Harga Pokok Produksi Dalam Menentukan Harga Jual Melalui Metode Cost Plus Pricing Dengan Pendekatan Full Costing

2017 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
pp. 119-132
Author(s):  
Dian Purnama ◽  
Saiful Muchlis ◽  
Andi Wawo

The purpose of this study is to determine the calculation of the cost of production and selling price setting process at PT. Istiqamah Prima Sejahtera. Calculating the cost of production for the full costing method and setting the selling price using a cost plus pricing. This type of research is quantitative research. Based on the characteristics of the issues raised by the researchers, the study is classified as a quantitative descriptive research. The data used in this study are primary data obtained directly from the company such as data from interviews with the company and the data contains information on the production costs of companies during the month of September 2016. As for the secondary data obtained from books, journals, internet or other media which supported this research. From the analysis of the data, the results showed that the company's calculation of the cost of production is lower than the production cost price calculation using a full costing method. Cost of production is calculated using a method that is equal Rp85.472 company and according to the full costing method that is equal to Rp85.962. This is because in the calculation of factory overhead cost companies do not take into account some costs into the cost of production as the cost of maintenance and maintenance of production equipment, and the cost of depreciation on a shredded fish product. In addition, setting the selling price of the company only to estimate the selling price calculations per kg of shredded fish with a mark-up rate of 40%, amounting to Rp120,000 to set the selling price on the packaging of 100 grams, 250 grams and 500 grams. While using the cost plus pricing method with a mark up of 40% lower than the selling price according to the company in the amount of USD 12 683. (100 grams), Rp 30,488 (250 grams), and USD 60 798 (500 grams). So, setting the selling price should be done precisely because the price is too high will make the product less competitive, while the sale price is too low will lead to losses for the company.

2016 ◽  
Vol 12 (3) ◽  
pp. 97
Author(s):  
Wa Ode Ariany ◽  
Gene H. M. Kapantow ◽  
Caroline B. D. Pakasi

Rambutan (Nephelium lappaceum L) in the form of a tree with fruit that has skin hair resembles a fruit crop wooded meant in the family Sapindaceae. Talawaan village is a center of rambutan fruit producer in North Minahasa Regency. This research was conducted in January to April 2016 in the village Talawaan Talawaan District of North Minahasa regency. This study using purposive sampling technique using a sample of 15 people rambutan growers. Data collected consist of primary data and secondary data. The results showed that the respondents farmers for the production of rambutan Talawaan village average per farmer as much as 1237.73 kg while the average production per tree as much as 78.51 kg with the average price per kilogram of rambutan Rp 6,000. Rambutan farm receipts on average per farmer Rp 7.4264 million while for the average receipts per tree Rp 471 060. Farm production costs to the cost of production per farmer Rp 228.374.33 while the cost of production per tree Rp 161.56.78, so revenues are reduced by the cost of production, the rambutan farm income to average per farmer Rp 7,198,025.67 while for earnings per tree Rp 454,904.63.


SUSTAINABLE ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 42
Author(s):  
Sriyati Sriyati

