scholarly journals СУТНІСТЬ ТА ОСОБЛИВОСТІ ДОСУДОВОГО ВРЕГУЛЮВАННЯ АДМІНІСТРАТИВНО-ПРАВОВИХ СПОРІВ

2019 ◽  
Vol 14 ◽  
pp. 5-18
Author(s):  
C. В. Ківалов
Keyword(s):  
Dispute Resolution ◽  
Alternative Dispute Resolution ◽  
Dispute Settlement ◽  
The Relationship

У статті проаналізовано поняття, сутність та особливості досудового урегулювання адміністративно-правових спорів. Особливу увагу приділено співвідношенню понять «спо­соби, альтернативні правосуддю» й «альтернативне вирішення спорів». Здійснено поділ до­судових способів за такими критеріями: 1) за суб'єктом, що здійснює процедуру вирішення спору: а) державні процедури врегулювання спору; б) недержавні процедури врегулювання спору; 2) за методом врегулювання спору: а) примирювальні (компромісні) процедури; б) правовїдновлювальні процедури; в) змішані процедури. Визначено, що найбільш поши­реними методами досудового вирішення спорів с переговори, посередництво, арбітраж.   The paper analyzes the concept, essence, and characteristics of pre-trial settlement of administrative legal disputes. Particular attention is paid to the relationship between the concepts "methods alternative to justice" and "alternative dispute resolution". The author carries out the classification of pre-trial methods according to the following criteria: 1) by the entity that carries out the procedure for dispute settlement: a) state dispute settlement procedures; b) non-state dispute settlement procedures; 2) by the method of settlement of the dispute: a) conciliation (compromise) procedures; b) procedures for restoration of rights; c) mixed procedures. It is determined that the most common methods of pre-trial dispute resolution are: negotiation, mediation, arbitration.

scholarly journals Kewenangan Badan Penyelesaian Sengketa Konsumen (BPSK) dalam Menyelesaikan Sengketa Asuransi Pasca Keluarnya Peraturan Otoritas Jasa Keuangan (OJK) Nomor 1/POJK.07/2014

2019 ◽  
Vol 12 (2) ◽  
pp. 102
Author(s):  
Wisnu Kumala ◽  
Yaswirman Yaswirman ◽  
Ulfanora Ulfanora
Keyword(s):  
Dispute Resolution ◽  
Consumer Protection ◽  
Financial Services ◽  
Alternative Dispute Resolution ◽  
Dispute Settlement ◽  
Legal Research ◽  
Research Results ◽  
Consumer Protection Act ◽  
Legal Effect ◽  
Legal Consequences

There is a tug of authority in resolving insurance disputes outside the court between the Consumer Dispute Settlement Agency (BPSK) based on Law Nomor 8 of 1999 concerning Consumer Protection with Alternative Dispute Resolution Institutions (LAPS) based on Financial Services Authority Regulation Number 1/POJK.07/2014. This encourages the author to conduct legal research in order to determine the authority of BPSK in resolving insurance disputes as well as the legal consequences of the decision after the issuance of the Financial Services Authority Regulation Number 1/POJK.07/2014 using the statutory approach. This legal research results in the finding that BPSK is still authorized to settle insurance disputes following the issuance of the Financial Services Authority Regulation Number 1/POJK.07/2014, this is based on the provisions of the Lex superior derogat legi inferiori principle. Then there is no legal effect on the BPSK decision after the issuance of the Financial Services Authority Regulation. This is because BPSK's decision has been based on Law Number 8 of 1999 concerning Consumer Protection, whose position is higher than the Regulation of the Financial Services Authority. So there is no need for BPSK to follow the provisions of the regulations whose hierarchy of legislation is lower than the Consumer Protection Act. Therefore BPSK's decision is "final and binding" as explained in Article 54 paragraph 3 of the Consumer Protection Act.

scholarly journals Analisa Dan Pengaruh Metode Hubungan Industrial Terhadap Penyelesaian Perselisihan Di Serikat Pekerja Sektoral Kota Cilegon Tahun 2019

2020 ◽  
Vol 14 (2) ◽  
pp. 91-100
Author(s):  
Udi Iswadi ◽  
Mahfudoh Haerani
Keyword(s):  
Dispute Resolution ◽  
Trade Unions ◽  
Dispute Settlement ◽  
Mutual Influence ◽  
Alternative Hypothesis ◽  
Industrial Relations ◽  
Internal And External Factors ◽  
Settlement Of Disputes ◽  
The Relationship ◽  
The City

