scholarly journals Effects of Dexmedetomidine on Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting in Adult Patients Undergoing Ambulatory Thyroidectomy: A Randomized Clinical Trial

2021 ◽  
Vol 8 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cuiyu Xie ◽  
Caihui Zhang ◽  
Hao Sun ◽  
Yao Lu
Keyword(s):  
Relative Risk ◽  
Postoperative Nausea ◽  
Prospective Trial ◽  
Postoperative Nausea And Vomiting ◽  
Adult Patients ◽  
Nausea And Vomiting ◽  
Severe Nausea ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Pain Scores ◽  
Significant Difference

Background: Postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) is a common and disturbing problem in patients undergoing ambulatory thyroidectomy. This prospective trial aimed to explore whether dexmedetomidine (DEX) combined with azasetron (AZA) can further drop the incidence of PONV in patients undergoing ambulatory thyroidectomy compared with AZA.Methods: This single-center, randomized, double-blind trial involved 172 adult patients undergoing ambulatory thyroidectomy. The individuals were randomized to DEX + AZA group and AZA group. In the DEX + AZA group, patients received dexmedetomidine 0.5 μg kg−1 for 10 min and then the infusion rate was held at 0.1 μg kg−1 h−1 until the completion of the operation, while the same amount of 0.9% saline in the AZA group. At the completion of the surgery, 10 mg azasetron was administered to every patient in both groups. The primary outcome was the incidence of 24 h PONV after ambulatory thyroidectomy. The secondary outcomes included residence time in recovery room, pain scores, severity of nausea, and adverse events.Results: No significant difference was found in the incidence of 24-h PONV between the DEX + AZA group and the AZA group [36% (30 of 84) vs. 38% (32 of 84); relative risk, 0.94; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.63–1.40; P = 0.749]. The incidence of severe nausea was similar between the DEX + AZA group and the AZA group [57% (12 of 21) vs. 43% (9 of 21); relative risk, 1.33; 95% CI, 0.72–2.50; P = 0.355].Conclusions: Intraoperative dexmedetomidine combined with azasetron failed to drop the incidence of 24-h PONV compared with azasetron alone in patients undergoing ambulatory thyroidectomy.

scholarly journals Granisetron versus Granisetron-Dexamethasone for Prevention of Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting in Pediatric Strabismus Surgery: A Randomized Double-Blind Trial

2016 ◽  
Vol 2016 ◽  
pp. 1-6 ◽  
Author(s):  
Renu Sinha ◽  
Dilip Shende ◽  
Souvik Maitra ◽  
Neeraj Kumar ◽  
Bikash Ranjan Ray ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Postoperative Nausea ◽  
Postoperative Nausea And Vomiting ◽  
Complete Response ◽  
Strabismus Surgery ◽  
Nausea And Vomiting ◽  
Fisher Exact Test ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Exact Test ◽  
Oculocardiac Reflex ◽  
Significant Difference

Aim.Efficacy of granisetron and combination of granisetron and dexamethasone was evaluated for prevention of postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) in children undergoing elective strabismus surgery.Methods.A total of 136 children (1–15 years) were included. Children received either granisetron (40 mcg/kg) [group G] or combination of granisetron (40 mcg/kg) and dexamethasone (150 mcg/kg) [group GD]. Intraoperative fentanyl requirement and incidence and severity of oculocardiac reflex were assessed. PONV severity was assessed for first 24 hours and if score was >2, it was treated with metoclopramide. Postoperative analgesia was administered with intravenous fentanyl and ibuprofen.Results.The demographic profile, muscles operated, and fentanyl requirement were comparable. Complete response to PONV in first 24 hours was observed in 75% (51/68) of children in group G and 76.9% (50/65) of children in group GD, which was comparable statistically (p=0.96, Fisher exact test; OR 1.11, 95% CI 0.50, 2.46). Incidence of PONV between 0 and 24 hours was comparable. One child in group G required rescue antiemetic in first 24 hours and none of the children had severe PONV in group GD. There was no significant difference in incidence or severity of oculocardiac reflex.Conclusion.Dexamethasone did not increase efficacy of granisetron for prevention of PONV in elective pediatric strabismus surgery. Registration number of clinical trial wasCTRI/2009/091/001000.

scholarly journals Preoperative Fasting Abbreviation and its Effects on Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting Incidence in Gynecological Surgery Patients