The purpose of this study was to determine the extent to which the calculation of the cost of production using the full costing method the determine the cost of production at PT.Cahaya Agro Teknik Surabaya. Researchers used data sources consisting of primary data consisting of primary data and secondary data. The secondary theory is the theory obtained from the existing literature theory data, while the primary data is obtained from the company PT. Cahaya Agro Teknik Surabaya. In this study, the researcher used descriptive method with a qualitative method approach. Descriptive research method is research on problems that occur in the company and qualitative method is a research procedure that produces descriptive data consisting of written or oral forms of people and behaviors that researchers observe. The tools used for research use the full costing method. The researchers use the full costing method because the full costing method is one method of determining the costs of production that takes into account all elements of production costs into the costs of production. The results of the research that researchers have done are in calculating the cost of production using the full costing method to produce a higher value than the method applied by PT. Cahaya Agro Teknik Surabaya. This is because PT. Cahaya Agro Teknik Surabaya does not fully calculate the costs, both variable and fixed. The results of the analysis in calculating the cost of production using the full costing method for plastic 50 miliing mechines amounting to Rp.170.723.300, plastic 100 milling machines of Rp.300.976.260, plastic 200 milling mechines of Rp .509.424.300 and coconut milk machine of Rp. 169.424.300 Keywords: Full Costing Method, Cost of Production, Analysis Tujuan penelitian ini adalah untuk mengetahui sejauh mana perhitungan harga pokok produksi dengan menggunakan Metode full costing untuk menetapkan harga pokok produksi pada PT. Cahaya Agro Teknik Surabaya. Peneliti menggunakan sumber data yang terdiri dari data primer dan data sekunder. Teori sekunder adalah teori yang diperoleh dari data kepustakaan yang ada, sedangkan data primer diperoleh dari perusahaan PT. Cahaya Agro Teknik Surabaya.Dalam penelitian ini peneliti menggunakan Metode diskriptif dengan pendekatan Metode kualitatif. Metode penelitian kualitatif deskriptif adalah penelitian terhadap masalah yang terjadi diperusahaan dan Metode kualitatif adalah prosedur penelitian yang menghasilkan data secara deskriptif yang terdiri dari kata bentuk tertulis atau lisan dari orang-orang yang peneliti amati. Alat yang digunakan untuk penelitian menggunakan Metode Full Costing karena Metode penentuan harga pokok produksi yang memperhitungkan semua unsur biaya produksi ke Dalam harga pokok produksi.Hasil peneliti yang telah peneliti lakukan adalah Dalam perhitungan harga pokok produksi dengan menggunakan Metode full costing menghasilkan nilai yang lebih tinggi dibandingkan dengan Metode yang diterapkan oleh PT.Cahaya Agro Teknik Surabaya. Hal ini dikarenakan PT.Cahaya Agro Teknik Surabaya tidak sepenuhnya melakukan perhitungan harga pokok produksi baik yang bersifat variable maupun tetap. Hasil analisis Dalam perhitungan harga pokok produksi menggunakan Metode full costing untuk mesin giling plastic 50 sebesar Rp 170.723.300, Mesin Giling Plastik 100 sebesar Rp 300.976.300, Mesin Giling Plastik 200 Sebesar Rp 509.424.300 dan mesin peras santan sebesar Rp 169.424.300. Kata Kunci: Metode Full Costing, Harga Pokok Produksi, Analisis


2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
pp. 17-26
Author(s):  
Evi Noviasari ◽  
Richad Alamsyah

The purpose of this study were to know the role of calculation cost of goods manufactured and  determination of the selling price of shoes in the Heriyanto’s shoes MSME. To knowing the extent of differences in determination the cost of goods manufactured by using the company method and the full costing approach and compare the selling price according to the company's method with using the Cost Plus Pricing. The type of research used is qualitative research. The analytical method used in this study is qualitative descriptive analysis. The data used in this study are primary data. Data were obtained directly through observation and interviews with the Heriyanto’s shoes MSME and data in the form of information on production costs such as raw material costs, labor costs, and factory overhead costs MSME during December 2018. While for secondary data. Data were obtained from intermediary media such as books or literature, journals related to the title of the research, and can also be via the internet. The results of the study it can be concluded that the cost of goods manufactured calculation according Heriyanto’s MSME is lower than the cost of  goods manufactured calculation using the full costing method. The cost of goods manufactured according heriyanto’s MSME is Rp. 15.675/pair or Rp. 313.492/score (Hamer Material) and Rp. 14.600/pair or Rp. 291.992/score (Kavaro Material). While the cost of goods manufactured used the full costing method, which is Rp. 16.310/pair or Rp. 326.201/score (Hamer Material) and Rp. 15.235/pair or Rp. 304.701/score (Kavaro Material). This is caused  factory overhead costs that are not calculate by Heriyanto’s MSME such as electricity costs, gas costs, maintenance costs for machinery and factory vehicles, and depreciation costs.             Determination of selling price must be appropriately because the determination of selling prices that are too high will result in difficulty competition with similar products while the determination of selling prices too low will result in reduced income generated by Heriyanto’s MSME. The difference in determination the cost of good manufactured will affect the Heriyanto’s MSME in determining the selling price, because the cost of goods manufactured is the main element in determination selling price. Calculation of selling prices according Heriyanto’s MSME is Rp. 18.026/pair or Rp. 360.516/score (Hamer Material) and Rp. 16.790/pair or Rp. 335.791/score (Kavaro material). While the selling price used the Cost Plus Pricing method which is Rp. 18.814/pair or Rp. 376.281/score (Hamer Material) and Rp. 17.578/pair or Rp. 351.556/score (Kavaro material). Keywords : Cost of Goods manufactured, Selling Price, Full Costing, Cost Plus Pricing


2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
pp. 9-16
Author(s):  
Sintia Anggreani ◽  
I Gde Sudi Adnyana

