scholarly journals Labor-Induced Pregnancy Cases In Dr Soetomo General Hospital: A Descriptive Study

2021 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
pp. 7-13
Author(s):  
Alfin Firasy

Background: Labor induction is a procedure to stimulate uterine contractions during pregnancy before labor begins on its own to achieve a vaginal birth with medical or mechanical intervention to start the labor. This procedure aims to stimulate more extensive contraction in the uterus. The labor induction can reduce the caesarean rate. Prostaglandin E2 (PGE2) and misoprostol are the commonest medicine used to ripen the cervix in the Dr. Soetomo Hospital. Objective: Our study aim to evaluate the success rate of induction of labor patient. Methods: This study was a descriptive study using the medical record in 2018 in the Dr. Soetomo General Hospital, Surabaya. A total of 183 patient’s medical record data who underwent induced labor were used in this study. Inclusion criteria were the women with indication to deliver and have no cephalo-pelvic disproportion. Women with contraindication labor induction were excluded. Data was described using table and narrative approach. Results: The most range of gestational age was 21-36 weeks (53.01%) followed by 37-42 weeks (42.07%). There were 68 patients (37,1%) primigravida and 115 patients (62,8%) were multipara. The major induced labor was conducted with misoprostol (78.6%), and the most pelvic scores were 2 (58.46%) before underwent induced labor. Vertex delivery was the preferred mode of delivery after the induction of labor with 89 patients (48,62%). The labor induction failure followed with the caesarean operation were 27 patients (14,7%) and one patient (0,54%) with hysterotomy, most of them caused by failure to progress and fetal distress. There were 78 babies (43%) with the weight over 2500 g, 28 babies (31%) were over 2000 g, and the other was below 2000 g. A total of 84.71% with labor induction can be delivered vaginally, and It is a good number to reduce the rate of caesarean operations. Conclusion: This study concludes that misoprostol uses for the induction of labor than the other. Delivery abdominal is less percentage than the additional delivery finds that as a failure of induction of labor. The Labor induction success to delivered vaginally can reduce the rate of caesarean operation.

2019 ◽  
Vol 9 (2) ◽  
pp. 63-68
Author(s):  
Areefa S. M. Alkasseh ◽  
Muyassar El-Jazzaranal ◽  
Doaa Abu Khadijah ◽  
Fatma Al-Derbaly ◽  
Reem Al-Nemnum ◽  
...  

BACKGROUNDProstaglandin E1 (oral misoprostol) and the other Prostaglandin E2 (Dinoprostone gel) are promising agents for cervical ripening and induction of labor.AIMS OF STUDYTo compare the efficiency and safety on maternal-fetal outcomes using 25 micrograms oral misoprostol PGE1 with 50 micrograms of intra-vaginal PGE2 for induction of labor.METHODSThis was a retrospective study design reviewing medical records of induced labor at Al Shifa hospital in Gaza Strip.RESULTSIn general, the results showed that women who used oral misoprostol with an age less than 30 years and parity less than 3 was effective for delivery and safe outcomes with an odds ratio (OR) of 15.8 (CI 6.9–39.8) and OR 29.2 (CI 10.7–80.3) respectively. The most common indication for labor induction in both methods was reputure of the membrane (ROM) more than 24 hours, postdates, and a medical disorder. However, the total interval hours for both methods was 8.4 hours. The mode of delivery was similar in both groups as vaginal delivery outcome was 73.6% for oral misoprostol E1 and 75% for prostaglandin E2 cases. However, PGE2 induction showed a higher cesarean delivery 25% rate versus 18.4%. Clinically the use of oral misoprostol showed a higher percentage of birth canal injury, failed induction, uterine rupture by 9.3%, 8%, 1.3% respectively. Fetal distress was found as the most common fetal complication and the most common cause for cesarean section.CONCLUSIONThe study recommended more research is needed as present evidence does not support use of oral misoprostol versus Prostaglandin E2.


Author(s):  
Nalini Sharma ◽  
Hanslata Gehlot

Background: The Induction of labor in oligohydramnios poses a dilemma for obstetrician. Studies are limited with variable results. This study aims at finding whether isolated oligohydramnios is an indication for operative delivery or labor induction followed by vaginal delivery is possible.Methods: A prospective study carried out on females delivered in study duration in Umaid Hospital, Jodhpur, Rajasthan. Outcomes studied were gestational age at delivery, colour of amniotic fluid, FHR tracings, mode of delivery, indication for cesarean section or instrumental delivery, Apgar score at one minute and five minutes, birth weight, admission to Neonatal Intensive Care Unit (NICU), perinatal morbidity and perinatal mortality. Descriptive statistics were applied and data was represented on frequency tables, graphs and diagrams.Results: 40% of subjects had amniotic fluid index (AFI) <5 cm and 60% demonstrated AFI between 5-7 cm. 60% of patients induced delivered vaginally with (38.33%) having AFI <5 cm. Operative delivery was resorted to in 40% of patients. Perinatal outcomes resulted in total 97% of babies discharged in healthy condition.Conclusions: Labor induction is feasible in idiopathic oligohydramnios. Fetal distress is the most feared and predicted outcome with labor induction in oligohydramnios. This study deduced that in majority- reason for c-sections was failed labor induction due the poor Bishop's score, not fetal reasons. We hope by putting at rest apprehensions of obstetrician regarding this notion rate of c-sections could be reduced.