Abstrak - Hubungan merupakan tindakan yang saling mempengaruhi antar pihak, saling memberi manfaat guna mencapai tujuan, hubungan dapat dikatakan pula sebuah representasi kegiatan yang dilandasi keinginan untuk saling memberi dan memenuhi keperluan masing-masing pihak. Keselarasan akan timbal balik pada sebuah hubungan yang sesuai menghasilkan kedekatan dan kenyamanan antar pihak. Konsep sebuah hubungan didasari oleh faktor internal dan eksternal organisasi atau perusahaan. Sedangkan hubungan yang terjadi dalam perusahaan yaitu hubungan Industrial, dimaknai sebuah metode dalam menyelesaikan persoalan yang timbul di antara pengusaha dan pekerjanya. Hal yang diselesaikan sudah barang tentu adalah perselisihan. Pelaksanaan metode penelitian dalam pengumpulan data berupa kuesioner. Jumlah populasi yang digunakan yaitu 35 serikat pekerja atau dengan jumlah pekerja sebanyak 5.860 pekerja sebagai populasi dari serikat pekerja sektoral yang tergabung dengan Federasi Serikat Pekerja Sektoral Kimia di kota Cilegon. Untuk mengetahui bagaimana metode hubungan Industrial yang efektif dipakai maka harus ditentukan jenis perselisihannya terlebih dahulu, dalam penelitian ini ditemukan perselisihan kepentingan kecenderungannya akan diselesaikan ditingkat hubungan Industrial bipatride. Adapun perselisihan yang banyak diselesaikan peneliti melihat waktu kejadiannya seperti perselisihan upah maka akan banyak muncul di awal tahun. Sedangkan untuk melihat seberapa kuat korelasi yang didapat antara Variabel Metode Hubungan Industrial terhadap Penyelesaian Perselisihan, maka hasil perhitungan Uji Korelasi Product Moment r hitung 0,920, dapat dikatakan bahwa pengaruhnya Sangat Kuat. Hal tersebut menunjukkan bahwa variabel Metode Hubungan Industrial mempengaruhi variabel Penyelesaian Perselisihan sebesar 84,6% sedangkan sisanya dipengaruhi oleh faktor-faktor lainnya. Nilai Sig. 0,000 < 0,05, diartikan bahwa pengaruh Variabel Metode Hubungan Industrial (X) terhadap Penyelesaian Perselisihan (Y) signifikan. Dari perhitungan ttabel diperoleh nilai 1,987. Berdasarkan kriteria pengujian hipotesis terhadap nol (Ho), yaitu Ho ditolak jika thitung > ttabel. Diperoleh thitung  5,458 > ttabel 1,987 maka Hipotesis nol (Ho) di tolak, dan menerima Hipotesis alternatif (Ha). Dalam penelitian ini dapat ditarik kesimpulan bahwa “Terdapat Pengaruh Metode Hubungan Industrial terhadap Penyelesaian Perselisihan di Serikat Pekerja Sektoral Kimia Kota Cilegon Tahun 2019”. Dengan regresi sebagai berikut : Ÿ = 20,710 + 1,010 X.      Abstract - Relationship is an act of mutual influence between parties, mutually beneficial to achieve goals, the relationship can also be said to be a representation of activities based on the desire to give and meet the needs of each party. Alignment of reciprocity in an appropriate relationship results in closeness and comfort between parties. The concept of a relationship is based on internal and external factors of the organization or company. While the relationships that occur within a company that is industrial relations, is interpreted as a method of solving problems that arise between employers and their workers. The matter that was resolved was naturally a dispute. The implementation of research methods in collecting data in the form of a questionnaire. The population used is 35 trade unions or with a total of 5,860 workers as a population of sectoral trade unions that are members of the Federation of Chemical Sector Trade Unions in the city of Cilegon. For know, how effective industrial relations methods are used, the type of dispute must be determined first. In this study, it was found that disputes over the interests of fraud will be resolved at the bipartite industrial relations level. As for the disputes that many researchers have resolved, seeing when it occurs, such as wage disputes, many will appear at the beginning of the year. To see how strong the correlation obtained between the Industrial Relations Method Variables on Dispute Resolution, the results of the Product Moment Correlation Test r count of 0.920, it can be said that the effect is very Strong. This shows that the Industrial Relations Method variable affected 84.6% Dispute Resolution while the rest was influenced by other factors. The Sig. 0,000 <0.05, which means that the effect of the Industrial Relations Method Variable (X) on Dispute Settlement (Y) is significant. From the ttable calculation, the value is 1.987. Based on the hypothesis testing criteria for zero (Ho), i.e. Ho is rejected if tcount> ttable. Obtained tcount 5.458> t table 1.987 then the null hypothesis (Ho) was rejected, and accepted the alternative hypothesis (Ha). In this study, it can be concluded that "There is an Effect of the Industrial Relations Method on the Settlement of Disputes in the Chemical Sectoral Trade Unions of Cilegon City in 2019". With the regression as follows: Ÿ = 20,710 + 1,010 X.

