scholarly journals CSCs in Breast Cancer—One Size Does Not Fit All: Therapeutic Advances in Targeting Heterogeneous Epithelial and Mesenchymal CSCs

Cancers ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 11 (8) ◽  
pp. 1128 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrew Sulaiman ◽  
Sarah McGarry ◽  
Xianghui Han ◽  
Sheng Liu ◽  
Lisheng Wang
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Clinical Trials ◽  
Triple Negative ◽  
Signal Pathway ◽  
Future Research ◽  
Research Needs ◽  
Disease Relapse ◽  
Differential Signal ◽  
Cancer Subtypes ◽  
Potential Inhibitors

Unlike other breast cancer subtypes, triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) has no specific targets and is characterized as one of the most aggressive subtypes of breast cancer that disproportionately accounts for the majority of breast cancer-related deaths. Current conventional chemotherapeutics target the bulk tumor population, but not the cancer stem cells (CSCs) that are capable of initiating new tumors to cause disease relapse. Recent studies have identified distinct epithelial-like (E) ALDH+ CSCs, mesenchymal-like (M) CD44+/CD24− CSCs, and hybrid E/M ALDH+/CD44+/CD24− CSCs. These subtypes of CSCs exhibit differential signal pathway regulations, possess plasticity, and respond differently to treatment. As such, co-inhibition of different subtypes of CSCs is key to viable therapy. This review serves to highlight different pathway regulations in E and M CSCs in TNBC, and to further describe their role in disease progression. Potential inhibitors targeting E and/or M CSCs based on clinical trials are summarized for further investigation. Since future research needs to adopt suitable tumor models and take into account the divergence of E and M CSCs for the development of effective treatments, TNBC models for clinically translatable studies are further discussed.

scholarly journals AKT Inhibitors: New Weapons in the Fight Against Breast Cancer?

2021 ◽  
Vol 12 ◽  
Author(s):  
Federica Martorana ◽  
Gianmarco Motta ◽  
Giuliana Pavone ◽  
Lucia Motta ◽  
Stefania Stella ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Clinical Trials ◽  
Triple Negative ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Unmet Need ◽  
Predictive Biomarkers ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
New Combination ◽  
Cancer Subtypes ◽  
Combination Strategies

The serine/threonine kinase AKT is a key component of the PI3K/AKT/mTOR signaling pathway as it exerts a pivotal role in cell growth, proliferation, survival, and metabolism. Deregulation of this pathway is a common event in breast cancer including hormone receptor-positive (HR+) disease, HER2-amplified, and triple negative tumors. Hence, targeting AKT represents an attractive treatment option for many breast cancer subtypes, especially those resistant to conventional treatments. Several AKT inhibitors have been recently developed and two ATP-competitive compounds, capivasertib and ipatasertib, have been extensively tested in phase I and II clinical trials either alone, with chemotherapy, or with hormonal agents. Additionally, phase III trials of capivasertib and ipatasertib are already under way in HR+ and triple-negative breast cancer. While the identification of predictive biomarkers of response and resistance to AKT inhibition represents an unmet need, new combination strategies are under investigation aiming to boost the therapeutic efficacy of these drugs. As such, trials combining capivasertib and ipatasertib with CDK4/6 inhibitors, immune checkpoint inhibitors, and PARP inhibitors are currently ongoing. This review summarizes the available evidence on AKT inhibition in breast cancer, reporting both efficacy and toxicity data from clinical trials along with the available translational correlates and then focusing on the potential use of these drugs in new combination strategies.

