The Effect of Learning Models and Learning Styles on Social Science Learning Outcomes of Arrahman Percut Students

This study aims (1) to determine the differences in social studies learning outcomes taught by the Two Stay Two Stray (TSTS) learning model which is higher than the social studies learning outcomes with the Problem Based Learning model. (2) To find out the differences in social studies learning outcomes of students who have a higher visual learning style than the social studies learning outcomes of students who have a kinesthetic learning style. (3) To determine the interaction between learning models and student learning styles in influencing the social studies learning outcomes of private students, Ar Rahman Percut. The population of this study was 122 students of class VII-A and VII-B of Ar Rahman Percut Private Middle School. Samples were taken by cluster rondom sampling. The sample used in this study was 63 students. The selected sample is classVII-A and class VII-B. The instrument used was a multiple choice test, amounting to 30 items and a learning style questionnaire. The data were analyzed at the significant level = 0.05, followed by the Scheffe further test after the normality and homogeneity tests. The results showed that, (1) There are differences in social studies learning outcomes, where the social studies learning outcomes with the Two Stay Two Stray (TSTS) learning model are higher than the social studies learning outcomes with the Problem Based Learning model with Fcount 8,70> Ftable 4.00, (2) There are differences in student social studies learning outcomes, where the social studies learning outcomes of students who have a visual learning style from the social studies learning outcomes of students who have a kinesthetic learning style with Fcount 5.01> Ftable 4.00, (3) There is an interaction between the learning model and the learning style of the students' social studies learning outcomes Fcount 5.20> Ftable 4.00

Download Full-text

The effect of CTL learning model and learning style on the historical learning outcomes

Harmoni Sosial Jurnal Pendidikan IPS ◽

10.21831/hsjpi.v7i1.29734 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 7 (1) ◽

Author(s):

Inda Syahra ◽

Sarkadi Sarkadi ◽

Nurzengky Ibrahim

Keyword(s):

Learning Styles ◽

Learning Outcomes ◽

Learning Style ◽

Visual Learning ◽

Sampling Technique ◽

Student Learning Outcomes ◽

Learning Model ◽

Learning Models ◽

Auditory Learning ◽

School Year

This study aims to obtain the influence of learning models and learning styles on historical learning outcomes. Students are given a CTL and conventional learning model by measuring visual learning styles and auditory learning styles. This type of research is a quantitative study using an experimental method with a 2 x 2 factorial design. The population is all students of class X 2019/2020 school year. The sampling technique used is multistage random sampling. Class X-A as an experimental class and grade X-B as a control class with a total of 70 students construct validity is analyzed by the correlation between items using Product Moment Correlation, and Cronbach's alpha formula tested reliability. The results showed that learning outcomes with the CTL learning model were higher than conventional learning models. While student learning outcomes using visual learning styles are more effective than auditory learning styles. There is a relationship between learning models with learning styles.

Download Full-text

The Effect of Value Clarification Technique Learning Models and Learning Styles on the Achievement Learning Outcomes of Class VIII MTs Al-Hasanah Tanjung Leidong, Labura District

Budapest International Research and Critics in Linguistics and Education (BirLE) Journal ◽

10.33258/birle.v3i3.1189 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 3 (3) ◽

pp. 1371-1377

Author(s):

Siti Halimah ◽

Zulfahmi Lubis ◽

Saidatun Nisa Nasution

Keyword(s):

