Teaching Materials for Teaching the Discipline «Liturgy of the Bachelor's Program of Theological Schools of the Russian Orthodox Church»

2020 ◽  
pp. 162-194
Author(s):  
А.М. Пентковский ◽  
М. Желтов ◽  
К. Рева ◽  
С.Ю. Акишин
Keyword(s):  
Learning Process ◽  
Teaching Methods ◽  
Working Group ◽  
Russian Orthodox ◽  
Orthodox Church ◽  
Russian Orthodox Church ◽  
Undergraduate Program ◽  
Theological Schools ◽  
Academic Year ◽  
Thematic Plan

В настоящем выпуске журнала «Праксис» публикуется тематический план занятий дисциплины Литургика, предназначенный для программы бакалавриата Московской духовной академии, а также отзывы на эти материалы. Задача «объяснения обрядов» (по выражению профессора МДА А. П. Голубцова) традиционно является неотъемлемой частью изучения богослужения в духовных школах Русской Православной Церкви, однако следует признать, что одна из проблем этого изучения в настоящее время состоит в использовании устаревших методик преподавания и в отсутствии последовательного изложения материала, вследствие чего процесс обучения в основном сводится к бессистемному запоминанию сведений о совершении богослужения, содержащихся в Типиконе и в богослужебных книгах. Во втором семестре 2019/2020 учебного года рабочая группа кафедры церковно-практических дисциплин Московской духовной академии, состоящая из преподавателей литургики под руководством профессора А. М. Пентковского, провела работу по корректировке и уточнению содержания учебных программ и тематического плана для трех лет обучения на программе бакалавриата. This issue of Praxis publishes a thematic plan of classes in the Liturgical disci pline, designed for the undergraduate program of the Moscow Theological Academy, as well as reviews of these materials. The task of "explaining the rites" (as expressed by MTA professor A.P. Golubtsov) traditionally, it is an integral part of the study of worship in the theological schools of the Russian Orthodox Church, but it should be recognized that one of the problems of this study at present is the use of outdated teaching methods and the lack of consistent presentation of ma terial, as a result of which the learning process is mainly reduced to unsystematic memorization of information about the performance of worship contained in the Typicon and in liturgical books. In the second semester of the 2019/2020 academic year, the working group of the Department of Church Practical Disciplines of the Moscow Theological Academy, consisting of liturgical teachers led by Professor A. M. Pentkovsky, carried out work on adjusting and refining the content of the cur ricula and the thematic plan for three years of study at the undergraduate program.

scholarly journals Męczeństwo i zniewolenie Rosyjskiej Cerkwi Prawosławnej w latach 1917-1970

Sympozjum ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 25 (2 (41)) ◽  
pp. 167-221
Author(s):  
Marian Radwan
Keyword(s):  
Russian Orthodox ◽  
Orthodox Church ◽  
Religious Groups ◽  
Russian Orthodox Church ◽  
Unsuccessful Attempt ◽  
Theological Schools ◽  
Security Service ◽  
The Government