2020 ◽  
Vol 42 (08) ◽  
pp. 468-475
Author(s):  
Gisele Vissoci Marquini ◽  
Francisco Edes da Silva Pinheiro ◽  
Alfredo Urbano da Costa Vieira ◽  
Rogério Melo da Costa Pinto ◽  
Maria Gabriela Baumgarten Kuster Uyeda ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
At Risk ◽  
Postoperative Nausea ◽  
Randomized Study ◽  
Postoperative Nausea And Vomiting ◽  
Nausea And Vomiting ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Gynecological Surgery ◽  
Preoperative Fasting ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Significant Difference

Abstract Objective To investigate the effects of preoperative fasting abbreviation with a carbohydrate and protein-enriched solution, on postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) incidence in gynecological surgery patients, a population naturally at risk for such unpleasant episodes. Methods The present prospective double-blind randomized study was performed at The Hospital Municipal e Maternidade Dr. Odelmo Leão Carneiro (HMMOLC, in the Portuguese acronym), in Uberlândia, state of Minas Gerais, Brazil, in partnership with the Gynecology Department of the Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP), approved by the Human Research Ethics Committee of UNIFESP and the board of HMMOLC, and included in the Brazil Platform and in the Brazilian Clinical Trial Registry. After signing the consent form, 80 women, who were submitted to gynecological surgery in the period from January to June 2016, were randomized into 2 groups: control group (n = 42) and juice group (n = 38). They received, respectively, 200 mL of inert solution or liquid enriched with carbohydrate and protein 4 hours presurgery. The incidence, frequency and intensity of PONV were studied using the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), with statistical analysis performed by the software IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 20.0 (IBM Corp, Armonk, NY, USA). Results The incidence of nausea and vomiting was lower than in the literature, to this population, with 18.9% (14/74) for the control group and 10.8% (8/74) for the juice group, respectively, with no statistically significant difference between the groups. Conclusion The incidence of nausea and vomiting was lower than in the literature, but it cannot be said that this is due to the abbreviation of fasting. It can provide greater comfort, with the possibility of PONV prevention in patients at risk for these episodes.

scholarly journals Is Infusion of Subhypnotic Propofol as Effective as Dexamethasone in Prevention of Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting Related to Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy? A Randomized Controlled Trial

2015 ◽  
Vol 2015 ◽  
pp. 1-5 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mine Celik ◽  
Aysenur Dostbil ◽  
Mehmet Aksoy ◽  
Ilker Ince ◽  
Ali Ahiskalioglu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy ◽  
Postoperative Nausea ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Postoperative Nausea And Vomiting ◽  
Nausea And Vomiting ◽  
Controlled Study ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Group D

Background. Postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) is one of common complications in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC). Aim of this study was to compare the efficacy of subhypnotic (1 mg/kg/h) infusion of propofol with dexamethasone on PONV in patients undergoing LC.Methods. A total of 120 patients were included in this randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Patients were randomly assigned to 3 groups; patients of group dexamethasone (group D) were administrated 8 mg dexamethasone before induction of anesthesia, patients of group propofol (group P) were infused to subhypnotic (1 mg/kg/h) propofol during operation and patients of group control (group C) were applied infusion of 10% intralipid. The incidence of PONV and needs for rescue analgesic and antiemetic were recorded in the first 24 h postoperatively.Results. In the 0–24 h, the incidence of PONV was significantly lower in the group D and group P compared with the group C (37.5%, 40%, and 72.5%, resp.). There was no significant difference in the incidence of PONV and use of antiemetics and analgesic between group D and group P.Conclusion. We concluded that infusion of propofol 1 mg/kg/h is as effective as dexamethasone for the prevention of PONV during the first 24 hours after anesthesia in patients undergoing LC.

scholarly journals A Double-Blind Randomized Controlled Trial of Ginger for the Prevention of Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting

1995 ◽  
Vol 23 (4) ◽  
pp. 449-452 ◽  
Author(s):  
Z. Arfeen ◽  
H. Owen ◽  
J. L. Plummer ◽  
A. H. Ilsley ◽  
R. A. C. Sorby-Adams ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Randomized Controlled Trial ◽  
Postoperative Nausea ◽  
Odds Ratio ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Postoperative Nausea And Vomiting ◽  
Nausea And Vomiting ◽  
Severe Nausea ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Randomized Controlled ◽  
Oral Diazepam