Learning Styles ◽

Student Learning ◽

Learning Outcomes ◽

Learning Style ◽

Visual Learning ◽

Sampling Technique ◽

Learning Model ◽

Learning Models ◽

Average Value ◽

Class Viii

The purpose of this study was to determine: (1) the influence of the value clarification technique (VCT) learning model on student learning result. (2) Knowing the influence of learning styles on student learning result. (3) Knowing the interaction between learning models and learning styles on student learning result. The population of this study were students of class VIII MTs Al-Hasanah Tanjung Leidong Labuhan Batu Utara consisting of three classes. The sample chosen for the class with the VCT learning model was class VIII-3 with 30 students, while students who were taught using the expository model were 32 students. The cluster random sampling technique is influenced by analysis of variance at a significant level (α = 0.05) followed by Scheffe. The results of this study are: (1) the average value of students taught with the VCT learning model (= 33.6) is higher than students taught with the expository learning model (= 24.68) with Fcount 0.0023 < Ftable 3,988. (2) The average value of learning outcomes Akidah Akhlak with visual learning styles (= 27.5), auditory (= 29.56) and kinesthetic (= 28.26) with Fcount = 0.068 < Ftable = 3,988. (3) There is an interaction between learning models and learning styles on students' learning outcomes Akidah Akhlak with Fcount 28.96 < Ftable 3,988. Based on the data analysis, it can be concluded that students with visual and auditory characteristics, the appropriate learning model is the VCT, while students with the kinesthetic learning style are expository. The implication is that teachers must be trained in how to understand student learning styles. Thus it is suggested that in planning the learning process the characteristics of students must be considered.

Download Full-text

PENGARUH MODEL PEMBELAJARAN KOOPERATIF TSTS–NHT DAN GAYA BELAJAR TERHADAP HASIL BELAJAR PENGANTAR BISNIS

Jurnal Teknologi Pendidikan (JTP) ◽

10.24114/jtp.v12i1.14505 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 12 (1) ◽

pp. 88

Author(s):

Mendarissan Aritonang ◽

Abdul Hamid K ◽

Julaga Situmorang

Keyword(s):

Cooperative Learning ◽

Learning Styles ◽

Learning Outcomes ◽

Learning Style ◽

Random Sampling ◽

Business Students ◽

Learning Model ◽

Learning Models ◽

Quasi Experimental ◽

Cluster Random Sampling

Abstrak: Penelitian ini bertujuan :(1) Untuk mengetahui hasil belajar pengantar bisnis mahasiswa yang diajar dengan model pembelajaran kooperatif tipe TST lebih tinggi dari mahasiswa yang diajar dengan model pembelajaran kooperatif tipe NHT. (2) Untuk mengetahui hasil belajar pengantar bisnis mahasiswa yang memiliki gaya belajar teoritis dan mahasiswa yang memiliki gaya belajar pragmatis. (3) Untuk mengetahui interaksi antara model pembelajaran kooperatif dengan gaya belajar terhadap hasil belajar pengantar bisnis. Penelitian ini dilaksanakan di Universitas Methodist Indonesia. Populasi berjumlah 180 orang. Pengambilan sampel dilakukan dengan cluster random sampling. Metode penelitian kuasi eksperimen dengan desain faktorial 2 x 2 dilanjutkan dengan statistik inferensial dengan menggunakan ANAVA dua jalur dengan taraf signifikan α = 0,05 yang dilanjutkan dengan uji Scheffe. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan: (1) hasil belajar pengantar bisnis mahasiswa yang diajarkan dengan model pembelajaran kooperatif tipe TSTS lebih tinggi dari pada hasil belajar pengantar bisnis mahasiswa yang diajarkan dengan model pembelajaran kooperatif tipe NHT; (2) hasil belajar pengantar bisnis mahasiswa yang memiliki gaya belajar teoritis lebih tinggi dari pada hasil belajar pengantar bisnis mahasiswa yang memiliki gaya belajar pragmatis; (3) terdapat interaksi antara model pembelajaran kooperatif dengan gaya belajar dalam mempengaruhi hasil belajar mahasiswa. Kata Kunci: model pembelajaran kooperatif, TST, NHT, gaya belajar, pengantar bisnis. Abstract: This study aims: (1) To find out the introductory learning outcomes of business students who are taught with the cooperative learning model of the TST type are higher than students who are taught with the cooperative learning model of the NHT type. (2) To find out the introductory learning outcomes of business students who have theoretical learning styles and students who have pragmatic learning styles. (3) To determine the interaction between cooperative learning models with learning styles on introductory business learning outcomes. This research was conducted at the Methodist University of Indonesia. The population is 180 people. Sampling was done by cluster random sampling. Quasi-experimental research method with 2 x 2 factorial design followed by inferential statistics using two-way ANAVA with a significant level α = 0.05 followed by the Scheffe test. The results showed: (1) the results of introductory business learning students who were taught with the cooperative learning model type TSTS were higher than the results of introductory business learning students who were taught with the NHT type cooperative learning model; (2) the results of introductory business learning students who have theoretical learning styles are higher than the results of introductory business learning students who have pragmatic learning styles; (3) there is an interaction between cooperative learning models and learning styles in influencing student learning outcomes. Keywords: cooperative learning model, TST, NHT, learning style, business introduction.

