scholarly journals Breast Conservation in Breast Cancer: A Bangladesh Experience

2019 ◽  
Vol 19 (2) ◽  
pp. 55-60
Author(s):  
Parveen shahida Akhtar ◽  
Syeeda Hasina Azam ◽  
Syed Khalid Hasan ◽  
Zafor Mohammad Masud ◽  
Nazrina Khatun ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Local Recurrence ◽  
Hormone Therapy ◽  
Distant Metastasis ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Breast Conserving Surgery ◽  
Breast Conserving Treatment ◽  
Free Survival

Background: Breast cancer is one of the most common cancers in Bangladeshi women. Breast sacrificing treatment is still now the common practice in our country. Now a day’s breast conservative treatment is the standard treatment of breast cancer without compromising the survival. Objective: To observe local recurrence and distant metastasis free survival and overall survival of patients with breast cancer. Methods: Between January 1996 and December 2010, breast conserving treatment was carried out in 237 female patients with breast cancer in different Institutions of Bangladesh. Clinical staging was recorded by physical examination, relevant investigations as well as surgical records. Revised breast conserving surgery was carried out in those who had positive surgical margins or palpable disease. The patients with large but operable cancer or locally advanced cancer were treated by neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by breast conserving surgery. Systemic adjuvant therapy (chemotherapy and or hormone therapy) and adjuvant radiotherapy were given in all patients. After completion of treatment, the patients were followed up with a standard protocol and data were compiled and analysed. Results: Among 237 patients who underwent breast conserving therapy 13 patients were excluded from the study for various reasons. Total 224 female patients with breast cancer who followed all the treatment schedules and attended for regular follow up were included in the study. They were between 22- 74 years of age, mean age 42.35 years; premenopausal 152 (68%). Sixty five percent (146 patients) was localized cancer (T1-2N0M0), 31.6% was regional cancer (T1-3N1M0), five cases were locally advanced stage (T4bN12M0) and two metastastatic cancer (T2-3N1M1).  All most all (98%) were Infiltrating duct cell carcinoma except four which were Intraductal carcinoma in situ (IDIS).  Estrogen and progesterone receptors were positive in 57% , HER2 positive (+++) in 24% of Patients. Lumpectomy/quandrentectomy with/without axillary clearance was done in 158 patients, revised breast conserving surgery in 53 cases, mastectomy in 8 cases and only biopsy done but no surgical treatment in five cases.Chemotherapy was given in 192 patients (86%); adjuvant 122 cases and neoadjuvant 70 cases. Hormone therapy in 182 patients. Radiotherapy: in 222 cases. Follow up period  was 4 years  to 19 years, median 10 years. Overall survival (OS) and disease free survival (DFS) was 84% and 70% respectively. Local recurrence occurred in 14(6%) cases and distant metastasis in 54 cases (24%). Conclusion: Breast conserving treatment was satisfactory for appropriate case selection and optimized therapy. Survival was no way worse than breast sacrificing treatment. Journal of Surgical Sciences (2015) Vol. 19 (2) : 55-60

Intraoperative versus external beam boost for breast cancer: A matched-pair analysis.

2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 1120-1120 ◽  
Author(s):  
Elena Sperk ◽  
Daniela Astor ◽  
Grit Welzel ◽  
Axel Gerhardt ◽  
Marc Suetterlin ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Local Recurrence ◽  
Breast Conserving Surgery ◽  
Matched Pair ◽  
Recurrence Free Survival ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Matched Pair Analysis ◽  
Pair Analysis ◽  
Local Recurrence Free Survival