scholarly journals Alternative Dispute Resolution: Use and Abuse of Information and Specialized Knowledge

1995 ◽  
Vol 33 (2) ◽  
pp. 301
Author(s):  
Judith A. Snider ◽  
C. Kemm Yates
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Dispute Resolution ◽  
Judicial Review ◽  
Alternative Dispute Resolution ◽  
Specialized Knowledge ◽  
Natural Justice ◽  
The Subject ◽  
The Relationship

The authors examine the subject of Alternative Dispute Resolution ("ADR") with a focus on the issue of specialized knowledge and its use in two particular spheres of ADR: regulatory tribunals and arbitration. The authors define "specialized knowledge" and compare it to the concept of evidence in order to determine whether it is evidence which can be relied upon by regulators and arbitrators in the context of their ADR decision-making. The relationship between specialized knowledge and the rules of natural justice is explored — in particular, the audi alteram pattern rule and the rule against bias. The authors conclude by suggesting guidelines to be used by arbitrators and regulatory tribunals in adjudicating on matters before them in order to avoid challenges, by judicial review, to their decisions on the basis of misuse or "abuse" of their specialized knowledge.

Alternative Dispute Resolution

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Faris Elias Nasrallah
Keyword(s):  
Dispute Resolution ◽  
Alternative Dispute Resolution ◽  
Theory And Practice ◽  
Forum Shopping ◽  
Cultural Contexts ◽  
Interdisciplinary Work ◽  
Interstate Disputes ◽  
The Relationship

Alternative dispute resolution (ADR) is an umbrella term to describe an array of social and institutional methods for resolving disputes. These methods offer individual and collective disputants a panoply of forum shopping options, each taking place in different intrinsic, inherited, and constructed cultural contexts. While not immediately apparent to lawyers or anthropologists, different ADR methods, including arbitration and mediation, in fact constitute the principal global tools utilized to resolve most international and interstate disputes concerning matters of investment, commerce, and industry. To grasp the magnitude of this necessarily requires both lawyers and anthropologists to break the barriers of habitual thinking about the nature and extent of their disciplinary and interdisciplinary work. This chapter outlines the prevalence and pervasiveness of ADR processes and practices both past and present, using ADR as an interface for reconceptualizing interdisciplinary boundaries, appraising the relationship between theory and practice, and understanding emerging social and legal practices.

Dissolution of Marriage

2019 ◽  
pp. 101-121
Author(s):  
Eve M. Brank
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Dispute Resolution ◽  
Alternative Dispute Resolution ◽  
Financial Support ◽  
Personal Relationships ◽  
State Laws ◽  
The Law ◽  
The Relationship

Not all marriages last and unlike other personal relationships, the dissolution of a marriage requires legal involvement to end the relationship. A divorce not only severs a marriage, but it also introduces legal involvement. That legal involvement is in the form of state laws that define how divorces are granted, whether the couple needs to have a formal separation before a divorce can be granted, how property should be divided upon dissolution, and whether formalized spousal financial support should commence. Although the law is involved in each of these issues, there are now more opportunities for the use of alternative dispute resolution options rather than traditional court settings that attempt to give more of the decision making back to the couple.

Teetering at the Top of the Ladder: The Experience of Citizen Group Participants in Alternative Dispute Resolution Processes

1996 ◽  
Vol 39 (2) ◽  
pp. 249-262 ◽  
Author(s):  
Julia M. Wondolleck ◽  
Nancy J. Manring ◽  
James E. Crowfoot
Keyword(s):  
Dispute Resolution ◽  
Citizen Participation ◽  
Alternative Dispute Resolution ◽  
Dispute Settlement ◽  
Working Relationships ◽  
Citizen Groups ◽  
Citizen Group ◽  
Critical Components ◽  
Resolution Processes ◽  
Do So