Author(s):  
Santosh Khajotia ◽  
Madhuri Sharma ◽  
Mool Chand Khichar ◽  
Manoj Gupta ◽  
Kavita Choudhary

Background: Induction of labor means initiation of uterine contraction, after period of viability by any method (medical, surgical or combined) before spontaneous onset of labor for the purpose of vaginal delivery. The condition of cervix or favorability is important for successful labor induction. Assessment of cervix has been used as a predictor of successful vaginal delivery. Induction of labor carried out in approximately 20% of all pregnancies. Aim and objectives of the current study were to compare the predictive value of trans-vaginal ultra-sonographic measurement of cervical length versus Bishop score prior to induction of labor in predicting the mode of delivery and maternal and fetal outcome.Methods: This prospective observational study was conducted in the department of obstetrics and gynecology, Sardar Patel medical college and associated group of hospitals, Bikaner between February to November 2020. Study group included 100 pregnant women in which induction of labor was performed at 37-42 weeks of gestation.Results: Bishop Score appears to be a better predictor than the cervical length with sensitivity of 1.00 and a specificity of 0.12 compared to 0.52 and 1.00 respectively. In the receiver operating characteristic curves, the cut-off point for the prediction of successful induction taken was 2.6 cm cervical length and >4 for the bishop score.Conclusions: TVS cervical length could be used as alternative to Bishop score for prediction of successful labor induction in the sitting where the appropriate equipment and expertise are available. Bishop score and TVS cervical length both are good predictors of successful induction of labor. 


2018 ◽  
Vol 24 (3) ◽  
pp. 79 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dina Delvin Anggriani ◽  
Lilik Herawati ◽  
Ernawati Ernawati

Objectives: to identify factors affecting labor induction failure in Sungailiat General Hospital, District Bangka, Bangka Belitung.Materials and Methods: This is a case control retrospective analytic study. Population of this study was postterm delivering mother at delivery room Sungailiat General Hospital during July 1st, 2012 to July 1st, 2015. Sampling method conducted for case group was total sampling method with labor induction failure as a inclusion criteria, and no data for first trimester ultrasound, didn’t have a routine antenatal care history, and maternal complication as exclusion criterias as many as 78 samples. Whereas, control group was women whose underwent a success labor induction used random sampling method with 1:1 ratio. Data source was from medical records. Data analysis was chi square with 95% confidence interval.Results: From the 78 samples with labor induction, 19,2 % was ≥ 35 years old, 48,7% was primiparas, 62,8% with infant birth weight ≥ 3500 gram, and from 96 samples, 47,5% with ≥ 5 years pregnancy interval. Statistical analysis result showed factors that affecting induction failure were parity (P Value 0,014, odds ratio 2,970), baby’s weight (P Value 0,016, odds ratio 2,631), pregnancy interval (P Value 0,023, odds ratio 2,993), whereas mother’s age did not show significant effect (P Value 0,383, odds ratio 2,278).Conclusion: Parity has a 2,9 times risk to develop induction failure.


2011 ◽  
Vol 18 (02) ◽  
pp. 201-207
Author(s):  
TAHIRA JABBAR ◽  
SHAMAILA FAISAL ◽  
FAIQA IMRAN ◽  
Robina Kauser

background: Labor can be induced through a myriad of ways. The aim of this study was to compare the effectiveness of the intracervical Foley balloon catheter and intra vaginal 3 mg prostaglandin E2 tablet(s) in preinduction cervical ripening at term. Methods: Prospective analytic study of a cohort of 280 women selected through non probability sampling admitted in Obstetrics units, in two private hospitals one at Rawalpindi and the other at Mirpur (Azad Kashmir), from January 2009 to March 2010. All women were randomized to receive an intracervical Foley catheter or prostaglandin E2 tablets. The primary measured outcome was ripening of the cervix as measured with the Bishop score. Results: There were no differences in mean Bishop Scores between the prostaglandin and the Foley catheter groups. Bishop scores (mean ± S.D.) after ripening were 6.6±0.81 and 6.7±0.86 for the Foley catheter and prostaglandin groups, respectively (P=0.54). The prostaglandin group showed a statistically shorter induction to delivery time compared with the Foley catheter (16.5±2.2 and 20.51±3.89 h, respectively (P<0.01). Both the groups showed no statistically significant difference between the occurrences of spontaneous vaginal delivery. Labor was established in 72% cases of cervical Foley group. On the other hand induction occurred in 76% cases in prostaglandin group. There was no statistical difference between the need of oxytocin infusion for labor augmentation between the two groups and fetal distress was equally frequent in both the groups. Conclusions: Foley catheter was as effective as Prostaglandin E-2 at term for induction of labor with additional advantage of being cheaper, readily available and had no systemic side effects. 