1120 Background: After breast conserving surgery, radiotherapy leads to a better overall survival. In addition to whole breast radiotherapy (WBRT) a boost to the tumor bed leads to a better local control. The tumor bed boost is usually added after WBRT or can be done intraoperative (IORT). Belletti et al. (Clin Cancer Res., 2008) described positive effects, an antitumoral effect and modulation of microenvironment after IORT with 50kV x-rays. A matched pair analysis was performed to investigate the impact of IORT boost on overall survival compared to standard external beam boost. Methods: Between 2002 – 2009, 370 patients were treated for breast cancer with WBRT + boost (external beam (EBRT) boost n = 146, IORT boost n =224). A matched pair analysis (1:1 propensity score matching for age, TNM, grading, hormonal treatment and chemotherapy) for overall survival and local recurrence free survival could be done for 53 pairs. All patients underwent breast conserving surgery and WBRT with 46-50Gy. 53 patients received an EBRT boost with 16Gy (2Gy/fraction, dedicated linear accelerator) and 53 patients received an IORT boost with 20Gy (INTRABEAM system, 50kV x-rays). Median follow-up was 6 months (range, 1-77 months) for the EBRT boost patients and 56 months (range, 2-97 months) for IORT boost patients. Kaplan Meier estimates were performed for overall survival and local recurrence free survival. Results: IORT boost patients had a longer follow-up than EBRT boost patients. Despite the difference in follow-up times, there was a strong trend towards better overall survival after IORT boost (90.2% vs. 62.3%, p = 0.375). One local recurrence was present in each group (EBRT boost after 15 months, local recurrence free survival 95%; IORT boost after 12 months, local recurrence free survival 98.1%). Conclusions: IORT given as a boost seems to have a positive impact on overall survival in breast cancer patients after breast conserving surgery. To identify such an effect a prospective randomized trial should be conducted.

Single-center experiences of neoadjuvant systemic therapy in breast cancer: Individualization of the treatment

2009 ◽  
Vol 27 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e11628-e11628
Author(s):  
M. Gumus ◽  
B. O. Ustaalioglu ◽  
M. Seker ◽  
A. Bilici ◽  
T. Salman ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Survival Rate ◽  
Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy ◽  
Distant Metastasis ◽  
Locally Advanced Breast Cancer ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Disease Free Survival ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Disease Free

e11628 Background: Neoadjuvant chemotherapy is one of the standard treatment options for patients with locally advanced breast cancer for twenty five years. In this study, we evaluate results of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer patients. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 68 patients with locally advanced breast cancer. Anthracycline/taxane-based chemotherapy regimens were prescribed mostly for neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Before chemotherapy was given, patients were examined for distant metastasis by radiologic methods thereafter if patient had distant metastasis, they were excluded. Patients with breast cancer received neoadjuvant chemotherapy were analyzed according to age, menopausal status, type of surgery, response to the treatment, histopathological properties and survival. After 3 to 6 cycle of chemotherapy patients were reevaluated by clinically and radiologically for response. Surgery was performed for appropriate patient thereafter adjuvant locoregional and systemic chemotherapy were continued. Results: Median age was 47 (29–43) years. 17,6 % of them were younger than 35 years and 42,6 % were premenopausal. Median follow-up time was 19 month. After 3 to 6 cycle of neoadjuvant chemotherapy 64 of patients responded to therapy (94,1 %). Breast conserving surgery was performed for 15,6 % patients. In histopathologic analysis most of patients were invasive ductal carcinoma and there was lymph node invasion for 84,9 %. Estrogen and progesterone receptor status were negative for 18,6 % of patients and cerbB2 was positive for 14,8 % of patients. Median disease free survival time was 44 month (SE: 9; 95% CI: 25–62) but median overall survival time could not be reached. Three years disease free survival rate and overall survival rate were 55,3% and 90,1% respectively. According to Cox regression analyses; we did not find any demographic and pathologic characteristic of breast cancer that is related to prognosis. Conclusions: In recent years neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer is increasingly being used for early stage disease. Further study will be facilitated establishment of guidelines for preselecting patients for neoadjuvant chemotherapy and will provide beneficial effect on treatment option and survival. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

scholarly journals Saving the Breast Saves the Lives of Breast Cancer Patients

2020 ◽  
Vol 2020 ◽  
pp. 1-8 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mohammad Esmaeil Akbari ◽  
Maryam Khayamzadeh ◽  
Hamid Reza Mirzaei ◽  
Afshin Moradi ◽  
Atieh Akbari ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Disease Free Survival ◽  
Breast Conserving Surgery ◽  
Breast Conserving Therapy ◽  
Breast Cancer Patients ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Disease Free

