scholarly journals In Leaders We Trust, or Should We? Supervisors’ Dark Triad Personality Traits and Ratings of Team Performance and Innovation

2021 ◽  
Vol 12 ◽  
Author(s):  
Oana C. Fodor ◽  
Petru L. Curşeu ◽  
Nicoleta Meslec
Keyword(s):  
Personality Traits ◽  
Performance Appraisal ◽  
Team Performance ◽  
Dark Triad ◽  
Team Members ◽  
Team Innovation ◽  
Mediating Role ◽  
Team Outcomes ◽  
Member Exchange ◽  
Supervisory Ratings

Our study tests in a sample of 87 organizational groups (297 employees and 87 supervisors) the mediating role of leader-member exchange (LMX) and collective narcissism in the relationship between supervisors’ dark triad (SDT) personality traits and ratings of team outcomes made by supervisors and team members. We show that LMX mediates the association between SDT and team performance and innovation as rated by team members, while collective narcissism mediates the association between SDT and supervisory ratings of team innovation and team performance. Moreover, collective narcissism also mediates the association between SDT and team innovation as rated by team members. Results show that team-level performance appraisal is influenced by supervisory attributes and that the quality of relational exchanges and collective narcissism are plausible mechanisms explaining this association. The use of supervisory ratings of team outcomes in empirical research should also account for the supervisory attributes.

Differentiatie door coaches binnen amateursportteams: terecht of onterecht?

2007 ◽  
Vol 20 (4) ◽  
Author(s):  
Wim van Breukelen ◽  
Wendy Wesselius
Keyword(s):  
Team Performance ◽  
Differential Treatment ◽  
Working Relationships ◽  
Leader Member Exchange ◽  
Sports Teams ◽  
Team Members ◽  
Lmx Theory ◽  
Member Exchange ◽  
Relevant Topic ◽  
And Performance

Differential treatment by coaches of amateur sports teams: right or wrong? Differential treatment by coaches of amateur sports teams: right or wrong? J.W.M. van Breukelen & W. Wesselius, Gedrag & Organisatie, volume 20, November 2007, nr. 4, pp. 427-444 A central assumption in the Leader-Member Exchange (LMX) theory is that leaders do not adopt a single style towards all members of their work unit, but treat the various team members differently. This may result in different kinds of working relationships between the leader and the various members ranging from formal to intense. The effects of these different LMX relationships are visible in important outcome variables such as job satisfaction and performance. Not only in working organizations but also in the context of sports differential treatment by the coach seems a relevant topic. In this article we describe the results of a field study among the players (N = 218) of 21 amateur sports teams. Firstly, we investigated on which aspects the coaches of these teams differentiated between the various team members and how these incidents of differential treatment were experienced by the players in terms of justice and fairness. In addition, we analyzed whether the frequency and evaluation of differential treatment was related to the players' enthusiasm and to team atmosphere and team performance. Social differentiation was appreciated less than task differentiation. Especially task differentiation proved to be important for team performance.

scholarly journals Linking Team Condition and Team Performance: A Transformational Leadership Approach

2017 ◽  
Vol 48 (2) ◽  
pp. 22-38 ◽  
Author(s):  
Amin Akhavan Tabassi ◽  
Kamand M. Roufechaei ◽  
Abu Hassan Abu Bakar ◽  
Nor'Aini Yusof
Keyword(s):  
Transformational Leadership ◽  
Team Performance ◽  
High Performance ◽  
Leadership Behavior ◽  
Team Building ◽  
Theoretical Perspective ◽  
Team Development ◽  
Team Leaders ◽  
Team Members ◽  
Mediating Role

Because project teams in the construction industry shape the primary focus of the industry's project life cycle, a high-performance construction workplace facilitates employees’ technical and innovation skills through team development. Drawing on the current research in general teamwork and leadership, this study, from a theoretical perspective, extends the team condition as a hierarchical construct, incorporating six associated components. This article argues that team building and team development can be studied as ongoing processes that are crucial to project success. In order to reduce the risk of common method variance, the research analysis was completed using 94 construction teams from three different sources, within which team members rated their leader's transformational leadership behavior. The team leaders evaluated the team's conditions, and, lastly, the supervisor of each team rated the team's performance. The model shows that the team condition, which is defined as the factors that contribute to making a great team, has significant direct and indirect impacts on team performance. Furthermore, the transformational leadership behavior of team leaders showed a mediating role between the team condition and the performance.

