scholarly journals Immune Thrombocytopenia Induced by Immune Checkpoint Inhibitrs in Lung Cancer: Case Report and Literature Review

2021 ◽  
Vol 12 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wang Xie ◽  
NaNa Hu ◽  
LeJie Cao
Keyword(s):  
Lung Cancer ◽  
Cell Death ◽  
Programmed Cell Death ◽  
Immune Checkpoint ◽  
Clinical Presentation ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Immune Dysregulation ◽  
Cancer Case ◽  
Severe Thrombocytopenia ◽  
Cell Death Protein

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), including antibodies targeting programmed cell death protein-1 (PD-1) and programmed cell death ligand-1 (PD-L1), are being extensively used on advanced human malignancies therapy. The treatment with ICIs have acquired durable tumor inhibition and changed the treatment landscape in lung cancer. Immune-related adverse events including pneumonitis and thyroiditis have been well described, but less frequent events, such as ICIs-induced thrombocytopenia, are now emerging and may sometimes be severe or fatal. Since early detection and prompt intervention are crucial to prevent fatal consequences, it is of outmost importance that medical staff is aware of these potential toxicities and learn to recognize and treat them adequately. This review focuses on the epidemiology, clinical presentation, mechanisms, and clinical management of ICIs-induced thrombocytopenia in patients with lung cancer. We also present a patient with advanced lung adenocarcinoma who received the PD-L1 inhibitor atezolizumab and eventually developed severe thrombocytopenia. The case indirectly suggests that cytokine changes might contribute to immune dysregulation in ICIs-induced thrombocytopenia.

scholarly journals Immune Thrombocytopenia Induced by Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors in Solid Cancer: Case Report and Literature Review

2020 ◽  
Vol 10 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xiaolin Liu ◽  
Xiuju Liang ◽  
Jing Liang ◽  
Yan Li ◽  
Jun Wang
Keyword(s):  
Cell Death ◽  
Programmed Cell Death ◽  
Immune Checkpoint ◽  
Immune Thrombocytopenia ◽  
Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Cancer Case ◽  
Solid Cancer ◽  
Severe Thrombocytopenia ◽  
Advanced Cancer Patients

Immune checkpoint inhibitors, including antibodies targeting programmed cell death protein-1 (PD-1) and its receptor programmed cell death ligand-1 (PD-L1), represent promising therapeutic strategies for advanced human malignancies. However, a subgroup of patients experiences various autoimmune toxicities, termed immune-related adverse events (irAEs), that occur as a result of on-target and off-tumor autoimmune responses. Although irAEs are generally confirmed to be less severe than toxicities caused by conventional chemotherapy and targeted therapy, uncommon irAEs, such as immune thrombocytopenia, may occur with a very low incidence and sometimes be severe or fatal. This review focuses on the epidemiology, clinical presentation, and prognosis of immune thrombocytopenia occurring in advanced cancer patients induced by immune checkpoint inhibitors, especially in those with PD-1 or PD-L1 inhibitor treatment. We also first present one patient with non-small cell lung cancer who received the PD-L1 inhibitor durvalumab and developed severe thrombocytopenia.

scholarly journals Failure of Immunotherapy—The Molecular and Immunological Origin of Immunotherapy Resistance in Lung Cancer

2021 ◽  
Vol 22 (16) ◽  
pp. 9030
Author(s):  
Justyna Błach ◽  
Kamila Wojas-Krawczyk ◽  
Marcin Nicoś ◽  
Paweł Krawczyk
Keyword(s):  
Lung Cancer ◽  
Cell Death ◽  
Programmed Cell Death ◽  
Current Knowledge ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Treatment Resistance ◽  
Immune Checkpoints ◽  
Cytotoxic T Cell ◽  
Number Of Patients ◽  
Cell Death Protein