Cost of Goods Manufacture is an important component that must be calculated by the company in order to determine the selling price of the product. SMEs are often wrong in calculating the Cost of Goods Manufacture they do. One of the mistakes made by SMEs in calculating the Cost of Goods Manufacture is that the calculations carried out are very simple and do not specify all costs used in the production process to produce a product. This study aims to analyze (1) the calculation of the Cost of Goods Manufacture in SMEs Tahu AN Anugrah , (2) the determination of Cost of Goods Manufacture with the full costing method in SMEs Tahu AN Anugrah, and (3) the difference in calculation of Cost of Goods Manufacture according to SMEs AN Anugrah and according full costing method and its effect on selling prices.                The data used in this study are primary data and secondary data. The primary data used is obtained from the results of interviews and recording of information needed directly in SMEs Tahu AN Anugrah. While the secondary data are is obtained from literature studies such as previous journals, related books, documentation and reading in accordance with the research title.  The Research results show, there are differences in the calculation results of the Cost of Goods Manufacture carried out by the SMEs and by the full costing method. The calculation of Cost of Goods Manufacture by SMEs Tahu AN Anugrah for White Tofu products is Rp 200 and Yellow Tofu Rp 201.12 while by the full costing method for White Tofu products is Rp 218.41 and Yellow Tofu Rp 228.44. So that, there are differences in the calculation results, namely for White Tofu Rp 18.41 and Yellow Tofu Rp 27.32. Differences in calculation are due to the full costing method is more detailed by including all elements of production costs. This shows that the method provides a more accurate calculation to be able to set a better selling price.  Keywords: Cost of Goods Manufacture, Full Costing, Selling Prices, SMEs


2020 ◽  
Vol 6 (2) ◽  
pp. 90-104
Author(s):  
Arief R. Hakim ◽  
Asro L. Indrayanti ◽  
Novita Chandrawijaya

Communities in Tumbang Nusa Village, Jabiren Raya District Pulang Pisau Regency began to develop prupuk (Phragmites karka (Retz) Trin ex Steud) as a straw material to replace plastik that is difficult to decompose. This study aims to calculate the cost of production, develop a selling price scenario and conduct a feasibility study on the development of straws from prupuk. Primary data was collected from 20 people involved in making pru[uk straws and supplemented with secondary data from various previous studies and publications.The results of this study indicate that the cost of production of prupuk straws ranges between IDR 374.3 - IDR 408.68 per pcs. The proportion of prupuk straw financing is for the purchase of raw materials (59.72% to 65.14%), labor costs (34.36% to 39.58%) and overhead costs for capital financing (0.6% to 0.7 %). Determination of the selling price is done by adding the cost of goods manufactured to the desired profit (mark up method) with scenario I with a profit rate of 10% (amounting to IDR 389.04 for large packages and IDR 449.54 for small packages) to scenario VI with a level of 60% profit (IDR 565.88 for large packages and IDR 653.88 for small packages). In terms of price, determining the selling price up to scenario VI can still compete with the prices of its competitors, namely bamboo straws. Although the price of the product is competitive, the level of labor productivity is very low. At the break even point condition, the maximum labor income is only IDR 180,062.74. When compared with the UMR District of Pulang Pisau, the income contribution received from making this purun straw is very small (only 6.11%). In order to achieve an income level equivalent to the UMR of Pulang Pisau Regency, a production turnover of 383 pcs per person per day is needed or equal to 7,652 pcs per person per month. In order to improve the quality and quantity of prupuk straws, it is necessary to apply production technology.


Author(s):  
Maya Widyana Dewi ◽  
Muryati Muryati

This study aims to determine and analyze the calculation of the cost of production of screen printing based on the cost of order method whether it has been in accordance with the theory of cost accounting by comparing the calculation of cost of goods manufactured by the company with the calculation of cost of production based on the cost accounting theory that is using full costing method, As well as to know how much influence the cost of production to the determination of product selling price. This study uses primary data in the form of information obtained from the owner of the company or parties concerned and secondary data with population and sample data of cost of production and selling price of screen printing orders during January 2017. Data collection methods used are literature research methods, interviews and Method of documentation. While the method of data analysis used is by using simple regression analysis, coefficient of determination and hypothesis test using t test by using the tool program SPSS 16.0 for windows. From the results of research indicate that the calculation of cost of production based on the results of analysis using full costing method is greater than the calculation of cost of production method company. This difference occurs because the loading of factory overhead cost calculated using full costing method more thorough and detailed. Based on the tests conducted known that the cost of production has a very strong influence on the sale price. The influence of the cost of production to the selling price in this study is 91%, and the remaining 9% is influenced by other factors (variables) such as demand, supply, and other unreported variables.Keywords: Cost of Production, Selling Price 


