scholarly journals Topographical Mapping of 436 Newly Diagnosed IDH Wildtype Glioblastoma With vs. Without MGMT Promoter Methylation

2020 ◽  
Vol 10 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fatih Incekara ◽  
Sebastian R. van der Voort ◽  
Hendrikus J. Dubbink ◽  
Peggy N. Atmodimedjo ◽  
Rishi Nandoe Tewarie ◽  
...  
2021 ◽  
Vol 23 (Supplement_2) ◽  
pp. ii23-ii23
Author(s):  
R Lucaciu ◽  
B Suchorska ◽  
M Wettig ◽  
S Jung ◽  
M Scholz

Abstract BACKGROUND Tumor-treating fields (TTFields) are a modern anti-mitotic, non-invasive therapy for the treatment of patients with recurrent and newly diagnosed glioblastoma multiforme (GBM). In Europe, Optune® recieved in 2015 the CE certification. TTFields are a low-intensity (1–3 V/cm) approved therapeutic modality using a non-invasive application of intermediate frequency (200 kHz) alternating electric fields through four transducer arrays directly applied to the skin. The EF-14 study has shown that the addition of TTFields to temozolomide chemotherapy in patients with newly diagnosed GBM significantly improved overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) without additional adverse events, apart from mild to moderate skin irritations (Stupp et al., JAMA 2017). MATERIAL We retrospectively analyzed data from TTFields-treated patients (2015–2020) that were treated at our department. Patient characteristics such as MGMT promoter methylation status, age, and diagnosis, as well as treatment duration and TTFields therapy usage, were evaluated for this study. RESULTS 29 patients were treated with TTFields therapy between 2015 and 2020 at our hospital. Most patients received TTFields as primary treatment together with temozolomide maintenance therapy. In detail, 48% of patients were diagnosed with newly diagnosed GBM, 41% received TTFields therapy after tumor recurrence and 10% were diagnosed with other high-grade gliomas. In summary, patients could integrate TTFields therapy into their daily life and showed high adherence to the therapy.Particularly, one of our patients (with MGMT-promoter methylation positive) receives TTFields therapy now for almost 1229 days (approx. 41 months) and is still on therapy. Additionally, this patient shows a high usage rate of 86% indicating well integration of the therapy into daily life. CONCLUSION Taken together, our data provided the outcomes of using TTFields together with chemotherapy in the treatment of recurrent and newly diagnosed GBM in our department. Therapy with TTFields has been showing to provide significant clinical benefit for GBM patients.


2019 ◽  
Vol 21 (Supplement_6) ◽  
pp. vi105-vi105
Author(s):  
Radhika Mathur ◽  
Yalan Zhang ◽  
Matthew Grimmer ◽  
Chibo Hong ◽  
Mitchel Berger ◽  
...  

Abstract Low-grade gliomas (LGGs), which include grade II astrocytoma and grade II oligodendroglioma, inevitably recur despite aggressive treatment with surgery, and sometimes, with radiation and the chemotherapeutic agent temozolomide (TMZ). The clinical benefit of TMZ in LGG is unclear, and a subset of TMZ-treated LGGs recur with hypermutation in association with malignant progression to high-grade tumors. It is currently unknown why some TMZ-treated LGGs recur with hypermutation while others do not. O6-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase (MGMT) is a DNA repair protein that reverses mutagenic lesions induced by TMZ. The amount of MGMT protein in a cell is regulated at the epigenetic level by promoter methylation. Here, we hypothesize that epigenetic silencing of MGMT by promoter methylation facilitates TMZ-induced mutagenesis and contributes to the development of hypermutation. We demonstrate in a cohort of 37 TMZ-treated patients with an initial diagnosis of IDH-mutant LGG that methylation level of the MGMT promoter in initial untreated tumors is significantly associated with hypermutation at recurrence. We also confirm our previous finding that methylation level of the MGMT promoter in recurrent hypermutated tumors is higher than in recurrent tumors that are not hypermutated. These results provide a plausible mechanistic basis for observed differences in propensity of TMZ-treated LGG patients to develop hypermutation at recurrence. Furthermore, they establish the potential of MGMT promoter methylation level to inform treatment decisions in the clinic for patients with newly diagnosed LGG.


2010 ◽  
Vol 28 (16) ◽  
pp. 2712-2718 ◽  
Author(s):  
Roger Stupp ◽  
Monika E. Hegi ◽  
Bart Neyns ◽  
Roland Goldbrunner ◽  
Uwe Schlegel ◽  
...  