Introduction. Surgery has been known as the procedure of choice for breast cancer management since 1700 years before Christ. Nowadays, breast-conserving surgery and mastectomy are performed in selected cases with specific clinical criteria. Here, we compare these two procedures for breast cancer patients with variable features in Cancer Research Center, Tehran, as a single institution experience. Methods. In this 25-year follow-up retrospective cohort study, we identified breast cancer patients who had undergone breast-conserving therapy or mastectomy. Disease-free survival and overall survival were evaluated using Kaplan–Meier survival analysis and the log-rank test between the two groups. A p value less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results. A total of 3358 breast cancer patients, including 61% breast-conserving therapy and 39% mastectomy cases were identified, with a mean follow-up time of 94 months. The overall survival and disease-free survival of all cases were significantly better in breast-conserved patients, particularly in early-stage breast cancer with favorable clinical, pathological, and biological features. Ten-year disease-free survival and overall survival in breast-conserving therapy and mastectomy cases were 74%, 88% and 58%, 80%, respectively. Conclusion. Breast-conserving surgery and radiation therapy prove to be an appropriate treatment option for breast cancer patients in terms of overall survival and disease-free survival when indicated.

scholarly journals Breast Cancer Outcomes Following Immediate Breast Reconstruction with Implants Versus Autologous Flaps: A Propensity Score-Matched Study

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zhen-Yu Wu ◽  
Jing Han ◽  
Hee Jeong Kim ◽  
Jong Won Lee ◽  
Il Yong Chung ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Local Recurrence ◽  
Propensity Score ◽  
Breast Reconstruction ◽  
Distant Metastasis ◽  
Immediate Breast Reconstruction ◽  
Hazard Ratio ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Breast Cancer Outcomes

Abstract Purpose A large proportion of patients with breast cancer who had mastectomy had undergone breast reconstruction with implants or autologous flaps. However, only a few studies have compared the breast cancer outcomes between the implant-based reconstruction (IBR) and autologous flap reconstruction (AFR). In this study, we retrospectively compared the local recurrence rates, distant metastasis rates, and survival outcomes between immediate IBR and AFR. Methods A total of 1530 patients with primary breast cancer who underwent IBR or AFR with nipple-/skin-sparing mastectomy were included. Patients who underwent neoadjuvant systemic therapy were excluded from the study. After propensity score matching by age at diagnosis, T stage, N stage, molecular subtype, mastectomy type, adjuvant radiotherapy status, and follow-up period, 938 patients were 1:1 matched, comprising the well-balanced IBR and AFR groups. Locoregional recurrence-free survival (LRRFS), disease-free survival (DFS), distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS), and breast cancer-specific survival (BCSS) were compared between the matched groups. Results After matching, the median follow-up periods were 68 months and 71 months for the IBR and AFR groups, respectively. No significant differences were observed between the IBR and AFR groups regarding the local recurrence (7.2% vs. 5.1%; P = 0.175), regional recurrence (2.1% vs. 1.5%; P = 0.463), or distant metastasis (3.2% vs. 3.2%; P = 1.000) rates. Moreover, no significant difference was observed between the IBR and AFR groups in the LRRFS (hazard ratio, 0.691; 95% CI, 0.433–1.102; P = 0.118), DFS (hazard ratio, 0.709; 95% CI, 0.468–1.076; P = 0.104), DMFS (hazard ratio, 1.006; 95% CI, 0.491–2.059; P = 0.987), or BCSS (hazard ratio, 0.445; 95% CI, 0.111–1.786; P = 0.659). Conclusion In this propensity score-matched analysis of oncologic outcomes in patients with primary breast cancer who underwent immediate breast reconstruction with nipple-/skin-sparing mastectomy, no significant differences were observed between the IBR and AFR groups.

