scholarly journals Komparasi Tingkat Hasil Belajar Berdasarkan Gaya Belajar Visual, Auditorial, dan Kinestetik

2021 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 37-48
Author(s):  
Nastiti ◽  
Wahyu Rika Agustin
Keyword(s):  
Social Studies ◽  
Learning Styles ◽  
Learning Outcomes ◽  
Learning Style ◽  
Visual Learning ◽  
Sampling Technique ◽  
Significance Level ◽  
Ex Post ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Good Learning

The purpose of the study was to determine whether there was a difference between learning outcomes based on VAK learning styles (visual, auditory, kinesthetic) in Integrated Social Studies subjects for seventh grade students of SMP Negeri 1 Patianrowo. Researchers used a comparative quantitative approach with a comparative causal design or ex post facto. The population in the study were all students of class VII, amounting to 295 students and the sample was 59 students taken from class VII H and I. The sample was taken using simple random sampling technique. The study used a questionnaire and documentation as data collection instruments. While the data analysis technique used kruskal wallis. The results showed that good learning outcomes based on visual learning styles were 20%, low learning outcomes were 60%, and moderate learning outcomes were 20%. Furthermore, good learning outcomes based on auditory learning styles are 68%, low learning outcomes are 3%, and moderate learning outcomes are 29%. Finally, good kinesthetic learning outcomes are 22%, low learning outcomes are 73%, and low learning outcomes are 5%. Based on these results, it can be concluded that there is a significant difference in learning outcomes based on learning styles using the VAK learning style in Integrated Social Studies subjects class VII SMP Negeri 1 Patianrowo. This can be seen from the sig value. namely 0.000 <from the significance level of 5% (0.05).

scholarly journals PENGARUH METODE PEMBELAJARAN ROLE PLAY DAN GAYA BELAJAR TERHADAP HASIL BELAJAR IPS KELAS IV SD MUHAMMADIYAH 31 HELVETIA KOTA MEDAN

2016 ◽  
Vol 9 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Junaidi Amin Sitepu ◽  
Samsidar Tanjung
Keyword(s):  
Social Studies ◽  
Learning Styles ◽  
Learning Outcomes ◽  
Learning Style ◽  
Teaching Methods ◽  
Visual Learning ◽  
Role Play ◽  
Auditory Learning ◽  
Significance Level ◽  
Quasi Experimental

Abstrak: Penelitian ini bertujuan untu mengetahui: (1) hasil belajar IPS siswa yang dibelajarkan dengan menggunakan metode pemelajaran role play dan hasil belajar siswa yang dibelajarkan dengan menggunakan metode ekspositori, (2) hasil belajar siswa yang memiliki gaya belajar visual, gaya belajar auditori, dan gaya belajar kinestetik, (3) interaksi antara metode pembelajaran dengan gaya belajar dalam mempengaruhi hasil belajar IPS. Metode penelitian menggunakan metode quasi eksperimen dengan rancangan faktorial 2 X 3. Teknik analisis data menggunakan analisis varians (ANAVA) dua jalur dengan taraf signifikansi 5 % (α = 0.05).. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan: (1) hasil belajar IPS siswa yang dibelajarkan dengan metode pembelajaran role play lebih tinggi dari hasil belajar IPS siswa yang dibelajarkan dengan metode pembelajaran ekspositori; (2) terdapat perbedaan hasil belajar antara siswa yang memiliki gaya belajar visual, gaya belajar auditori, dan gaya belajar kinesteti; (3) terdapat interaksi antara metode pembelajaran dan gaya belajar  dalam meningkatkan hasil belajar IPS. Kata Kunci: role play dan gaya belajar terhadap hasil belajar ips Abstract: This study aims untu determine: (1) the results of social studies students that learned by using learning role play and learning outcomes of students that learned by using the expository method, (2) the learning outcomes of students who have a visual learning style, learning style auditory, and kinesthetic learning styles, (3) the interaction between the learning method with learning styles in influencing learning outcomes IPS. The research method using quasi-experimental method with factorial design 2 X 3. Data were analyzed using analysis of variance (ANOVA) two lanes with a significance level of 5% (α = 0,05) .. The results showed: (1) the results of social studies students that learned with learning methods play a higher role than the results of social studies students that learned with expository teaching methods; (2) there are differences in learning outcomes between students who have a visual learning style, auditory learning styles and learning styles kinesteti; (3) There is no interaction between teaching methods and learning styles to improve learning outcomes IPS. Keywords: role play and learning style on learning outcomes ips

scholarly journals Pengaruh Gaya Belajar dan Sikap Siswa pada Pelajaran Matematika terhadap Hasil Belajar Matematika

