ctDNA-Profiling-Based UBL Biological Process Mutation Status as a Predictor of Atezolizumab Response Among TP53-Negative NSCLC Patients

Atezolizumab, an immune checkpoint inhibitor, has been approved for use in clinical practice in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients, but potential biomarkers for response stratification still need further screening. In the present study, a total of 399 patients with high-quality ctDNA profiling results were included. The mutation status of ubiquitin-like conjugation (UBL) biological process genes (including ABL1, APC, LRP6, FUBP1, KEAP1, and TOP2A) and clinical information were further integrated. The results suggested that the patients with the clinical characteristics of male or history of smoking had a higher frequency of UBL mutation positivity [UBL (+)]; the patients who were UBL (+) had shorter progression-free survival (PFS) (1.69 vs. 3.22 months, p = 0.0007) and overall survival (8.61 vs. 16.10 months, p < 0.0001) than those patients with UBL mutation negativity [UBL (–)]; and more promising predictive values were shown in the smoker subgroup and ≤ 3 metastasis subgroup. More interestingly, we found the predictor has more performance in TP53-negative cohorts [training in an independent POPLAR and OAK cohorts (n = 200), and validation in an independent MSKCC cohort (n = 127)]. Overall, this study provides a predictor, UBL biological process gene mutation status, not only for identifying NSCLC patients who may respond to atezolizumab therapy but also for screening out the potential NSCLC responders who received other immune checkpoint inhibitors.

Download Full-text

Beyond Abscopal Effect: A Meta-Analysis of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors and Radiotherapy in Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

Cancers ◽

10.3390/cancers13102352 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 13 (10) ◽

pp. 2352

Author(s):

Francesco Fiorica ◽

Umberto Tebano ◽

Milena Gabbani ◽

Mariasole Perrone ◽

Sonia Missiroli ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Lung Cancer ◽

Immune Checkpoint ◽

Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽

Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽

Progression Free Survival ◽

Small Cell ◽

Small Cell Lung ◽

Free Survival ◽

Metastatic Nsclc ◽

Nsclc Patients

Background: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) plus radiotherapy (RT) have been suggested as an emerging combination in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients. However, little is known about the magnitude of its benefits and potential clinical predictors. Objective: To assess the effects of this combination on the increase in overall and progression-free survival. Data sources: The MEDLINE and CANCERLIT (1970–2020) electronic databases were searched, and the reference lists of included studies were manually searched. Study selection: Studies were included if they were comparative studies between combination ICI-RT and ICI or RT alone in advanced or metastatic NSCLC patients. Overall survival (OS) was analyzed according to the treatment strategy. Data extraction: Data on population, intervention, and outcomes were extracted from each study, in accordance with the intention-to-treat method, by two independent observers and combined using the DerSimonian method and Laird method. Results: Compared to ICI or RT alone, ICI-RT significantly increased the 1-year and 3-year OS RR by 0.75 (95% CI 0.64–0.88; p = 0.0003) and 0.85 (95% CI 0.78–0.93; p = 0.0006), respectively. Furthermore, there was a statistically significant benefit on 1- and 3-year progression-free survival (RR 0.73 (95% CI, 0.61–0.87; p = 0.0005) and RR 0.82 (95% CI 0.67–0.99; p = 0.04), respectively). Conclusions: In patients with advanced or metastatic NSCLC, combination ICI-RT increases 1- and 3-year OS and progression-free survival compared to ICI or RT alone.

Download Full-text

The association between albumin-globulin ratio (AGR) and survival in patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors

Cancer Biomarkers ◽

10.3233/cbm-210349 ◽

2021 ◽

pp. 1-11

Author(s):

Deniz Can Guven ◽

Oktay Halit Aktepe ◽

Melek Seren Aksun ◽

Taha Koray Sahin ◽

Gozde Kavgaci ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Immune Checkpoint ◽

Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽

Multivariate Analyses ◽

Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽

Progression Free Survival ◽

Free Survival ◽

Patients With Cancer ◽

Early Progression ◽

Term Benefit

BACKGROUND: The albumin-globulin ratio (AGR) could be a prognostic biomarker in patients with cancer, although the data is limited in patients treated with immune-checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). OBJECTIVES: We aimed to evaluate the association between AGR and survival in ICI-treated patients. METHODS: The data of 212 advanced-stage patients were retrospectively evaluated in this cohort study. The association between AGR with overall (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were evaluated with multivariate analyses. Additionally, receptor operating curve (ROC) analysis was conducted to assess the AGR’s predictive power in the very early progression (progression within two months) and long-term benefit (more than twelve months survival). RESULTS: The median AGR was calculated as 1.21, and patients were classified into AGR-low and high subgroups according to the median. In the multivariate analyses, patients with lower AGR (< 1.21) had decreased OS (HR: 1.530, 95% CI: 1.100–2.127, p= 0.011) and PFS (HR: 1.390, 95% CI: 1.020–1.895, p= 0.037). The area under curve of AGR to detect early progression and long-term benefit were 0.654 (95% CI: 0.562–0.747, p= 0.001) and 0.671 (95% CI: 0.598–0.744, p< 0.001), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: In our experience, survival with ICIs was impaired in patients with lower AGR. Additionally, the AGR values could detect the very early progression and long-term benefit ICIs.

Download Full-text

Comparative Analysis of Durable Responses on Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors Versus Other Systemic Therapies: A Pooled Analysis of Phase III Trials

JCO Precision Oncology ◽

10.1200/po.18.00114 ◽

2019 ◽

pp. 1-10 ◽

Cited By ~ 12

Author(s):

Elvire Pons-Tostivint ◽

Aurélien Latouche ◽

Pauline Vaflard ◽

Francesco Ricci ◽

Delphine Loirat ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Immune Checkpoint ◽

Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽

Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽

Progression Free Survival ◽

Phase Iii ◽

Durable Response ◽

Free Survival ◽

Drug Classes ◽

Metastatic Setting ◽

The Mean

PURPOSE Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have been demonstrated to improve overall survival (OS) in several tumor types. Durable responses have been reported with these agents in patients with melanoma and lung cancer. We aimed to quantify the proportion of patients who experience durable responses on ICIs and to compare it with other drug classes. PATIENTS AND METHODS We retrieved published phase III randomized trials that included at least one ICI arm in the recurrent and/or metastatic setting. A durable response to treatment was defined as a progression-free survival that exceeded three times the median progression-free survival of the whole population. The proportion of patients who experienced an OS that exceeded two times the median OS of the whole patient population also was estimated. RESULTS Nineteen studies involving 11,640 patients treated in 42 treatment arms (26 ICI and 16 non-ICI arms) were included. The mean proportion of patients who experienced a durable response was 2.3 times higher in those treated with an ICI compared with those treated in the control arms (25% v 11%). Durable responses were more frequent in patients treated with anti–PD-1/PD-L1 agents than in patients treated with anti–CTLA-4 agents (28% v 18%). The mean proportion of patients who had an OS that exceeded two times the median OS was also higher in those treated with ICIs than in those treated in the control arms (30% v 23%). In multivariable analysis, the effects of treatment with anti–PD-1/PD-L1 agents and of first-line treatment were statistically associated with a higher mean proportion of durable responses. CONCLUSION Durable responses were more frequent in patients treated with ICIs, although they also occurred in patients treated with other drug classes.

Download Full-text

Salvage Ipilimumab and Nivolumab in Patients With Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma After Prior Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors

Journal of Clinical Oncology ◽

10.1200/jco.19.03315 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 38 (27) ◽

pp. 3088-3094 ◽

Cited By ~ 4

Author(s):

Anita Gul ◽

Tyler F. Stewart ◽

Charlene M. Mantia ◽

Neil J. Shah ◽

Emily Stern Gatof ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Renal Cell Carcinoma ◽

Targeted Therapy ◽

Immune Checkpoint ◽

Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽

Response Rate ◽

Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽

Objective Response ◽

Progression Free Survival ◽

Free Survival ◽

Metastatic Rcc

PURPOSE Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are standard therapy in metastatic renal cell carcinoma (RCC). The safety and activity of the combination of ipilimumab and nivolumab in patients who have received prior ICI targeting the programmed death 1 (PD-1) pathway remains unknown. We evaluated ipilimumab and nivolumab in patients with metastatic RCC after prior treatment with anti–PD-1 pathway–targeted therapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS Patients with metastatic RCC who received prior anti–PD-1 pathway-targeted therapy and subsequently received ipilimumab and nivolumab were reviewed. Objective response rate and progression-free survival per investigator assessment were recorded. Toxicity of ipilimumab and nivolumab was also assessed. RESULTS Forty-five patients with metastatic RCC were included. All patients (100%) received prior ICIs targeting the PD-1 pathway. The median age was 62 years (range, 21-82 years). At a median follow-up of 12 months, the objective response rate to ipilimumab and nivolumab was 20%. The median progression-free survival while on ipilimumab and nivolumab was 4 months (range, 0.8-19 months). Immune-related adverse events (irAEs) of any grade with ipilimumab and nivolumab were recorded in 29 (64%) of the 45 patients; grade 3 irAEs were recorded in 6 (13%) of the 45 patients. CONCLUSION Ipilimumab and nivolumab demonstrated antitumor activity with acceptable toxicity in patients with metastatic RCC who had prior treatment with checkpoint inhibition.