Identification of new therapeutic leads for triple negative breast cancer subtypes

Planta Medica ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 81 (11) ◽  
Author(s):  
AJ Robles ◽  
L Du ◽  
S Cai ◽  
RH Cichewicz ◽  
SL Mooberry
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Triple Negative Breast Cancer ◽  
Triple Negative ◽  
Breast Cancer Subtypes ◽  
Cancer Subtypes ◽  
Therapeutic Leads

scholarly journals Triple negative breast cancer subtypes and pathologic complete response rate to neoadjuvant chemotherapy

Oncotarget ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 9 (41) ◽  
pp. 26406-26416 ◽  
Author(s):  
Angela Santonja ◽  
Alfonso Sánchez-Muñoz ◽  
Ana Lluch ◽  
Maria Rosario Chica-Parrado ◽  
Joan Albanell ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy ◽  
Triple Negative Breast Cancer ◽  
Triple Negative ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Complete Response Rate ◽  
Pathologic Complete Response ◽  
Complete Response ◽  
Cancer Subtypes ◽  
Pathologic Complete Response Rate

scholarly journals Identification of human triple-negative breast cancer subtypes and preclinical models for selection of targeted therapies

2011 ◽  
Vol 121 (7) ◽  
pp. 2750-2767 ◽  
Author(s):  
Brian D. Lehmann ◽  
Joshua A. Bauer ◽  
Xi Chen ◽  
Melinda E. Sanders ◽  
A. Bapsi Chakravarthy ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Triple Negative Breast Cancer ◽  
Targeted Therapies ◽  
Triple Negative ◽  
Breast Cancer Subtypes ◽  
Preclinical Models ◽  
Cancer Subtypes ◽  
Selection Of

scholarly journals A common goal to CARE: Cancer Advocates, Researchers, and Clinicians Explore current treatments and clinical trials for breast cancer brain metastases

2021 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Natalie S. Joe ◽  
Christine Hodgdon ◽  
Lianne Kraemer ◽  
Kristin J. Redmond ◽  
Vered Stearns ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Clinical Trials ◽  
Brain Metastases ◽  
Detection Methods ◽  
Future Research ◽  
Breast Cancer Brain Metastasis ◽  
Patient Advocates ◽  
Breast Cancer Brain Metastases ◽  
The Brain

AbstractBreast cancer is the most commonly diagnosed cancer in women worldwide. Approximately one-tenth of all patients with advanced breast cancer develop brain metastases resulting in an overall survival rate of fewer than 2 years. The challenges lie in developing new approaches to treat, monitor, and prevent breast cancer brain metastasis (BCBM). This review will provide an overview of BCBM from the integrated perspective of clinicians, researchers, and patient advocates. We will summarize the current management of BCBM, including diagnosis, treatment, and monitoring. We will highlight ongoing translational research for BCBM, including clinical trials and improved detection methods that can become the mainstay for BCBM treatment if they demonstrate efficacy. We will discuss preclinical BCBM research that focuses on the intrinsic properties of breast cancer cells and the influence of the brain microenvironment. Finally, we will spotlight emerging studies and future research needs to improve survival outcomes and preserve the quality of life for patients with BCBM.

scholarly journals Epigenetic Regulation of Immunotherapy Response in Triple-Negative Breast Cancer

Cancers ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (16) ◽  
pp. 4139
Author(s):  
Pere Llinàs-Arias ◽  
Sandra Íñiguez-Muñoz ◽  
Kelly McCann ◽  
Leonie Voorwerk ◽  
Javier I. J. Orozco ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Triple Negative Breast Cancer ◽  
Triple Negative ◽  
Immune Escape ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Early Stage ◽  
Regulatory Elements ◽  
Her2 Overexpression ◽  
Breast Cancers ◽  
Cancer Subtypes

Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) is defined by the absence of estrogen receptor and progesterone receptor and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) overexpression. This malignancy, representing 15–20% of breast cancers, is a clinical challenge due to the lack of targeted treatments, higher intrinsic aggressiveness, and worse outcomes than other breast cancer subtypes. Immune checkpoint inhibitors have shown promising efficacy for early-stage and advanced TNBC, but this seems limited to a subgroup of patients. Understanding the underlying mechanisms that determine immunotherapy efficiency is essential to identifying which TNBC patients will respond to immunotherapy-based treatments and help to develop new therapeutic strategies. Emerging evidence supports that epigenetic alterations, including aberrant chromatin architecture conformation and the modulation of gene regulatory elements, are critical mechanisms for immune escape. These alterations are particularly interesting since they can be reverted through the inhibition of epigenetic regulators. For that reason, several recent studies suggest that the combination of epigenetic drugs and immunotherapeutic agents can boost anticancer immune responses. In this review, we focused on the contribution of epigenetics to the crosstalk between immune and cancer cells, its relevance on immunotherapy response in TNBC, and the potential benefits of combined treatments.