Download Full-text

Komparasi Tingkat Hasil Belajar Berdasarkan Gaya Belajar Visual, Auditorial, dan Kinestetik

ENTITA: Jurnal Pendidikan Ilmu Pengetahuan Sosial dan Ilmu-Ilmu Sosial ◽

10.19105/ejpis.v3i1.4590 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 3 (1) ◽

pp. 37-48

Author(s):

Nastiti ◽

Wahyu Rika Agustin

Keyword(s):

Social Studies ◽

Learning Styles ◽

Learning Outcomes ◽

Learning Style ◽

Visual Learning ◽

Sampling Technique ◽

Significance Level ◽

Ex Post ◽

Significant Difference ◽

Good Learning

The purpose of the study was to determine whether there was a difference between learning outcomes based on VAK learning styles (visual, auditory, kinesthetic) in Integrated Social Studies subjects for seventh grade students of SMP Negeri 1 Patianrowo. Researchers used a comparative quantitative approach with a comparative causal design or ex post facto. The population in the study were all students of class VII, amounting to 295 students and the sample was 59 students taken from class VII H and I. The sample was taken using simple random sampling technique. The study used a questionnaire and documentation as data collection instruments. While the data analysis technique used kruskal wallis. The results showed that good learning outcomes based on visual learning styles were 20%, low learning outcomes were 60%, and moderate learning outcomes were 20%. Furthermore, good learning outcomes based on auditory learning styles are 68%, low learning outcomes are 3%, and moderate learning outcomes are 29%. Finally, good kinesthetic learning outcomes are 22%, low learning outcomes are 73%, and low learning outcomes are 5%. Based on these results, it can be concluded that there is a significant difference in learning outcomes based on learning styles using the VAK learning style in Integrated Social Studies subjects class VII SMP Negeri 1 Patianrowo. This can be seen from the sig value. namely 0.000 <from the significance level of 5% (0.05).

Download Full-text

THE EFFECT OF USE MODEL MAKE A MATCH & PICTURE AND PICTURE AND STUDY LEARNING STYLE ON LEARNING RESULTS OF SOCIAL KNOWLEDGE CLASS II CLUSTER XI CIBINONG-BOGOR

Journal Civics & Social Studies ◽

10.31980/civicos.v4i1.779 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 4 (1) ◽

pp. 38-49

Author(s):

Ajat Sudrajat ◽

Marfuah Darojat

Keyword(s):

Cooperative Learning ◽

Learning Styles ◽

Learning Outcomes ◽

Learning Style ◽

Class Ii ◽

Learning Model ◽

Social Knowledge ◽

Kinesthetic Learning ◽

The Difference ◽

Knowledge Learning

This research is a quantitative research that aims to know the difference of learning result of Social Knowledge learners using learning model make a match and picture and picture; Differences in learning outcomes of Social Knowledge learners who have a tendency of visual, auditorial, and kinesthetic learning styles; And the influence of interaction between cooperative learning model and student learning style tendency toward Social Knowledge learning result. The research was conducted in Cibinong District XI Cluster with sample of students of class II of SDN Ciriung 02 ( Public School Ciriung 2) which amounted to 78 students. Instrument used in this research is questionnaire and test result of learning. Data analysis techniques in this study using Saphiro Wilk Test to test the normality of data and Bartlett Test to test the homogeneity of data. After that, two way analysis of variance (ANOVA) Test was done to test the difference of mean value between groups followed by Tukey HSD test to see group interaction with reference to significant level α = 0,05. The results showed that there was a difference between learning outcomes of IPS learners using cooperative learning model make a match and picture and picture with significance of 0,000; There are differences in learning outcomes of Social Knowledge learners who have a tendency of visual, auditorial, and kinesthetic learning styles with significance of 0,001; And there is no direct interaction effect between the use of cooperative learning model and the learner's learning style tendency toward Social Knowledge learning result. This is indicated by a significance of 0,535.Keywords : Make a Match, Picture and Picture, learning style, Social Science learning result.