2015 ◽  
Vol 3 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Leny Hartati
Keyword(s):  
Learning Styles ◽  
Learning Outcomes ◽  
Learning Style ◽  
Mathematics Learning ◽  
Visual Learning ◽  
Cognitive Learning ◽  
Negative Attitude ◽  
Math Learning ◽  
Significance Level ◽  
Learning Mathematics

<p>This study aims to determine the effect of learning styles and attitudes of <br />students in math on math learning outcomes. The method used is the method Expose Facto. The study sample drawn from a population with affordable proportional random technique, as many as 60 students. The instrument used in this study is a questionnaire instrument to measure learning style variables and variable attitudes of students in math, and test instruments, to measure the outcomes of learning mathematics. The research design used in this study is a 3 x 2 factorial design with three variables consisting of two independent variables, namely cognitive learning styles and attitudes of students in math, as well as the dependent variable, which is the result of learning mathematics. From the <br />data processing obtained the following results: (1) There are differences in mathematics learning outcomes of students who have a visual learning style, auditory and kinesthetic. It is in the show by the price of the F - count of 2,494 with a probability of 0.047 sig (sig &lt; 0.05) at significance level ? = 5 %. (2) The results of the mathematical learning of students who have a positive attitude at a higher math than students who have a negative attitude on math. It is in the show by the price of the F - count of 3,124 with a probability <br />of 0.018 sig (sig &lt; 0.05) at significance level. (3) There is no interaction between the learning styles of students in math attitudes toward math learning outcomes. It is in the show by the price of the F - calculated interaction probability value was 1.621 while sig. for interaction (learning styles * attitude of students in math) of 0.140 (sig &gt; 0.05). </p>

scholarly journals The effect of CTL learning model and learning style on the historical learning outcomes

2020 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Inda Syahra ◽  
Sarkadi Sarkadi ◽  
Nurzengky Ibrahim
Keyword(s):  
Learning Styles ◽  
Learning Outcomes ◽  
Learning Style ◽  
Visual Learning ◽  
Sampling Technique ◽  
Student Learning Outcomes ◽  
Learning Model ◽  
Learning Models ◽  
Auditory Learning ◽  
School Year

This study aims to obtain the influence of learning models and learning styles on historical learning outcomes. Students are given a CTL and conventional learning model by measuring visual learning styles and auditory learning styles. This type of research is a quantitative study using an experimental method with a 2 x 2 factorial design. The population is all students of class X 2019/2020 school year. The sampling technique used is multistage random sampling. Class X-A as an experimental class and grade X-B  as a control class with a total of 70 students construct validity is analyzed by the correlation between items using Product Moment Correlation, and Cronbach's alpha formula tested reliability. The results showed that learning outcomes with the CTL learning model were higher than conventional learning models. While student learning outcomes using visual learning styles are more effective than auditory learning styles. There is a relationship between learning models with learning styles.

scholarly journals The Effect of Value Clarification Technique Learning Models and Learning Styles on the Achievement Learning Outcomes of Class VIII MTs Al-Hasanah Tanjung Leidong, Labura District

2020 ◽  
Vol 3 (3) ◽  
pp. 1371-1377
Author(s):  
Siti Halimah ◽  
Zulfahmi Lubis ◽  
Saidatun Nisa Nasution
Keyword(s):  
Learning Styles ◽  
Student Learning ◽  
Learning Outcomes ◽  
Learning Style ◽  
Visual Learning ◽  
Sampling Technique ◽  
Learning Model ◽  
Learning Models ◽  
Average Value ◽  
Class Viii

The purpose of this study was to determine: (1) the influence of the value clarification technique (VCT) learning model on student learning result. (2) Knowing the influence of learning styles on student learning result. (3) Knowing the interaction between learning models and learning styles on student learning result.   The population of this study were students of class VIII MTs Al-Hasanah Tanjung Leidong Labuhan Batu Utara consisting of three classes. The sample chosen for the class with the VCT learning model was class VIII-3 with 30 students, while students who were taught using the expository model were 32 students. The cluster random sampling technique is influenced by analysis of variance at a significant level (α = 0.05) followed by Scheffe. The results of this study are: (1) the average value of students taught with the VCT learning model (= 33.6) is higher than students taught with the expository learning model (= 24.68) with Fcount 0.0023 < Ftable 3,988. (2) The average value of learning outcomes Akidah Akhlak with visual learning styles (= 27.5), auditory (= 29.56) and kinesthetic (= 28.26) with Fcount = 0.068 < Ftable = 3,988. (3) There is an interaction between learning models and learning styles on students' learning outcomes Akidah Akhlak with Fcount 28.96 < Ftable 3,988. Based on the data analysis, it can be concluded that students with visual and auditory characteristics, the appropriate learning model is the VCT, while students with the kinesthetic learning style are expository. The implication is that teachers must be trained in how to understand student learning styles. Thus it is suggested that in planning the learning process the characteristics of students must be considered.

