scholarly journals Distribution and Clinical Analysis of EpCAM+/Vimentin+ Circulating Tumor Cells in High-Risk Population and Cancer Patients

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chunjin Huang ◽  
Sheng Ding ◽  
Chunyan Huang ◽  
Feng Pan ◽  
Xiaodong Liu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
High Risk ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Tumor Cells ◽  
Circulating Tumor Cells ◽  
Peripheral Blood ◽  
Healthy Subjects ◽  
Magnetic Bead ◽  
High Risk Population ◽  
Risk Population ◽  
Blood Samples

Circulating Tumor Cells (CTCs) are already present in the peripheral blood of patients with early tumors and even precancerous lesions. The objective of this study was to determine the count of CTCs in peripheral blood from high-risk population(HRP), healthy subjects and patients with Pan-cancer. The CTCs in the peripheral blood from HRP and cancer patients were enriched and identified based on the positive sorting method by epithelial cell adhesion molecular (EpCAM) liposome magnetic bead (Ep-LMB) and Vimentin liposome magnetic bead (Vi-LMB). Simultaneously, further analysis was carried out focusing on the clinical characteristics of patients by collecting the peripheral blood samples from healthy subjects as the parallel control. According to the results, the prepared LMBs had high specificity and stability, resulting in an average (Av) proliferation rate of over 90% for each cell line, and the average capture rate of higher than 80%. In terms of CTCs count detection in clinical blood samples, the average count was 0.9 (Ep: Av=0.6, Vi: Av=0.3), 2.4 (Ep: Av=1.4, Vi: Av=0.8) and 7.3 (Ep: Av=4.0, Vi: Av=3.3) in healthy subjects, HRP and total cancer patients, respectively. Besides, there was no obvious difference in the average count of CTCs among patients with different cancer types. While count of CTCs in the aforementioned cancer patients was statistically different from that in healthy subjects and patients with HRP. The survival time of cancer patients whose number of CTCs is greater than the average is significantly increased. Collectively, the study confirmed that CTCs can achieve early tumor detection and auxiliary diagnosis, and its number is related to the occurrence and development of tumors, and CTCs can be detected in HRP and sub-health population.

scholarly journals Isolation of Circulating Tumor Cells from Peripheral Blood Samples of Cancer Patients Using Microfluidic Technology

2020 ◽  
Vol 12 (6) ◽  
pp. 62
Author(s):  
A.B. Volovetskiy ◽  
P.A. Malinina ◽  
A.Y. Kapitannikova ◽  
S.V. Smetanina ◽  
I.A. Kruglova ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Tumor Cells ◽  
Circulating Tumor Cells ◽  
Peripheral Blood ◽  
Blood Samples ◽  
Microfluidic Technology

Detection of circulating lymphendothelial cells in patients with solid tumors

2006 ◽  
Vol 24 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 20010-20010
Author(s):  
W. Fiedler ◽  
K. Suhrbier ◽  
S. Riethdorf ◽  
G. Schuch ◽  
K. Pantel ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Endothelial Cells ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Tumor Cells ◽  
Circulating Tumor Cells ◽  
Peripheral Blood ◽  
Healthy Subjects ◽  
Metastatic Cancer ◽  
Lymphatic Vessels ◽  
Lymphatic Endothelial Cells ◽  
Tumor Patients

20010 Background: Bone marrow derived endothelial progenitor cells (ECPs) contribute to neoangiogenesis in cancer patients. Elevated numbers of circulating endothelial cells and EPCs can be detected in the peripheral blood of tumor patients. Recently, proliferating lymphatic vessels have been described in human cancers such as melanoma and head and neck tumors. Therefore, we investigated whether circulating lymphatic endothelial cells can be detected in cancer patients. Methods: We developed a sensitive immunocytochemical approach using a monoclonal antibody against the lymphendothelial specific hyaluronic receptor LYVE. After enrichment by Ficoll density gradient centrifugation, 7 × 10(5) peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMNCs) from 23 patients with metastatic cancer (6 gastrointestinal, 4 lung, 3 thymus, 3 thyroid, 1 mamma, 1 pancreas, 2 renal, 1 adrenal, 2 urothelial cancer, 1 PNET, 1 NET) and healthy individuals (n = 7) were spun onto glass slides. Two million PBMNs from each patient were stained for LYVE using the APAP technique. Isotype antibodies were used as controls. Cytospins were analyzed with the automated cellular imaging system (ACIS; ChromaVision Medical Systems). The method was validated with spiked blood samples. Results: Circulating LYVE+ lymphatic endothelial cells could be detected in 4 of 7 healthy subjects (57%) and in 16 of 23 patients (69%) with metastatic cancer. The mean number of lymphendothelial cells was significantly higher in cancer patients (15 cells/1 × 10(6) PBMNCs [range 0–276] vs. 1.0 cells/1 × 10(6) PBMNCs [range 0–2]). As a control, circulating tumor cells were enumerated after staining with a cytokeratin antibody (A45-B/B3). Circulating tumor cells could not be detected in healthy controls but in 13 of 23 of cancer patients (mean 1.4 cells/1 × 10(6) PBMNCs range [0–9]). Conclusion: Circulating lymphendothelial cells can be detected in patients with metastatic cancer and healthy subjects. Tumor patients have higher levels of circulating lymphendothelial cells than normal controls. These cells may participate in the generation of lymphatic vessels within tumor manifestations. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