Download Full-text

PENGARUH STRATEGI PEMBELAJARAN DAN GAYA BELAJAR SISWA TERHADAP HASIL BELAJAR MATEMATIKA SISWA

Jurnal Teknologi Pendidikan (JTP) ◽

10.24114/jtp.v11i1.11199 ◽

2018 ◽

Vol 11 (1) ◽

pp. 86

Author(s):

Winner Macson Pandiangan ◽

Sahat Siagian ◽

Harun Sitompul

Keyword(s):

Learning Styles ◽

Learning Outcomes ◽

Learning Strategies ◽

Learning Style ◽

Random Sampling ◽

Mathematics Learning ◽

Visual Learning ◽

Homogeneous Population ◽

Kinesthetic Learning ◽

Cluster Random Sampling

Abstrak: Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui: (1) perbedaan hasil belajar Matematika antara siswa yang dibelajarkan dengan menggunakan Strategi TGT dan Strategi Ekspositori, (2) mengetahui perbedaan hasil belajar siswa yang memiliki Gaya Belajar Kinestetik dan Gaya Berpikir Visual (3) interaksi antara penggunaan Strategi pembelajaran dan Gaya belajar dalam mempengaruhi hasil belajar Matematika siswa. Populasi penelitian ini adalah siswa kelas XI SMK Pharmaca Medan sebanyak 3 kelas dengan jumlah 122 orang. Teknik penarikan sampel dilakukan dengan cluster random sampling. Metode penelitian menggunakan metode quasi eksperimen dengan disain penelitian faktorial 2x2, sedangkan teknik analisis data menggunakan ANAVA dua jalur pada taraf signifikansi a = 0.05. Syarat ANAVA adalah data berdistribusi normal dengan Lilifors dan data harus memiliki varians populasi homogen dengan uji Bartlett dan uji Fisher. Hasil penelitian diperoleh: (1) hasil belajar Matematika siswa yang dibelajarkan dengan menggunakan Strategi Pembelajaran TGT lebih tinggi dibandingkan dengan menggunakan Strategi Ekspositori, (2) hasil belajar Matematika siswa yang memiliki Gaya belajar Kinestetik lebih tinggi dibandingkan dengan Gaya belajar Visual dan (3) terdapat interaksi antara penggunaan Strategi pembelajaran dengan Gaya belajar dalam mempengaruhi hasil belajar Matematika. Kata Kunci: strategi pembelajaran, gaya belajar, hasil belajar matematika Abstract: This study aims to determine: (1) differences in mathematics learning outcomes between students who are taught using the TGT Strategy and Expository Strategy, (2) knowing the differences in learning outcomes of students who have Kinesthetic Learning Styles and Visual Thinking Styles (3) interactions between uses Learning strategies and learning styles in influencing students' mathematics learning outcomes. The population of this study were 3 class students of Pharmaca Medan Vocational High School as many as 3 classes with a total of 122 people. The sampling technique was carried out by cluster random sampling. The research method uses a quasi-experimental method with 2x2 factorial research design, while the data analysis technique uses two-way ANOVA at a significance level a = 0.05. ANOVA requirements are normally distributed data with Lilifors and data must have homogeneous population variance with the Bartlett test and Fisher's test. The results of the study were obtained: (1) the students 'mathematics learning outcomes that were learned using the TGT Learning Strategy were higher than using the Expository Strategy, (2) the students' mathematics learning outcomes who had a Kinesthetic Learning Style were higher than the Visual learning styles and (3) there were interaction between the use of learning strategies and learning styles in influencing mathematics learning outcomes. Keywords: learning strategies, learning styles, mathematics learning outcomes

Download Full-text

Effect of Problem Based Learning (PBL) Learning Strategies and Student Learning Styles on PKn Learning Outcomes of Grade V Students of Elementary School Experimental District of Kota Medan

Budapest International Research and Critics in Linguistics and Education (BirLE) Journal ◽

10.33258/birle.v3i1.834 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 3 (1) ◽

pp. 404-410

Author(s):

Ramiyah Ramiyah ◽

Reh Bungana Beru Perangin Angin ◽

Yusnadi Yusnadi

Keyword(s):