Citizen groups that participate in alternative dispute resolution processes have overcome many of the barriers described in Sherry Arnstein's classic article, “A Ladder of Citizen Participation.” A well-structured collaborative process can remedy some of the imbalances and other stumbling blocks inherent in traditional forums, broadening the issues considered as well as the potential solutions. At the top of the ladder, there exists a three-runged extension of choices. First citizens must make the strategic choice whether or not to participate in the dispute resolution process. Second, if they choose to participate, citizens must then determine how to do so effectively. Citizen representatives can significantly influence the outcome of a negotiation if they pay attention to the critical components comprising the dispute settlement process and ensure that these are satisfactory at the outset. They must also maintain effective communication with their constituencies. At the third rung, citizen groups confront the need for continued involvement, both to ensure implementation of any agreements reached, as well as to capitalize on the productive working relationships and opportunities for further influence provided by their participation in this process.

scholarly journals Penyelesaian Sengketa antara Bank Sharî‘ah dengan Nasabah Bermasalah melalui Badan Arbitrase Sharî‘ah Nasional (BASYARNAS) menurut UU No. 30 tahun 1999

2015 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
pp. 193
Author(s):  
Sulistyowati Sulistyowati
Keyword(s):  
Dispute Resolution ◽  
Alternative Dispute Resolution ◽  
Dispute Settlement ◽  
Islamic Law ◽  
Legal Rules ◽  
Arbitration Board ◽  
Strong Emphasis ◽  
The Cost

<p>This study deals with dispute settlement between <em>Bank Syari’ah</em> and its customers through the National Shari’ah Arbitration Board (BASYARNAS). It focuses to elaborate the procedures of dispute settlement between <em>Bank Syari’ah</em> and its customers of financing from the perspective of Islamic law according to Bill No. 30/1999 above law No. 30 year 1999. Based on procedures as mentioned in the bill with regard to arbitration and alternative dispute resolution, Basyarnas, in proofing and resolving cases, has fulfilled the procedures and satisfied the conflicting parties with justice, so there is no need to appeal and reconsideration. This means that Basyarnas has conducted dispute resolution according to the existing procedures. The dispute settlement has also been in accordance with the Qur’ân and other Islamic legal rules which consist of the principles of power and mandate applied by the arbitrator in deciding and resolving the dispute. The board—as an independent institution—has setttled the disputes on the basis of justice for all parties, rejected the act of bribery since the cost is measurable. In addition, Basyarnas also gives strong emphasis on the principle of equality, friendship, consistence and response-bility in resolving disputes.</p>

scholarly journals EFISIENSI PEMILIHAN ALTERNATIF PENYELESAIAN SENGKETA DALAM PENYELESAIAN SENGKETA WARALABA

FIAT JUSTISIA ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 10 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Rahmi Yuniarti
Keyword(s):  
Dispute Resolution ◽  
Alternative Dispute Resolution ◽  
Dispute Settlement ◽  
Business Continuity ◽  
Legal Research ◽  
Descriptive Research ◽  
Business Contract

AbstractFranchise as a business contract between franchisor and frachisee which in the practice sometimes leads to a dispute. A dispute happens because their rights and obligations are not met. Dispute settlement businesses can choose a judiciary or non-judiciary institution. However, considering of the business continuity, the dispute must be resolved so each side can fulfill their needs to solve the dispute. The problems in this study are the factors that can arise disputes franchise and the efficiency of selecting alternatives of dispute resolution to resolve the dispute franchise. This type of the research used by the researcher is a normative legal research. This type of research is a descriptive research. The conclusions of this study are the factors that cause disputes franchise is the existence of rights and obligations are not met and fulfilled, and it happens mostly because the oversight and discontinuance of the franchise that are assumed not giving advantages or inflicting one of the parties. Moreover, there are possibilities of not keeping promises which have been decided before. Keywords: Alternative Dispute Resolution, Franchise Dispute AbstrakWaralaba sebagai suatu kontrak bisnis antara franchisor dan frachisee dalam pelaksanaannya tidak sedikit yang menimbulkan suatu sengketa. Suatu sengketa muncul dikarenakan adanya hak dan kewajiban yang tidak terpenuhi. Penyelesaian sengketa bisnis dapat memilih lembaga pengadilan atau lemabaga non-peradilan. Namun, dengan pertimbangan akan kelanjutan bisnis yang dijalani alternatif penyelesaian sengketa dianggap lebih dapat menyalurkan keinginan para pihak untuk menyelesaiakan sengketa bisnis. Permasalahan pada penelitian ini adalah faktor-faktor yang dapat menimbulkan sengketa waralaba dan efisiensi pemilihan alternatif penyelesaian sengketa untuk menyelesaikan sengketa waralaba. Jenis penelitian yang digunakan penulis dalam penelitian ini adalah bersifat penelitian hukum normatif. Tipe penelitian ini adalah penelitian deskriptif. Simpulan dari penelitian ini, faktor-faktor yang menyebabkan timbulnya sengketa waralaba adalah adanya suatu hak dan kewajiban yang tidak terpenuhi dan paling banyak terjadi dikarenakan pengawasan dan pemutusan hubungan waralaba yang dianggap merugikan salah satu pihak. Selain itu, ketidakpastian karena ada kemungkinan tidak ditepatinya janji serta risiko permintaan yang tidak sesuai dengan yang direncanakan. Kata Kunci: Penyelesaian Sengketa, Sengketa Waralaba

