scholarly journals Ventricle contact is associated with lower survival and increased peritumoral perfusion in glioblastoma

2019 ◽  
Vol 131 (3) ◽  
pp. 717-723 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bart Roelf Jan van Dijken ◽  
Peter Jan van Laar ◽  
Chao Li ◽  
Jiun-Lin Yan ◽  
Natalie Rosella Boonzaier ◽  
...  

OBJECTIVEThe purpose of this study was to prospectively investigate outcome and differences in peritumoral MRI characteristics of glioblastomas (GBMs) that were in contact with the ventricles (ventricle-contacting tumors) and those that were not (noncontacting tumors). GBMs are heterogeneous tumors with variable survival. Lower survival is suggested for patients with ventricle-contacting tumors than for those with noncontacting tumors. This might be supported by aggressive peritumoral MRI features. However, differences in MRI characteristics of the peritumoral environment between ventricle-contacting and noncontacting GBMs have not yet been investigated.METHODSPatients with newly diagnosed GBM underwent preoperative MRI with contrast-enhanced T1-weighted, FLAIR, diffusion-weighted, and perfusion-weighted sequences. Tumors were categorized into ventricle-contacting or noncontacting based on contrast enhancement. Survival analysis was performed using log-rank for univariate analysis and Cox regression for multivariate analysis. Normalized perfusion (relative cerebral blood volume [rCBV]) and diffusion (apparent diffusion coefficient [ADC]) values were calculated in 2 regions: the peritumoral nonenhancing FLAIR region overlapping the subventricular zone and the remaining peritumoral nonenhancing FLAIR region.RESULTSOverall survival was significantly lower for patients with contacting tumors than for those with noncontacting tumors (434 vs 747 days, p < 0.001). Progression-free survival showed a comparable trend (260 vs 375 days, p = 0.094). Multivariate analysis confirmed a survival difference for both overall survival (HR 3.930, 95% CI 1.740–8.875, p = 0.001) and progression-free survival (HR 2.506, 95% CI 1.254–5.007, p = 0.009). Peritumoral perfusion was higher in contacting than in noncontacting tumors for both FLAIR regions (p = 0.04). There was no difference in peritumoral ADC values between the 2 groups.CONCLUSIONSPatients with ventricle-contacting tumors had poorer outcomes than patients with noncontacting tumors. This disadvantage of ventricle contact might be explained by higher peritumoral perfusion leading to more aggressive behavior.

2021 ◽  
pp. 78-81
Author(s):  
Devashish Kaushal ◽  
Rajeev Sood

Introduction: Studies on the effects of chemotherapy in Indian Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer (CRPC) patients are very limited and world data is inconsistent. The purpose of the present study is to assess the effects of Docetaxel therapy in CRPC in Indian patients in terms of survival benet, both progression-free survival, and overall survival. This study also analyzes the effects of various factors on the survival of CRPC patients. Methodology: This is a single institutional prospective observational study. CRPC patients were treated with Docetaxel and followed till death as the primary endpoint or till the end of the study. Survivals were calculated with the Kaplan Meier method. Factors affecting survival were analyzed with univariate and multivariate analysis by log-rank t-test and Cox proportion hazard regression analysis. Result: Out of enrolled 101 patients, 78 were treated with Docetaxel. A decline in PSA (>50% reduction) was observed in 61.54%. Radiological response of regression noted in 40 % Nuclear Bone Scan and 19.23% CT/MRI by RECIST criteria. Progression-free survival and overall survival with Docetaxel (n=78) were 11.8 and 21 months respectively. Hemoglobin less than 11 gm%, Alkaline phosphatase more than 115 IU/dl, PSAmore than 14 ng/ml, Gleason score more than 7 and duration from diagnosis of carcinoma prostate to CRPC less than 24 months, the number of chemotherapy cycles less than 6 were all found to be signicantly associated with poor overall survival in univariate analysis while only Hemoglobin (P=0.0159) showed an independent association with overall survival in multivariate analysis. Conclusion: Overall and progression-free survival of CRPC patients with Docetaxel is 21 & 11.8 months respectively. Hemoglobin, Alkaline phosphatase, PSA, Gleason score, Docetaxel cycle, and duration from diagnosis of carcinoma prostate to CRPC were found to be signicantly associated with poor overall survival.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yuki Mukai ◽  
Yuichiro Hayashi ◽  
Izumi Koike ◽  
Toshiyuki Koizumi ◽  
Madoka Sugiura ◽  
...  