Download Full-text

Efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors and age in cancer patients

Immunotherapy ◽

10.2217/imt-2019-0124 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 12 (8) ◽

pp. 587-603 ◽

Cited By ~ 2

Author(s):

Xuan-zhang Huang ◽

Peng Gao ◽

Yong-xi Song ◽

Jing-xu Sun ◽

Xiao-wan Chen ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Cancer Patients ◽

Immune Checkpoint ◽

Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽

Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽

Progression Free Survival ◽

Comparable Efficacy ◽

Control Groups ◽

Free Survival ◽

Meta Regression Analysis ◽

The Impact

Aim: To evaluate the impact of age on the efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) in cancer patients. Materials & methods: The primary outcomes included overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS). Subgroup, meta-regression analysis and within-trial interaction HR were conducted. Results: A total of 34 studies containing 20,511 cancer patients were included. ICI could improve the OS and PFS in patient aged <65 and ≥65 years. Patients aged <75 years treated with ICI also had favorable OS and PFS compared with the control groups. Conclusion: ICI has comparable efficacy in cancer patients aged <65 and ≥65 years. Cancer patients aged ≥75 years need more attention in the future clinical trials.

Download Full-text

Efficacy of first-line immune checkpoint inhibitors in patients with sarcomatoid and/or rhabdoid (S/R) metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC).

Journal of Clinical Oncology ◽

10.1200/jco.2019.37.8_suppl.66 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 37 (8_suppl) ◽

pp. 66-66

Author(s):

Ziad Bakouny ◽

Sarah Abou Alaiwi ◽

Amin Nassar ◽

John A. Steinharter ◽

Xiao X. Wei ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Immune Checkpoint ◽

Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor ◽

Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽

Objective Response ◽

Multivariable Analysis ◽

Progression Free Survival ◽

First Line ◽

Free Survival ◽

Logistic Regressions

66 Background: Patients with mRCC with S/R components tend to have a poor prognosis with few therapeutic options available. Recent data suggest that immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI)-based therapies may be especially effective for these patients. Our aim was to evaluate the efficacy of ICI-based therapies in patients with S/R mRCC. Methods: We retrospectively assessed objective response rate (ORR), progression free survival (PFS) & overall survival (OS) of patients with S/R mRCC treated at our institution with first-line ICI-based therapies and compared these to those of patients treated with first-line non-ICI-based therapies. Univariable and multivariable (adjusted for IMDC group) Cox and logistic regressions were performed. Results: 92 patients (70 S, 9 R, and 13 S&R) patients were included, of which 74 with a clear-cell component. For all patients (regardless of therapy), 74 (80.4%) patients experienced a PFS event (progression or death) and 52 (56.5%) died at 25.3 months (m) median follow-up. Overall median PFS was 5.3 m (95% CI= 3.4–7.2) and 24 m OS rate was 39.5% (27.4–51.7). Out of 78 patients in whom response was evaluable, ORR was 30.8% (20.4–41.2). Patients treated with ICI-based therapies had significantly better ORR, PFS, and OS on multivariable analysis (table). Conclusions: mRCC patients with S/R components have significantly better ORR, PFS, and OS with first-line ICI-based compared to non-ICI-based therapies. These data support the use of ICI-based therapies for patients with S/R mRCC. [Table: see text]

Download Full-text

Impact of SWI/SNF complex mutations in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors: Immuno-oncology biomarker study in LC-SCRUM-Japan (LC-SCRUM-IBIS).

Journal of Clinical Oncology ◽

10.1200/jco.2020.38.15_suppl.9530 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 38 (15_suppl) ◽

pp. 9530-9530

Author(s):

Kiyotaka Yoh ◽

Shingo Matsumoto ◽

Naoki Furuya ◽

Kazumi Nishino ◽

Shingo Miyamoto ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Lung Cancer ◽