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have a huge impact on clinical treatment results in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Blocking antibodies targeting programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1), programmed cell death protein ligand 1 (PD-L1) or CTLA-4 (cytotoxic T cell antigen 4) have been developed and approved for the treatment of NSCLC patients. However, a large number of patients develop resistance to this type of treatment. Primary and secondary immunotherapy resistance are distinguished. No solid biomarkers are available that are appropriate to predict the unique sensitivity to immunotherapy. Knowledge of predictive markers involved in treatment resistance is fundamental for planning of new treatment combinations. Scientists focused research on the use of immunotherapy as an essential treatment in combination with other therapy strategies, which could increase cancer immunogenicity by generating tumor cells death and new antigen release as well as by targeting other immune checkpoints and tumor microenvironment. In the present review, we summarize the current knowledge of molecular bases underlying immunotherapy resistance and discuss the capabilities and the reason of different therapeutic combinations.

Immune checkpoint inhibitor-induced gastrointestinal and hepatic injury: pathologists’ perspective

2018 ◽  
Vol 71 (8) ◽  
pp. 665-671 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dipti M Karamchandani ◽  
Runjan Chetty
Keyword(s):  
Cell Death ◽  
Programmed Cell Death ◽  
Immune Checkpoint ◽  
Cytotoxic T Lymphocyte ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Survival Rates ◽  
Immune Mediated ◽  
Self Tolerance ◽  
Novel Drugs ◽  
Cell Death Protein

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (CPIs) are a relatively new class of ‘miracle’ dugs that have revolutionised the treatment and prognosis of some advanced-stage malignancies, and have increased the survival rates significantly. This class of drugs includes cytotoxic T lymphocyte antigen-4 inhibitors such as ipilimumab; programmed cell death protein-1 inhibitors such as nivolumab, pembrolizumab and avelumab; and programmed cell death protein ligand-1 inhibitors such as atezolizumab. These drugs stimulate the immune system by blocking the coinhibitory receptors on the T cells and lead to antitumoural response. However, a flip side of these novel drugs is immune-related adverse events (irAEs), secondary to immune-mediated process due to disrupted self-tolerance. The irAEs in the gastrointestinal (GI) tract/liver may result in diarrhoea, colitis or hepatitis. An accurate diagnosis of CPI-induced colitis and/or hepatitis is essential for optimal patient management. As we anticipate greater use of these drugs in the future given the significant clinical response, pathologists need to be aware of the spectrum of histological findings that may be encountered in GI and/or liver biopsies received from these patients, as well as differentiate them from its histopathological mimics. This present review discusses the clinical features, detailed histopathological features, management and the differential diagnosis of the luminal GI and hepatic irAEs that may be encountered secondary to CPI therapy.

scholarly journals Immune checkpoint dysfunction in large and medium vessel vasculitis

2017 ◽  
Vol 312 (5) ◽  
pp. H1052-H1059 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ryu Watanabe ◽  
Hui Zhang ◽  
Gerald Berry ◽  
Jörg J. Goronzy ◽  
Cornelia M. Weyand
Keyword(s):  
T Cells ◽  
Cell Death ◽  
T Cell ◽  
Programmed Cell Death ◽  
Immune Checkpoint ◽  
Intimal Hyperplasia ◽  
Cd4 T Cells ◽  
Vessel Wall ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Cell Death Protein