Elementary School ◽

Learning Styles ◽

Learning Outcomes ◽

Learning Style ◽

Citizenship Education ◽

Visual Learning ◽

Mean Difference ◽

Auditory Learning ◽

Kinesthetic Learning ◽

Significant Difference

The problem in this study is the low learning achievement of Pancasila and Citizenship Education. The purpose of this study was to determine the effect of learning styles on the Learning Outcomes of Pancasila and Citizenship Education. The type of research used is a 2x2 factorial design study. The population of this study amounted to 60 students and the sample was taken as a whole from the total population of 60 people consisting of 30 from class Va and 30 from class Vb Elementary School Experiment in Medan. Data collection techniques using questionnaires (questionnaires) and tests. Data analysis techniques used product moment correlation and Statistical Product and Service Solutions (SPSS) programs. The results obtained indicate that the value of students who have a visual learning style has a difference with students who have auditory learning styles with a sig value of 0.000 and a mean difference of 4.5756. Between students who have a visual learning style, have a significant difference with students who have kinesthetic learning styles, with a sig value of 0.002 and a mean difference of 4.4940. Between students who have auditory learning styles did not have a significant difference with students who have kinesthetic learning styles, with a sig value of 0.998 and a mean difference of only 0.815. The results showed that there was a significant effect between learning styles on the learning outcomes of Pancasila and Citizenship Education in the fifth grade students of SD Negeri Experiment City Medan

Download Full-text

PENGARUH METODE PEMBELAJARAN ROLE PLAY DAN GAYA BELAJAR TERHADAP HASIL BELAJAR IPS KELAS IV SD MUHAMMADIYAH 31 HELVETIA KOTA MEDAN

Jurnal Teknologi Pendidikan (JTP) ◽

10.24114/jtp.v9i2.4903 ◽

2016 ◽

Vol 9 (2) ◽

Author(s):

Junaidi Amin Sitepu ◽

Samsidar Tanjung

Keyword(s):

Social Studies ◽

Learning Styles ◽

Learning Outcomes ◽

Learning Style ◽

Teaching Methods ◽

Visual Learning ◽

Role Play ◽

Auditory Learning ◽

Significance Level ◽

Quasi Experimental

Abstrak: Penelitian ini bertujuan untu mengetahui: (1) hasil belajar IPS siswa yang dibelajarkan dengan menggunakan metode pemelajaran role play dan hasil belajar siswa yang dibelajarkan dengan menggunakan metode ekspositori, (2) hasil belajar siswa yang memiliki gaya belajar visual, gaya belajar auditori, dan gaya belajar kinestetik, (3) interaksi antara metode pembelajaran dengan gaya belajar dalam mempengaruhi hasil belajar IPS. Metode penelitian menggunakan metode quasi eksperimen dengan rancangan faktorial 2 X 3. Teknik analisis data menggunakan analisis varians (ANAVA) dua jalur dengan taraf signifikansi 5 % (α = 0.05).. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan: (1) hasil belajar IPS siswa yang dibelajarkan dengan metode pembelajaran role play lebih tinggi dari hasil belajar IPS siswa yang dibelajarkan dengan metode pembelajaran ekspositori; (2) terdapat perbedaan hasil belajar antara siswa yang memiliki gaya belajar visual, gaya belajar auditori, dan gaya belajar kinesteti; (3) terdapat interaksi antara metode pembelajaran dan gaya belajar dalam meningkatkan hasil belajar IPS. Kata Kunci: role play dan gaya belajar terhadap hasil belajar ips Abstract: This study aims untu determine: (1) the results of social studies students that learned by using learning role play and learning outcomes of students that learned by using the expository method, (2) the learning outcomes of students who have a visual learning style, learning style auditory, and kinesthetic learning styles, (3) the interaction between the learning method with learning styles in influencing learning outcomes IPS. The research method using quasi-experimental method with factorial design 2 X 3. Data were analyzed using analysis of variance (ANOVA) two lanes with a significance level of 5% (α = 0,05) .. The results showed: (1) the results of social studies students that learned with learning methods play a higher role than the results of social studies students that learned with expository teaching methods; (2) there are differences in learning outcomes between students who have a visual learning style, auditory learning styles and learning styles kinesteti; (3) There is no interaction between teaching methods and learning styles to improve learning outcomes IPS. Keywords: role play and learning style on learning outcomes ips