scholarly journals Locally Advanced Breast Cancer (LABC): Real-World Outcome of Patients From Cancer Institute, Chennai

2021 ◽  
pp. 767-781
Author(s):  
Manikandan Dhanushkodi ◽  
Velusamy Sridevi ◽  
Viswanathan Shanta ◽  
Ranganathan Rama ◽  
Rajaraman Swaminathan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy ◽  
Triple Negative Breast Cancer ◽  
Tumor Size ◽  
Triple Negative ◽  
Locally Advanced Breast Cancer ◽  
Locally Advanced

PURPOSE There are sparse data on the outcome of patients with locally advanced breast cancer (LABC). This report is on the prognostic factors and long-term outcome from Cancer Institute, Chennai. METHODS This is an analysis of untreated patients with LABC (stages IIIA-C) who were treated from January 2006 to December 2013. RESULTS Of the 4,577 patients with breast cancer who were treated, 2,137 patients (47%) with LABC were included for analysis. The median follow-up was 75 months (range, 1-170 months), and 2.3% (n = 49) were lost to follow-up at 5 years. The initial treatment was neoadjuvant concurrent chemoradiation (NACR) (77%), neoadjuvant chemotherapy (15%), or others (8%). Patients with triple-negative breast cancer had a pathologic complete response (PCR) of 41%. The 10-year overall survival was for stage IIIA (65.1%), stage IIIB (41.2%), and stage IIIC (26.7%). Recurrence of cancer was observed in 27% of patients (local 13% and distant 87%). Multivariate analysis showed that patients with a tumor size > 10 cm (hazard ratio [HR], 2.19; 95% CI, 1.62 to 2.98; P = .001), hormone receptor negativity (HR, 1.45; 95% CI, 1.22 to 1.72; P = .001), treatment modality (neoadjuvant chemotherapy, HR, 0.56; 95% CI, 0.43 to 0.73; P = .001), lack of PCR (HR, 2.36; 95% CI, 1.85 to 3.02; P = .001), and the presence of lymphovascular invasion (HR, 1.97; 95% CI, 1.60 to 2.44; P = .001) had decreased overall survival. CONCLUSION NACR was feasible in inoperable LABC and gave satisfactory long-term survival. PCR was significantly higher in patients with triple-negative breast cancer. The tumor size > 10 cm was significantly associated with inferior survival. However, this report acknowledges the limitations inherent in experience of management of LABC from a single center.

scholarly journals Improved Overall Survival and Decreased Metastasis With Adjuvant 5-Fluorouracil and Platinum Chemotherapy After Definitive Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy for N3 Nasopharyngeal Cancer: A Registry-Based Analysis

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mu-Hung Tsai ◽  
Shang-Yin Wu ◽  
Tsung Yu ◽  
Sen-Tien Tsai ◽  
Yuan-Hua Wu
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Prognostic Factors ◽  
Adjuvant Chemotherapy ◽  
Distant Metastasis ◽  
Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Nasopharyngeal Cancer ◽  
Disease Free Survival ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Risk Of Death

Abstract Background and purpose Concurrent chemoradiotherapy is the established treatment for locally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC). However, there is no evidence supporting routine adjuvant chemotherapy. We aimed to demonstrate the effect of adjuvant chemotherapy on survival and distant metastasis in high-risk N3 NPC patients. Materials and methods We linked the Taiwan Cancer Registry and Cause of Death database to obtain data. Clinical N3 NPC patients were divided as those receiving definitive concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) with adjuvant 5-fluorouracil and platinum (PF) chemotherapy and those receiving no chemotherapy after CCRT. Patients receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy were excluded. We compared overall survival, disease-free survival, local control, and distant metastasis in both groups using Cox proportional hazards regression analysis. Results We included 431 patients (152 and 279 patients in the adjuvant PF and observation groups, respectively). Median follow-up was 4.3 years. The 5-year overall survival were 69.1% and 57.4% in the adjuvant PF chemotherapy and observation groups, respectively (p = 0.02). Adjuvant PF chemotherapy was associated with a lower risk of death (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.61, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.43–0.84; p = 0.003), even after adjusting for baseline prognostic factors (HR = 0.61, 95% CI: 0.43–0.86; p = 0.005). Distant metastasis-free survival at 12 months was higher in the adjuvant PF chemotherapy group than in the observation group (98% vs 84.8%; p < 0.001). After adjusting for baseline prognostic factors, adjuvant PF chemotherapy was associated with freedom from distant metastasis (HR = 0.11, 95% CI: 0.02–0.46; p = 0.003). Conclusion Prospective evaluation of adjuvant PF chemotherapy in N3 NPC patients treated with definitive CCRT is warranted because adjuvant PF chemotherapy was associated with improved overall survival and decreased risk of distant metastasis.

