scholarly journals Predicting Prognosis of Breast Cancer Patients with Brain Metastases in the BMBC Registry—Comparison of Three Different GPA Prognostic Scores

Cancers ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (4) ◽  
pp. 844
Author(s):  
Kerstin Riecke ◽  
Volkmar Müller ◽  
Rudolf Weide ◽  
Marcus Schmidt ◽  
Tjoung-Won Park-Simon ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Brain Metastases ◽  
Triple Negative ◽  
Karnofsky Performance Status ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Univariate Analysis ◽  
Prognostic Scores ◽  
Breast Cancer Patients ◽  
Luminal A ◽  
Her2 Positive

Several scores have been developed in order to estimate the prognosis of patients with brain metastases (BM) by objective criteria. The aim of this analysis was to validate all three published graded-prognostic-assessment (GPA)-scores in a subcohort of 882 breast cancer (BC) patients with BM in the Brain Metastases in the German Breast Cancer (BMBC) registry. The median age at diagnosis of BM was 57 years. All in all, 22.3% of patients (n = 197) had triple-negative, 33.4% (n = 295) luminal A like, 25.1% (n = 221) luminal B/HER2-enriched like and 19.2% (n = 169) HER2 positive like BC. Age ≥60 years, evidence of extracranial metastases (ECM), higher number of BM, triple-negative subtype and low Karnofsky-Performance-Status (KPS) were all associated with worse overall survival (OS) in univariate analysis (p < 0.001 each). All three GPA-scores were associated with OS. The breast-GPA showed the highest probability of classifying patients with survival above 12 months in the best prognostic group (specificity 68.7% compared with 48.1% for the updated breast-GPA and 21.8% for the original GPA). Sensitivities for predicting 3 months survival were very low for all scores. In this analysis, all GPA-scores showed only moderate diagnostic accuracy in predicting the OS of BC patients with BM.

The role of systemic treatment after whole brain radiotherapy (WBRT) in breast cancer patients with brain metastases: Differences depending on biological subtype

2009 ◽  
Vol 27 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 1027-1027
Author(s):  
A. Niwinska ◽  
M. Murawska ◽  
I. Lemanska ◽  
J. Milewska
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Brain Metastases ◽  
Median Survival ◽  
Triple Negative Breast Cancer ◽  
Triple Negative ◽  
Systemic Treatment ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Poor Performance Status ◽  
Breast Cancer Patients ◽  
Her 2

1027 Background: The aim of the study was to analyze the efficacy of systemic treatment (chemotherapy [chth], endocrine therapy, targeted therapy) performed after WBRT in patients (pts) with breast cancer and brain metastases. Methods: The group of 222 consecutive breast cancer pts with brain metastases treated in one institution in the years 2003–2006 was divided into four biological subgroups based on ER, PR, and HER-2 receptors’ expression: HER-2(+++)ER/PR(-); HER-2(+++)ER/PR(+); ER(-)PR(-)HER-2(-); and ER/PR(+)HER-2(-). WBRT was performed in 219 (99%) pts. Systemic therapy after WBRT was continued in 160 (72%) pts. Clinically, patients with triple-negative breast cancer were more often in poor performance status (KPS<60%) than the others (51% vs. 28%, respectively). Survivals from brain metastases without and with systemic treatment were compared in four mentioned biological subgroups. Results: Median survival from brain metastases in the entire group was 7.5 months. In the group of ER/PR(+)HER-2(-) median survival without and with systemic therapy was 3 and 14 months, respectively (p = 0.007). In the group of HER-2(+++)ER/PR(+) median survival without further treatment, after chth and after chth with trastuzumab was 2, 8, and 13 months, respectively (p = 0.000) and in the group of HER-2(+++)ER/PR(-) median survival without further treatment, after chth and after chth with trastuzumab was 4, 8, and 10 months, respectively (p = 0.004). In triple-negative breast cancer patients median survival without and with chemotherapy was 3 and 4 months, respectively (p = 0.75). Conclusions: Systemic treatment (chth, endocrine therapy, targeted therapy) continued after WBRT in breast cancer pts with brain metastases prolongs survival in three of four biological subgroups. In the group of HER-2-positive breast cancer pts, trastuzumab added to chth had independent positive impact on survival. No benefit was observed in the subgroup of triple-negative breast cancer pts; it would be the result of refractory disease and the fact, that more pts were in poor performance status. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

scholarly journals Comparison of Clinico-Pathological Presentations of Triple-Negative versus Triple-Positive and HER2 Iraqi Breast Cancer Patients