The efficacy of ginger for the prevention of postoperative nausea and vomiting was studied in a double-blind, randomized, controlled trial in 108 ASA 1 or 2 patients undergoing gynaecological laparoscopic surgery under general anaesthesia. Patients received oral placebo, ginger BP 0.5g or ginger BP 1.0g, all with oral diazepam premedication, one hour prior to surgery. Patients were assessed at three hours postoperatively. The incidence of nausea and vomiting increased slightly but nonsignificantly with increasing dose of ginger. The incidence of moderate or severe nausea was 22, 33 and 36%, while the incidence of vomiting was 17, 14 and 31% in groups receiving 0, 0.5 and 1.0g ginger, respectively (odds ratio per 0.5g ginger 1.39 for nausea and 1.55 for vomiting). These results were essentially unchanged when adjustment was made for concomitant risk factors. We conclude that ginger BP in doses of 0.5 or 1.0 gram is ineffective in reducing the incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting.

scholarly journals Effect of Supplemental Perioperative Oxygen 80% in Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting in Patients Undergoing Cataract Surgery

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Aliakbar Keykha ◽  
Mahshid Ashrafzadeh ◽  
Alireza Rahat Dahmardeh ◽  
Bibi Mahdie Khodadadi Hosseini
Keyword(s):  
Cataract Surgery ◽  
Incidence Rate ◽  
Postoperative Nausea ◽  
Postoperative Nausea And Vomiting ◽  
Supplemental Oxygen ◽  
Nausea And Vomiting ◽  
Chi Square ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Double Blind Clinical Trial ◽  
Significant Difference

Background: Postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) leads to an increase in intraocular pressure (IOP) and its side effects, which should be controlled using the least complicated method. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of 80% supplemental perioperative oxygen on PONV in patients undergoing cataract surgery. Methods: The present double-blind clinical trial was conducted on 201 patients undergoing cataract surgery. The subjects were selected by convenience sampling method and randomly divided into two groups of oxygen 30% administration and oxygen 80% administration. The operation of patients was performed with the same surgical procedure and team. After the operation, the incidence rate of PONV was recorded in both groups and compared along with other variables by SPSS software using descriptive statistics and chi-square. Results: There was no significant difference in age and sex between the two groups. The incidence rate of PONV was high in both groups, with statistically significant higher value in the group with 30% supplemental oxygen compared to the group with 80% supplemental oxygen (p=0.000). Conclusion: The use of 80% perioperative oxygen concentration could reduce the PONV severity

scholarly journals Perbandingan Aromaterapi Pepermin dengan Ondansetron Intravena sebagai Terapi Rescue Mual Muntah Pascaoperasi Mastektomi

2019 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
pp. 25-32
Author(s):  
Arna Fransisca ◽  
Iwan Fuadi ◽  
Dewi Yulianti Bisri
Keyword(s):  
Randomized Controlled Trial ◽  
Postoperative Nausea ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Postoperative Nausea And Vomiting ◽  
Nausea And Vomiting ◽  
Chi Square ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Consecutive Sampling ◽  
Randomized Controlled ◽  
Significant Difference