scholarly journals Association of Cardiovascular Risk Factors With Cardiac Events and Survival Outcomes Among Patients With Breast Cancer Enrolled in SWOG Clinical Trials

2018 ◽  
Vol 36 (26) ◽  
pp. 2710-2717 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dawn L. Hershman ◽  
Cathee Till ◽  
Sherry Shen ◽  
Jason D. Wright ◽  
Scott D. Ramsey ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Risk Factors ◽  
Cardiovascular Disease ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Clinical Trials ◽  
Survival Outcomes ◽  
Cardiac Events ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Increased Risk

Background Cardiovascular disease is the primary cause of death among patients with breast cancer. However, the association of cardiovascular-disease risk factors (CVD-RFs) with long-term survival and cardiac events is not well studied. Methods We examined SWOG (formerly the Southwest Oncology Group) breast cancer trials from 1999 to 2011. We identified baseline diabetes, hypertension, hypercholesterolemia, and coronary artery disease by linking trial records to Medicare claims. The primary outcome was overall survival. Patients with both baseline and follow-up claims were examined for cardiac events. Cox regression was used to assess the association between CVD-RFs and outcomes. Results We identified 1,460 participants older than 66 years of age from five trials; 842 were eligible for survival outcomes analysis. At baseline, median age was 70 years, and median follow-up was 6 years. Hypertension (73%) and hypercholesterolemia (57%) were the most prevalent conditions; 87% of patients had one or more CVD-RF. There was no association between any of the individual CVD-RFs and overall survival except for hypercholesterolemia, which was associated with improved overall survival (hazard ratio [HR], 0.73; 95% CI, 0.57 to 0.93; P = .01). With each additional CVD-RF, there was an increased risk of death (HR, 1.23; 95% CI, 1.08 to 1.40; P = .002), worse progression-free survival (HR, 1.12; 95% CI, 1.00 to 1.25; P = .05), and marginally worse cancer-free survival (HR, 1.15; 95% CI, 0.99 to 1.34; P = .07). The relationship between baseline CVD-RFs and cardiac events was analyzed in 736 patients. A strong linear association between the number of CVD-RFs and cardiac event was observed (HR per CVD-RF, 1.41; 95% CI, 1.17 to 1.69; P < .001). Conclusion Among participants in clinical trials, each additional baseline CVD-RF was associated with an increased risk of cardiac events and death. Efforts to improve control of modifiable CVD-RFs are needed, especially among those with multiple risk factors.

5-Year Results of Dose-Intensive Sequential Adjuvant Chemotherapy for Women With High-Risk Node-Positive Breast Cancer: A Phase II Study

1999 ◽  
Vol 17 (4) ◽  
pp. 1118-1118 ◽  
Author(s):  
C. Hudis ◽  
M. Fornier ◽  
L. Riccio ◽  
D. Lebwohl ◽  
J. Crown ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Pilot Study ◽  
Adjuvant Chemotherapy ◽  
Disease Free Survival ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Dose Dense ◽  
Disease Free