Martyrdom and enslavement of the Russian Orthodox Church (1917-1970) The Russian Orthodox Church was deprived of a patriarch by the tsar Peter I the Great in 1721 and since then had been ruled by every next monarch. The position of a patriarch was restored in 1917, when the Synod chose Tikhon Biellavin (died in 1925), by secret voting. When the Russian Provisional Government was overthrown by bolsheviks, the new government started to subordinate the Orthodox Church. There were many attempts of destroying the Orthodox Church by pro-government religious groups, deceptional taking over the Orthodox administration, accusing the Patriarch Tikhon, and executing people defending churches during sacral pretiosas depriving action. The Orthodox Church’s independence was cut short in 1927 after the so-called Declaration of Metropolitan Sergei Stragorodski was published. Since then, his opponents had been persecuted, and his supporters had got promoted. The process of the Russian Orthodox Church enslavement ended when the Council of the Russian Orthodox Church Affairs with the security service officer Karpow as a director was established. The Council had its impact on the election of patriarchs Stragorodski and Simansky and bishops nominations. Orthodox churches, theological schools, monasteries, were liquidated massively, the 169 Męczeństwo i zniewolenie Rosyjskiej Cerkwi Prawosławnej w latach 1917-1970 number of dioceses was reduced, as well. On the Karpov’s and the government order, there was an unsuccessful attempt of establishing the Orthodox Vatican in Moscow. Patriarchs Stragorodsky and Simansky ruled according to governmental demands, not faithful people’s needs. Od 1721 roku z woli cara Piotra Wielkiego Rosyjska Cerkiew Prawosławna została pozbawiona patriarchy i na jej czele stawał każdorazowy monarcha. Urząd ten został przywrócony dopiero w 1917 roku, kiedy Synod w tajnym głosowaniu doprowadził do wyboru metropolity T. Biełławina (†1925). Po obaleniu Rządu Tymczasowego przez bolszewików nowe władze podjęły starania o podporządkowanie sobie Cerkwi. W ramach tej inicjatywy podejmowano próby rozbicia Cerkwi przez prorządowe ugrupowania religijne (np. Żywa Cerkiew W. Wwiedienskiego, Ruch georgiewski G. Jackowskiego), podstępne przejęcie administracji cerkiewnej, przygotowania do postawienia przed sądem patriarchy Tichona, wykonanie wyroków śmierci na osobach broniących cerkwi podczas akcji odbierania cerkwiom sakralnych precjozów. Niezależność Cerkwi została złamana w 1927 roku po publikacji tzw. Deklaracji metropolity S. Stragorodz168 kiego. Jego oponenci odtąd byli prześladowani (P. Polańskij, C. Smirnow, J. Petrowych), a lojalni duchowni awansowani. Powołanie tzw. Rady ds. Rosyjskiej Cerkwi Prawosławnej na czele z oficerem władz bezpieczeństwa G. Karpowem zakończyło proces zniewalania Cerkwi. Rada ta manipulowała wyborem patriarchy Stragorodzkiego i A. Szymańskiego oraz nominacjami biskupów. Masowo likwidowano cerkwie, szkolnictwo teologiczne, klasztory, redukowano liczbę diecezji. Na polecenie władz z udziałem Karpowa podjęto nieudaną próbę utworzenia w Moskwie Prawosławnego Watykanu. Zarówno Stragorodzki, jak i Szymański kierowali się głównie żądaniami władz politycznych a nie oczekiwaniami wiernych.

scholarly journals The Moscow Theological Academy during the rectorate of Archbishop Filaret (Vahromeyev) (1966-1973): A Historical Sketch

2019 ◽  
pp. 104-113
Author(s):  
Иоанн Кечкин ◽  
Илья Рязанов
Keyword(s):  
Russian Orthodox ◽  
Archival Data ◽  
Orthodox Church ◽  
Theological Seminary ◽  
Russian Orthodox Church ◽  
Theological Schools ◽  
Scientific Potential ◽  
History Of ◽  
Doctoral Dissertations ◽  
Historical Sketch

Статья посвящена истории Московских духовных школ во время ректорства архиепископа Филарета (Вахромеева). На основании архивных данных рассмотрена личность владыки Филарета, его путь от студента Московской духовной семинарии до ректора академии. В этот период Академия продолжает развивать свой научный потенциал, пишутся и защищаются как магистерские, так и докторские диссертации. К преподаванию в Академии привлекаются наиболее способные выпускники. Московскую духовную академию посещают многочисленные официальные иностранные делегации, что даёт Академии возможность играть всё более важную роль во внешней деятельности Русской Православной Церкви. The article is devoted to the history of Moscow Theological Schools during the rectorcy of Archbishop Filaret (Vahromeev). Based on archival data, the personality of Vladyka Filaret and his path from a student at Moscow Theological Seminary to Rector of the Academy is examined. During this period the Academy continues to develop its scientific potential, both master's and doctoral dissertations are written and defended. The most gifted graduates are attracted to teaching in the Academy. Numerous official foreign delegations visit the Moscow Theological Academy, which enables the Academy to play an increasingly important role in external activities of the Russian Orthodox Church.