Leader dark personality and team agreeableness: a recipe for volatile team performance

2020 ◽  
Vol ahead-of-print (ahead-of-print) ◽  
Author(s):  
Nishant Uppal
Keyword(s):  
Team Performance ◽  
Dark Triad ◽  
Team Leaders ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Team Members ◽  
Sales Team ◽  
Performance Variability ◽  
The Relationship ◽  
Practical Implications

Purpose This paper aims to examine the effects of the leaders’ dark triad (DT) personality traits, namely, Machiavellianism, Narcissism and Psychopathy, on the team performance variability. Furthermore, this work explores the role of team agreeableness in the above relationship. Design/methodology/approach The study is based on the longitudinal and archival data obtained from the sales team (team leaders: n = 190; team members: n = 832) of 19 firms dealing with fast-moving consumer goods in India. Findings From the finding of the study, it can be inferred that the presence of DT traits in the leaders causes high fluctuations in team performance. Besides, team agreeableness was found to moderate the relationship between the DT traits of the leaders and the team performance variability. Originality/value The theoretical and practical implications of the study are also discussed.

Relation between Social Cohesion and Team Performance in Soccer Teams

2003 ◽  
Vol 96 (1) ◽  
pp. 145-148 ◽  
Author(s):  
Aharon Tziner ◽  
Nicola Nicola ◽  
Anis Rizac
Keyword(s):  
Team Performance ◽  
Social Cohesion ◽  
Cognitive Abilities ◽  
Interpersonal Relations ◽  
Empirical Examination ◽  
Team Members ◽  
Team Outcomes ◽  
Workplace Teams ◽  
Soccer Teams ◽  
National League

Investigations of the influence on team performance of team composition, in terms of task-related attributes, e.g., personality traits, cognitive abilities, often assumes this relation to be mediated by the strength (intensity) of the interpersonal relations (social cohesion) among team members. However, there has been little empirical examination of how much social cohesion actually affects team outcomes. This preliminary study sought to examine this issue using soccer teams, which have been held to resemble workplace teams. Perceptions of team cohesion were collected from 198 Israeli soccer players (comprising 36 national league teams) during the week preceding their weekly games. A significant correlation was found between the perceptions of social cohesion and the results of the soccer matches, indicating a link between team social cohesion and team performance. Implications of the results, as well as the study's limitations, are discussed, and avenues for research are suggested.

Team goal orientation composition, team efficacy, and team performance: The separate roles of team leader and members

2017 ◽  
Vol 25 (6) ◽  
pp. 825-843 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chiung-Yi Huang ◽  
Jia-Chi Huang ◽  
Yuhsuan Chang
Keyword(s):  
Goal Orientation ◽  
Team Performance ◽  
Team Leader ◽  
Performance Goal ◽  
Team Members ◽  
Team Efficacy ◽  
Team Outcomes ◽  
Learning Goal ◽  
Learning Goal Orientation ◽  
Performance Goal Orientation

AbstractThis study aims to examine team goal orientation composition regarding the different roles of a leader’s and team members’ collective goal orientation, and the effects of these on team outcomes. Data included 268 respondents from 64 teams. Results showed team members’ learning goal orientation has positive effect on team performance, mediated by team efficacy. Further, for the role of team leader, the results also revealed the same pattern. Study also showed a leader’s performance goal orientation has negatively related on team performance, mediated by team efficacy. Finally, taking both roles simultaneously, study indicated the interaction between a leader’s and members’ performance goal orientation has negatively related to team efficacy, and the interaction between a leader’s and members’ learning goal orientation has negatively related to team performance. This research contributes to the existing goal orientation theory by taking the different roles of team leader and members into consideration.

scholarly journals Linking Personality Trait Variance in Self-Managed Teams to Team Innovation

2019 ◽  
Vol 51 (2) ◽  
pp. 265-295 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sophie C. den Hartog ◽  
J. Malte Runge ◽  
Gudrun Reindl ◽  
Jonas W. B. Lang
Keyword(s):  
Personality Traits ◽  
Personality Trait ◽  
Team Members ◽  
Team Innovation ◽  
Team Heterogeneity ◽  
Time Points ◽  
Trait Variance ◽  
Team Functioning ◽  
Main Effects ◽  
Over Time

Researchers have suggested that some personality traits are associated with better team functioning when team members are homogeneous, whereas other personality traits improve team functioning when team members are heterogeneous. This article extends these ideas to team innovation and examines (a) how team variance in extraversion, agreeableness, openness, and conscientiousness relates to innovation in teams; and (b) how these relationships dynamically evolve over time. Our study included 704 surveys completed by 243 team members in 32 teams, at three time points. Results revealed that teams with less variance in extraversion showed higher levels of team innovation. For agreeableness and openness, we did not find main effects of team heterogeneity on team innovation. For teams with low heterogeneity in agreeableness, however, team innovation decreased over time. Team variance in conscientiousness was negatively associated with team innovation. Our findings provide support that team personality plays a role for innovation.