Download Full-text

Eksperimentasi Model Pembelajaran STAD Berbantuan Geogebra pada Materi Similaritas Ditinjau dari Gaya Belajar

NUMERICAL Jurnal Matematika dan Pendidikan Matematika ◽

10.25217/numerical.v1i1.117 ◽

2017 ◽

pp. 1

Author(s):

Wawan Wawan

Keyword(s):

Learning Styles ◽

Learning Style ◽

Visual Learning ◽

Sampling Technique ◽

Learning Model ◽

Learning Method ◽

Learning Achievement ◽

Auditory Learning ◽

Kinesthetic Learning ◽

Achievement In Mathematics

The objective of this research was to investigate the effect of Learning model of STAD geogebra viewed from learning style. This research used the quasi experimental research method with the factorial design of 2 × 3. The population was entirely the students 4thof Mathematics Education Program Ma’arif Institute of Metro Lampung in Academic Year 2015/2016. The samples of the research were taken by using the cluster random sampling technique. The size of the sample was 50 students consisted of 26 students in the first experimental class and 24 students in the control class. The instruments to gather the data of the research were test of learning achievement in mathematics and student learning styles questionnaire. The data was analyzed by using the two-way analysis of variance with unbalanced cells. The conclusionsof thisresearchwere as follows. (1) The cooperative learning model of STAD Geogebra type resulted in a better learning achievement in mathematics than the Powerpoint-assisted direct learning model. (2) Students with visual learning style have the same achievement with students with auditory learning styles. Students with auditory learning style have the same achievement with students with kinesthetic learning styles. Students with visual learning styles have a better academic achievement than students with kinesthetic learning styles. (3) Difference in achievement of each learning method was not consistent with their respective learning styles and differences between individual learning style also was not consistent in each learning method Keywords: geogebra, power point, STAD

Download Full-text

PENGARUH PENDEKATAN SAINTIFIK DAN GAYA BELAJAR TERHADAP HASIL BELAJAR PENDIDIKAN AGAMA ISLAMDI MADRASAH TSANAWIYAH MESRAKOTA PEMATANGSIANTAR

ANSIRU PAI : Pengembangan Profesi Guru Pendidikan Agama Islam ◽

10.30821/ansiru.v3i2.5847 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 3 (2) ◽

pp. 32

Author(s):

Mul Iadi

Keyword(s):

Learning Styles ◽

Student Learning ◽

Learning Outcomes ◽

Learning Strategies ◽

Learning Style ◽

Visual Learning ◽

Student Learning Outcomes ◽

Kinesthetic Learning ◽

Significant Difference ◽

Scientific Approach

The purpose of this study was to find out: (1) differences in Akidah Akhlak learning outcomes of students taught with scientific approaches with students taught with contextual approaches, (2) differences in learning outcomes Akidah Akhlak students who have visual, auditory and kinesthetic learning styles, and (3) the influence of the scientific approach and student learning styles on the learning outcomes of Akidah Akhlak. This research method is quasi-experimental with the population of this study are students of class VII (Seven). The sample was chosen into two classes with cluster random sampling technique, in this case selected for the experimental class with a scientific approach is class VIIa with the number of students 31, while for the control class that is the contextual approach is class VIId with the number of students 34. Instruments of data collection is a questionnaire and test of learning outcomes. The technique by analysis of variance (Anava) at "α" = 0.05. The results of this study are: (1) student learning outcomes taught with scientific approach (= 33.5) higher than student learning outcomes taught with contextual approaches (= 28,7), with Fcount = 68,10> Ftable = 3.988 , (2) student learning outcomes with visual learning style (= 34.21) higher than student learning outcomes with kinesthetic learning styles (= 28.38) and auditory learning styles (= 27.69), with Fcount = 79,32 > Ftable = 3.988. And (3) there is an interaction between learning strategies and learning styles towards learning outcomes with statistical calculations known F count = 30,16> Ftable = 3.988. Further test calculations using the Scheffe test also showed a significant difference between student learning outcomes taught by the scientific approach and the contextual approach (CTL) as well as student learning outcomes with visual, auditory and kinesthetic learning styles.

Download Full-text