Legal Training of Graduates of Theological Schools

2020 ◽  
pp. 47-56
Author(s):  
Александр Задорнов
Keyword(s):  
Canon Law ◽  
Russian Orthodox ◽  
Orthodox Church ◽  
Russian Orthodox Church ◽  
Canonical Theory ◽  
Theological Schools ◽  
The Future ◽  
Legal Training

Актуальные программы бакалавриата и магистратуры духовных школ Русской Православной Церкви должны обеспечить, среди прочего, появление целого поколения квалифицированных церковных правоведов. Последние должны быть способны не только представлять актуальные аналитические доклады, исходящие из канонической теории, но и создать ту практику правоприменения, которая позволит развиваться каноническому праву в будущем. В настоящей статье рассматриваются возможности и перспективы повышения правовой подготовки студентов духовных школ, а также первоочередные задачи для этой работы. The actual programs of undergraduate and master’s studies of theological schools of the Russian Orthodox Church should ensure, among other things, the emergence of a whole generation of qualified Church legal scholars. The latter should be able not only to present rel evant analytical reports emanating from canonical theory, but also to create the practice of en forcement that will allow the development of canon law in the future. This article examines the possibilities and prospects for improving the legal training of students of theological schools, as well as the priorities for this work.

Christian unity: the search for ways to achieve

2001 ◽  
pp. 91-100
Author(s):  
Yu. Ye. Reshetnikov
Keyword(s):  
Catholic Church ◽  
Russian Orthodox ◽  
Orthodox Church ◽  
Turn Of The Millennium ◽  
Russian Orthodox Church ◽  
Basic Principles ◽  
Christian Churches ◽  
The Press ◽  
Christian Unity ◽  
Future Policy

Last year, the anniversary of all Christianity, witnessed a number of significant events caused by a new interest in understanding the problem of the unity of the Christian Church on the turn of the millennium. Due to the confidentiality of Ukraine, some of these events have or will have an immediate impact on Christianity in Ukraine and on the whole Ukrainian society as a whole. Undoubtedly, the main event, or more enlightened in the press, is a new impetus to the unification of the UOC-KP and the UAOC. But we would like to focus on two documents relating to the problem of Christian unity, the emergence of which was almost unnoticed by the wider public. But at the same time, these documents are too important as they outline the future policy of other Christian denominations by two influential Ukrainian christian churches - the Russian Orthodox Church and the Ukrainian Greek Catholic Church. These are the "Basic Principles of the attitude of the Russian Orthodox Church to the" I ", adopted by the Anniversary Bishops' Council of the Russian Orthodox Church, and the Concept of the Ecumenical Position of the Ukrainian Greek Catholic Church, adopted by the Synod of the Bishops of the UGCC. It is clear that the theme of the second document is wider, but at the same time, ecumenism, unification is impossible without solving the problem of relations with others, which makes it possible to compare the approaches laid down in the mentioned documents to the building of relations with other Christian confessions.

Ransoming Russians from Tatars: Justification and Practice

2020 ◽  
Vol 47 (1-2) ◽  
pp. 91-99
Author(s):  
Donald Ostrowski
Keyword(s):  
Early Modern ◽  
Social Status ◽  
Russian Orthodox ◽  
Orthodox Church ◽  
Russian Government ◽  
Russian Orthodox Church ◽  
Gender And Age ◽  
Sliding Scale ◽  
The Government ◽  
Modern Russian

The early modern Russian government and Russian Orthodox Church identified as one of their main duties the ransoming of Russian Christians from Muslim Tatar captors. The process of ransoming could be an involved one with negotiations being carried on by different agents and by the potential ransomees themselves. Different amounts of ransom were paid on a sliding scale depending upon the ransomee’s social status, gender, and age. One of our main sources for the justification of this practice was the Stoglav (100 Chapters) Church Council in 1551, which discussed the issue of ransom in some detail. The Law Code (Ulozhenie) of 1649 specifies the conditions and amounts to be paid to redeem captives. Church writers justified the ransoming of Christian captives of the Muslim Tatars by citing Scripture, and they also specified that the government should pay the ransom out of its own treasury.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document