Abstract Background: We compared outcomes and toxicities between concurrent retrograde super-selective intra-arterial chemoradiotherapy (IACRT) and concurrent systemic chemoradiotherapy (SCRT) for gingival carcinoma (GC). Methods: We included 84 consecutive patients who were treated for non-metastatic GC ≥ stage III, from 2006 to 2018, in this retrospective analysis (IACRT group: n=66; SCRT group: n=18).Results: The median follow-up time was 24 (range: 1–124) months. The median prescribed dose was 60 (6–70.2) Gy (IACRT: 60 Gy; SCRT: 69 Gy). There were significant differences between the two groups in terms of 3-year overall survival (OS; IACRT: 78.8%, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 66.0–87.6; SCRT: 50.4%, 95% CI: 27.6–73.0; P = 0.039), progression-free survival (PFS; IACRT: 75.6%, 95% CI: 62.7–85.2; SCRT: 42.0%, 95% CI: 17.7–70.9; P = 0.028) and local control rates (LC; IACRT: 77.2%, 95% CI: 64.2–86.4; SCRT: 42.0%, 95% CI: 17.7–70.9; P = 0.015). In univariate analysis, age ≥ 65 years, decreased performance status (PS) and SCRT were significantly associated with worse outcomes (P < 0.05). In multivariate analysis, age ≥ 65 years, clinical stage IV, and SCRT were significantly correlated with a poor OS rate (P < 0.05). Patients with poorer PS had a significantly worse PFS rate. Regarding acute toxicity, 22 IACRT patients had grade 4 lymphopenia, and osteoradionecrosis was the most common late toxicity in both groups.Conclusions: This is the first report to compare outcomes from IACRT and SCRT among patients with GC. ALL therapy related toxicities were manageable. IACRT is an effective and safe treatment for GC.


BMC Cancer ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Yuki Mukai ◽  
Yuichiro Hayashi ◽  
Izumi Koike ◽  
Toshiyuki Koizumi ◽  
Madoka Sugiura ◽  
...  

Abstract Background We compared outcomes and toxicities between concurrent retrograde super-selective intra-arterial chemoradiotherapy (IACRT) and concurrent systemic chemoradiotherapy (SCRT) for gingival carcinoma (GC). Methods We included 84 consecutive patients who were treated for non-metastatic GC ≥ stage III, from 2006 to 2018, in this retrospective analysis (IACRT group: n = 66; SCRT group: n = 18). Results The median follow-up time was 24 (range: 1–124) months. The median prescribed dose was 60 (6–70.2) Gy (IACRT: 60 Gy; SCRT: 69 Gy). There were significant differences between the two groups in terms of 3-year overall survival (OS; IACRT: 78.8, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 66.0–87.6; SCRT: 50.4, 95% CI: 27.6–73.0; P = 0.039), progression-free survival (PFS; IACRT: 75.6, 95% CI: 62.7–85.2; SCRT: 42.0, 95% CI: 17.7–70.9; P = 0.028) and local control rates (LC; IACRT: 77.2, 95% CI: 64.2–86.4; SCRT: 42.0, 95% CI: 17.7–70.9; P = 0.015). In univariate analysis, age ≥ 65 years, decreased performance status (PS) and SCRT were significantly associated with worse outcomes (P < 0.05). In multivariate analysis, age ≥ 65 years, clinical stage IV, and SCRT were significantly correlated with a poor OS rate (P < 0.05). Patients with poorer PS had a significantly worse PFS rate. Regarding acute toxicity, 22 IACRT patients had grade 4 lymphopenia, and osteoradionecrosis was the most common late toxicity in both groups. Conclusions This is the first report to compare outcomes from IACRT and SCRT among patients with GC. ALL therapy related toxicities were manageable. IACRT is an effective and safe treatment for GC.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yuki Mukai ◽  
Yuichiro Hayashi ◽  
Izumi Koike ◽  
Toshiyuki Koizumi ◽  
Madoka Sugiura ◽  
...  

