scholarly journals “Just One More Rep!” – Ability to Predict Proximity to Task Failure in Resistance Trained Persons

2020 ◽  
Vol 11 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cedrik Armes ◽  
Henry Standish-Hunt ◽  
Patroklos Androulakis-Korakakis ◽  
Nick Michalopoulos ◽  
Tsvetelina Georgieva ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Resistance Training ◽  
Maximum Voluntary Contraction ◽  
Voluntary Contraction ◽  
Separate Experiment ◽  
Training Experience ◽  
Repetition Maximum ◽  
Task Failure ◽  
Analytic Estimate ◽  
Maximum Effort ◽  
Single Repetition

In resistance training, the use of predicting proximity to momentary task failure (MF, i.e., maximum effort), and repetitions in reserve scales specifically, is a growing approach to monitoring and controlling effort. However, its validity is reliant upon accuracy in the ability to predict MF which may be affected by congruence of the perception of effort compared with the actual effort required. The present study examined participants with at least 1 year of resistance training experience predicting their proximity to MF in two different experiments using a deception design. Within each experiment participants performed four trials of knee extensions with single sets (i.e., bouts of repetitions) to their self-determined repetition maximum (sdRM; when they predicted they could not complete the next repetition if attempted and thus would reach MF if they did) and MF (i.e., where despite attempting to do so they could not complete the current repetition). For the first experiment (n = 14) participants used loads equal to 70% of a one repetition maximum (1RM; i.e., the heaviest load that could be lifted for a single repetition) performed in a separate baseline session. Aiming to minimize participants between day variability in repetition performances, in the second separate experiment (n = 24) they used loads equal to 70% of their daily isometric maximum voluntary contraction (MVC). Results suggested that participants typically under predicted the number of repetitions they could perform to MF with a meta-analytic estimate across experiments of 2.0 [95%CIs 0.0 to 4.0]. Participants with at least 1 year of resistance training experience are likely not adequately accurate at gauging effort in submaximal conditions. This suggests that perceptions of effort during resistance training task performance may not be congruent with the actual effort required. This has implications for controlling, programming, and manipulating the actual effort in resistance training and potentially on the magnitude of desired adaptations such as improvements in muscular hypertrophy and strength.

scholarly journals “Just one more rep!” – Ability to predict proximity to task failure in resistance trained persons

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cedrik Armes ◽  
Henry Standish-Hunt ◽  
Patroklos Androulakis-Korakakis ◽  
Nick Michalopoulos ◽  
Tsvetelina Georgieva ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Resistance Training ◽  
Maximum Voluntary Contraction ◽  
Voluntary Contraction ◽  
Separate Experiment ◽  
Training Experience ◽  
Repetition Maximum ◽  
Task Failure ◽  
Analytic Estimate ◽  
Maximum Effort ◽  
One Year

In resistance training, the use of predicting proximity to momentary task failure (MF, i.e. maximum effort), and repetitions in reserve scales specifically, is a growing approach to monitoring and controlling effort. However, its validity is reliant upon accuracy in the ability to predict MF which may be affected by congruence of the perception of effort compared with the actual effort required. The present study examined participants with at least one year of resistance training experience predicting their proximity to MF in two different experiments using a deception design. Within each experiment participants performed four trials of knee extensions with single sets (i.e. bouts of repetitions) to their self-determined repetition maximum (sdRM; when they predicted they could not complete the next repetition if attempted and thus would reach MF if they did) and MF (i.e. where despite attempting to do so they could not complete the current repetition). For the first experiment (n = 14) participants used loads equal to 70% of a one repetition maximum (1RM; i.e. the heaviest load that could be lifted for a single repetition) performed in a separate baseline session. Aiming to minimize participants between day variability in repetition performances, in the second separate experiment (n = 24) they used loads equal to 70% of their daily isometric maximum voluntary contraction (MVC). Results suggested that participants typically under predicted the number of repetitions they could perform to MF with a meta-analytic estimate across experiments of 2.02 [95%CIs 0.0 to 4.04]. Participants with at least one year of resistance training experience are likely not adequately accurate at gauging effort in submaximal conditions. This suggests that perceptions of effort during resistance training task performance may not be congruent with the actual effort required. This has implications for controlling, programming, and manipulating the actual effort in resistance training and potentially on the magnitude of desired adaptations such as improvements in muscular hypertrophy and strength.

