scholarly journals Patents and licensing in pharmaceutical industry

2015 ◽  
Vol 61 (01) ◽  
pp. 51-59
Author(s):  
Katerina Ancevska Netkovska ◽  
Jasmina Tonic Ribarska ◽  
Aleksandra Grozdanova ◽  
Zoran Sterjev
Keyword(s):  
Intellectual Property ◽  
Pharmaceutical Industry ◽  
Property Rights ◽  
Management Style ◽  
Industrial Property ◽  
Know How ◽  
Patent License ◽  
License Agreements ◽  
The Status ◽  
The Right

Intellectual property rights (IPR) have been defined as ideas, inventions, and creative expressions based on which there is a public willingness to bestow the status of property. IPR provide certain exclusive rights to the inventors or creators of that property, in order to enable them to reap commercial benefits from their creative efforts or reputation. There are several types of intellectual property protection like patent, copyright, trademark, etc. Patent is recognition for an invention, which satisfies the criteria of global novelty, non-obviousness, and industrial application. IPR is prerequisite for better identification, planning, commercialization, rendering, and thereby protection of invention or creativity. Each industry should evolve its own IPR policies, management style, strategies, and so on depending on its area of specialty. Pharmaceutical industry currently has an evolving IPR strategy requiring a better focus and approach in the coming era. The protection of inventions with patents in the pharmaceutical industry have a specific role in the development of society and represent one of the drivers of economic development. The license agreements are considered as one of the most common types of transfer of industrial property rights. The right holders often transfer their rights to patents by concluding licensing agreement. While the patent license may give the license a right to use the technology many license agreements have provisions for the transfer of know-how in addition to the patent.

Rhetorics of Power and Development: Intellectual Property Rights and The Pharmaceutical Industry in Brazil

2007 ◽  
Vol 6 (4) ◽  
pp. 585-610 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ariane McCabe
Keyword(s):  
Developing Countries ◽  
Intellectual Property ◽  
Pharmaceutical Industry ◽  
Property Rights ◽  
Intellectual Property Rights ◽  
Regulatory Framework ◽  
Property Law ◽  
Industrial Property ◽  
Rights Discourse

AbstractThis paper examines the rise of an intellectual property (IP) rights discourse and highlights how it has been translated into national IP regimes. Recently, IP has become a polarizing concept, and attention has focused on questions that are overly narrow in scope. The characterization of the issue in simplistic dichotomous terms has ignored complex realities of developing countries. The case of Brazil is to highlights the complex ways in which the local pharmaceutical industry has been shaped by and has responded to the regulatory framework that has been established since and including the passage of the 1996 Industrial Property Law.

scholarly journals HISTORICAL EXPERIENCE OF INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY REGULATION IN GALICIA AS A PART OF AUSTRIA AND AUSTRO-HUNGARY (1772–1918)

2021 ◽  
Vol 77 (4) ◽  
pp. 23-29
Author(s):  
Ihor Boiko ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Intellectual Property ◽  
Property Rights ◽  
Legal Regulation ◽  
Civil Code ◽  
Industrial Property ◽  
Historical Experience ◽  
Definition Of ◽  
The Right ◽  
First Time ◽  
Right Of Reproduction

The article analyzes the features of the legal regulation of intellectual property in Ukraine, in particular in the Ukrainian lands of Austria and Austria-Hungary (1772-1918). The author shows that the main source of legal regulation of civil relations, in particular intellectual property, in Galicia as part of Austria and Austria-Hungary (1772–1918) was the Austrian Civil Code of 1811. Property rights under the Austrian Civil Code of 1811 were the right of ownership, the right of possession, the right to pledge, and easements. The author highlights that things were divided into corporeal, disembodied, movable and immovable, used and unused, with price and without price. The bodily things were those perceived by the sense organs. Disembodied things included, first of all, property rights - the right to fish, hunt, and so on. It is shown that in the Austrian Empire for the first time the provisions on the legal regulation of intellectual property were provided for in the Civil Code of 1811 (Articles 1164‒1170). The author shows that the Austrian legal acts of 1846 for the first time regulated the free use of works, including the right of translation, citation. According to the law of 1846, the artist had to reserve the right of reproduction and exercise it for 2 years under the threat of losing his rights. It is emphasized that the presence of Western Ukrainian lands in the Austro-Hungarian monarchy, in comparison with the previous period of the Commonwealth, contributed to the spiritual progress of the Ukrainian nation, intensified cultural and artistic processes in Ukrainian lands. The author reveals that an important and new normative act in the field of intellectual property regulation was the Austrian Copyright Act for works of literature, art and photography, adopted on December 26, 1895. Attention is focused on the fact that the development of industrial property rights was carried out under the influence of economic development, which in the western Ukrainian lands as part of Austria was slower than in the economically developed regions of Austria, and thus - Austria-Hungary. It is concluded that the development of legal regulation of intellectual property in Galicia as part of Austria and Austria-Hungary (1772-1918) formed a certain experience, which was characterized by the specification of objects, subjects, the definition of intellectual property, the consolidation of copyright and their defense in court.