Abstract Background: We compared outcomes and toxicity between radiation therapy (RT) with concurrent retrograde super-selective intra-arterial chemotherapy (IACRT) and RT with concurrent systemic chemoradiotherapy (SCRT), for gingival carcinoma (GC). Methods: We included 84 consecutive patients who were treated for GC ≥ stage III, from 2006 to 2018, in this retrospective analysis (IACRT group: n=66; SCRT group: n=18).Results: Median follow-up time was 24 (range: 1–124) months. The median prescribed dose was 60 (6–70.2) Gy (IACRT group: 60 Gy; SCRT group:69 Gy). At 3 years, the two groups significantly differed in overall survival (OS; IACRT: 78.75%, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 66.00–87.62; SCRT: 50.37%, 95% CI: 27.58–73.0; P = 0.039), progression-free survival (PFS; IACRT: 75.64%, 95% CI: 62.69–85.17; SCRT: 41.96%, 95% CI: 17.65–70.90; P = 0.028) and local control (LC; IACRT: 77.17%, 95% CI: 64.23–86.41; SCRT: 41.96%, 95% CI: 17.65–70.90; P = 0.015). In univariate analysis, age ≥ 65, decreased performance status (PS) and SCRT were significantly associated with worse outcomes (P < 0.05). In multivariate analysis, age ≥ 65 years, clinical stage IV, and SCRT were significantly correlated with poor OS (P < 0.05). Patients with poorer PS had significantly worse PFS.Conclusions: This is the first report to compare outcomes from IACRT and SCRT among patients with GC. IACRT is an effective and organ-preserving treatment for GC.Trial registration: retrospectively registered


Blood ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 132 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 4434-4434
Author(s):  
Wenzhuo Zhuang ◽  
Sha Song ◽  
Huiying Han ◽  
Gao Fan ◽  
Nengjun Yi ◽  
...  

