scholarly journals Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Bloodstream Infections and Injection Drug Use, Tennessee, USA, 2015–2017

2020 ◽  
Vol 26 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Meghana P. Parikh ◽  
Rany Octaria ◽  
Marion A. Kainer
Keyword(s):  
Staphylococcus Aureus ◽  
Drug Use ◽  
Injection Drug Use ◽  
Methicillin Resistant Staphylococcus Aureus ◽  
Bloodstream Infections ◽  
Injection Drug ◽  
Methicillin Resistant

scholarly journals Staphylococcus aureus injection drug use-associated bloodstream infections are propagated by community outbreaks of diverse lineages

2021 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Laura R. Marks ◽  
Juan J. Calix ◽  
John A. Wildenthal ◽  
Meghan A. Wallace ◽  
Sanjam S. Sawhney ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Staphylococcus Aureus ◽  
Drug Use ◽  
Injection Drug Use ◽  
Academic Medical Center ◽  
Bloodstream Infections ◽  
Clonal Expansion ◽  
The United States ◽  
Injection Drug ◽  
Comparative Genomic ◽  
Molecular Features

Abstract Background The ongoing injection drug use (IDU) crisis in the United States has been complicated by an emerging epidemic of Staphylococcus aureus IDU-associated bloodstream infections (IDU-BSI). Methods We performed a case-control study comparing S. aureus IDU-BSI and non-IDU BSI cases identified in a large US Midwestern academic medical center between Jan 1, 2016 and Dec 21, 2019. We obtained the whole-genome sequences of 154 S. aureus IDU-BSI and 91 S. aureus non-IDU BSI cases, which were matched with clinical data. We performed phylogenetic and comparative genomic analyses to investigate clonal expansion of lineages and molecular features characteristic of IDU-BSI isolates. Results Here we show that patients with IDU-BSI experience longer durations of bacteremia and have lower medical therapy completion rates. In phylogenetic analyses, 45/154 and 1/91 contemporaneous IDU-BSI and non-IDU BSI staphylococcal isolates, respectively, group into multiple, unique clonal clusters, revealing that pathogen community transmission distinctively spurs IDU-BSI. Lastly, multiple S. aureus lineages deficient in canonical virulence genes are overrepresented among IDU-BSI, which may contribute to the distinguishable clinical presentation of IDU-BSI cases. Conclusions We identify clonal expansion of multiple S. aureus lineages among IDU-BSI isolates, but not non-IDU BSI isolates, in a community with limited access to needle exchange facilities. In the setting of expanding numbers of staphylococcal IDU-BSI cases consideration should be given to treating IDU-associated invasive staphylococcal infections as a communicable disease.

scholarly journals Antibiotic Resistance, spa Typing and Clonal Analysis of Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) Isolates from Blood of Patients Hospitalized in the Czech Republic

Antibiotics ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (4) ◽  
pp. 395
Author(s):  
Katarina Pomorska ◽  
Vladislav Jakubu ◽  
Lucia Malisova ◽  
Marta Fridrichova ◽  
Martin Musilek ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Staphylococcus Aureus ◽  
Czech Republic ◽  
Methicillin Resistant Staphylococcus Aureus ◽  
Bloodstream Infections ◽  
Spa Typing ◽  
The Czech Republic ◽  
Methicillin Resistant ◽  
Mrsa Strains ◽  
Spa Types ◽  
Repeat Pattern

Staphylococcus aureus is one of the major causes of bloodstream infections. The aim of our study was to characterize methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) isolates from blood of patients hospitalized in the Czech Republic between 2016 and 2018. All MRSA strains were tested for antibiotic susceptibility, analyzed by spa typing and clustered using a Based Upon Repeat Pattern (BURP) algorithm. The representative isolates of the four most common spa types and representative isolates of all spa clonal complexes were further typed by multilocus sequence typing (MLST) and staphylococcal cassette chromosome mec (SCCmec) typing. The majority of MRSA strains were resistant to ciprofloxacin (94%), erythromycin (95.5%) and clindamycin (95.6%). Among the 618 strains analyzed, 52 different spa types were detected. BURP analysis divided them into six different clusters. The most common spa types were t003, t586, t014 and t002, all belonging to the CC5 (clonal complex). CC5 was the most abundant MLST CC of our study, comprising of 91.7% (n = 565) of spa-typeable isolates. Other CCs present in our study were CC398, CC22, CC8, CC45 and CC97. To our knowledge, this is the biggest nationwide study aimed at typing MRSA blood isolates from the Czech Republic.

scholarly journals 286. Exploratory Cost-Effectiveness Analysis for Treatment of Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Bloodstream Infections: Are Daptomycin and Linezolid Favored over Vancomycin and Other Antibiotics?

