education teachers, this has never been done especially for questions created by the Subject Teachers' Consultation which are used for the end-semester assessment. The purpose of this study was to determine the quality of the questions based on distinguishing feature, level of difficulty, and effectiveness of the distractor. This study is an evaluation study of 50 items of  Civics Education Subject test in Banjarmasin, totaling 50 questions in the form of multiple choice questions at the end-semester test, academic year 2019/2020. The data collected are in the form of: (1) final exams question sheet, (2) question answer key sheet, and (3) students’ answer sheet. All data is obtained by documentation techniques. Data analysis uses the AnBuso version 8.0 application. The criteria for determining the quality of items are: (a) questions are considered good if the distinguishing feature is good/good enough, the level of difficulty is medium and all alternative answers are effective, (b) revision of alternative answers, if the distinguishing feature is good/good enough and the level of difficulty is medium, but the alternative there are ineffective answers, (c) good enough, if the distinguishing feature is good/good enough but the level of difficulty is easy/difficult, and (d) not good, if the distinguishing feature is not good.  The results of this study indicate that the questions used for the end-semester test at Junior High School in Banjarmasin are 50 % of poor quality.

scholarly journals Analyzed Quality Question Type Multiple Choices Questions (MCQ) of Final Exam Even Semester on Biology Course Class XI SMA Negeri Se-Kecamatan IV Jurai Academic Year 2017/2018

2019 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. 200
Author(s):  
Nadya Khairiyah Syafti ◽  
Rahmawati Darussyamsu ◽  
Ganda Hijrah Selaras ◽  
Syamsurizal Syamsurizal
Keyword(s):  
Data Analysis ◽  
Descriptive Study ◽  
Question Type ◽  
Final Exam ◽  
School Year ◽  
Level Of Difficulty ◽  
Academic Year ◽  
Distinguishing Features

Researcher conducted a study with the aim to determine the quality of items in terms of analysis: 1) reliability, 2) the validity of the content and empirical, 3) distinguishing features, 4) level of difficulty, and 5) the function of detractors. This research is a descriptive study. Based on the results of data analysis, the result for the review of aspects: 1)reliability packet A and B, belong to the category high,2)the validity of the content packet A & B, not fulfilling all criteriaand then validity empirically package A, 57.5% are invalid matter and packet B,65% are invalid matte, 3) the level of difficulty package A, 27 questions (67,5%) good category and 13 questions (32,5%) not good category while package B, 27 questions (67,5%) good category and 13 questions (32,5%) not good category. 4) different power packet A, obtained with different power values, namely 35 questions (87,5%) including good categories and 5 questions (12,5) which do not belong to the good category while package B, 29 questions (72,5%) is included in category and 11 questions (27,5%) which do not belong to category, 5) function options packet A, for options that are not qualified is 37% and the quality is 63% and packet B,for options that are not qualified is 31% and the quality is 69%. It can be concluded that the end of the semester exam subjects biology grade XI of the school year 2017/2018 in the se-kecamatan IV Jurai not meet both criteria.

scholarly journals Upaya Peningkatan Higher Order Thinking Skills (HOTS) Siswa Melalui Penerapan Model Inquiri di SMA Negeri 9 Tanjung Jabung Timur

2019 ◽  
Vol 19 (2) ◽  
pp. 208
Author(s):  
Mohamad Muspawi ◽  
Suratno Suratno ◽  
Ridwan Ridwan
Keyword(s):  
High School ◽  
Higher Order Thinking ◽  
Thinking Skills ◽  
Higher Order ◽  
Female Students ◽  
Male Students ◽  
Higher Order Thinking Skills ◽  
Student Graduation ◽  
High Level ◽  
Academic Year

This study aims to determine the improvement of Higher Order Thinking Skills (HOTS) in Economics lessons through the Inquiry model in class X students. IPS.1 Tanjung Jabung Timur 9 High School. This research was conducted in Tanjung Jabung Timur 9 High School in the academic year 2018/2019. This research is classroom action research with research procedures covering the stages of planning, implementation, observation, and reflection. The subjects of this study were all students of class X. IPS.1 Tanjung Nabung Timur High School 9 9 which consisted of 36 students consisting of 16 male students and 20 female students. The object of this research is the application of the Inquiry model to improve Higher Order Thinking Skills (HOTS). Data collection techniques used were observation, interview, documentation, journal and test assessment. Analysis of data obtained by calculating the percentage of graduation of students in high-level thinking skills. The results of the study showed that there was an increase in Higher Order Thinking Skills in Economics in class X students. IPS.1 SMA N 9 Tanjung Jabung Timur. It can be seen that the average increase and graduation from cycle to cycle. In the first cycle the percentage of student graduation was 36.11% and HOTS was 13, and in the second cycle it increased by 41.67% with HOTS as many as 15.  