Activation varies among the knee extensor muscles during a submaximal fatiguing contraction in the seated and supine postures

2003 ◽  
Vol 95 (4) ◽  
pp. 1515-1522 ◽  
Author(s):  
L Rochette ◽  
S. K. Hunter ◽  
N Place ◽  
R Lepers
Keyword(s):  
Vastus Lateralis ◽  
Maximum Voluntary Contraction ◽  
Knee Extensor ◽  
Voluntary Contraction ◽  
Emg Activity ◽  
Task Failure ◽  
Rate Of Increase ◽  
Extensor Muscles ◽  
Seated Posture ◽  
Knee Extensor Muscles

Ten young men sustained an isometric contraction of the knee extensor muscles at 20% of the maximum voluntary contraction (MVC) torque on three separate occasions in a seated posture. Subjects performed an isometric knee extension contraction on a fourth occasion in a supine posture. The time to task failure for the seated posture was similar across sessions (291 ± 84 s; P > 0.05), and the MVC torque was similarly reduced across sessions after the fatiguing contraction (42 ± 12%). The rate of increase in electromyograph (EMG) activity (%MVC) and torque fluctuations during the fatiguing contractions were similar across sessions. However, the rate of increase in EMG differed among the knee extensor muscles: the rectus femoris began at a greater amplitude (31.5 ± 11.0%) compared with the vastus lateralis and vastus medialis muscles (18.8 ± 5.3%), but it ended at a similar value (45.4 ± 3.1%). The time to task failure and increase in EMG activity were similar for the seated and supine tasks; however, the reduction in MVC torque was greater for the seated posture. These findings indicate that the time to task failure for the knee extensor muscles that have a common tendon insertion did not alter over repeat sessions as had been observed for the elbow flexor muscles (Hunter SK and Enoka RM. J Appl Physiol 94: 108-118, 2003).

scholarly journals The Effects of the Movement Tempo on the One-Repetition Maximum Bench Press Results

2020 ◽  
Vol 72 (1) ◽  
pp. 151-159 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michal Wilk ◽  
Artur Golas ◽  
Piotr Zmijewski ◽  
Michal Krzysztofik ◽  
Aleksandra Filip ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Resistance Training ◽  
Repeated Measures ◽  
Bench Press ◽  
Trial And Error ◽  
Training Experience ◽  
Test Procedures ◽  
Test Protocol ◽  
Repetition Maximum ◽  
One Year ◽  
The One

AbstractDifferent tempos of movement can be used during resistance training, but programming them is often a trial-and-error practice, as changing the speed at which the exercise is performed does not always correspond with the tempo at which the 1-repetition-maximum occurred. Therefore, the aim of this study was to determine the effect of different movement tempos during the bench press (BP) exercise on the one-repetition maximum (1RM) load. Ninety men (age = 25.8 ± 5.3 years, body mass = 80.2 ± 14.9 kg), with a minimum one year of resistance training experience took part in the study. Using a randomized crossover design, each participant completed the BP 1RM test with five different movement tempos: V/0/V/0, 2/0/V/0, 5/0/V/0, 8/0/V/0 and 10/0/V/0. Repeated measures ANOVA compared the differences between the 1RM at each tempo. The 1RM load was significantly greater during V/0/V/0 and 2/0/V/0 compared to 5/0/V/0, 8/0/V/0, and 10/0/V/0 (p < 0.01). Furthermore, the 1RM load was significantly greater during 5/0/V/0 compared to 8/0/V/0 and 10/0/V/0 (p < 0.01), but there were no differences between either V/0/V/0 and 2/0/V/0 (p = 0.92) or between 8/0/V/0 and 10/0/V/0 (p = 0.08). Therefore, different movement tempos used during training should be accompanied by their own tempo-specific 1RM testing, as slower eccentric phases significantly decrease maximal concentric performance. Furthermore, 1RM test procedures should include information about the movement tempo used during the test protocol. In addition, the standardization of the tempo should be taken into account in investigations that use the 1 RM test to assess the effects of any treatment on maximal muscle strength.

scholarly journals Can Heart Rate Variability Determine Recovery Following Distinct Strength Loadings? A Randomized Cross-Over Trial

2019 ◽  
Vol 16 (22) ◽  
pp. 4353 ◽  
Author(s):  
Antonia Thamm ◽  
Nils Freitag ◽  
Pedro Figueiredo ◽  
Kenji Doma ◽  
Christoph Rottensteiner ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Heart Rate ◽  
Heart Rate Variability ◽  
Low Frequency ◽  
Voluntary Contraction ◽  
Mean Square ◽  
Acute Effects ◽  
Training Experience ◽  
Repetition Maximum ◽  
Leg Press ◽  
Frequency Domains