Giant cell arteritis (GCA) is a granulomatous vasculitis of the aorta and its medium-sized branch vessels. CD4 T cells, macrophages, and dendritic cells (DCs) build granulomatous infiltrates that injure the vessel wall and elicit a maladaptive response to injury. Pathological consequences include fragmentation of elastic membranes, destruction of the medial layer, microvascular neoangiogenesis, massive outgrowth of myofibroblasts, and lumen-occlusive intimal hyperplasia. Antigens have been suspected to drive the local activation of vasculitogenic CD4 T cells, but recent data have suggested a more generalized defect in the threshold setting of such T cells, rendering them hyperreactive. Under physiological conditions, immune checkpoints provide negative signals to curb T cell activation and prevent inflammation-associated tissue destruction. This protective mechanism is disrupted in GCA. Vessel wall DCs fail to express the immunoinhibitory ligand programmed cell death ligand-1, leaving lesional T cells unchecked. Consequently, programmed cell death protein-1-positive CD4 T cells can enter the immunoprivileged vessel wall, where they produce a broad spectrum of inflammatory cytokines (interferon-γ, IL-17, and IL-21) and have a direct role in driving intimal hyperplasia and intramural neoangiogenesis. The deficiency of the programmed cell death protein-1 immune checkpoint in GCA, promoting unopposed T cell immunity, contrasts with checkpoint hyperactivity in cancer patients in whom excessive programmed cell death ligand-1 expression paralyzes the function of antitumor T cells. Excessive checkpoint activity is the principle underlying cancer-immune evasion and is therapeutically targeted by immunotherapy with checkpoint inhibitors. Such checkpoint inhibitors, which unleash anticancer T cells and induce immune-related toxicity, may lead to drug-induced vasculitis.

scholarly journals Anti–PD-L1 Treatment Induced Central Diabetes Insipidus

2017 ◽  
Vol 103 (2) ◽  
pp. 365-369 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chen Zhao ◽  
Sri Harsha Tella ◽  
Jaydira Del Rivero ◽  
Anuhya Kommalapati ◽  
Ifechukwude Ebenuwa ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cell Death ◽  
Programmed Cell Death ◽  
Diabetes Insipidus ◽  
Immune Checkpoint ◽  
Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Cytotoxic T Lymphocyte ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Central Diabetes Insipidus ◽  
Early Screening ◽  
Cell Death Protein

Abstract Context Immune checkpoint inhibitors, including anti–programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1), anti–programmed cell death protein ligand 1 (PD-L1), and anti–cytotoxic T-lymphocyte antigen 4 (anti-CTLA4) monoclonal antibodies, have been widely used in cancer treatment. They are known to cause immune-related adverse events (irAEs), which resemble autoimmune diseases. Anterior pituitary hypophysitis with secondary hypopituitarism is a frequently reported irAE, especially in patients receiving anti–CTLA4 treatment. In contrast, posterior pituitary involvement, such as central diabetes insipidus (DI), is relatively rare and is unreported in patients undergoing PD-1/PD-L1 blockade. Case Description We describe a case of a 73-year-old man with Merkel cell carcinoma who received the anti–PD-L1 monoclonal antibody avelumab and achieved partial response. The patient developed nocturia, polydipsia, and polyuria 3 months after starting avelumab. Further laboratory testing revealed central DI. Avelumab was held and he received desmopressin for the management of central DI. Within 6 weeks after discontinuation of avelumab, the patient’s symptoms resolved and he was eventually taken off desmopressin. The patient remained off avelumab and there were no signs or symptoms of DI 2 months after the discontinuation of desmopressin. Conclusion To our knowledge, this is the first report of central DI associated with anti–PD-L1 immunotherapy. The patient’s endocrinopathy was successfully managed by holding treatment with the immune checkpoint inhibitor. This case highlights the importance of early screening and appropriate management of hormonal irAEs in subjects undergoing treatment with immune checkpoint inhibitors to minimize morbidity and mortality.

scholarly journals Immune-related pneumonitis associated with immune checkpoint inhibitors in lung cancer: a network meta-analysis

2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (2) ◽  
pp. e001170
Author(s):  
Xinru Chen ◽  
Zhonghan Zhang ◽  
Xue Hou ◽  
Yaxiong Zhang ◽  
Ting Zhou ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Lung Cancer ◽  
Cell Death ◽  
Programmed Cell Death ◽  
Immune Checkpoint ◽  
Lower Risk ◽  
Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
Grade 3

