scholarly journals Diffeomorphic Registration With Intensity Transformation and Missing Data: Application to 3D Digital Pathology of Alzheimer's Disease

2020 ◽  
Vol 14 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniel Tward ◽  
Timothy Brown ◽  
Yusuke Kageyama ◽  
Jaymin Patel ◽  
Zhipeng Hou ◽  
...  
2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniel Jacob Tward ◽  
Timothy Brown ◽  
Yusuke Kageyama ◽  
Jaymin Patel ◽  
Zhipeng Hou ◽  
...  

This paper examines the problem of diffeomorphic image mapping in the presence of differing image intensity profiles and missing data. Our motivation comes from the problem of aligning 3D brain MRI with 100 micron isotropic resolution, to histology sections with 1 micron in plane resolution. Multiple stains, as well as damaged, folded, or missing tissue are common in this situation. We overcome these challenges by introducing two new concepts. Cross modality image matching is achieved by jointly estimating polynomial transformations of the atlas intensity, together with pose and deformation parameters. Missing data is accommodated via a multiple atlas selection procedure where several atlases may be of homogeneous intensity and correspond to ''background'' or ''artifact''. The two concepts are combined within an Expectation Maximization algorithm, where atlas selection posteriors and deformation parameters are updated iteratively, and polynomial coefficients are computed in closed form. We show results for 3D reconstruction of digital pathology and MRI in standard atlas coordinates. In conjunction with convolutional neural networks, we quantify the 3D density distribution of tauopathy throughout the medial temporal lobe of an Alzheimer's disease postmortem specimen.


2021 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Angela M. Crist ◽  
Kelly M. Hinkle ◽  
Xue Wang ◽  
Christina M. Moloney ◽  
Billie J. Matchett ◽  
...  

AbstractSelective vulnerability of different brain regions is seen in many neurodegenerative disorders. The hippocampus and cortex are selectively vulnerable in Alzheimer’s disease (AD), however the degree of involvement of the different brain regions differs among patients. We classified corticolimbic patterns of neurofibrillary tangles in postmortem tissue to capture extreme and representative phenotypes. We combined bulk RNA sequencing with digital pathology to examine hippocampal vulnerability in AD. We identified hippocampal gene expression changes associated with hippocampal vulnerability and used machine learning to identify genes that were associated with AD neuropathology, including SERPINA5, RYBP, SLC38A2, FEM1B, and PYDC1. Further histologic and biochemical analyses suggested SERPINA5 expression is associated with tau expression in the brain. Our study highlights the importance of embracing heterogeneity of the human brain in disease to identify disease-relevant gene expression.


NeuroImage ◽  
2006 ◽  
Vol 30 (3) ◽  
pp. 768-779 ◽  
Author(s):  
Satoru Hayasaka ◽  
An-Tao Du ◽  
Audrey Duarte ◽  
John Kornak ◽  
Geon-Ho Jahng ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Minh Nguyen ◽  
Tong He ◽  
Lijun An ◽  
Daniel C. Alexander ◽  
Jiashi Feng ◽  
...  

AbstractEarly identification of individuals at risk of developing Alzheimer’s disease (AD) dementia is important for developing disease-modifying therapies. In this study, given multimodal AD markers and clinical diagnosis of an individual from one or more timepoints, we seek to predict the clinical diagnosis, cognition and ventricular volume of the individual for every month (indefinitely) into the future. We proposed and applied a minimal recurrent neural network (minimalRNN) model to data from The Alzheimer’s Disease Prediction Of Longitudinal Evolution (TADPOLE) challenge, comprising longitudinal data of 1677 participants (Marinescu et al. 2018) from the Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI). We compared the performance of the minimalRNN model and four baseline algorithms up to 6 years into the future. Most previous work on predicting AD progression ignore the issue of missing data, which is a prevalent issue in longitudinal data. Here, we explored three different strategies to handle missing data. Two of the strategies treated the missing data as a “preprocessing” issue, by imputing the missing data using the previous timepoint (“forward filling”) or linear interpolation (“linear filling). The third strategy utilized the minimalRNN model itself to fill in the missing data both during training and testing (“model filling”). Our analyses suggest that the minimalRNN with “model filling” compared favorably with baseline algorithms, including support vector machine/regression, linear state space (LSS) model, and long short-term memory (LSTM) model. Importantly, although the training procedure utilized longitudinal data, we found that the trained minimalRNN model exhibited similar performance, when using only 1 input timepoint or 4 input timepoints, suggesting that our approach might work well with just cross-sectional data. An earlier version of our approach was ranked 5th (out of 53 entries) in the TADPOLE challenge in 2019. The current approach is ranked 2nd out of 63 entries as of June 3rd, 2020.


2011 ◽  
Vol 999 (999) ◽  
pp. 1-12
Author(s):  
N. Coley ◽  
V. Gardette ◽  
C. Cantet ◽  
S. Gillette-Guyonnet ◽  
F. Nourhashemi ◽  
...  

2012 ◽  
Vol 8 (4S_Part_6) ◽  
pp. P211-P212
Author(s):  
Janna Neltner ◽  
Stephanie Denison ◽  
Ela Patel ◽  
Sonya Anderson ◽  
Peter Nelson

2021 ◽  
pp. 174077452098231
Author(s):  
Shana D Stites ◽  
R Scott Turner ◽  
Jeanine Gill ◽  
Anna Gurian ◽  
Jason Karlawish ◽  
...  

Background Missing data are a notable problem in Alzheimer’s disease clinical trials. One cause of missing data is participant dropout. The Research Attitudes Questionnaire is a 7-item instrument that measures an individual’s attitudes toward biomedical research, with higher scores indicating more favorable attitudes. The objective of this study was to describe the performance of the Research Attitudes Questionnaire over time and to examine whether Research Attitudes Questionnaire scores predict study dropout and other participant behaviors that affect trial integrity. Methods The Research Attitudes Questionnaire was collected at baseline and weeks 26 and 52 from each member of 119 participant/study partner dyads enrolled in a Phase 2, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled mild-to-moderate Alzheimer’s disease clinical trial. Within-subject longitudinal analyses examined change in Research Attitudes Questionnaire scores over time in each population. Logistic regression analyses that controlled for trial arm and clustering in trial sites were used to assess whether baseline Research Attitudes Questionnaire scores predicted trial completion, study medication compliance, and enrollment in optional substudies. Results Participants and study partners endorsed statistically similar ratings on the Research Attitudes Questionnaire that were stable over time. Participants with baseline Research Attitudes Questionnaire scores above 28.5 were 4.7 (95% confidence interval = 1.01 to 21.95) times as likely to complete the trial compared to those with lower scores. Applying the same cutoff, baseline study partner Research Attitudes Questionnaire scores were similarly able to predict study completion (odds ratio = 4.2, 95% confidence interval = 1.71 to 10.32). Using a score cutoff of 27.5, higher participant Research Attitudes Questionnaire scores predicted study medication compliance (odds ratio = 5.85, 95% confidence interval = 1.34 to 25.54). No relationship was observed between Research Attitudes Questionnaire score and participation in optional substudies. Conclusion This brief instrument that measures research attitudes may identify participants at risk for behaviors that cause missing data.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document