Abstract PIs resistance is a major challenge for multiple myeloma (MM). The bone marrow microenvironment facilitates crucial interactions between the myeloma cells and mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) that permit MM to survive and proliferate progression. Exosomes are involved in intercellular communication, and in this study we investigated how the transfer of exosomic PMSA3 (encodes proteasome subunit α7) and lncPSMA3-AS1 from MSCs to MM cells affected proteasome inhibitors resistance (Figure 1). We firstly underscored that exosomes derived from r-MSCs (MSCs derived from bortezomib-resistant patients), but not from s-MSCs (MSCs derived from bortezomib-resistant patients) reduced the proteasome inhibitors sensitivity in MM cells (Figure 2). To further elucidate mechanisms of Proteasome inhibitors (PIs) resistance, we retrieved a database containing gene expression profile of 169 myeloma cases with clinical response and disease prognosis (GSE9782). The analysis of this dataset showed that the mRNA levels of PSMA3 and PSMA3-AS1 in CD138+ cells are upregulated in bortezomib-resistant patients (Figure 3A-3D). Moreover, Kaplan-Meier analysis showed that high PSMA3 levels in CD138+ MM cells were correlated with reduced progression-free survival (PFS) (p = 0.0307) and overall survival (OS) (p = 0.0328) (Figure 3E). Cox proportional hazards regression analysis further demonstrated that high PSMA3 was an independent prognostic factor for MM patients with bortezomib therapy in a multivariate analysis (p = 0.0013, HR = 1.3104, 95%CI = 1.1113-1.545). Further analysis of Oncomine data showed that the PSMA3 levels appeared a progressive increase in MGUS, SM, MM and PCL (Figure 3F-3H). Similarly, our PIs resistant models (U266BR, U266CR, U266IR, MM.1SBR, MM.1SCR, MM.1SIR) consistently displayed up-regulation of PSMA3 and PSMA3-AS1 expression (Figure 3J). Consistent with this previously published study, our clinical data showed that the mRNA levels of PSMA3 and PSMA3-AS1 are upregulated in CD138+ MM cells derived from bortezomib resistant patients relative to those from bortezomib sensitive patients (Figure 3I). In addition, r-MSCs had increased expression of PSMA3 and PSMA3-AS1 compared to s-MSCs (Figure 3K). Moreover, the expression of PSMA3 and PSMA3-AS1 in MSCs were positively correlated with that in CD138+ myeloma cells (Figure 3L). These data suggested that high levels of PSMA3 and PSMA3-AS1 were correlated with proteasome inhibitors resistance in MM. We further identified that PSMA3 and PSMA3-AS1 in MSCs could be incorporated into exosomes and transmitted to myeloma cells, thus promoting PIs resistance (Figure not shown). PSMA3-AS1 was capable of forming an RNA duplex with PSMA3 pre-mRNA at overlapping regions and this duplex transcriptionally promoted PSMA3 expression by increasing its stability, conferring bortezomib resistance to myeloma cells (Figure not shown). To evaluate the therapeutic potential of PSMA3-AS1 in MM in vivo, bioluminescent MM models (U266-luc), which recapitulates the clinical sequelae, anatomic distribution of MM lesions, and hallmark bone pathophysiology observed in MM patients were established. Intravenously administered siPSMA3-AS1 was found to be effective in increasing bortezomib sensitive (Figure 4). Moreover, circulating exosomal PSMA3 and PSMA3-AS1 derived from the plasma of MM patients were significantly associated with both progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) in the univariate analysis, and were still statistically significant after adjusting for the international staging system (ISS) and several other clinical variables in the multivariate analysis (Figure not shown). In summary, our results indicated a unique role of exosomic lncPSMA3-AS1 in transferring proteasome inhibitors resistance from MSCs to MM cells, through a novel exosomic lncPSMA3-AS1/PSMA3 signaling pathway. Exosomic PSMA3 and PSMA3-AS1 may serve as a potential therapeutic target for proteasome inhibitors resistance and a prognostic predictor for clinical response. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yuki Mukai ◽  
Yuichiro Hayashi ◽  
Izumi Koike ◽  
Toshiyuki Koizumi ◽  
Madoka Sugiura ◽  
...  

Abstract Background: We compared outcomes and toxicities between concurrent retrograde super-selective intra-arterial chemoradiotherapy (IACRT) and concurrent systemic chemoradiotherapy (SCRT) for gingival carcinoma (GC). Methods: We included 84 consecutive patients who were treated for non-metastatic GC ≥ stage III, from 2006 to 2018, in this retrospective analysis (IACRT group: n=66; SCRT group: n=18).Results: The median follow-up time was 24 (range: 1–124) months. The median prescribed dose was 60 (6–70.2) Gy (IACRT: 60 Gy; SCRT: 69 Gy). There were significant differences between the two groups in terms of 3-year overall survival (OS; IACRT: 78.8%, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 66.0–87.6; SCRT: 50.4%, 95% CI: 27.6–73.0; P = 0.039), progression-free survival (PFS; IACRT: 75.6%, 95% CI: 62.7–85.2; SCRT: 42.0%, 95% CI: 17.7–70.9; P = 0.028) and local control rates (LC; IACRT: 77.2%, 95% CI: 64.2–86.4; SCRT: 42.0%, 95% CI: 17.7–70.9; P = 0.015). In univariate analysis, age ≥ 65 years, decreased performance status (PS) and SCRT were significantly associated with worse outcomes (P < 0.05). In multivariate analysis, age ≥ 65 years, clinical stage IV, and SCRT were significantly correlated with a poor OS rate (P < 0.05). Patients with poorer PS had a significantly worse PFS rate. Regarding acute toxicity, 22 IACRT patients had grade 4 lymphopenia, and osteoradionecrosis was the most common late toxicity in both groups.Conclusions: This is the first report to compare outcomes from IACRT and SCRT among patients with GC. ALL therapy related toxicities were manageable. IACRT is an effective and safe treatment for GC.