scholarly journals Validitas Instrumen Tes Berpikir Tingkat Tinggi (HOTS) pada Materi Sistem Respirasi di Kelas XI SMA

Mangifera Edu ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 4 (2) ◽  
pp. 129-142
Author(s):  
Marvia Afrita ◽  
Rahmawati Darussyamsu
Keyword(s):  
Higher Order Thinking ◽  
Thinking Skills ◽  
Natural Sciences ◽  
Assessment Instrument ◽  
Assessment Instruments ◽  
Cognitive Level ◽  
Higher Order Thinking Skills ◽  
Average Value ◽  
Is Research ◽  
The Subject

Higher order thinking skills is very important in the 2013 curriculum. This 2013 curriculum emphasizes the ability of reasoning for concepts. This ability involves a high cognitive level from Bloom’s taxonomy, C4-C6. One example in improving students HOTS is to develop assessment instruments HOTS. This type research is research and development (R&D) research with using the 4D models. This research develop an assessment instrument in the form of multiple choice. In this research, the object is assessment instrument HOTS on respiration system content. The subject of this research were two lectures major in Biology, Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences UNP. The result of validation show an average value of 87.91 with a valid category. This shows of assessment instrument HOTS on respiration system content is valid among in terms of the feasibility aspects of content, construction, language, and the cognitive level of the assessment instruments is at a HOTS.

scholarly journals Profil Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis Siswa pada Mata Pelajaran Ekonomi Melalui Pembelajaran Berbasis Riset

heritage ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 111-124
Author(s):  
Khoirotul Fitriyah
Keyword(s):  
High School ◽  
Critical Thinking ◽  
Thinking Skills ◽  
Research Area ◽  
Critical Thinking Skills ◽  
Economics Education ◽  
Analytical Skills ◽  
High School Class ◽  
Skills Use ◽  
High Level

Abstract Economics is one of high school subjects especially in the social sciences major that requires continuous evaluation and research. The purpose of this study is to describe the profile of students' critical thinking skills through research-based learning models on economics with indicators of critical thinking skills, namely interpretation skills, analytical skills, evaluation skills, and the conclusion making skill. Descriptive qualitative research is employed in this study with the research area of Muhammadiyah 3 Jember High School class XII / IPS 3 with a total of 35 students and three students with high, medium and low levels of ability have been consulted with supporting economics teachers and one of the lecturers who are experts in the field of economics education. The test results of students' critical thinking skills use modules or worksheets that have been validated by economics teachers and economics education experts of the faculty of Teacher Training and Education Faculty at University of Jember. The data taken is the result of data reduction using triangulation methods to obtain valid and accurate data. The study found out that the ability to think critically at a low level was 34.28%, moderate level was 48.58%, and high level was 17.14%. Based on the results of research conducted, it can be concluded that the interpretation skill is the highest achievement and the inference skill is the lowest achievement.   Abstrak Mata pelajaran ekonomi merupakan menu utama di SMA khususnya pada jurusan IPS sehingga memerlukan evaluasi dan penelitian secara kontinue. Tujuan dari penelitian ini adalah untuk mendeskripsikan profil kemampuan berpikir kritis siswa melalui model pembelajaran berbasis riset pada mata pelajaran ekonomi dengan indikator kemampuan berpikir kritis yaitu kemampuan interpretasi, kemampuan analisis, kemampuan evaluasi dan kemampuan menarik kesimpulan. Deskriptif kualitatif merupakanpenelitian yang digunakan pada penelitian ini dengan daerah penelitian SMA Muhammadiyah 3 Jember kelas XII/IPS 3 dengan jumlah 35 siswa dan yang dipilih pada subyek penelitiannya tiga siswa yang mempunyai tingkat kemampuan tinggi, sedang dan rendah yang sudah dikonsultasikan dan dimusyarawahkan dengan guru pengampu mata pelajaran dan salah satu dosen yang ahli dibidang pendidikan ekonomi. Hasil uji kemampuan berpikir kritis siswa menggunakan modul atau LKS yang sudah divalidasi oleh guru pengampu mata pelajaran dan ahli pendidikan ekonomi yaitu dosen FKIP Universitas Jember. Data yang diambil merupakan hasil reduksi data dengan melakukan observasi, mengambil tes dan wawancara atau menggunakan triangulasi metode guna mendapatkan data yang valid dan akurat. Hasil dari penelitian tersebut didapat bahwa kemampuan berpikir kritis tingkat rendah 34,28%, sedang 48,58% dan tinggi mencapai 17,14%. Berdasarkan hasil penelitian yang telah dilakukan, dapat disimpulkan bahwa secara khusus kemampuan berpikir kritis siswa di SMA Muhammadiyah 3 jember yaitu kemampuan interpretasi merupakan capaian tertinggi dan kemampuan inferensi adalah capaian terendah.   Kata kunci: kemampuan berpikir kritis, pembelajaran berbasis riset

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document