scholarly journals Acoustic separation of circulating tumor cells

2015 ◽  
Vol 112 (16) ◽  
pp. 4970-4975 ◽  
Author(s):  
Peng Li ◽  
Zhangming Mao ◽  
Zhangli Peng ◽  
Lanlan Zhou ◽  
Yuchao Chen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Tumor Cells ◽  
Circulating Tumor Cells ◽  
Peripheral Blood ◽  
Cancer Biology ◽  
Cancer Metastasis ◽  
Surface Acoustic Waves ◽  
Clinical Samples ◽  
Label Free ◽  
Blood Samples

Circulating tumor cells (CTCs) are important targets for cancer biology studies. To further elucidate the role of CTCs in cancer metastasis and prognosis, effective methods for isolating extremely rare tumor cells from peripheral blood must be developed. Acoustic-based methods, which are known to preserve the integrity, functionality, and viability of biological cells using label-free and contact-free sorting, have thus far not been successfully developed to isolate rare CTCs using clinical samples from cancer patients owing to technical constraints, insufficient throughput, and lack of long-term device stability. In this work, we demonstrate the development of an acoustic-based microfluidic device that is capable of high-throughput separation of CTCs from peripheral blood samples obtained from cancer patients. Our method uses tilted-angle standing surface acoustic waves. Parametric numerical simulations were performed to design optimum device geometry, tilt angle, and cell throughput that is more than 20 times higher than previously possible for such devices. We first validated the capability of this device by successfully separating low concentrations (∼100 cells/mL) of a variety of cancer cells from cell culture lines from WBCs with a recovery rate better than 83%. We then demonstrated the isolation of CTCs in blood samples obtained from patients with breast cancer. Our acoustic-based separation method thus offers the potential to serve as an invaluable supplemental tool in cancer research, diagnostics, drug efficacy assessment, and therapeutics owing to its excellent biocompatibility, simple design, and label-free automated operation while offering the capability to isolate rare CTCs in a viable state.

Circulating Tumor Cells in HER-2 Positive Metastatic Breast Cancer Patients Treated with Trastuzumab and Chemotherapy

2009 ◽  
Vol 24 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-10 ◽  
Author(s):  
Raquel A. Nunes ◽  
Xiaochun Li ◽  
Soonmo Peter Kang ◽  
Harold Burstein ◽  
Lisa Roberts ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Metastatic Breast Cancer ◽  
Treatment Response ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Tumor Cells ◽  
Circulating Tumor Cells ◽  
Peripheral Blood ◽  
Metastatic Breast ◽  
Breast Cancer Patients ◽  
Her 2

The detection of circulating tumor cells (CTCs) in peripheral blood may have important prognostic and predictive implications in breast cancer treatment. A limitation in this field has been the lack of a validated method of accurately measuring CTCs. While sensitivity has improved using RT-PCR, specificity remains a major challenge. The goal of this paper is to present a sensitive and specific methodology of detecting CTCs in women with HER-2-positive metastatic breast cancer, and to examine its role as a marker that tracks disease response during treatment with trastuzumab-containing regimens. The study included patients with HER-2-positive metastatic breast cancer enrolled on two different clinical protocols using a trastuzumab-containing regimen. Serial CTCs were measured at planned time points and clinical correlations were made. Immunomagnetic selection of circulating epithelial cells was used to address the specificity of tumor cell detection using cytokeratin 19 (CK19). In addition, the extracellular domain of the HER-2 protein (HER-2/ECD) was measured to determine if CTCs detected by CK19 accurately reflect tumor burden. The presence of CTCs at first restaging was associated with disease progression. We observed an association between CK19 and HER-2/ECD. The association of HER-2/ECD with clinical response followed a similar pattern to that seen with CK19. Finally, the absence of HER-2/ECD at best overall response and a change of HER-2/ECD from positive at baseline to negative at best overall response was associated with favorable treatment response. Our study supports the prognostic and predictive role of the detection of CTCs in treatment of HER-2-positive metastatic breast cancer patients. The association between CK19 and markers of disease burden is in line with the concept that CTCs may be a reliable measure of tumor cells in the peripheral blood of patients with metastatic breast cancer. The association of CTCs at first restaging with treatment failure indicates that CTCs may have a role as surrogate markers to monitor treatment response.

scholarly journals Circulating Tumor Cells Predict Survival in Early Average-to-High Risk Breast Cancer Patients