Author(s):  
Valentin Nicolae Varlas ◽  
Georgiana Bostan ◽  
Bogdana Adriana Nasui ◽  
Nicolae Bacalbasa ◽  
Anca Lucia Pop

Background and objectives: Induction of labor (IOL) is an event that occurs in up to one-quarter of pregnancies; less is known about the outcomes and safety of IOL in obese pregnant woman; no data is available on misoprostol vaginal insert (MVI) IOL in high-risk pregnancy obese women. Objectives: (1) to evaluate the rate of successful IOL with 200 &mu;g MVI in obese (Body Mass Index - BMI over 30 kg/m2) high-risk pregnant women: late-term pregnancy, hypertension or diabetes, compared to obese non-high-risk ones; (2) to evaluate the safety profile of MVI in high-risk pregnancy obese patients. Study design: We conducted a cross-sectional study in "Filantropia" Clinical Hospital, Bucharest, Romania, from June 2017 to September 2019 (28 months). From a total of 11,096 registered live births, IOL was performed in 206 obese patients; 74 obese high-risk pregnant patients matched the inclusion criteria; of these, 33.8% pregnancies (n=25) were late-term (41 &ndash; 41+6 weeks), 43.2% (n=32) had associated pathologies (hypertension and diabetes); labor induction was guided using a standardized protocol. We evaluated the maternal and gestational age, parity, fetal tachysystole, hyper-stimulation, initial cervical status, time from induction to delivery, drug side effects, mode of delivery, and neonatal outcomes. Results: (a) The overall successful labor induction rate, evaluated by the vaginal delivery rate, was 71.6% (n=53), spontaneously or instrumentally assisted; 28.4% (n=21) births were unsuccessful MVI IOL, converted into caesareans. (b) No significant differences were found regarding the maternal outcomes; in terms of perinatal outcomes of safety, four cases of high-risk pregnancies vaginally delivered were associated with neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) admissions and a one-minute Apgar score under seven (5.4%). Most cases with adverse effects of misoprostol have been managed conservatively, except for three emergency C-section cases. Conclusions: Misoprostol vaginal insert is a safe choice in IOL in obese high-risk pregnancies with good maternal and perinatal outcomes.


2012 ◽  
Vol 46 (3) ◽  
pp. 138-143
Author(s):  
Sujata Siwatch ◽  
Vanita Jain

ABSTRACT Background This study is a randomized controlled trial comparing the efficacy and safety of sublingual vs vaginal misoprostol for induction of labor. Materials and methods A total of 160 women admitted for induction of labor at the PGIMER, Chandigarh, India were randomized to receive 25 μg of vaginal or sublingual misoprostol for labor induction. The two groups were compared for mode of delivery, induction delivery interval, misoprostol dose required, uterine contraction abnormalities and neonatal outcomes. Results Majority of women in both groups delivered vaginally (91 and 89% in vaginal and sublingual misoprostol groups respectively). Mean number of doses of misoprostol required for induction of labor was similar in vaginal misoprostol group and sublingual misoprostol group (1.81 ± 0.84 vs 2.05 ± 0.98). The occurrence of uterine contraction abnormalities and neonatal outcome was similar in both groups. Conclusion The low dose of 25 μg is equally efficacious and safe by both vaginal and sublingual routes. How to cite this article Siwatch S, Kalra J, Bagga R, Jain V. Sublingual vs Vaginal Misoprostol for Labor Induction. J Postgrad Med Edu Res 2012;46(3):138-143.


2013 ◽  
Vol 26 (2) ◽  
pp. 81-85
Author(s):  
Nabila Aminu Buhari ◽  
Sumayya Lugman Ahmed ◽  
Nastaran Redha Sohrabi ◽  
Hidayat Yetunde Ogunsola ◽  
Riwana B Shaikh ◽  
...  