Mual muntah pascaoperasi merupakan salah satu komplikasi anestesi dan operasi yang menjadi perhatian khusus karena memengaruhi kualitas pelayanan kesehatan, memperpanjang lama perawatan, dan meningkatkan angka morbiditas perioperatif. Pascaoperasi payudara berkaitan dengan angka kejadian mual muntah pascaoperasi yang tinggi. Beberapa konsensus penatalaksanaan mual muntah pascaoperasi merekomendasikan pemberian terapi nonfarmakologi dengan aromaterapi sebagai terapi rescue untuk mengatasi mual muntah pascaoperasi. Tujuan penelitian ini adalah membandingkan aromaterapi pepermin dengan ondansetron sebagai terapi rescue dalam menurunkan kejadian mual muntah pascaoperasi mastektomi. Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian eksperimental yang dilakukan secara prospektif dengan desain penelitian double blind randomized controlled trial dan consecutive sampling terhadap 32 subjek penelitian yang menjalani operasi mastektomi elektif dan memenuhi kriteria inklusi di RSUP Dr. Hasan Sadikin Bandung pada bulan Juli–September 2018. Pada penelitian ini, data ordinal diuji dengan Uji Mann Whitney dan untuk data kategorik diuji dengan uji chi-square. Hasil penelitian ini didapatkan penurunan kejadian mual muntah pascaoperasi yang signifikan pada kelompok pepermin dibanding dengan kelompok ondansetron dengan perbedaan yang bermakna (p<0,05) pada penilaian menit kedua dan menit kelima setelah perlakuan. Simpulan, aromaterapi pepermin efektif menurunkan kejadian mual muntah pascaoperasi mastektomi dan dapat digunakan sebagai alternatif terapi atau terapi tambahan untuk penatalaksanaan mual muntah pascaoperasi.Comparison of Peppermint Aromatherapy with Ondansetron Intravenous as a Rescue for Postoperative Nausea Vomiting after Mastectomy SurgeryPostoperative nausea and vomiting are among anesthesia and surgery  complications that receive special considerations as it affects the quality of healthcare services, prolongs care, and increases perioperative morbidities. The incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting is high in patients that have undergone breast surgery. The consensus for postoperative nausea and vomiting management recommends non-pharmacological treatments, one of which is through the use of aromatherapy as a rescue to resolve postoperative nausea and vomiting. This study aimed to compare the effects of peppermint aromatherapy and ondansetron as a rescue in reducing the incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting after elective mastectomies. This was a prospective experimental double blind randomized controlled trial study with consecutive sampling on 32 research subjects underwent elective mastectomies and met the inclusion criteria in Dr. Hasan Sadikin General Hospital in July–September 2018. The ordinal data were tested using the Mann Whitney statistics test and the categorical data using the chi square test. The results show a significant decrease in nausea and vomiting incidence in the peppermint group compared to the ondansetron group with significant difference (p<0.05) in two minutes and five minutes after treatment. In conclusion, peppermint aromatherapy is effective in reducing the incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting after mastectomies and can be used as an alternative or additional treatment in managing postoperative nausea and vomiting.

scholarly journals Comparison of Ondansetron and Granisetron Effects for Prevention of Nausea and Vomiting Following Strabismus Surgery

2019 ◽  
Vol 7 (19) ◽  
pp. 3195-3200
Author(s):  
Shirin Salajagheh ◽  
Soodeh Kuhestani ◽  
Mahdieh Sharifzadeh Kermani ◽  
Omid Taheri ◽  
Naeimeh Naeimi Bafghi
Keyword(s):  
Postoperative Nausea ◽  
Rating Scale ◽  
Intervention Group ◽  
Postoperative Nausea And Vomiting ◽  
Strabismus Surgery ◽  
Nausea And Vomiting ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Chi Square ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Significant Difference

BACKGROUND: Postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) is a common complaint after strabismus surgery that leads to unpleasantness, increased hospitalisation time and increased costs. In severe cases, it can lead to dehydration, electrolyte disturbances, aspiration, pneumonia, and even sutures opening. AIM: This study was conducted to compare the effects of both ondansetron and granisetron on the reduction of PONV after strabismus surgery. METHODS: This randomised, and the double-blind clinical study was conducted on patients with ASA I and II undergoing strabismus surgery with age over 3 years old in Shafa Hospital, Kerman University of Medical Sciences during 2017 under general anaesthesia. Patients with inclusion criteria were randomly assigned to one of three groups including Ondansetron (A), Granisetron (B) and control group (C). Matching cases and controls on drugs were fully completed. Furthermore, 100 μg/kg of Ondansetron was intravenously injected, followed by injection of 40 μg/kg Granisetron for another intervention group. All patients underwent the same anaesthetic procedure and intravenous injection of drugs during anaesthesia induction. The severity of nausea and vomiting in recovery, 6 and 18 hours after the operation were verified according to the Verbal Rating Scale (VRS). Our data were analysed by Chi-square, ANOVA and TUKEY tests via SPSS version 18. RESULTS: There was no significant difference between the three groups in terms of age and sex. The incidence of postoperative nausea in recovery among three groups of A, B and C was determined to be 15, 7.5 and 37.5%, respectively. No significant difference was found between the two groups A and B (P = 0.68), although there was a significant difference between these two groups and group C (P < 0.05). The incidence of nausea at 6 hours after surgery in groups A, B and C was recorded as 40, 15 and 65% respectively, indicating that the incidence of nausea in group B was significantly lower than the other two groups, while showed a significant difference with group A (P = 0.039) and group C (P < 0.05). Also, the incident of nausea between groups was not statistically significant 18 hours after surgery (P < 0.05). Additionally, no significant difference was found in different groups in terms of vomiting incidence in recovery, 6 and 18 hours after surgery (P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Our study suggests that Granisetron is more effective in preventing PONV during 6 hours after the surgery in comparison with Ondansetron which makes it a favourable alternative for preventing PONV.