scholarly journals Effect of Problem Based Learning (PBL) Learning Strategies and Student Learning Styles on PKn Learning Outcomes of Grade V Students of Elementary School Experimental District of Kota Medan

2020 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 404-410
Author(s):  
Ramiyah Ramiyah ◽  
Reh Bungana Beru Perangin Angin ◽  
Yusnadi Yusnadi
Keyword(s):  
Elementary School ◽  
Learning Styles ◽  
Learning Outcomes ◽  
Learning Style ◽  
Citizenship Education ◽  
Visual Learning ◽  
Mean Difference ◽  
Auditory Learning ◽  
Kinesthetic Learning ◽  
Significant Difference

The problem in this study is the low learning achievement of Pancasila and Citizenship Education. The purpose of this study was to determine the effect of learning styles on the Learning Outcomes of Pancasila and Citizenship Education. The type of research used is a 2x2 factorial design study. The population of this study amounted to 60 students and the sample was taken as a whole from the total population of 60 people consisting of 30 from class Va and 30 from class Vb Elementary School Experiment in Medan. Data collection techniques using questionnaires (questionnaires) and tests. Data analysis techniques used product moment correlation and Statistical Product and Service Solutions (SPSS) programs. The results obtained indicate that the value of students who have a visual learning style has a difference with students who have auditory learning styles with a sig value of 0.000 and a mean difference of 4.5756. Between students who have a visual learning style, have a significant difference with students who have kinesthetic learning styles, with a sig value of 0.002 and a mean difference of 4.4940. Between students who have auditory learning styles did not have a significant difference with students who have kinesthetic learning styles, with a sig value of 0.998 and a mean difference of only 0.815. The results showed that there was a significant effect between learning styles on the learning outcomes of Pancasila and Citizenship Education in the fifth grade students of SD Negeri Experiment City Medan

scholarly journals THE EFFECT OF LEARNING STYLES FOR ENGLISH SPEAKING SKILL

2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Abd Ghofur
Keyword(s):  
Standard Deviation ◽  
Learning Styles ◽  
Learning Style ◽  
Visual Learning ◽  
Auditory Learning ◽  
Ex Post ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Ex Post Facto ◽  
Speaking Skill ◽  
English Speaking

Everyone has a dominant learning style that allows them to easily absorb the information it receives. Thispaper is the result of a study corresponding author modalities influence students to absorb information onthe differences in the English speaking skill. This research was conducted in class X SMA N 1 Lamongan.The study design using the ex post facto with a population of 383 and the number of samples 70. The datacollection technique using questionnaires and tests the ability to speak English. Analysis using descriptiveanalysis and ANOVA one lane using parametric statistical methods. This is done because it is based on astatistical test, the normal distribution of research data and homogeneous. The results showed thatstudents who have a visual learning style as many as 32 people, with a mean of 69.56 and a standarddeviation of 12.281. Then students who have auditory learning styles as many as 20 people with a mean of66.10 with a standard deviation of 10.935. While students who have a kinesthetic learning style as manyas 18 people with a mean of 66.28 and a standard deviation of 12.942. The results of data analysis knownthat the significance value (sig.) Of 0.511. This showed that no significant difference in the Englishspeaking skill among students who have learning styles of visual, auditory and kinesthetic.

PENGARUH PENDEKATAN SAINTIFIK DAN GAYA BELAJAR TERHADAP HASIL BELAJAR PENDIDIKAN AGAMA ISLAMDI MADRASAH TSANAWIYAH MESRAKOTA PEMATANGSIANTAR

2019 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
pp. 32
Author(s):  
Mul Iadi
Keyword(s):  
Learning Styles ◽  
Student Learning ◽  
Learning Outcomes ◽  
Learning Strategies ◽  
Learning Style ◽  
Visual Learning ◽  
Student Learning Outcomes ◽  
Kinesthetic Learning ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Scientific Approach