2019 ◽  
Vol 7 (21) ◽  
pp. 3534-3539
Author(s):  
Nada A. S. Alwan ◽  
Furat N. Tawfeeq
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Triple Negative ◽  
Molecular Subtype ◽  
Clinical Stage ◽  
Lymph Node Involvement ◽  
Breast Cancer Patients ◽  
Luminal A ◽  
Her2 Positive ◽  
Cancer Subtypes ◽  
Significant Difference

BACKGROUND: Breast cancer remains the most common malignancy among the Iraqi population. Affected patients exhibit different clinical behaviours according to the molecular subtypes of the tumour. AIM: To identify the clinical and pathological presentations of the Iraqi breast cancer subtypes identified by Estrogen receptors (ER), Progesterone receptors (PR) and HER2 expressions. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The present study comprised 486 Iraqi female patients diagnosed with breast cancer. ER, PR and HER2 contents of the primary tumours were assessed through immunohistochemical staining; classifying the patients into five different groups: Triple Negative (ER/PR negative/HER2 negative), Triple Positive (ER/PR positive/HER2 positive), Luminal A (ER/PR positive/HER2 negative), HER2 enriched ((ER/PR negative/HER2 positive) and all other subtypes. RESULTS: The major registered subtype was the Luminal A which was encountered in 230 patients (47.3%), followed by the Triple Negative (14.6%), Triple Positive (13.6%) and HER2 Enriched (11.5%). Patients exhibiting the Triple Negative subtype were significantly younger than the rest of the groups and presented with larger size tumours. A significant difference in the distribution of the breast cancer stages was displayed (p < 0.05); the most advanced were noted among those with HER2 enriched tumours who exhibited the highest frequency of poorly differentiated carcinomas and lymph node involvement. CONCLUSION: The most significant variations in the clinicopathological presentations were observed in the age and clinical stage of the patients at diagnosis. Adoption of breast cancer molecular subtype classification in countries with limited resources could serve as a valuable prognostic marker in the management of aggressive forms of the disease.

Poor prognostic factors of post-CNS recurrence survival in breast cancer patients.

2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 2097-2097
Author(s):  
Carlos Castaneda Altamirano ◽  
Henry Leonidas Gomez ◽  
Joseph A. Pinto ◽  
Luis Jesus Schwarz ◽  
C. E. Vigil ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Brain Metastases ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Cox Regression ◽  
Histological Grade ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Prognostic Scores ◽  
Breast Cancer Patients ◽  
Class Iii ◽  
Ecog Performance Status