This study aimed to compare the acute effects of hypertrophic (HYP) and maximum strength (MAX) loadings on heart rate variability (HRV) and to compare possible loading-specific alterations with other markers of recovery. Ten young men with strength training experience performed two leg press loadings (HYP: five times 10 repetitions at 70% of one repetition maximum (1RM) with 2 minutes inter-set rest; MAX: 15 times one repetition at 100% of 1RM with 3 minutes inter-set rest) in a randomized order. The root mean square of successive differences statistically decreased after both protocols (HYP: 65.7 ± 26.6 ms to 23.9 ± 18.7 ms, p = 0.026; MAX: 77.7 ± 37.0 ms to 55.3 ± 22.3 ms, p = 0.049), while the frequency domains of HRV remained statistically unaltered. The low frequency (LF) band statistically increased at 48h post-MAX only (p = 0.033). Maximal isometric voluntary contraction (MVC) statistically decreased after HYP (p = 0.026) and returned to baseline after 24h of recovery. Creatine kinase (CK) statistically increased above baseline at 1h post-loadings (HYP p = 0.028; MAX p = 0.020), returning to baseline at 24h post. Our findings indicate no distinct associations between changes in HRV and MVC or CK.

scholarly journals Repetition numbers in resistance training: a comparison between the predetermined and the estimated repetitions to failure prescription approaches on affective responses

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hadar Schwartz ◽  
Aviv Emanuel ◽  
Itzhak Rozen Smukas ◽  
Israel Halperin
Keyword(s):  
Resistance Training ◽  
Knee Extension ◽  
Affective Responses ◽  
Affective Valence ◽  
Training Experience ◽  
Task Failure ◽  
Leg Press ◽  
Performance Variability ◽  
Age Range ◽  
Repetitions To Failure

Background: In resistance-training, the number of repetitions is traditionally prescribed using a predetermined approach, whereby the numbers are decided upon before set initiation (e.g., three sets of 10 repetitions). An alternative is the estimated repetitions to failure (ERF) approach, whereby sets are terminated based on one's estimated proximity to task-failure (e.g., two repetitions before failure). The latter approach allows trainees to better account for day-to-day performance variability and may be perceived as a more enjoyable way to train. Methods: Twenty women (age range: 23-45 years) without resistance-training experience first completed estimated 1RM tests in four exercises. In the next two counterbalanced sessions, participants performed three sets of each exercise using 70%1RM. They either completed ten repetitions in all sets (predetermined condition) or terminated the sets when they perceived to be two repetitions before task-failure (ERF condition). Affective-valence, enjoyment, and approach-preference were collected during and after the sessions. Results: We observed trivial differences in the subjective measures and an approximately even approach-preferences split. Number of repetitions performed were mostly similar under both conditions in the chest-press, knee-extension and lat-pulldown (difference of ~1 repetition). However, under the ERF condition participants completed more repetitions in the leg-press (17 vs. 10, p&lt;0.01). Conclusions: Both approaches led to comparable affective responses. However, the fact that participants performed a different number of repetitions across exercises while reaching a similar proximity to task-failure, suggests that the ERF approach may be preferable to account for day-to-day performance variability.

scholarly journals CNTF 1357 G → A polymorphism and the muscle strength response to resistance training

2009 ◽  
Vol 107 (4) ◽  
pp. 1235-1240 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sean Walsh ◽  
Bethany K. Kelsey ◽  
Theodore J. Angelopoulos ◽  
Priscilla M. Clarkson ◽  
Paul M. Gordon ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Resistance Training ◽  
Muscle Strength ◽  
Maximum Voluntary Contraction ◽  
Voluntary Contraction ◽  
Cross Sectional Area ◽  
Isometric Strength ◽  
Sectional Area ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Caucasian Men ◽  
Before And After