AGREEMENTS ON THE DISPOSAL OF PROPERTY RIGHTS TO THE OBJECTS OF PATENT LAW AND «KNOW-HOW»: NEWS OF LEGISLATION

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Juliia Kanaryk ◽  
◽  
Vladyslav Nosinskyi ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Intellectual Property ◽  
Property Rights ◽  
Intellectual Property Rights ◽  
Patent Protection ◽  
Patent Law ◽  
Compulsory Licensing ◽  
Real Cost ◽  
Know How ◽  
Cost Of Drugs ◽  
The Right

The article is devoted to the review of novelties of the legislation in the part of disposition of property rights to objects of patent law and know-how. Based on the analysis of the existing legislation, it is established that there is an exclusive list of the following agreements: license to use the object of intellectual property rights; license agreement; agreement on the creation by order and use of the object of intellectual property rights; agreement on the transfer of exclusive intellectual property rights; another agreement on the disposal of intellectual property rights. It is noted that the agreement on the transfer (use) of «know-how» differs from that for the patent. The basis for granting the right to use «know-how» is not an exclusive right, but a de facto monopoly on the object of the agreement. «Know-how» in contrast to the patented invention can not be used without receiving it from the owner. The consequence of this is the need not only to grant the right of use under the contract, but also the transfer of the «knowhow» in full. It is noted that the legislator has significantly simplified the contractual procedures for granting the right to dispose of property rights for pharmaceutical companies due to the need to combat the pandemic. Lists of substances and medical procedures, medical equipment that cannot be the subject of patent protection have been established. It is emphasized that the legislator does not take into account the current level of digitalization, where the right to own or use intellectual property is certified by numerous electronic methods. For example, by confirming electronic licenses, user terms, affiliate programs with a number of intermediaries. Accordingly, it is necessary to expand the list of possible reliable ways of certifying contracts, which could be considered written or be equated to such a way. The bill №5552, which proposes amendments to the law «On Copyright and Related Rights», in terms of combating «patent trolling» was analyzed. The authors of the bill propose a number of administrative procedures that will help to respond quickly to such unfair actions of competitors. At the same time, it is noted that with the expansion of the contractual procedure, some of these cases could be avoided. It is proposed, as part of the fight against the COVID-19 pandemic, to introduce compulsory licensing, in order to reduce the real cost of drugs against the virus, as well as the logistics of specialized hospitals.

scholarly journals Artificial intelligence as a potential subject of property and intellectual property relations

2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
pp. 231-250
Author(s):  
Kateryna Nekit ◽  
Vira Tokareva ◽  
Volodymyr Zubar
Keyword(s):  
Artificial Intelligence ◽  
Intellectual Property ◽  
Property Rights ◽  
Intellectual Property Rights ◽  
Legal Capacity ◽  
Legal Personality ◽  
Potential Subject ◽  
Property Relations ◽  
The Status ◽  
The Right

The article analyzes the possibility to provide legal capacity to artificial intelligence, which would lead to the emergence of a new subject in legal relations. The aim of the article is to reveal whether it is possible to recognize, that artificial intelligence is able to have property and intellectual property rights. To achieve this aim, dialectical, comparative, dogmatic and legal methods are used. It is noted that according to recent studies, there are more and more grounds for recognizing artificial intelligence as subjects of legal relations. Particular attention in the article is paid to the specifics of the status of artificial intelligence in property relations. The consequences of empowering artificial intelligence with the right to property are analyzed. The conclusion is drawn on the appropriateness of such an approach, since this will solve the problem of liability for damage caused by artificial intelligence. The possibility of endowing artificial intelligence with property on the basis of trust before resolving the issue of its legal personality is proposed. Modern approaches to the problem of rights to objects of creativity created by artificial intelligence are considered in the article. The options for the distribution of rights to such objects are analyzed depending on the degree of human participation in their creation and on the level of complexity of the artificial intelligence that creates these objects. The general conclusion is made about the possibility to qualify artificial intelligence as a subject of legal relations, in particular, of property and intellectual property relations.