Objectives: To study various methods of induction of labor and their effect on mode of delivery  and fetal outcome.Methods: 104 pregnant women induced in Gulf Medical College hospital from August to   November 2009 were included. Mothers were observed from the start of their induction and  followed up till they were discharged. The methods of induction compared were the use of prostaglandin, oxytocin, prostaglandin and oxytocin combined and artificial rupture of membranes.Results: Out of 104 pregnant women, 86 (89%) had normal vaginal delivery. Of these, 36 (41.9%) were induced with combination of prostaglandin and oxytocin, 32 (37.2%) with prostaglandin, 14 (16.2%) with oxytocin, and 4 (4.6%) with artificial rupture of membranes. 13 (12.5%) mothers delivered through caesarean section of these, 7 (53.8%) mothers were induced with prostaglandin, 3 (23%) with prostaglandin and oxytocin, 2 (15.3%) with oxytocin alone, and 1 (7.7%) with artificial rupture of membranes. Induction of labor with combination of prostaglandin and oxytocin was found to be the most effective method. Duration of labor between primigravidas and multigravidas were significantly different with primigravidas having longer duration of labor with mean time of 12.47 hours while multigravidas had 9.16 hours.Conclusion: Induction of labor with combination of prostaglandin and oxytocin was found to be the most effective method in this study with very good progressing to normal vaginal delivery. Further research is needed on a larger scale to compare other methods of labor induction on parturient to be able to recommend the most effective method of labor induction. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3329/bjog.v26i2.13785 Bangladesh J Obstet Gynaecol, 2011; Vol. 26(2) : 81-85  


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ying Dong ◽  
Chuyu Li ◽  
Xin Zhao ◽  
Lin Zhang ◽  
Xiaojun Jia ◽  
...  

Abstract Background The use of COOK balloon in the process of induction of labor is gradually promoted. This study was conducted to investigate the safety and efficacy of COOK double balloon dilation for pre-induction cervical maturation and induction of labor. Methods A total of 343 pregnant women with full-term pregnancy in Shanghai Putuo Maternity & Infant Health Hospital from January 1st to September 30th of 2016 were enrolled. Of all the pregnant women, 166 had labor induction, which included the use of a COOK balloon, the implementation of artificial rupture of membranes (AROM) and oxytocin intravenous (IV) drip (COOK group). The other 177 pregnant women with spontaneous rupture of membranes (SROM) and mature cervix only administrated with oxytocin IV drip to promote regular uterus contraction (oxytocin group). Maternal adverse reactions, mode of delivery and delivery outcomes of two groups were subsequently compared between the two groups. Results There were significant differences of maternal age (28.29 ± 3.34 vs. 29.25 ± 3.62 years, P = 0.02), gestational age (283.49 ± 4.53 vs. 274.71 ± 7.04 years, P < 0.001) and birth weight (3435.27 ± 340.29 vs. 3354.63 ± 387.96 g, P = 0.02) between the COOK group and the oxytocin group. There were no significant differences in terms of gravidity, parity, mode of delivery, analgesia, 1 min and 5 min Apgar score, labor time, postpartum hemorrhage, and adverse events. Conclusion Use of a COOK balloon may help full-term pregnancy women with immature cervix obtain the same pregnancy results as those with mature cervix, without extra occurrence of adverse events.Trial registration This is an observational study and no registration is required.


2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (2) ◽  
pp. 29-32
Author(s):  
Upendra Pandit ◽  
Basant Sharma ◽  
Rakshya Joshi ◽  
Julli Chaudhari ◽  
Prekshya Singh ◽  
...  

Background: Labor induction is one of the most common Obstetrics interventions worldwide. It has got significant risks and benefits. Careful selection of cases for induction improves the feto­maternal outcomes. So, the study was designed to assess the fetomaternal outcome and factors associated with mode of delivery following the induction of labor. Methods: It was a descriptive observational study conducted in the department of Obstetrics and Gynecology from July 17, 2018, to July 16, 2019. The study comprised of 264 mothers admitted in the labor ward subjected to labor induction as clinical management of labor and delivery. Data analyzed with chi-square test and one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) wherever appropriate. Results: Of 2950 deliveries, the induction rate was 8.94%. Out of them, 264 mothers undergone labor induction. A caesarean was the highly associated mode of deliveries 168(63.63%) due to in­duction failure 94(55.97%) followed by fetal distress 37(22%). The mean birth weight of neonates was 3.09±0.41 kg. Apgar score in one minute and hospital stay showed a significant difference (p-value .002), in modes of deliveries. No significant association was observed in maternal and fetal complications like PPH, endometritis, and low Apgar score <7 in five minutes. The majority of neonates admitted for observation at the care unit. The neonatal mortality was two. Conclusions: Caesarean mode of delivery highly was associated with labor induction due to in­duction failure and fetal distress. Carefully selected cases improve morbidity and fetomaternal outcomes following labor induction.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document