<p>The purpose of this study was to find out: (1) differences in Akidah<br />Akhlak learning outcomes of students taught with scientific approaches<br />with students taught with contextual approaches, (2) differences in<br />learning outcomes Akidah Akhlak students who have visual, auditory and<br />kinesthetic learning styles, and (3) the influence of the scientific approach<br />and student learning styles on the learning outcomes of Akidah Akhlak.<br />This research method is quasi-experimental with the population of this<br />study are students of class VII (Seven). The sample was chosen into two<br />classes with cluster random sampling technique, in this case selected for<br />the experimental class with a scientific approach is class VIIa with the<br />number of students 31, while for the control class that is the contextual<br />approach is class VIId with the number of students 34. Instruments of data<br />collection is a questionnaire and test of learning outcomes. The technique<br />by analysis of variance (Anava) at "α" = 0.05. The results of this study are:<br />(1) student learning outcomes taught with scientific approach (= 33.5)<br />higher than student learning outcomes taught with contextual approaches<br />(= 28,7), with Fcount = 68,10&gt; Ftable = 3.988 , (2) student learning<br />outcomes with visual learning style (= 34.21) higher than student learning <br />outcomes with kinesthetic learning styles (= 28.38) and auditory learning <br />styles (= 27.69), with Fcount = 79,32 &gt; Ftable = 3.988. And (3) there is an<br />interaction between learning strategies and learning styles towards<br />learning outcomes with statistical calculations known F count = 30,16&gt;<br />Ftable = 3.988. Further test calculations using the Scheffe test also showed<br />a significant difference between student learning outcomes taught by the<br />scientific approach and the contextual approach (CTL) as well as student<br />learning outcomes with visual, auditory and kinesthetic learning styles.</p>

scholarly journals The Effect of Learning Models and Learning Styles on Social Science Learning Outcomes of Arrahman Percut Students

2020 ◽  
Vol 3 (4) ◽  
pp. 2076-2083
Author(s):  
Lili Nur Indah Sari ◽  
Abdul Muin Sibuea ◽  
Samsidar Tanjung
Keyword(s):  
Social Studies ◽  
Learning Styles ◽  
Learning Outcomes ◽  
Learning Style ◽  
Visual Learning ◽  
Problem Based Learning ◽  
Learning Model ◽  
Learning Models ◽  
Kinesthetic Learning ◽  
The Social

This study aims (1) to determine the differences in social studies learning outcomes taught by the Two Stay Two Stray (TSTS) learning model which is higher than the social studies learning outcomes with the Problem Based Learning model. (2) To find out the differences in social studies learning outcomes of students who have a higher visual learning style than the social studies learning outcomes of students who have a kinesthetic learning style. (3) To determine the interaction between learning models and student learning styles in influencing the social studies learning outcomes of private students, Ar Rahman Percut. The population of this study was 122 students of class VII-A and VII-B of Ar Rahman Percut Private Middle School. Samples were taken by cluster rondom sampling. The sample used in this study was 63 students. The selected sample is classVII-A and class VII-B. The instrument used was a multiple choice test, amounting to 30 items and a learning style questionnaire. The data were analyzed at the significant level = 0.05, followed by the Scheffe further test after the normality and homogeneity tests. The results showed that, (1) There are differences in social studies learning outcomes, where the social studies learning outcomes with the Two Stay Two Stray (TSTS) learning model are higher than the social studies learning outcomes with the Problem Based Learning model with Fcount 8,70> Ftable 4.00, (2) There are differences in student social studies learning outcomes, where the social studies learning outcomes of students who have a visual learning style from the social studies learning outcomes of students who have a kinesthetic learning style with Fcount 5.01> Ftable 4.00, (3) There is an interaction between the learning model and the learning style of the students' social studies learning outcomes Fcount 5.20> Ftable 4.00

PENGARUH STRATEGI PEMBELAJARAN DAN GAYA BELAJAR TERHADAP HASIL BELAJAR FISIKA

2017 ◽  
Vol 10 (2) ◽  
pp. 114
Author(s):  
Abdul Halim
Keyword(s):  
Cooperative Learning ◽  
Learning Styles ◽  
Learning Outcomes ◽  
Learning Strategies ◽  
Learning Style ◽  
Learning Strategy ◽  
Visual Learning ◽  
Homogeneity Test ◽  
Physics Learning ◽  
Significance Level