scholarly journals PENINGKATAN STATUS HAK GUNA BANGUNAN MENJADI HAK MILIK

2021 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Atik Winanti ◽  
Taupiq Qurrahman ◽  
Rosalia Dika Agustanti
Keyword(s):  
Property Rights ◽  
Community Service ◽  
Land Rights ◽  
Know How ◽  
The People ◽  
The Status ◽  
Housing Complex ◽  
The Right ◽  
Ownership Rights ◽  
The Village

Article 33 paragraph (3) of the 1945 Constitution which reads Earth, water and natural resources in it are controlled by the State and used for the greatest prosperity of the people. This article is one of the foundations for the birth of a law on basic agrarian principles. In the UUPA, land rights include property rights, rights to build, right to cultivate, use rights and other rights.So far, people in Indonesia control land with the status of ownership rights and building use rights. The strongest and most fulfilled status of land a person has is only property rights. Meanwhile, the right to build only has a certain period. We chose a place of service in the village of Satria Jaya because in this village there is a housing complex, namely Perum Graha Prima which is intended for Civil Servants and Members of the Indonesian National Army who are certified Building Use Rights. Most of the residents in this housing do not know how to qualify and how to change their rights position. From building use rights to ownership rights.  So that giving understanding to the community about the importance of property rights and how to improve the position of land rights is a solution given to local communities. The implementation of community service activities is carried out virtually by using the Zoom application. Where the resource person delivered material about Property Rights, Building Use Rights and the process of increasing the status of land rights.ABSTRAK:Pasal 33 ayat (3) Undang-undang Dasar 1945 yang berbunyi Bumi, air dan kekayaan alam di dalamnya dikuasai oleh Negara dan dipergunakan untuk sebesar-besarnya kemakmuran rakyat. Pasal tersebut sebagai salah satu landasan lahirnya undang-undang tentang peraturan dasar pokok-pokok agraria (UUPA). Dalam UUPA hak-hak atas tanah meliputi hak milik, hak guna bangunan, hak guna usaha, hak pakai dan hak lainnya. Sejauh ini, masyarakat di Indonesia menguasai tanah dengan status hak milik dan hak guna bangunan. Status tanah yang terkuat dan terpenuh yang dimiliki seseorang hanyalah hak milik.  Sedangkan hak guna bangunan hanya mempunyai jangka waktu tertentu. Kami memilih tempat pengabdian di desa Satria Jaya karena di Desa ini terdapat Perumahan yaitu Perum Graha Prima yang diperuntukkan bagi PNS dan Anggota TNI yang bersertifikat Hak Guna Bangunan (HGB). Hampir sebagian besar penduduk di perumahan tersebut tidak mengetahui bagaimana persyaratan dan caranya untuk merubah status hak dari Hak Guna Bangunan menjadi Hak Milik. Sehingga pemberian pemahaman kepada masyarakat tentang pentingnya hak milik serta bagaimana peningkatan status hak katas tanah menjadi solusi yang diberikan kepada masyarakat setempat. Kegiatan pelaksanaan pengabdian dilakukan secara virtual dengan mempergunakan aplikasi Zoom. Dimana narasumber menyampaikan materi tentang Hak Milik, Hak Guna Bangunan dan proses peningkatan status hak atas tanah

AGREEMENTS ON THE DISPOSAL OF PROPERTY RIGHTS TO THE OBJECTS OF PATENT LAW AND «KNOW-HOW»: NEWS OF LEGISLATION

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Juliia Kanaryk ◽  
◽  
Vladyslav Nosinskyi ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Intellectual Property ◽  
Property Rights ◽  
Intellectual Property Rights ◽  
Patent Protection ◽  
Patent Law ◽  
Compulsory Licensing ◽  
Real Cost ◽  
Know How ◽  
Cost Of Drugs ◽  
The Right