The present study examined associations between the ciliary neurotrophic factor (CNTF) 1357 G → A polymorphism and the muscle strength response to a unilateral, upper arm resistance-training (RT) program among healthy, young adults. Subjects were 754 Caucasian men (40%) and women (60%) who were genotyped and performed a training program of the nondominant (trained) arm with the dominant (untrained) arm as a comparison. Peak elbow flexor strength was measured with one repetition maximum, isometric strength with maximum voluntary contraction, and bicep cross-sectional area with MRI in the trained and untrained arms before and after training. Women with the CNTF GG genotype gained more absolute isometric strength, as measured by MVC (6.5 ± 0.3 vs. 5.2 ± 0.5 kg), than carriers of the CNTF A1357 allele in the trained arm pre- to posttraining ( P < 0.05). No significant associations were seen in men. Women with the CNTF GG genotype gained more absolute dynamic (1.0 ± 0.1 vs. 0.6 ± 0.1 kg) and allometric (0.022 ± 0.0 vs. 0.015 ± 0.0 kg/kg−0.67) strength, as measured by 1 RM, than carriers of the CNTF A1357 allele in the untrained arm pre- to posttraining ( P < 0.05). No significant associations were seen in men. No significant associations, as measured by cross-sectional area, were seen in men or women. The CNTF 1357 G → A polymorphism explains only a small portion of the variability in the muscle strength response to training in women.

scholarly journals Exercise-Induced Muscle Damage and Recovery in Young and Middle-Aged Males with Different Resistance Training Experience

Sports ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 7 (6) ◽  
pp. 132 ◽  
Author(s):  
John Fernandes ◽  
Kevin Lamb ◽  
Craig Twist
Keyword(s):  
Resistance Training ◽  
Muscle Damage ◽  
Peak Power ◽  
Time Course ◽  
Voluntary Contraction ◽  
Voluntary Activation ◽  
Knee Extensors ◽  
Middle Aged ◽  
Training Experience ◽  
Exercise Induced

This study compared the time course of recovery after a squatting exercise in trained young (YG; n = 9; age 22.3 ± 1.7 years) and trained (MT; n = 9; 39.9 ± 6.2 years) and untrained (MU; n = 9; age 44.4 ± 6.3 years) middle-aged males. Before and at 24 and 72 h after 10 × 10 squats at 60% one-repetition maximum (1RM), participants provided measurements of perceived muscle soreness (VAS), creatine kinase (CK), maximal voluntary contraction (MVC), voluntary activation (VA), and resting doublet force of the knee extensors and squatting peak power at 20% and 80% 1RM. When compared to the YG males, the MT experienced likely and very likely moderate decrements in MVC, resting doublet force, and peak power at 20% and 80% 1RM accompanied by unclear differences in VAS, CK, and VA after the squatting exercise. MU males, compared to MT, experienced greater alterations in peak power at 20% and 80% 1RM and VAS. Alterations in CK, MVC, VA, and resting doublet force were unclear at all time-points between the middle-aged groups. Middle-aged males experienced greater symptoms of muscle damage and an impaired recovery profile than young resistance trained males. Moreover, regardless of resistance training experience, middle-aged males are subject to similar symptoms after muscle-damaging lower-body exercise.

scholarly journals How One Feels During Resistance Exercises: A Repetition-by-Repetition Analysis Across Exercises and Loads

2021 ◽  
Vol 16 (1) ◽  
pp. 135-144 ◽  
Author(s):  
Aviv Emanuel ◽  
Isaac Rozen Smukas ◽  
Israel Halperin
Keyword(s):  
Resistance Training ◽  
Bench Press ◽  
Affective Valence ◽  
Repetition Maximum ◽  
Task Failure ◽  
Position Transducer ◽  
Feeling Scale ◽  
Resistance Exercises ◽  
Bar Velocity

Context: The Feeling Scale (FS) is a unique and underexplored scale in sport sciences that measures affective valence. The FS has the potential to be used in athletic environments as a monitoring and prescription tool. Purpose: To examine whether FS ratings, as measured on a repetition-by-repetition basis, can predict proximity to task failure and bar velocity across different exercises and loads. Methods: On the first day, 20 trained participants (10 females) completed 1-repetition-maximum (1-RM) tests in the barbell bench and squat exercises and were introduced to the FS. In the following 3 sessions, participants completed 3 sets to task failure with either (1) 70% 1-RM bench press, (2) 70% 1-RM squat (squat-70%), or (3) 80% 1-RM squat (squat-80%). Sessions were completed in a randomized, counterbalanced order. After every completed repetition, participants verbally reported their FS ratings. Bar velocity was measured via a linear position transducer. Results: FS ratings predicted failure proximity and bar velocity in all 3 conditions (P < .001, R2 .66–.85). Based on the analysis, which included over 2400 repetitions, a reduction of 1 unit in the FS corresponded to approaching task failure by 14%, 11%, and 11%, and to a reduction in bar velocity of 10%, 4%, and 3%, in the bench, squat-70%, and squat-80%, respectively. Conclusion: This is the first study to investigate whether the FS can be used in resistance-training environments among resistance-trained participants on a repetition-by-repetition basis. The results indicate that the FS can be used to monitor and prescribe resistance training and that its benefits should be further explored.