2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e16231-e16231
Author(s):  
Veronica Placencio-Hickok ◽  
Marie Lauzon ◽  
Natalie Moshayedi ◽  
Michelle Guan ◽  
Sungjin Kim ◽  
...  

e16231 Background: Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is one of the most aggressive cancers with an estimated five-year survival rate of 10%. The dense desmoplastic stroma in PDAC contributes to its aggressive nature and treatment resistance. Among the components comprising the stroma, hyaluronan (HA) has been demonstrated to play a critical role in tumor progression and survival. Previous preliminary studies have suggested differences in HA expression in primary and metastatic foci in PDAC. However, the effects of treatment and location of HA expression as well as the role of CD44, a known receptor for HA, on HA as a biomarker signature remain unknown. Thus, we investigated the potential of HA as a biomarker in primary PDAC and metastases. Methods: PDAC tissue from primary (n = 43) and metastatic (n = 66) sites were obtained from Cedars-Sinai Medical Center along with associated clinical data. Tissue slides were stained with H&E, HA using a histochemical assay, and CD44 by immunohistochemistry. HA staining was scored according to the proportion of stromal staining at an intensity greater than the background stroma. HA status was defined as ≥ 50% staining being HA high and < 50% as being HA low. CD44 staining was recorded as an H-score (percentage of tumor cells staining multiplied by intensity of staining on a scale from 0 to 3). Associations between HA levels and the requested variables were examined with t-test, Wilcoxon rank-sum test, Chi-squared test, Fisher’s exact test, or Cox regression model where appropriate. Kaplan-Meier curves were created to assess progression free survival and overall survival. Analyses were performed using SAS 9.4 with two-sided tests and a significance level of 0.05. Results: HA score was significantly higher in primary PDAC tissue compared to sites of metastases (p = 0.0148). Within the metastases, HA score was significantly higher in liver metastasis compared to other sites of metastasis (p = 0.0478). In the liver metastasis tissue, HA score trended lower in patients with previously treated tissue compared to treatment naïve tissue (p = 0.0622). In the treatment naive liver metastasis cohort, patients with HA high status had decreased progression free survival and overall survival compared to patients with HA low status (p = 0.0032 and p = 0.0478, respectively). Using HA score and CD44 in a Cox regression model demonstrated that for every one unit increase in HA score, the risk for recurrence/progression increased by 4.4% at any fixed point in time, adjusting for CD44 score (p = 0.0049). Conclusions: HA score is variable between primary PDAC, PDAC metastatic to the liver, and PDAC metastatic to other sites. Within liver metastases, patients with HA high status had decreased progression free survival and overall survival compared to patients with HA low status. HA levels can serve as a potential biomarker to guide pancreatic cancer treatments and trial design for agents targeting the stroma.


2012 ◽  
Vol 27 (3) ◽  
pp. 212-218 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hong-Qiang Guo ◽  
Guo-Liang Huang ◽  
Ou-Fei Liu ◽  
Yan-Yan Liu ◽  
Zhi-Hua Yao ◽  
...  

p63 is highly expressed in some malignant tumors and is associated with tumorigenesis, invasion and metastasis. The aim of our study was to evaluate the clinical significance of p63 in colorectal cancer (CRC). p63 expression was detected by immunohistochemistry in 66 CRC patients. Correlations between p63 expression and clinicopathological factors, progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were analyzed. Among the 66 CRC cases, 31 cases (47%) exhibited a high score of p63 expression, while 35 cases (53%) were marked with a low score. The p63 level correlated with peritumoral deposits (p=0.021). The 5-year OS rates in the low p63 score and high p63 score groups were, respectively, 49% and 74% (p<0.001). The 5-year PFS rates in the low p63 score and high p63 score groups were, respectively, 44% and 71% (p<0.001). Univariate analysis revealed that p63 expression was correlated with OS and PFS. Multivariate analysis suggested that p63 expression was an independent prognostic factor for OS (p=0.035). In conclusion, p63 was negatively correlated with peritumoral deposits and positively associated with OS and PFS in CRC. The data suggest that p63 is a potential prognostic factor for CRC.