The article is devoted to the review of novelties of the legislation in the part of disposition of property rights to objects of patent law and know-how. Based on the analysis of the existing legislation, it is established that there is an exclusive list of the following agreements: license to use the object of intellectual property rights; license agreement; agreement on the creation by order and use of the object of intellectual property rights; agreement on the transfer of exclusive intellectual property rights; another agreement on the disposal of intellectual property rights. It is noted that the agreement on the transfer (use) of «know-how» differs from that for the patent. The basis for granting the right to use «know-how» is not an exclusive right, but a de facto monopoly on the object of the agreement. «Know-how» in contrast to the patented invention can not be used without receiving it from the owner. The consequence of this is the need not only to grant the right of use under the contract, but also the transfer of the «know- how» in full. It is noted that the legislator has significantly simplified the contractual procedures for granting the right to dispose of property rights for pharmaceutical companies due to the need to combat the pandemic. Lists of substances and medical procedures, medical equipment that cannot be the subject of patent protection have been established. It is emphasized that the legislator does not take into account the current level of digitalization, where the right to own or use intellectual property is certified by numerous electronic methods. For example, by confirming electronic licenses, user terms, affiliate programs with a number of intermediaries. Accordingly, it is necessary to expand the list of possible reliable ways of certifying contracts, which could be considered written or be equated to such a way. The bill No5552, which proposes amendments to the law «On Copyright and Related Rights», in terms of combating «patent trolling» was analyzed. The authors of the bill propose a number of administrative procedures that will help to respond quickly to such unfair actions of competitors. At the same time, it is noted that with the expansion of the contractual procedure, some of these cases could be avoided. It is proposed, as part of the fight against the COVID-19 pandemic, to introduce compulsory licensing, in order to reduce the real cost of drugs against the virus, as well as the logistics of specialized hospitals.

scholarly journals Innovation IT-Payment Technologies as a Know-how and an Object of Intellectual Property Rights

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (Especial II) ◽  
pp. 518-535
Author(s):  
Ernest Gramatskyy ◽  
Inha Kryvosheyina ◽  
Volodymyr Makoda ◽  
Liydmyla Panova
Keyword(s):  
Intellectual Property ◽  
Property Rights ◽  
Intellectual Property Rights ◽  
Information Technologies ◽  
Personal Data ◽  
Modern Society ◽  
Research Information ◽  
Know How ◽  
Legal Method ◽  
System Method

The modern society necessitates the introduction of new IT-solutions to meet its needs. With the spread of know-how, the need for its detailed analysis with the further determination of the direction of development. The purpose is to carry out an analysis of the introduction and functioning of know-how, as well as to determine the vectors of its use, taking into account the needs of participants in legal relations arising in this area. The subject of research – information technologies (know-how) as objects of intellectual property rights in their use. The methodological basis consists of the method of analysis, the method of synthesis, the dialectical method, the comparative-legal method, the system method, and the logical-legal method. The result of this work is to identify the importance of the information technologies in everyday life of modern society and the level of popularity of their use, outlining possible vectors of development in the economics in the direction of digitalization and justification of the need to improve the provisions of current legislation within the considered topic, expressing the idea of the direction of innovative information policy in the direction of active use of blockchain and maximum compliance with the protection of personal data of customers.

scholarly journals KEEPING THE NATION'S ASSETS THROUGH THE LEGAL PROTECTION OF COPYRIGHT WORKS OF CULTURE

2016 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 55-71
Author(s):  
Zulkifli Makkawaru
Keyword(s):  
Intellectual Property ◽  
Property Rights ◽  
Intellectual Property Rights ◽  
Legal Protection ◽  
Literature And Science ◽  
Community Rights ◽  
Art And Culture ◽  
The Right

Indonesia positioned copyright art and culture based on its strength as a nation or community rights over an Alliance grouping of the society which can give the effect of distortions in its protection. Which institution can be megurus and oversee the interests between countriesCultivate ideas/ideas in the fields of art, literature and science in the context of intellectual property rights (HKI) categorized into areas of HKI named Copyright (Copyright). The scope of the rights provided for the protection of copyright in the context of this very broad following elements known in several countries. There is a different understanding about the copyright status of culture from both the substance of the right nor of the appreciation of the case which threatens foreign claims copyright over the culture of Indonesia

scholarly journals THE RIGHT OF AUTHORSHIP ON A WORK

2014 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
pp. 155-160
Author(s):  
Ciprian Raul Romiţan
Keyword(s):  
Intellectual Property ◽  
Property Rights ◽  
Intellectual Property Rights ◽  
Moral Rights ◽  
Economic Rights ◽  
Natural Connection ◽  
Artistic Work ◽  
The Law ◽  
The Right ◽  
The Relationship

The moral rights represent the legal expression of the relationship between the workand its creator; they precede, survive and exert a permanent influence on the economic rights.Moral rights are independent of economic rights, the author of a work preserving these rightseven after the transfer of its property rights.The right to claim recognition as the author of the work, called in the doctrine as the"right of paternity of the work" is enshrined in art. 10 lit. b) of the law and it is based on theneed to respect the natural connection between the author and his work. The right toauthorship is the most important prerogative that constitutes intellectual property rights ingeneral and consists of recognizing the true author of a scientific, literary or artistic work.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document