Purpose Invasion and migration are key processes of glioblastoma and are tightly linked to tumor recurrence. Integrin inhibition using cilengitide has shown synergy with chemotherapy and radiotherapy in vitro and promising activity in recurrent glioblastoma. This multicenter, phase I/IIa study investigated the efficacy and safety of cilengitide in combination with standard chemoradiotherapy in newly diagnosed glioblastoma. Patients and Methods Patients (age ≥ 18 to ≤ 70 years) were treated with cilengitide (500 mg) administered twice weekly intravenously in addition to standard radiotherapy with concomitant and adjuvant temozolomide. Treatment was continued until disease progression or for up to 35 weeks. The primary end point was progression-free survival (PFS) at 6 months. Results Fifty-two patients (median age, 57 years; 62% male) were included. Six- and 12-month PFS rates were 69% (95% CI, 54% to 80%) and 33% (95% CI, 21% to 46%). Median PFS was 8 months (95% CI, 6.0 to 10.7 months). Twelve- and 24-month overall survival (OS) rates were 68% (95% CI, 53% to 79%) and 35% (95% CI, 22% to 48%). Median OS was 16.1 months (95% CI, 13.1 to 23.2 months). PFS and OS were longer in patients with tumors with O6-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase (MGMT) promoter methylation (13.4 and 23.2 months) versus those without MGMT promoter methylation (3.4 and 13.1 months). The combination of cilengitide with temozolomide and radiotherapy was well tolerated, with no additional toxicity. No pharmacokinetic interactions between temozolomide and cilengitide were identified. Conclusion Compared with historical controls, the addition of concomitant and adjuvant cilengitide to standard chemoradiotherapy demonstrated promising activity in patients with glioblastoma with MGMT promoter methylation.


2019 ◽  
Vol 73 (2) ◽  
pp. 112-115 ◽  
Author(s):  
Charlotte von Rosenstiel ◽  
Benedikt Wiestler ◽  
Bernhard Haller ◽  
Friederike Schmidt-Graf ◽  
Jens Gempt ◽  
...  

AimsO(6)-methylguanine-DNA-methyltransferase (MGMT) promoter methylation is a high predictive factor for therapy results of temozolomide in patients with glioma. The objective of this work was to analyse the impact of MGMT promoter methylation in patients with primary diagnosed glioblastoma (GBM) relating to survival using a quantitative method (methylation quantification of endonuclease-resistant DNA, MethyQESD) by verifying a cut-off point for MGMT methylation provided by the literature (</≥10%) and calculating an optimal cut-off.Methods67 patients aged 70 years or younger, operated between January 2013 and December 2015, with newly diagnosed IDH wild-type GBM and clinical follow-up were retrospectively investigated in this study. A known MGMT promoter methylation status was the inclusion criteria.ResultsMedian overall survival (OS) was 16.9 months. Patients who had a methylated MGMT promoter region of ≥10% had an improved OS compared with patients with a methylated promoter region of <10% (p=0.002). Optimal cut-off point for MGMT promoter methylation was 11.7% (p=0.012).ConclusionThe results confirm that the quantitative level of MGMT promoter methylation is a positive prognostic factor in newly diagnosed patients with GBM. The cut-off provided by the literature (</≥10%) and the calculated optimal cut-off value of 11.7% give a statistically significant separation. Hence, MethyQESD is a reliable method to calculate MGMT promoter methylation in GBM.


2009 ◽  
Vol 27 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 2051-2051
Author(s):  
K. D. Aldape ◽  
G. Jones ◽  
M. Wang ◽  
M. Hegi ◽  
R. C. Janzer ◽  
...  

2051 Background: MGMT promoter methylation has been described as a prognostic marker in glioblastoma (GBM) and may be associated with chemosensitivity to alkylating agents. This study determined the feasibility of real-time determination of MGMT promoter methylation testing in a large international phase III clinical trial. Methods: Paraffin tumor blocks were obtained from patients registered onto RTOG 0525 then distributed to one of two central pathology labs: MD Anderson (Houston TX, K. Aldape) or CHUV (Lausanne, CH, R. Janzer). After histologic confirmation of GBM, unstained slides (40 microns of tumor tissue) were sent to the testing laboratories. Results were used for randomization into a treatment arm. MGMT methylation was assessed using methylation specific real-time PCR (MSP). The assay determined the number of copies of both methylated MGMT and of beta-actin (ACTB) in the sample. The ACTB copy number was used to assess the quality and quantity of the sample DNA. Results: Results were available for 995 samples. Following MSP samples were categorized into one of five possible results: failed (2, 0.2%), methylated (302, 30.2%), non-methylated (602, 60.2%), indeterminate (62, 6.2%), and invalid (27, 2.7%). Among cases that were evaluable as either methylated or unmethylated (n = 904) the MGMT promoter methylation rate in newly diagnosed GBM was approximately 1/3 (33.4%), a rate that is somewhat lower than prior reports. The average time from receipt of sample at the central pathology laboratory to reporting of results was 9.3 days. The time required decreased over the course of the clinical trial. This was due, in part, to training of the sites to deliver samples just before the start of runs. Conclusions: The results demonstrate the feasibility of performing real-time MGMT methylation testing, a tumor based assay, as a stratification factor in a multinational clinical trial. This study confirms that treatment decisions based on the molecular characteristics of the tumor are feasible, thereby providing opportunities to develop more molecularly-based tumor stratification or selection, a major advance in developing personalized treatment regimens. No significant financial relationships to disclose.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document