Counterproductive behaviors

2014 ◽  
Vol 20 (5/6) ◽  
pp. 202-220 ◽  
Author(s):  
Caroline Aubé ◽  
Vincent Rousseau
Keyword(s):  
Team Performance ◽  
Team Building ◽  
Design Data ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Team Members ◽  
Four Dimensions ◽  
Mediating Role ◽  
Counterproductive Behaviors ◽  
Collective Phenomenon

Purpose – The purpose of this paper, building on the work of Aubé et al. (2009, 2011) who developed a four-dimension model of counterproductive behaviors in team settings, is to examine the team-level consequences of these behaviors. More specifically, the authors investigate the mediating role of collaboration, a key component of teamwork, in the counterproductive behaviors–team performance relationships. Design/methodology/approach – Using a multisource approach and a team-level design, data were gathered from 101 work teams (381 members and 101 immediate supervisors). The study was conducted within a Canadian public safety organization. Findings – Results show that the four dimensions of counterproductive behaviors are negatively related to team performance. Moreover, results indicate that each of these relationships is completely mediated by a decrease of collaboration among members. Taken together, the results of this study show that the presence of counterproductive behaviors within teams constitutes a collective phenomenon which affects not only team members, but also the functioning and effectiveness of the team as a whole. Originality/value – This study differs from previous studies mainly by adopting a multidimensional conception of counterproductive behaviors and focusing on consequences of these behaviors on the team as a system. In practical terms, the results suggest that the presence of counterproductive behaviors may require team-level interventions (e.g. team building) in addition to individual interventions with individuals involved.

Is knowledge a tenement? The mediating role of team member exchange over the relationship of big five personality traits and knowledge-hiding behavior

2021 ◽  
Vol ahead-of-print (ahead-of-print) ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Ali Hamza ◽  
Saqib Rehman ◽  
Adnan Sarwar ◽  
Komal Nadeem Choudhary
Keyword(s):  
Personality Traits ◽  
Big Five ◽  
Big Five Personality ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Mediating Role ◽  
Team Member Exchange ◽  
Member Exchange ◽  
Hiding Behavior ◽  
Knowledge Hiding

Purpose The organizational success to achieve and maintain its competitiveness is ascribed in the effectiveness of its knowledge management (KM) system, which depends on its employees’ impetus to exhibit knowledge sharing behavior. When an employee hides knowledge, an organization somewhat loses its part of knowledge, which causes loss to the organization eventually. This study aims to examine the impact of personality traits and one’s ethnicity on knowledge hiding behavior (KHB) by focusing on mediating role of team member exchange (TMX). Design/methodology/approach A total 308 questionnaires are collected from the public sector organizations (Livestock and Dairy Development Department, Punjab, Pakistan), out of them 300 are used in the analysis. Through Google e-survey form, cross-sectional data using convenience sampling are collected from the Gazetted officers (managerial level) of the department. Findings The paper provides empirical insights about three personality traits, i.e. openness, conscientiousness and neuroticism, and ethnicity have positive relation with KHB, whereas TMX as a mediator converts this positive relation into negative. Remaining two personality traits, i.e. extraversion and agreeableness, have negative relation with KHB, whereas TMX as a mediator strengthens this negative relationship with KHB. Research limitations/implications The broad context of research and large number of items made it difficult to collect the responses. In future studies, 50 items of big five should be replaced with mini scale. Empirical explanation of the relation between ethnicity and knowledge hiding is an addition to body of knowledge in general, particularly in context of Pakistan. Practical implications This study has the power to help managers in managing their team members and to understand what kind of personality and social group involvements promote knowledge sharing culture within the organization. Originality/value To broaden the understanding of KM domain, this study adds value in the relationship between big five personality traits, ethnicity and KHB of employees by finding the mediating effect of TMX in the context of Pakistani organizations.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document