scholarly journals Immunotherapeutic Approaches in Triple-Negative Breast Cancer: State of the Art and Future Perspectives

2020 ◽  
Vol 2020 ◽  
pp. 1-9
Author(s):  
Karima Oualla ◽  
Loay Kassem ◽  
Lamiae Nouiakh ◽  
Lamiae Amaadour ◽  
Zineb Benbrahim ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Clinical Trials ◽  
Triple Negative Breast Cancer ◽  
Triple Negative ◽  
Growth Factor Receptor ◽  
Tumor Infiltrating Lymphocytes ◽  
Standard Of Care ◽  
Breast Cancers ◽  
Poor Outcomes ◽  
Infiltrating Lymphocytes

Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) is characterized by the absence of estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR), and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2). It accounts for 15%–20% of all breast cancers and is associated with an aggressive evolution and poor outcomes with the majority of recurrences and deaths occurring in the first 5 years. Chemotherapy remains the mainstay of treatment in the absence of effective targets, but the good understanding of immune tumor microenvironment, the identification of immune-related targets, and the role of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) in TNBC has allowed to develop promising immunotherapeutic strategies for this unique subset of breast cancer. Recently, immunotherapy is being extensively explored in TNBC and clinical trials have shown promising results. In this article, we tried to explain the rationale and mechanisms of targeting the immune system in TNBC, to report the results from recent clinical trials that put immunotherapy as a new standard of care in TNBC in addition to ongoing trials and future directions in the next decade.

scholarly journals Molecular stratification within triple-negative breast cancer subtypes

2019 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Dong-Yu Wang ◽  
Zhe Jiang ◽  
Yaacov Ben-David ◽  
James R. Woodgett ◽  
Eldad Zacksenhaus
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Triple Negative Breast Cancer ◽  
Poor Prognosis ◽  
Triple Negative ◽  
Cancer Subtypes ◽  
Molecular Stratification ◽  
Hazard Ratios ◽  
Programmed Cell Death 1 ◽  
Tgfβ Signalling ◽  
Survival Differences

AbstractTriple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) has been subdivided into six distinct subgroups: basal-like 1 (BL1), basal-like 2 (BL2), mesenchymal (M), mesenchymal stem–like (MSL), immunomodulatory (IM), and luminal androgen receptor (LAR). We recently identified a subgroup of TNBC with loss of the tumor suppressor PTEN and five specific microRNAs that exhibits exceedingly poor clinical outcome and contains TP53 mutation, RB1 loss and high MYC and WNT signalling. Here, show that these PTEN-low/miRNA-low lesions cluster with BL1 TNBC. These tumors exhibited high RhoA signalling and were significantly stratified on the basis of PTEN-low/RhoA-signalling-high with hazard ratios (HRs) of 8.2 (P = 0.0009) and 4.87 (P = 0.033) in training and test cohorts, respectively. For BL2 TNBC, we identified AKT1 copy gain/high mRNA expression as surrogate for poor prognosis (HR = 3.9; P = 0.02 and HR = 6.1; P = 0.0032). In IM, programmed cell death 1 (PD1) was elevated and predictive of poor prognosis (HR = 5.3; P = 0.01 and HR = 3.5; P < 0.004). Additional alterations, albeit without prognostic power, characterized each subtype including high E2F2 and TGFβ signalling and CXCL8 expression in BL2, high IFNα and IFNγ signalling and CTLA4 expression in IM, and high EGFR signalling in MSL, and may be targeted for therapy. This study identified PTEN-low/RhoA-signalling-high, and high AKT1 and PD1 expression as potent prognostications for BL1, BL2 and IM subtypes with survival differences of over 14, 2.75 and 10.5 years, respectively. This intrinsic heterogeneity could be exploited to prioritize patients for precision medicine.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document