scholarly journals BRCA in Gastrointestinal Cancers: Current Treatments and Future Perspectives

Cancers ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 12 (11) ◽  
pp. 3346
Author(s):  
Eleonora Molinaro ◽  
Kalliopi Andrikou ◽  
Andrea Casadei-Gardini ◽  
Giulia Rovesti

A strong association between pancreatic cancer and BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations is documented. Based on promising results of breast and ovarian cancers, several clinical trials with poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitors (PARPi) are ongoing for gastrointestinal (GI) malignancies, especially for pancreatic cancer. Indeed, the POLO trial results provide promising and awaited changes for the pancreatic cancer therapeutic landscape. Contrariwise, for other gastrointestinal tumors, the rationale is currently only alleged. The role of BRCA mutation in gastrointestinal cancers is the subject of this review. In particular, we aim to provide the latest updates about novel therapeutic strategies that, exploiting DNA repair defects, promise to shape the future therapeutic scenario of GI cancers.

Gut ◽  
2007 ◽  
Vol 56 (5) ◽  
pp. 601-605 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. B Greer ◽  
D. C Whitcomb

2022 ◽  
Vol 23 (2) ◽  
pp. 930
Author(s):  
Ba Da Yun ◽  
Ye Ji Choi ◽  
Seung Wan Son ◽  
Gabriel Adelman Cipolla ◽  
Fernanda Costa Brandão Berti ◽  
...  

Circular RNAs (circRNAs) and long noncoding RNAs (lncRNAs) are differentially expressed in gastrointestinal cancers. These noncoding RNAs (ncRNAs) regulate a variety of cellular activities by physically interacting with microRNAs and proteins and altering their activity. It has also been suggested that exosomes encapsulate circRNAs and lncRNAs in cancer cells. Exosomes are then discharged into the extracellular environment, where they are taken up by other cells. As a result, exosomal ncRNA cargo is critical for cell–cell communication within the cancer microenvironment. Exosomal ncRNAs can regulate a range of events, such as angiogenesis, metastasis, immune evasion, drug resistance, and epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition. To set the groundwork for developing novel therapeutic strategies against gastrointestinal malignancies, a thorough understanding of circRNAs and lncRNAs is required. In this review, we discuss the function and intrinsic features of oncogenic circRNAs and lncRNAs that are enriched within exosomes.


Genes ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 10 (10) ◽  
pp. 752 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rawat ◽  
Kadian ◽  
Gupta ◽  
Kumar ◽  
Chain ◽  
...  

Pancreatic cancer is one of the most aggressive malignancies, accounting for more than 45,750 deaths annually in the U.S. alone. The aggressive nature and late diagnosis of pancreatic cancer, coupled with the limitations of existing chemotherapy, present the pressing need for the development of novel therapeutic strategies. Recent reports have demonstrated a critical role of microRNAs (miRNAs) in the initiation, progression, and metastasis of cancer. Furthermore, aberrant expressions of miRNAs have often been associated with the cause and consequence of pancreatic cancer, emphasizing the possible use of miRNAs in the effective management of pancreatic cancer patients. In this review, we provide a brief overview of miRNA biogenesis and its role in fundamental cellular process and miRNA studies in pancreatic cancer patients and animal models. Subsequent sections narrate the role of miRNA in, (i) cell cycle and proliferation; (ii) apoptosis; (iii) invasions and metastasis; and (iv) various cellular signaling pathways. We also describe the role of miRNA’s in pancreatic cancer; (i) diagnosis; (ii) prognosis and (iii) therapeutic intervention. Conclusion section describes the gist of review with future directions.


2018 ◽  
Vol 9 (3) ◽  
pp. 33 ◽  
Author(s):  
Suha Al-Oballi Kridli ◽  
Holly Austin

Ovarian cancer is the leading cause of death among gynecological cancers. There are many risk factors that can increase a woman’s susceptibility to breast and ovarian cancers, some of which are modifiable.  However, non-modifiable risks for breast and ovarian cancer include the presence of genetic mutations (BRCA) increase the risk of these diseases. The purpose of this review was to identify factors, reported in the literature, known to affect women’s decision to get genetic testing for BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations for hereditary breast and ovarian cancer. A total of 31 studies that met the inclusion criteria were included in this review. Several internal and external factors, influencing women’s decision to getting tested for BRCA mutations, were identified and explained. Implications for clinical practice were provided.