2097 Background: Survival after the onset of metastases in the central nervous system is very short. However, some variables could indicate subsets of worse prognosis. Our aim was to determine the value of clinicopathological characteristics and prognostic scores in the post-SNC recurrence survival. Methods: We evaluated a retrospective cohort of 2597 breast cancer patients treated at the Instituto Nacional de Enfermedades Neoplasicas (Lima-Peru) between 2000-2005. Clinicopathological data was retrieved, RPA and GPA brain metastases prognostic scores were constructed and phenotypes were categorized according to the IHC expression in [HR+,HER2-], [Any HR, HER2+] and Triple Negative. Survival was calculated according to the Kaplan Meier methodology and cases were stratified by variables evaluated. The log-rank or Breslow tests were used when appropriate and multivariate analysis was done by the cox regression. A P<0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results: One hundred and fifty seven cases developed CNS metastasis, from which 23 developed leptomeningeal metastases. The post recurrence CNS survival was 0.405 years. There were not differences according to phenotype (P=0.102), histological grade (P=0.647), number of brain metastases (P=0.695) and metastases volume (P=0.155). We found statistic differences in regard to leptomeningeal carcinomatosis (present, 0.249ys vs absent 0.436ys; P=0.033); CSF infiltration (present, 0.115ys vs absent, 1.044ys; P=0.022); status of primary tumor (controlled, 0.501ys vs uncontrolled, 0.263ys; P<0.001); ECOG performance status (<2, 0.504ys vs ≥2, 0.288ys; P=0.030); and time from BC diagnosis to SNC metastases (<8 moths, 0.115 vs ≥8 months, 0.425ys; P=0.023). Cox regression identifies to CSF infiltration as statistically significant (HR=9.77; P=0.025). In regard to Prognostic scores, we found differences when cases were stratified according to RPA score (Class I, 0.564ys vs Class II, 0.455ys vs Class III, 0.288ys; P=0.049) and GPA score (0-1, 0.26ys vs 1.5-3, 0.455ys vs 3.5-5, 0,564; 0.048). Conclusions: RPA and GPA scores are more accurate to identify poor survival subsets in this group of patients than other tumor features (phenotype or histology).

scholarly journals Frequency of Brain Metastasis in Breast Cancer Patients and Factors Leading to it

2019 ◽  
Vol 4 (3) ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Risk Factors ◽  
Brain Metastasis ◽  
Brain Metastases ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Tumor Size ◽  
Triple Negative ◽  
Univariate Analysis ◽  
Axillary Lymph ◽  
Breast Cancer Patients

Objective: Breast cancer is the second commonest cause of brain metastasis after lung cancer.10-16% of patients diagnosed with breast cancer ultimately develop brain metastasis. As most of chemotherapeutic drugs do not cross blood brain barrier despite adequate management of breast cancer risk of CNS relapse persist. Prognosis for breast cancer patients after developing brain metastases is poor. Therefore, we sought to determine the frequency of brain metastasis in Pakistani breast cancer survivors, how often brain metastasis is the first site of recurrence and what are the risk factors that indicate greater likelihood of this event occurrence so that more accurate screening for patients at risk can be established. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed medical record of 507 patients with invasive breast cancer of all stages who received treatment in Liaquat National Hospital from January 2010 to December 2015. Patients who developed brain metastasis were identified and stratified according to risk factors. Result: Out of 507 patients 51(10%) developed brain metastasis. 14 patients had brain metastasis as first site of recurrence. On univariate analysis negative hormone receptor status, triple negative and her2 enriched subtype, higher tumor size, lymph node positivity, stages 3 and 4, lymphovascular and peri nodal extension, shorter diseasefree survival and recurrence with visceral metastasis had a statistically highly significant impact on brain metastasis occurrence, while young age at diagnosis (≤35 years), menopausal status, BMI and tumor histology showed no statistically significant impact. Conclusion: Brain metastases are more frequent in triple negative, Her2Neu positive and Estrogen and Progesterone receptor negative patients. Other factors associated with higher risk of brain metastases in breast cancer patients include larger tumor size, positive axillary lymph nodes, higher stage and lymphovascular and periodontal invasion. Frequency of brain metastasis in breast cancer patients and factors leading to it.

Prognostic factor Ki67 for breast cancer patients in each subgroup.

2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 565-565
Author(s):  
Naoki Niikura ◽  
Shinobu Masuda ◽  
Mizuho Terada ◽  
Mayako Terao ◽  
Nobue Kumaki ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Triple Negative ◽  
Predictive Marker ◽  
Rank Test ◽  
Breast Cancer Patients ◽  
Luminal A ◽  
Her2 Positive ◽  
Luminal B ◽  
Er Positive