Abstrak: Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui pengaruh strategi pembelajaran kooperatif tipe STAD dan strategi pembelajaran kooperatif tipe TPS terhadap hasil belajar fisika, pengaruh gaya belajar terhadap hasil belajar fisika, dan interaksi antara strategi pembelajaran dan gaya belajar tehadap hasil belajar fisika. Metode quasi eksperimen dan desain faktorial 2x3 pada taraf signifikansi α=5%. Sebelum uji lanjut dengan uji Scheffe dilakukan uji normalitas Lilifors serta uji homogenitas menggunakan uji F dan uji Barlett. Temuan penelitian ini menunjukkan ada pengaruh strategi pembelajaran terhadap hasil belajar fisika. Hasil belajar fisika siswa yang diajar dengan strategi pembelajaran kooperatif tipe STAD lebih tinggi dari pada hasil belajar fisika siswa yang diajar dengan strategi pembelajaran kooperatif tipe TPS. Ada pengaruh gaya belajar terhadap hasil belajar fisika. Siswa yang memiliki kecenderungan gaya belajar auditorial memperoleh hasil belajar fisika lebih tinggi dibandingkan hasil belajar fisika siswa yang memiliki kecenderungan gaya belajar visual dan gaya belajar kinestetik. Serta terdapat interaksi antara strategi pembelajaran dan gaya belajar terhadap hasil belajar fisika siswa.  Kata Kunci: strategi pembelajaran, gaya belajar, hasil belajar fisika Abstract: This study aims to determine the effect of STAD type cooperative learning strategies and cooperative learning strategies of TPS type to the results of physics learning, the influence of learning styles on the learning outcomes of physics, and the interaction between learning strategies and learning styles tehadap the results of physics learning. Method of quasi experiment and 2x3 factorial design at significance level α = 5%. Before the advanced test with Scheffe test is done Lilifors normality test and homogeneity test using F test and Barlett test. The findings of this study indicate that there is an influence of learning strategies on physics learning outcomes. The result of student physics learning taught by STAD type cooperative learning strategy is higher than the students' physics learning result which is taught by cooperative learning strategy of TPS type. There is an influence of learning styles on the learning outcomes of physics. Students who have a tendency of auditorial learning style to obtain the results of physics learning is higher than the results of physics learning students who have a tendency of visual learning style and kinesthetic learning style. And there is an interaction between learning strategies and learning styles to student physics learning outcomes. Keywords: learning strategies, learning styles, physics learning outcomes

scholarly journals PENGARUH STRATEGI PEMBELAJARAN DAN GAYA BELAJAR TERHADAP HASIL BELAJAR MENGGAMBAR TEKNIK

2017 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Novidawaty Tambunan
Keyword(s):  
Learning Styles ◽  
Learning Outcomes ◽  
Learning Strategies ◽  
Learning Style ◽  
Learning Strategy ◽  
Visual Learning ◽  
Map Learning ◽  
Significance Level ◽  
Quasi Experimental ◽  
Drawing Technique

Abstrak: Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui: (1) Perbedaan hasil belajar Menggambar teknik 1 antara siswa yang diajar dengan strategi pembelajaran Mind Map dan strategi pembelajaran ekspositori, (2) Perbedaan hasil belajar Menggambar teknik 1 antara siswa yang memiliki gaya belajar visual dengan kinestetik, (3) interaksi antara strategi pembelajaran dan gaya belajar terhadap hasil belajar Menggambar teknik 1. Metode penelitian yang menggunakan metode quasi eksperimen dengan desain penelitian faktorial 2 x 2. Teknik analisis data menggunakan ANAVA dua jalur pada taraf signifikansi α = 0,05. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa: (1) hasil belajar Menggambar teknik 1 siswa yang diajar dengan strategi pembelajaran Mind Map, lebih tinggi dari pada strategi pembelajaran ekspositori; (2) hasil belajar Menggambar teknik 1 siswa yang memiliki gaya belajar Kinestetik lebih tinggi daripada gaya belajar Visual; (3) terdapat interaksi antara strategi pembelajaran dan gaya belajar terhadap hasil belajar Menggambar teknik 1. Kata Kunci: strategi pembelajaran, gaya belajar, menggambar teknik Abstract: This study aims to determine: (1) Differences in learning outcomes Drawing techniques 1 between students taught with Mind Map learning strategies and expository learning strategies, (2) Differences in learning outcomes Drawing techniques 1 between students who have visual learning styles with kinestetik, (3) interaction between learning strategy and learning style to learning result Drawing technique 1. Method research using quasi experimental method with 2 x factorial research designs 2. Data analysis technique using two-way ANOVA at significance level α = 0,05. The results showed that: (1) learning result Drawing technique 1 students taught by Mind Map learning strategy, higher than expository learning strategy; (2) learning outcomes Drawing techniques 1 students who have a higher learning style Kinesthetic than Visual learning style; (3) there is an interaction between learning strategies and learning styles on learning outcomes Drawing technique 1. Keywords: learning strategy, learning style, drawing technique

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document