2020 ◽  
Vol 7 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S143-S144
Author(s):  
Michelle Vu ◽  
Kenneth Smith ◽  
Sherrie L Aspinall ◽  
Cornelius J Clancy ◽  
Deanna Buehrle
Keyword(s):  
Staphylococcus Aureus ◽  
Cost Effectiveness ◽  
Methicillin Resistant Staphylococcus Aureus ◽  
Bloodstream Infections ◽  
Sensitivity Analyses ◽  
Drug Event ◽  
Base Case ◽  
Health Administration ◽  
Research Support ◽  
Methicillin Resistant

Abstract Background Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus bloodstream infections (MRSAB) cause significant mortality and often require extended antibiotic therapy. Vancomycin, the most common initial MRSAB treatment, carries significant monitoring burden and nephrotoxicity risks. We compared cost-effectiveness of vancomycin and other antibiotic regimens as MRSAB treatment. Methods We estimated cost-effectiveness of intravenous antibiotics (vancomycin, daptomycin, linezolid, ceftaroline/daptomycin, dalbavancin) for Veterans Health Administration (VA) patients with MRSAB using an exploratory decision-tree model. Primary effectiveness outcome was composite of microbiological failure and adverse drug event (ADE)-related discontinuation at 7-days. Results In base-case analyses, linezolid and daptomycin were less expensive and had fewer treatment failures than other regimens at 4 and 6-weeks. Compared to linezolid, daptomycin incremental cost-effectiveness ratios were ~$45,000 (4-weeks) and ~$61,000 (6-weeks) per composite failure avoided, respectively. In one-way sensitivity analyses, daptomycin (4-weeks) was favored over linezolid if linezolid microbiological failure or ADE-related discontinuation rates were >14.8% (base case: 14.0%) or >14.3% (base case: 14.0%), respectively, assuming a willingness to pay (WTP) threshold of $40,000/ composite treatment failure avoided. Vancomycin was favored if its microbiological failure risk was < 16.4% (base case: 27.2%). In two-way sensitivity analyses, daptomycin was favored if linezolid microbiological failure and ADE-related discontinuation rates were >19% and > 16%, respectively. Linezolid, daptomycin and vancomycin were favored in 47%, 39%, and 11% of 4-week probabilistic iterations, respectively, at $40,000 WTP. Conclusion Daptomycin or linezolid are likely less expensive and more effective than vancomycin or other initial regimens for MRSAB. More data are needed to support safety of linezolid in MRSAB patients. Disclosures Cornelius J. Clancy, MD, Astellas (Consultant, Grant/Research Support)Cidara (Consultant, Research Grant or Support)Melinta (Grant/Research Support)Merck (Consultant, Grant/Research Support)Needham Associates (Consultant)Qpex (Consultant)Scynexis (Consultant)Shionogi (Consultant)

scholarly journals Multicenter Cohort Study of Ceftaroline versus Daptomycin for Treatment of Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Bloodstream Infection

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Evan J Zasowski ◽  
Trang D Trinh ◽  
Kimberly C Claeys ◽  
Abdalhamid M Lagnf ◽  
Sahil Bhatia ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Staphylococcus Aureus ◽  
Cohort Study ◽  
Treatment Failure ◽  
Methicillin Resistant Staphylococcus Aureus ◽  
Study Drug ◽  
Bloodstream Infections ◽  
Risk Difference ◽  
Multicenter Cohort Study ◽  
Methicillin Resistant ◽  
Composite Failure

Abstract Background Observational data suggest ceftaroline may be effective for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) bloodstream infections (BSI) but comparative data with standard of care are limited. This analysis compares the outcomes of MRSA BSI treated with ceftaroline or daptomycin. Methods Multicenter, retrospective, observational cohort study of adult patients with MRSA BSI from 2010 to 2017. Patients treated with ≥ 72 hours of ceftaroline or daptomycin were included. Those clearing BSI before study drug and those with a pneumonia source were excluded. The primary outcome was composite treatment failure, defined as 30-day mortality, BSI duration ≥ 7 days on study drug, and 60-day MRSA BSI recurrence. Inverse probability of treatment weighted risk difference in composite failure between daptomycin and ceftaroline groups was computed and 15% non-inferiority margin applied. Results Two hundred seventy patients were included; 83 ceftaroline and 187 daptomycin. Ceftaroline was non-inferior to daptomycin with respect to composite failure [39% daptomycin, 32.5% ceftaroline; weighted risk difference (95% CI) 7.0% (-5.0 – 19.0%)]. No differences between treatment groups was observed for 30-day mortality or other secondary efficacy outcomes. Creatine phosphokinase elevation was significantly more common among daptomycin patients (5.3% vs 0%, P = 0.034). Rash was significantly more common among ceftaroline patients (10.8 vs 1.1%, P = 0.001). Conclusions No difference in treatment failure or mortality was observed between MRSA BSI treated with ceftaroline or daptomycin. These data support future study of ceftaroline as a primary MRSA BSI treatment and current use of ceftaroline when an alternative to vancomycin and daptomycin is required.