BackgroundImmune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have dramatically revolutionized lung cancer treatment, providing unprecedented clinical benefits. However, immune-related pneumonitis (IRP) caused by ICIs has aroused widespread concern due to its high rate of discontinuation and mortality. This network meta-analysis (NMA) aims to compare the risks of IRP among different regimens for advanced lung cancer.MethodsPhase II and III randomized clinical trials (RCTs) were searched from electronic databases. The rates of grade 1–5 IRP and grade 3–5 IRP were systematically extracted. An NMA was conducted among chemotherapy, ICIs monotherapy, dual ICIs combination, and ICIs+chemotherapy. Subgroup analysis was also compared based on specific types of ICIs.ResultsTwenty-five RCTs involving 17,310 patients were eligible for inclusion. Compared with chemotherapy, ICI-based regimens were associated with an increased risk of grade 1–5 IRP and grade 3–5 IRP. Compared with ICIs+chemotherapy, ICIs monotherapy (grade 1–5: OR 2.14, 95% credible interval 1.12 to 4.80; grade 3–5: 3.03, 1.491 to 6.69) and dual ICIs combination (grade 1–5: 3.86, 1.69 to 9.89; grade 3–5: 5.12, 2.01 to 13.68) were associated with a higher risk of grade 1–5 IRP and grade 3–5 IRP. No significant difference was found between dual ICIs combination and ICIs monotherapy in grade 1–5 IRP (1.85, 0.91 to 3.37) or in grade 3–5 IRP (1.65, 0.81 to 3.37). Besides, compared with programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) inhibitors (2.56, 1.12 to 6.60), a lower risk of grade 1–5 IRP was observed in programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1) inhibitors.ConclusionCompared with chemotherapy, using ICIs is associated with an increased risk of IRP. ICIs+chemotherapy is associated with a lower risk of IRP compared with dual ICIs combination and ICIs monotherapy. PD-1 inhibitors are associated with a higher risk of 1–5 grade IRP compared with PD-L1 inhibitors.

Pointed Progress in Second-Line Advanced Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer: The Rapidly Evolving Field of Checkpoint Inhibition

2016 ◽  
Vol 34 (14) ◽  
pp. 1676-1688 ◽  
Author(s):  
Barbara Melosky ◽  
Quincy Chu ◽  
Rosalyn Juergens ◽  
Natasha Leighl ◽  
Deanna McLeod ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Lung Cancer ◽  
Cell Death ◽  
Programmed Cell Death ◽  
Randomized Trials ◽  
Advanced Nsclc ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Small Cell ◽  
Second Line ◽  
Small Cell Lung ◽  
Cell Death Protein

Purpose Non–small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is globally prevalent and associated with high rates of mortality. Immune checkpoint pathways are often exploited by tumors to evade immunity-mediated destruction, and checkpoint inhibitors can reactivate tumor-related immune responses. This review considers available clinical evidence for the use of checkpoint inhibitors in the treatment of second-line advanced NSCLC. Methods Our systematic search revealed 20 clinical trials evaluating checkpoint inhibitors in the second-line setting, three of which were randomized trials comparing programmed cell death protein 1 and programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) inhibitors to docetaxel, the current standard of care in this setting. Results A randomized phase II trial comparing the PD-L1 inhibitor atezolizumab to docetaxel did not demonstrate improved survival for atezolizumab in patients overall, although a trend toward improved survival with increased PD-L1 expression was apparent. Twin phase III trials showed significantly improved survival for the programmed cell death protein 1 inhibitor nivolumab compared with docetaxel in patients with both squamous and nonsquamous disease. PD-L1 expression correlated with improved survival in patients with nonsquamous disease, and patients with low levels of PD-L1 expression (< 10%) and those with EGFR mutations are unlikely to benefit. Checkpoint inhibitor therapy is generally well tolerated and associated with low rates of grade 3 or 4 adverse events compared with standard care. Conclusion Level 1 evidence exists to support the use of nivolumab as second-line treatment of patients with squamous advanced NSCLC, as well as in select patients with nonsquamous disease. Benefits remain unknown in patients with targetable driver mutations, and use of PD-L1 expression to guide therapy remains controversial. Results from ongoing randomized trials evaluating biomarkers and other checkpoint inhibitors will further our understanding of this rapidly evolving area of oncology.