2018 ◽  
pp. JGO.18.00066 ◽  
Author(s):  
Omalkhair Abulkhair ◽  
Mohammed Al Balwi ◽  
Ola Makram ◽  
Lamia Alsubaie ◽  
Medhat Faris ◽  
...  

Purpose Over the past three decades, the incidence rate of breast cancer (BC) among Arab women has continually increased. However, data on the prevalence of BRCA1/2 mutations are scarce. Although the population in Saudi Arabia is at large homogeneous and consanguinity is common, especially in the central, eastern, and southern regions of the country, the prevalence of BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations and the characteristics of BC are not well studied in the country. Methods This prospective observational study intended to determine the prevalence of BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations and sought to examine the clinicopathologic features of BC associated with these mutations. Results Of 310 patients, 270 (87%) had no mutation. BRCA mutations were identified in 40 patients; BRCA1 mutations were found in 11% of patients, and BRCA2 mutations were found in 2% of patients. Variants of unknown significance were found in 15% of patients (45 patients). Triple-negative BC (TNBC) accounted for 86% of all patients with BC and mutations. The following three recurrent deleterious founder BRCA1 mutations were observed: c.4136_4137delCT was observed in five unrelated patients, c.5530delC was observed in three unrelated patients, and c.4524G>A mutations were observed in five unrelated patients. One novel mutation was identified in the BRCA1 gene (c.5512 dup [p.Glu1838Glyfs*42]). Conclusion Among high-risk Saudi patients with BC, BRCA1 mutations are prevalent (11%). TNBC is the most common BC subtype. Furthermore, age alone does not have a significant association with mutation, but a combination of risk factors such as age, familial history, and TNBC has a significant association with BRCA mutation.


2008 ◽  
Vol 8 (2) ◽  
pp. 153-158 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniel H. Kim ◽  
Beth Crawford ◽  
John Ziegler ◽  
Mary S. Beattie

2015 ◽  
Vol 113 (3) ◽  
pp. 425-432 ◽  
Author(s):  
I Lohse ◽  
A Borgida ◽  
P Cao ◽  
M Cheung ◽  
M Pintilie ◽  
...  

2010 ◽  
Vol 28 (26) ◽  
pp. 4029-4037 ◽  
Author(s):  
Linda Coate ◽  
Sinead Cuffe ◽  
Anne Horgan ◽  
Rayjean J. Hung ◽  
David Christiani ◽  
...  

Studies of the role of germline or inherited genetic variation on cancer outcome can fall into three distinct categories. First, the impact of highly penetrant but lowly prevalent mutations of germline DNA on cancer prognosis has been studied extensively for BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations as well as mutations related to hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer syndrome. These mainly modest-sized analyses have produced conflicting results. Although some associations have been observed, they may not be independent of other known clinical or molecular prognostic factors. Second, the impact of germline polymorphisms on cancer prognosis is a burgeoning field of research. However, a deeper understanding of potentially confounding somatic changes and larger multi-institutional, multistage studies may be needed before consistent results are seen. Third, research examining the impact of germline genetic variation on differential treatment response or toxicity (pharmacogenetics) has produced some proof-of-principle results. Putative germline pharmacogenetic predictors of outcome include DPYD polymorphisms and fluorouracil toxicity, UGT1A1 variation and irinotecan toxicity, and CYP2D6 polymorphisms and tamoxifen efficacy, with emerging data on predictors of molecularly targeted or biologic drugs. Here we review data pertaining to these germline outcome and germline toxicity relationships.


2015 ◽  
Vol 33 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e15236-e15236
Author(s):  
Daniela Boggiani ◽  
Mariangela Bella ◽  
Paola Zanelli ◽  
Maria Michiara ◽  
Giulia Mazzaschi ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document