2014 ◽  
Vol 106 (5) ◽  
Author(s):  
Brigitte Rack ◽  
Christian Schindlbeck ◽  
Julia Jückstock ◽  
Ulrich Andergassen ◽  
Philip Hepp ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Tumor Cells ◽  
Circulating Tumor Cells ◽  
Breast Cancer Patients ◽  
High Risk Breast Cancer ◽  
High Risk Breast ◽  
Risk Breast Cancer

scholarly journals Circulating Tumor Cells as a Marker of Disseminated Disease in Patients with Newly Diagnosed High-Risk Prostate Cancer

Cancers ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
pp. 160 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wojciech A. Cieślikowski ◽  
Joanna Budna-Tukan ◽  
Monika Świerczewska ◽  
Agnieszka Ida ◽  
Michał Hrab ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Tumor Cells ◽  
Circulating Tumor Cells ◽  
Metastatic Disease ◽  
Newly Diagnosed ◽  
High Risk Prostate Cancer ◽  
Intergroup Comparison ◽  
Risk Prostate Cancer

The aim of this study was to investigate whether the enumeration of circulating tumor cells (CTCs) in blood can differentiate between true localized and metastatic prostate cancer. A cross-sectional study of 104 prostate cancer patients with newly diagnosed high-risk prostate cancer was conducted. In total, 19 patients presented metastatic disease and 85 were diagnosed with localized disease. Analyses included intergroup comparison of CTC counts, determined using the CellSearch® system, EPISPOT assay and GILUPI CellCollector®, and ROC analysis verifying the accuracy of CTC count as a maker of disseminated prostate cancer. The vast majority (94.7%) of patients with advanced-stage cancer tested positively for CTCs in at least one of the assays. However, significantly higher CTC counts were determined with the CellSearch® system compared to EPISPOT assay and GILUPI CellCollector®. Identification of ≥4 CTCs with the CellSearch® system was the most accurate predictor of metastatic disease (sensitivity 0.500; specificity 0.900; AUC (95% CI) 0.760 (0.613–0.908). Furthermore, we tried to create a model to enhance the specificity and sensitivity of metastatic prediction with CTC counts by incorporating patient’s clinical data, including PSA serum levels, Gleason score and clinical stage. The composite biomarker panel achieved the following performance: sensitivity, 0.611; specificity, 0.971; AUC (95% CI), 0.901 (0.810–0.993). Thus, although the sensitivity of CTC detection needs to be further increased, our findings suggest that high CTC counts might contribute to the identification of high-risk prostate cancer patients with occult metastases at the time of diagnosis.

Molecular markers for circulating tumor cells in breast cancer.

2011 ◽  
Vol 29 (27_suppl) ◽  
pp. 223-223
Author(s):  
R. Zeillinger ◽  
E. Obermayr ◽  
A. Fink-Retter ◽  
G. Heinze ◽  
A. Reinthaller ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Tumor Cells ◽  
Circulating Tumor Cells ◽  
Gene Panel ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Gene Marker ◽  
Breast Cancer Patients ◽  
Gene Markers ◽  
Blood Samples

223 Background: Recently, we identified a six gene panel (CCNE2, DKFZp762E1312, EMP2, MAL2, PPIC, and SLC6A8) for the RT-qPCR based detection of circulating tumor cells (CTC) in breast cancer patients. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the gene panel in further blood samples. Methods: Blood samples were taken from breast cancer patients with metastatic disease (MBC, N=10) or with no evidence of disease (NED, N=30). Putative CTC were enriched by Oncoquick density gradient centrifugation. Total RNA was isolated with RNeasy Micro Kit (QIAgen). Template cDNA was generated with M-MLV Reverse Transcriptase, RNase H Minus (Promega) and random nonamers as primers. RT-qPCR was performed in duplicate reactions using TaqMan Assays (Applied Biosystems) with default thermal cycling parameters. Raw data were analyzed with the AB7900 Sequence Detection Software version 2.2.2 using automatic baseline correction and manual cycle threshold setting. Gene expression was normalized to GAPDH expression. A threshold value TX for each gene X was set at two standard deviations above the mean dCtX value in the healthy control group. A patient was defined as CTC-positive, if at least one gene marker was over-expressed compared to the defined threshold. Results: The gene panel consisting of CCNE2, DKFZp762E1312, EMP2, MAL2, PPIC, and SLC6A8 identified 4/11 MBC but only 5/27 NED patients as CTC positive (p=0.163). By adding known CTC markers (SCGB2A2, TFF1, FXYD3, AGR2, S100A18, and EPCAM) to the panel, 7/11 MBC but only 6/27 NED patients were CTC positive (p=0.018). The presence of CTC in NED patients correlated with pN staging (p=0.026). Only one out of the six CTC positive NED patients relapsed within the observation period (median 35 months, range 25-39 months from blood sampling). We observed no correlation of CTC positivity and recurrence in NED patients. Conclusions: The sensitivity of the RT-qPCR based CTC detection in breast cancer patients may be enhanced by adding known CTC markers (SCGB2A2, TFF1, FXYD3, AGR2, S100A18, and EPCAM) to the six gene panel (CCNE2, DKFZp762E1312, EMP2, MAL2, PPIC, and SLC6A8). Longer follow-up times are needed to evaluate the predictive value of the gene markers on survival.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document