Isometric torque and shortening velocity following fatigue and recovery of different voluntary tasks in the dorsiflexors

2009 ◽  
Vol 34 (5) ◽  
pp. 866-874 ◽  
Author(s):  
Arthur J. Cheng ◽  
Charles L. Rice
Keyword(s):  
Maximum Rate ◽  
Maximum Voluntary Contraction ◽  
Voluntary Contraction ◽  
Shortening Velocity ◽  
Related Factors ◽  
Task Failure ◽  
Young Males ◽  
Dynamic Task ◽  
Dynamic Contractions ◽  
Isometric Torque

The present study was designed to compare the relative influence of various fatigue-related factors involved in isometric and dynamic task failure following an equivalent decrease in isometric maximum voluntary contraction (MVC) torque. Using a similar duty cycle (∼1-s contraction per 2 s) and contraction load (50% of MVC), 9 young males performed in the dorsiflexors a dynamic task, and on a separate occasion an intermittent isometric task, to an equal decrease in isometric MVC torque. Dynamic contractions had greater motor unit activation and maximum rate of torque development, and required fewer contractions to task failure than the isometric task, indicating a faster development of fatigue during the velocity-dependent dynamic contractions. Peripheral factors, rather than impairments in voluntary drive, were responsible for the equivalent decrease in MVC torque at task failure and its subsequent incomplete recovery. These included, for both tasks, similar changes during fatigue and recovery in voluntary isometric MVC torque, shortening velocity, stimulated twitch and 50 Hz torque, and 50 Hz maximum rate of relaxation. Irrespective of the task, however, the greater reduction in shortening velocity at task failure and its subsequent faster recovery than MVC torque suggest that changes in metabolites affect velocity to a greater extent than isometric torque.

scholarly journals Concentric-Only Versus Touch-and-Go Bench Press One-Repetition Maximum in Men and Women

2021 ◽  
pp. 194173812097786
Author(s):  
Amador García-Ramos ◽  
Danica Janicijevic ◽  
Ivan Jukic
Keyword(s):  
Resistance Training ◽  
Bench Press ◽  
Cross Sectional Study ◽  
Training Experience ◽  
Loading Test ◽  
Level Of Evidence ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Repetition Maximum ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
Repetitions To Failure

Background: One-repetition maximum (1RM) tests are time-consuming, and they might not always be logistically possible or warranted due to increased risk of injury when performed incorrectly or by novice athletes. Repetitions-to-failure tests are a widespread method of predicting the 1RM, but its accuracy may be compromised by several factors such as the type of exercise, sex, training history, and the number of repetitions completed in the test. Hypothesis: The touch-and-go bench press would provide a higher 1RM than the concentric-only bench press for both genders regardless of whether the 1RM was obtained by the direct or repetitions-to-failure method and the error in the 1RM prediction would be positively correlated with the number of repetitions performed to failure and negatively correlated with the 1RM strength and resistance training experience. Study Design: Cross-sectional study. Level of Evidence: Level 3. Methods: A total of 113 adults (87 men and 26 women) were tested on 2 sessions during the concentric-only and touch-and-go bench press. Each session consisted of an incremental loading test until reaching the 1RM load, followed by a repetitions-to-failure test. Results: The 1RM was higher for the touch-and-go bench press using both the direct (men, 7.80%; women, 7.62%) and repetitions-to-failure method (men, 8.29%; women, 7.49%). A significant, although small, correlation was observed between the error in the estimation of the 1RM and the number of repetitions performed ( r = 0.222; P < 0.01), 1RM strength ( r = −0.169; P = 0.01), and resistance training experience ( r = −0.136; P = 0.05). Conclusion: The repetitions-to-failure test is a valid method of predicting the 1RM during the concentric-only and touch-and-go bench press variants. However, the accuracy of the prediction could be compromised with weaker and less experienced individuals and if more than 10 repetitions are completed during the repetitions-to-failure test. Clinical Relevance: The repetitions-to-failure test does not require any sophisticated equipment and enables a widespread use in different training environments.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document