scholarly journals JURIDIS ANALYSIS OF CONFLICT COMPETENCY OF BUSINESS DISPUTE SETTLEMENT THROUGH ARBITRATION AND GENERAL JUSTICE IN STOCK OWNERSHIP

2018 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Edi Prayitno ◽  
Martin Roestamy
Keyword(s):  
Supreme Court ◽  
Dispute Resolution ◽  
Alternative Dispute Resolution ◽  
Dispute Settlement ◽  
District Court ◽  
Court Decisions ◽  
Legal Research ◽  
Actual Case ◽  
Arbitration Clause ◽  
Investment Agreement

This Thesis was written based on the result of legal research that analyzes conflict of business dispute resolution between arbitration and litigation in accordance with the applicable regulation and court decisions which have acquired permanent legal force. The method used in this legal research is normative legal methods. The study of literature as a basis of the research and according to Law Number 30 Years 1999 about Arbitration and Alternative Dispute Resolution, in Article 3 and Article 11 of the Law have expressively stated that District Court does not have the authority to adjudicate disputes between the parties that bound by the arbitration agreement. The result of this legal research is that arbitration clause as stated in business investment agreement that should be absolute competencies to resolve the dispute, but the Decision of District Court Judges which have been strengthened by Supreme Court of Indonesia expressively stated that the court has the authority to check and adjudicate the dispute even it has arbitration clause or arbitration agreement with the reason that the dispute is a tort and there are another parties beside the party who sign the Investment Agreement, in the suit. The court attitude that adjudicate the dispute with arbitration clause lead to conflict of competency and never ending adjudication process of business dispute. From the actual case that researcher has been analyzes, researcher suggest that Supreme Court of Indonesia as the highest judicial body must respect arbitration body by rejecting all of the civil cases that have arbitration clause on its agreement. Law Number 48 Years 2009 about Judicial Power stated that non-litigation dispute resolution is conducted through arbitration or alternative dispute resolution. Based on pacta sun servanda and choice of forum principles on the agreement binding to the parties and must be obeyed by the parties.KeyWord : : Arbitration Clause, Pacta Sun Servanda Principle, Business.

scholarly journals JUSTICE IN MANY ROOMS IN SHARIA BANKING DISPUTE RESOLUTION TO ACHIEVE JUSTICE

2018 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 43
Author(s):  
Nita Triana
Keyword(s):  
Dispute Resolution ◽  
Alternative Dispute Resolution ◽  
Dispute Settlement ◽  
Islamic Law ◽  
Third Party ◽  
Second Step ◽  
Legal Research ◽  
Long Time ◽  
The Cost ◽  
Religious Courts

This paper examines the dispute resolution of Sharia Banking. The method is a non-doctrinal legal research using qualitative research  and Socio Legal approach. Sharia banking cannot be separated from the problems between the banking and the Customer. This problem is calledproblematic financing. The resolution  of problematic financing of sharia banks in litigation is now the absolute authority of the Religious Courts. The downside of litigation settlement usually takes a long time, the need for proof, the cost is quite expensive and the result is winningor lost. Therefore, the settlement of sharia banking is very rarely resolved through litigation. Alternative Dispute Resolution is a choice of dispute settlement chosen by Sharia Banking. The first stage isto carry out negotiation between all parties, namely Banking (lender) and The Customer (Debtor) in the form of warning and guidance. If it does not succeed, there will bedebt restructuration. The second step is mediation, in the form of consultation with third party as a mediator.  The mediation determines the rescue process of debt by Banks when a debtor is still unable to return his debt, executed by the bank. According to Marc Galanter these various dispute resolutionsis called justice in many rooms. In Islamic Law it is known as Sulh (peace). However, to a large extent this non-litigation settlement is more satisfactory to both parties in resolving the dispute because it senses fairness and a win-win solution.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document