Small Cell Lung Cancer ◽

Clinical Outcomes ◽

Cell Lung Cancer ◽

Immune Checkpoint ◽

Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽

Progression Free Survival ◽

Small Cell ◽

Small Cell Lung ◽

Nsclc Patients

9530 Background: The SWI/SNF chromatin remodeling complex is reported to be involved in sensitivity and resistance to immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI). However, their role in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) remains unclear. We examined the relationship between SWI/SNF complex mutations and clinical outcomes of ICI in patients with NSCLC. Methods: Of 1017 lung cancer patients enrolled in LC-SCRUM-IBIS, 350 patients were analyzable for whole-exome sequencing (WES). WES data were used to analyze the presence of mutations in 29 major subunits of the SWI/SNF complexes. ARID1A and SMARCA4 mutations were also evaluated in a targeted NGS panel (Oncomine comprehensive assay, OCA). PD-L1 expression by 22C3, tissue tumor mutational burden (tTMB) by WES, STK11 and KEAP1 mutations by WES or OCA were also assessed. Durable clinical benefit (DCB) including CR, PR and SD > 6 mos to ICI, progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were compared in status of each of SWI/SNF complex mutations and other factors. Results: At least one mutation in any subunits of the SWI/SNF complex was present in 28% of NSCLC patients. The most common mutated subcomplexes were SMARCA4 (12%), BAF (7%: ARID1A, 4%), non-canonical BAF (3%), PBAF (3%), and SMARCA2 (2%). Of 101 NSCLC patients treated with PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors, SMARCA4 mutations tended to be associated with lower DCB (16 vs 31%) and shorter median PFS (1.9 vs 3.6 m) and OS (7.4 vs 18.1m). Patients with ARID1A mutations tended to have better clinical outcomes (DCB, 40 vs 28%) compared to those without mutations. No significant associations were found between PD-L1 expression and SMARCA4 or ARID1A mutations. Patients with STK11/KEAP1 mutations had lower rate of PD-L1 expression (TPS > 50%) (18% vs 48%, P = 0.03) and worse clinical outcomes (DCB, 6 vs 33%) compared to those without mutations. There was no significant association between a tTMB status and clinical outcome. Conclusions: SMARCA4 and ARID1A mutations appear to affect clinical outcomes of ICI in NSCLC patients. These findings indicate that SWI/SNF complex mutations may serve as a predictive biomarker for ICI in NSCLC patients.

Download Full-text

Impact of baseline and concomitant corticosteroid therapy on the outcomes of hepatocellular carcinoma treated with immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy.

Journal of Clinical Oncology ◽

10.1200/jco.2020.38.4_suppl.531 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 38 (4_suppl) ◽

pp. 531-531

Author(s):

David James Pinato ◽

Ahmed Omar Kaseb ◽

Yinghong Wang ◽

Anwaar Saeed ◽

David Szafron ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Hepatocellular Carcinoma ◽

Immune Checkpoint ◽

Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor ◽

Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽

Evaluation Criteria ◽

Progression Free Survival ◽

Corticosteroid Treatment ◽

Free Survival ◽

Checkpoint Inhibitor Therapy ◽

The Impact

531 Background: The impact of corticosteroid treatment (CT) on the efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is undefined. We evaluated whether CT administered at baseline (bCT) or concurrently to ICI (cCT) influences clinical outcomes of HCC patients treated with ICI. Methods: This retrospective, multi-center observational study was conducted across 9 tertiary academic referral centers collected 341 HCC patients who received ICI across 3 continents between January 1, 2016 and April 1, 2019. Outcome measures included overall (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) calculated from time of ICI commencement and overall response rates (ORR) defined by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (v1.1) on 6-8 weekly periodic restaging. Results: Of 331 eligible patients, 254 (76%) had BCLC-C stage HCC and received mostly PD(L)-1 ICI monotherapy (n=250, 85%). Median OS was 12.1 months (95%CI 9.2-15.0 months) and median PFS was 8.1 months (95%CI 6.3-10 months). In total 81 patients (24%) received >10 mg prednisone equivalent daily either as bCT (n=15, 4%) or cCT (n=66, 20%). Indications for CT included procedure/prophylaxis (n=37, 45%), management of irAE (n=31, 37%), cancer-related symptoms (n=5, 2%) or comorbidities (n=8, 3%). Neither overall CT, bCT nor cCT predicted for worse OS, PFS nor ORR in uni- and multi-variable analyses (p>0.05). CT for cancer-related indications predicted for shorter PFS (2.4 vs. 11.3 months, p=0.01), OS (4.5 vs. 12.8 months, p=0.05) and reduced ORR (p=0.03) compared to cancer-unrelated indications. Conclusions: This is the first study to demonstrate that neither bCT nor cCT appear to influence response and OS following ICI in HCC. Worse survival and ORR in CT recipients for cancer-related indications appears driven by the poor prognosis associated with symptomatic HCC.

Download Full-text