2018 ◽  
Vol 3 (01) ◽  
Author(s):  
Fitri Farah Diba ◽  
Cholis Hidayati

ABSTRACTIn this study using descriptive qualitative research methods. Case study at PT. Makmur Multi Mitra which is engaged in the manufacture of inner carton products operating in Surabaya and research only focuses on making inner cartons for the period 2015. The data source used in this study is internal data sources namely data obtained from within the company consisting of primary data and secondary data. Management of PT. Makmur Multi Mitra has determined the price of its inner carton products of Rp. 5,000.00 per pcs and the price is lower than its competitors. From the selling price the company wants a profit of Rp. 1,500.00 per pcs but after analyzing the manufacturing costs which include the cost of raw materials, direct labor costs, and overhead costs it turns out that the actual profit obtained is only Rp. 1,369.00 because the actual cost of production is Rp. 3,631.00. Therefore, the authors provide a solution to reduce production costs by offering three scenarios and one of the scenarios suggested to be implemented is to make changes by replacing direct raw materials used by the company with slightly lower quality raw materials (KW II) while replacing materials for engineering coating of prints to reduce manufacturing costs to Rp. 3,465.00 per pcs inner carton or smaller Rp. 35.00 from the target cost and get a profit of Rp. 1,535.00 per pcs. Keywords: Target Costing, Cost of Production, Costs, Selling Price


2018 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 53-62
Author(s):  
Istika Risyanti ◽  
Endah Masrunik

UD. Anisa Jaya is located on Arjuno Street Rt 02 Rw.07, Gogodeso Dusun Ngade, Kanigoro Sub-District, Blitar District. This business produces various kinds of products such as banana chips, kardol and others. The researcher focused on banana chips. The aim of the study was to find out the determination of the selling price of banana chips at UD. Anisa Jaya with company methods and cost plus pricing methods. This type of research is quantitative. The data used are primary data and secondary data. From the results of interviews and observations, researchers found the data needed to complete the needed data. Secondary data in the form of organizational structures, documents and business profiles. The results of the study indicate that the selling price set by the company is lower than IDR 1,567 rather than the cost plus pricing method. With the method of selling the selling price used is Rp. 8,000 per pack while the cost plus pricing method is Rp. 9,567. This is because the company does not include all factory overhead costs used in calculating the cost of production while the researcher includes all factory overhead costs in its calculations.


2018 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
pp. 50-60 ◽  
Author(s):  
Istika Risvanti

UD. Anisa Jaya is located on Arjuno Street Rt 02 Rw.07, Gogodeso Dusun Ngade, Kanigoro Sub-District, Blitar District. This business produces various kinds of products such as banana chips, kardol and others. The researcher focused on banana chips. The aim of the study was to find out the determination of the selling price of banana chips at UD. Anisa Jaya with company methods and cost plus pricing methods. This type of research is quantitative. The data used are primary data and secondary data. From the results of interviews and observations, researchers found the data needed to complete the needed data. Secondary data in the form of organizational structures, documents and business profiles. The results of the study indicate that the selling price set by the company is lower than IDR 1,567 rather than the cost plus pricing method. With the method of selling the selling price used is Rp. 8,000 per pack while the cost plus pricing method is Rp. 9,567. This is because the company does not include all factory overhead costs used in calculating the cost of production while the researcher includes all factory overhead costs in its calculations.


Owner ◽  
2022 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
pp. 632-647
Author(s):  
Laras Sukma Arum Melati ◽  
Guntur Saputra ◽  
Faridatun Najiyah ◽  
Fitria Asas

The problem that becomes the background of this research is in determining the selling price of a basic product that is used is the calculation of the cost of production, which is a way to take into account the determination of cost elements into the cost of the product and the selling price that is set must be able to determine all costs that produce long term profit. Based on the determination of the correct product cost of a product, it will be able to reduce uncertainty in determining the selling price. The purpose of this study is to find out how to calculate the cost of production based on the full costing method for determining the selling price of the product. In determining the selling price of the product, the selling price method is used based on cost-plus pricing. Cost plus pricing is the determination of the price by adding a certain amount (percentage) of the selling price or cost as profit. The method used in this study is quantitative descriptive analysis method, the results of this study indicate that there are advantages in calculating the cost of goods manufactured based on the Full Costing method and to be able to determine the cost of goods sold, the production costs must be calculated at the beginning of each month based on the previous period's sales report.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document