2003 ◽  
Vol 21 (24) ◽  
pp. 4572-4578 ◽  
Author(s):  
Véronique Laithier ◽  
Jacques Grill ◽  
Marie-Cécile Le Deley ◽  
Marie-Madeleine Ruchoux ◽  
Dominique Couanet ◽  
...  

Purpose: To evaluate a strategy aimed at avoiding radiotherapy during first-line treatment of children with progressive optic pathway tumors (OPT), by exclusively administering multiagent chemotherapy during 16 months. Patients and Methods: Between 1990 and 1998, 85 children with progressive OPT were enrolled onto this multicenter nationwide trial. Chemotherapy alternating procarbazine plus carboplatin, etoposide plus cisplatin, and vincristine plus cyclophosphamide was given every 3 weeks. At the time of relapse or progression, second-line chemotherapy was authorized before recourse to radiotherapy. Results: Objective response rate (partial response [PR] + complete response [CR]) to chemotherapy was 42%. Five-year progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival rates were 34% and 89%, respectively. The 5-year radiotherapy-free survival rate was 61%. In the multivariate analysis of the 85 patients that entered onto the study, factors associated with the risk of disease progression were age younger than 1 year at diagnosis (P = .047) and absence of neurofibromatosis type 1 (P = .035). In the multivariate analysis of the 74 patients that remained on study after the first cycle of chemotherapy, factors associated with the risk of disease progression were age younger than 1 year at diagnosis (P = .0053) and no objective response to chemotherapy (P = .0029). Three-year PFS was 44% in infants ≤ 1 year versus 66% in children older than 1 year. Three-year PFS was 53% in the absence of an objective response to chemotherapy versus 68% after a PR or CR. Conclusion: A significant proportion of children with OPT can avoid radiotherapy after prolonged chemotherapy. Deferring irradiation with chemotherapy protocols did not compromise overall survival of the entire population or visual function.


2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e15204-e15204
Author(s):  
Michael Adam Poch ◽  
Diana Mehedint ◽  
Alexandra Curtis ◽  
Kristopher Attwood ◽  
Gregory E. Wilding ◽  
...  

e15204 Background: Epidemiological studies indicate that the use of calcium channel blockers (CCB) is inversely related to prostate cancer (PCa) incidence. The goal of this study was to examine the association between CCB use and PCa aggressiveness at the time of radical prostatectomy (RP) or outcome after RP. Methods: Information on medication use, PCa aggressiveness and outcome after RP was retrieved from a prospective database that contains clinical and follow-up (FU) data for all men that have undergone RP at the Department of Urology at Roswell Park Cancer Institute since 1992. The database was queried for anti-hypertensive medication use at the time of diagnosis for all patients with ≥ 1 year FU. Prostate cancer aggressiveness (risk status) and recurrence were defined using NCCN guideline definitions. Cox regression models were performed to compare the distribution of progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) with adjustment for covariates. Chi-Square test was used to assess the relationship between CCB use and PCa aggressiveness. Results: 875 men were included in the study. At diagnosis, mean age was 60 (SD ± 7) years and mean serum PSA value was 7.4 (SD ±7.4) ng/ml. 48%, 37%, and 15% of patients had low risk, intermediate risk, or high risk PCa, respectively. 104 (12%) had a history of CCB use. CCB users and non-users were similar by PSA at diagnosis (p=0.97) and tumor aggressiveness (p=0.88). Patients taking CCB were more likely to be older (p=0.023), have a higher BMI (p=0.006) and use additional anti-hypertensive medications (p<0.01). Margin status after radical prostatectomy was similar (p=0.30) between the two groups. Median FU was 42 months. PFS (p=0.82, HR 95% CI: 0.63-1.44) and OS (p=0.72, HR 95% CI: 0.42-3.52) did not differ between the 2 groups. Adjusting for age and PCa aggressiveness did not alter the results observed for PFS (p=0.44, HR 95% CI: 0.62–1.41) and OS (p=0.50, HR 95% CI: 0.04-3.48). PCa aggressiveness was associated with PFS (p=0.001) in the multivariate model. Conclusions: CCB use does not affect PCa aggressiveness at time of diagnosis or improve PFS or OS.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document