scholarly journals Clinical heterogeneity of hypophysitis secondary to PD-1/PD-L1 blockade: insights from four cases

2019 ◽  
Vol 2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Isabella Lupi ◽  
Alessandro Brancatella ◽  
Mirco Cosottini ◽  
Nicola Viola ◽  
Giulia Lanzolla ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cell Death ◽  
Programmed Cell Death ◽  
T Cell Activation ◽  
Cell Activation ◽  
Clinical Presentation ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Combined Therapy ◽  
Case Series ◽  
List Type ◽  
Cell Death Protein

Summary Programmed cell death protein 1/programmed cell death protein ligand 1 (PD-1/PD-L1) and cytotoxic T-lymphocyte antigen 4/B7 (CTLA-4/B7) pathways are key regulators in T-cell activation and tolerance. Nivolumab, pembrolizumab (PD-1 inhibitors), atezolizumab (PD-L1 inhibitor) and ipilimumab (CTLA-4 inhibitor) are monoclonal antibodies approved for treatment of several advanced cancers. Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs)-related hypophysitis is described more frequently in patients treated with anti-CTLA-4; however, recent studies reported an increasing prevalence of anti-PD-1/PD-L1-induced hypophysitis which also exhibits slightly different clinical features. We report our experience on hypophysitis induced by anti-PD-1/anti-PD-L1 treatment. We present four cases, diagnosed in the past 12 months, of hypophysitis occurring in two patients receiving anti-PD-1, in one patient receiving anti-PD-1 and anti-CTLA-4 combined therapy and in one patient receiving anti-PD-L1. In this case series, timing, clinical presentation and association with other immune-related adverse events appeared to be extremely variable; central hypoadrenalism and hyponatremia were constantly detected although sellar magnetic resonance imaging did not reveal specific signs of pituitary inflammation. These differences highlight the complexity of ICI-related hypophysitis and the existence of different mechanisms of action leading to heterogeneity of clinical presentation in patients receiving immunotherapy. Learning points: PD-1/PD-L1 blockade can induce hypophysitis with a different clinical presentation when compared to CTLA-4 blockade. Diagnosis of PD-1/PD-L1 induced hypophysitis is mainly made on clinical grounds and sellar MRI does not show radiological abnormalities. Hyponatremia due to acute secondary adrenal insufficiency is often the principal sign of PD-1/PD-L1-induced hypophysitis and can be masked by other symptoms due to oncologic disease. PD-1/PD-L1-induced hypophysitis can present as an isolated manifestation of irAEs or be in association with other autoimmune diseases

scholarly journals Role of immune-checkpoint inhibitors in lung cancer

2018 ◽  
Vol 12 ◽  
pp. 175346581775007 ◽  
Author(s):  
Prantesh Jain ◽  
Chhavi Jain ◽  
Vamsidhar Velcheti
Keyword(s):  
Lung Cancer ◽  
Cell Death ◽  
Programmed Cell Death ◽  
Immune Checkpoint ◽  
Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Cytotoxic T Lymphocyte ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Predictive Biomarkers ◽  
Clinical Activity

Immune checkpoint inhibitors, mainly drugs targeting the programmed cell death 1 (PD-1)/programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1) and cytotoxic T-lymphocyte antigen 4 (CTLA4) pathways, represent a remarkable advance in lung cancer treatment. Immune checkpoint inhibitors targeting PD-1 and PD-L1 are approved for the treatment of patients with non-small-cell lung cancer, with impressive clinical activity and durable responses in some patients. This review will summarize the mechanism of action of these drugs, the clinical development of these agents and the current role of these agents in the management of patients with lung cancer. In addition, the review will discuss the role of predictive biomarkers for optimal patient selection for immunotherapy and management of autoimmune side effects of these agents.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document