PURPOSE: We conducted a phase II pilot study of dose-intensive adjuvant chemotherapy with doxorubicin followed sequentially by high-dose cyclophosphamide to determine the safety and feasibility of this dose-dense treatment and to estimate the disease-free and overall survival in breast cancer patients with four or more involved axillary lymph nodes. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Seventy-three patients received adjuvant treatment with four cycles of doxorubicin 75 mg/m2 as an intravenous bolus every 21 days, followed by three cycles of cyclophosphamide 3,000 mg/m2 every 14 days with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor support. RESULTS: Seventy-one patients were assessable, and all but two completed all planned chemotherapy. There was no treatment-related mortality. The most common toxicity was neutropenic fever, which occurred in 39% of patients. Median disease-free survival is 66 months (95% confidence interval, 34 to 98 months), and median overall survival has not yet been reached. At 5 years of follow-up, the disease-free survival is 51.7%, and overall survival is 60.0%. There is no long-term treatment-related toxicity, and no cases of acute myelogenous leukemia or myelodysplastic syndrome have been observed. CONCLUSION: Our pilot study of doxorubicin followed by cyclophosphamide demonstrates the safety and feasibility of the sequential dose-dense plan. Long-term follow-up, although noncomparative, is promising. However, this regimen is associated with a higher incidence of toxicity (and also higher costs) than the standard dose and schedule of doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide, and therefore it should not be used as conventional therapy in the absence of demonstrated improvement of outcome. Randomized trials testing the dose-dense approach have been completed but not yet reported. Because the sequential plan can decrease overlapping toxicities, it is an appropriate platform for the addition of newer active agents, such as taxanes or monoclonal antibodies.

scholarly journals Detection of local recurrence following breast-conserving treatment in young women with early breast cancer: Optimization of long-term follow-up strategies

The Breast ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 22 (3) ◽  
pp. 351-356 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maurice J.C. van der Sangen ◽  
Sanne W.M. Scheepers ◽  
Philip M.P. Poortmans ◽  
Ernest J.T. Luiten ◽  
Grard A.P. Nieuwenhuijzen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Local Recurrence ◽  
Early Breast Cancer ◽  
Young Women ◽  
Breast Conserving Treatment ◽  
Long Term Follow Up

Imatinib mesylate therapy in advanced gastrointestinal stromal tumors—A Regional cancer centre experience

2006 ◽  
Vol 24 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 19505-19505
Author(s):  
K. M. Patel ◽  
P. M. Shah ◽  
S. N. Shukla ◽  
B. J. Parikh ◽  
A. S. Anand ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Local Recurrence ◽  
Imatinib Mesylate ◽  
Metastatic Disease ◽  
Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Stromal Tumors ◽  
Post Surgery

19505 Background: The treatment of gastrointestinal stromal tumors has been revolutionised by the advent of Imatinib, a specific tyrosine kinase inhibitor. Post operative local and metastatic recurrences of this tumor have been effectively managed by Imatinib. Here we present our experience of Imatinib in recurrent locally advanced/metastatic gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GIST). Methods: From Nov 2001 to Sep 2005, 33 patients with metastatic and / or locally advanced inoperable CD-117 positive GIST were offered imatinib mesylate therapy at 400 mg/day p.o. A total of 21 patients were evaluable for tumor response. Follow up period ranged from 4 months to 38 months with median follow up period being 18 months. Median age is 58 yrs, M:F ratio is 6:4. ECOG performance status was 0–1 in 70% (23 patients) and 2 in 30% (10 patients). 70% patients had post surgery recurrence. 2 patients (6%) had received adjuvant chemotherapy prior to recurrence. 30% (10 patients) had local recurrence, 40% (13 patients) had metastatic disease while 30% (10 patients) had local recurrence as well as metastatic disease. Results: Response evaluation was done by RECIST criteria. 15% (5 patient) showed CR while PR rates were 30% (10 patients). The overall major response (CR+PR) was 45%. The overall progression free survival was as high as 80%. All the patients who had a progression free survival also had a significant improvement in quality of life. Conclusions: Imatinib mesylate therapy shows significant survival benefits in locally advanced inoperable/metatstatic gastrointestinal stromal tumors. It will be a very long time before PET scan for evaluation and follow up becomes feasible in developing country setting. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document