Incidence and predictors of Gram-negative bacilli in hospitalized people who inject drugs with injection drug use-attributable infections

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Megan C. Kelly ◽  
Samantha D. Yeager ◽  
Mahmoud A. Shorman ◽  
Laurence R. Wright ◽  
Michael P. Veve
Keyword(s):  
Drug Use ◽  
Injection Drug Use ◽  
People Who Inject Drugs ◽  
Bloodstream Infections ◽  
Antibiotic Use ◽  
Injection Drug ◽  
Gram Positive ◽  
Gram Negative ◽  
Multivariable Regression ◽  
Infection Types

Objective: Quantify incidence and determine predictors of Gram-negative bacilli (GNB) in people who inject drugs (PWID) with injection-drug use (IDU)-related infections. Design: Retrospective cohort of hospitalized PWID from 1/2017-12/2019. Methods: Inclusion criteria: age ≥18 years, active IDU, treated IDU-attributable infection, organism growth from microbiology cultures. Infection types: infective endocarditis (IE), acute bacterial skin/skin structure infection (ABSSSI), osteoarticular infection (OAI), other bloodstream infections (BSI). Primary outcome was GNB identification from microbiologic culture; descriptive statistics were used to describe the cohort. Multivariable regression was used to identify variables associated with GNB infection. Results: 230 PWID included; 65 (28%) GNB infections, 165 (72%) Gram-positive infections. The median (IQR) population age was 38 (31-45) years. Most patients were women (56%); 37% had no insurance. Infection types were: IE (41%), ABSSSI (37%), OAI (20%), other BSI (2%). 278 organisms were isolated from 230 patients; most common organisms were methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (43%), Streptococcus spp. (19%), methicillin-susceptible S. aureus (17%), Serratia marcescens (8%); 10% were mixed GNB and Gram-positive infections. 80% of patients received empiric Pseudomonas aeruginosa coverage; only 7% had P. aeruginosa infections. In multivariable regression, age >50 years (adjOR, 2.9; 95%CI; 1.2-7.2), prior hospitalization within 90-days (adjOR, 2.2; 95%CI; 1.2-4.3), and OAI (adjOR, 3.2; 95%CI; 1.5-6.6) were associated with GNB infection. Conclusions: GNB in PWID with IDU-attributed infections were more frequently observed in recently hospitalized, older patients with OAI. The majority of patients received empiric anti-pseudomonal antibiotic coverage, but P. aeruginosa was infrequent. PWID are a potential population to target improved empiric antibiotic use.

Determining the Utility of Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Nares Screening in Antimicrobial Stewardship

2019 ◽  
Vol 71 (5) ◽  
pp. 1142-1148 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kari A Mergenhagen ◽  
Kaitlyn E Starr ◽  
Bethany A Wattengel ◽  
Alan J Lesse ◽  
Zarchi Sumon ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Staphylococcus Aureus ◽  
Methicillin Resistant Staphylococcus Aureus ◽  
Bloodstream Infections ◽  
Department Of Veterans Affairs ◽  
Predictive Values ◽  
Methicillin Resistant ◽  
Entire Cohort ◽  
Clinical Culture ◽  
Specific Culture ◽  
Sensitivity Specificity

Abstract Background Treatment of suspected methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) is a cornerstone of many antibiotic regimens; however, there is associated toxicity. The Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) hospitals screen each patient for MRSA nares colonization on admission and transfer. The objective was to determine the negative predictive value (NPV) of MRSA screening in the determination of subsequent positive clinical culture for MRSA. High NPVs with MRSA nares screening may be used as a stewardship tool. Methods This was a retrospective cohort study across VA medical centers nationwide from 1 January 2007 to 1 January 2018. Data from patients with MRSA nares screening were obtained from the VA Corporate Data Warehouse. Subsequent clinical cultures within 7 days of the nares swab were evaluated for the presence of MRSA. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive values, and NPVs were calculated for the entire cohort as well as subgroups for specific culture sites. Results This cohort yielded 561 325 clinical cultures from a variety of anatomical sites. The sensitivity and specificity for positive MRSA clinical culture were 67.4% and 81.2%, respectively. The NPV of MRSA nares screening for ruling out MRSA infection was 96.5%. The NPV for bloodstream infections was 96.5%, for intraabdominal cultures it was 98.6%, for respiratory cultures it was 96.1%, for wound cultures it was 93.1%, and for cultures from the urinary system it was 99.2%. Conclusion Given the high NPVs, MRSA nares screening may be a powerful stewardship tool for deescalation and avoidance of empirical anti-MRSA therapy.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document