scholarly journals Ondansetron for Prevention of Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting following Minor Oral Surgery: A Double-blind Randomized Study

1994 ◽  
Vol 22 (5) ◽  
pp. 576-579 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. R. C. Rodrigo ◽  
R. C. H. Campbell ◽  
J. Chow ◽  
C. K. A. Tong ◽  
E. Hui ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Placebo Group ◽  
Postoperative Nausea ◽  
Oral Surgery ◽  
Postoperative Nausea And Vomiting ◽  
Nausea And Vomiting ◽  
General Anaesthetic ◽  
Double Blind Study ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Minor Oral Surgery

The efficacy and safety of ondansetron in preventing postoperative nausea and vomiting following minor oral surgery was evaluated in a prospective randomized double-blind study. Of a total of seventy-seven patients, randomly 38 had 4 mg of ondansetron and 39 had normal saline as placebo intravenously immediately prior to induction of anaesthesia. A standard general anaesthetic with thiopentone, suxamethonium, fentanyl, nitrous oxide and isoflurane was employed. Postoperatively nausea was assessed verbally and on a visual analog scale at 1, 4 and 24 hours from the time of awakening. Episodes of vomiting were recorded. Eight patients (21.1%) in the ondansetron group compared to 19 (48.7%) in the placebo group had nausea (P < 0.05) and 1 (2.6%) in the ondansetron group compared with 9 (23.1%) in the placebo group vomited (P < 0.05). Patients who vomited twice or more and the number who required a rescue antiemetic were significantly fewer in the ondansetron group (P < 0.05). Cardiovascular parameters were stable and showed no significant difference in the two groups. There were no significant adverse effects that could be directly attributable to ondansetron.

Intravenous Amisulpride for the Prevention of Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting

2017 ◽  
Vol 126 (2) ◽  
pp. 268-275 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tong J. Gan ◽  
Peter Kranke ◽  
Harold S. Minkowitz ◽  
Sergio D. Bergese ◽  
Johann Motsch ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Postoperative Nausea ◽  
Elective Surgery ◽  
Postoperative Nausea And Vomiting ◽  
Complete Response ◽  
Nausea And Vomiting ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Parallel Group ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Clinically Significant

Abstract Background Two essentially identical, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group phase III studies evaluated the efficacy of intravenous amisulpride, a dopamine D2/D3 antagonist, in the prevention of postoperative nausea and vomiting in adult surgical patients. Methods Adult inpatients undergoing elective surgery during general anesthesia and having at least two of the four Apfel risk factors for postoperative nausea and vomiting were enrolled at 9 U.S. and 10 European sites. A single 5-mg dose of amisulpride or matching placebo was given at induction of anesthesia. The primary endpoint was complete response, defined as no vomiting/retching and no use of antiemetic rescue medication in the 24-h postoperative period. Nausea incidence was a secondary endpoint. Results Across the two studies, 689 patients were randomized and dosed with study medication, of whom 626 were evaluable per protocol. In the U.S. study, 46.9% (95% CI, 39.0 to 54.9) of patients achieved complete response in the amisulpride group compared to 33.8% (95% CI, 26.2 to 42.0) in the placebo group (P = 0.026). In the European study, complete response rates were 57.4% (95% CI, 49.2 to 65.3) for amisulpride and 46.6% (95% CI, 38.8 to 54.6) for placebo (P = 0.070). Nausea occurred less often in patients who received amisulpride than those who received placebo. There was no clinically significant difference in the safety profile of amisulpride and placebo; in particular, there were no differences in terms of QT prolongation, extrapyramidal side effects, or sedation. Conclusions One of the two trials demonstrated superiority, while pooling both in a post hoc change to the plan of analysis supported the hypothesis that amisulpride was safe and superior to placebo in reducing the incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting in a population of adult inpatients at moderate to high risk of postoperative nausea and vomiting.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document