565 Background: Immunohistochemical (IHC) Ki67 has described it as a prognostic and predictive marker for breast cancer. The St. Gallen Consensus Meeting determined that Ki67 labeling index is chiefly important for distinguishing between “Luminal A” and “Luminal B (HER2 negative)” subtypes and is a predictive marker for chemotherapeutic efficacy. However, the high and low cutoff points remain controversial. Our objective is to compare survival in patients with low, intermediate, and high Ki67 levels in each subgroup. Methods: We retrospectively identified all the patients in the Tokai University breast cancer database for whom IHC Ki67 data were available between January 1, 2000, and December 31, 2010. Ki67 was defined as low if <10% Ki67 was detected, as Intermediate if 10–20% Ki67 was detected, and as high if >20% Ki67 was detected. To assess Ki67 levels and survival outcomes, survival curves were calculated using the Kaplan–Meier method and compared using the log-rank test. Results: We identified 1331 primary breast cancer patients without metastasis, of whom 686 received neoadjuvant or adjuvant chemotherapy. Patients with high Ki67 had poorer relapse-free survival (RFS) than patients with intermediate (p = 0.009) and low Ki67 (p < 0.001). Patients with intermediate Ki67 had poorer RFS than patients with low Ki67 (p < 0.001). In ER-positive cases (n = 1059), patients with high and intermediate Ki67 had poorer RFS than patients with low Ki67 (p < 0.001 and p = 0.002, respectively). In HER2-positive and ER-negative cases (n = 103), patients with high Ki67 had poorer RFS than patients with low Ki67 (p = 0.002). In triple-negative cases (n = 164), patients with high Ki67 tended to have poorer RFS than patients with low Ki67 (p = 0.064). Conclusions: Our data demonstrated that low, intermediate, and high Ki67 levels may be used to differentiate prognosis in ER-positive cancer patients as well as HER2-positive and triple-negative cancer patients.

scholarly journals Characteristics and Clinical Outcome of Breast Cancer Patients with Asymptomatic Brain Metastases

Cancers ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 12 (10) ◽  
pp. 2787
Author(s):  
Elena Laakmann ◽  
Isabell Witzel ◽  
Tanja Neunhöffer ◽  
Rudolf Weide ◽  
Marcus Schmidt ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Brain Metastases ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Metastatic Breast ◽  
Leptomeningeal Metastasis ◽  
Breast Cancer Patients ◽  
Her2 Positive ◽  
Asymptomatic Patients ◽  
Karnofsky Index ◽  
Cancer Network

Background: Brain metastases (BM) have become a major challenge in patients with metastatic breast cancer. Methods: The aim of this analysis was to characterize patients with asymptomatic BM (n = 580) in the overall cohort of 2589 patients with BM from our Brain Metastases in Breast Cancer Network Germany (BMBC) registry. Results: Compared to symptomatic patients, asymptomatic patients were slightly younger at diagnosis (median age: 55.5 vs. 57.0 years, p = 0.01), had a better performance status at diagnosis (Karnofsky index 80–100%: 68.4% vs. 57%, p < 0.001), a lower number of BM (>1 BM: 56% vs. 70%, p = 0.027), and a slightly smaller diameter of BM (median: 1.5 vs. 2.2 cm, p < 0.001). Asymptomatic patients were more likely to have extracranial metastases (86.7% vs. 81.5%, p = 0.003) but were less likely to have leptomeningeal metastasis (6.3% vs. 10.9%, p < 0.001). Asymptomatic patients underwent less intensive BM therapy but had a longer median overall survival (statistically significant for a cohort of HER2-positive patients) compared to symptomatic patients (10.4 vs. 6.9 months, p < 0.001). Conclusions: These analyses show a trend that asymptomatic patients have less severe metastatic brain disease and despite less intensive local BM therapy still have a better outcome (statistically significant for a cohort of HER2-positive patients) than patients who present with symptomatic BM, although a lead time bias of the earlier diagnosis cannot be ruled out. Our analysis is of clinical relevance in the context of potential trials examining the benefit of early detection and treatment of BM.

Biologic subtypes and first relapse pattern in curative surgery performed breast cancer patients: Study of Anatolian Society of Medical Oncology.

2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e11559-e11559
Author(s):  
Muhammet Ali Kaplan ◽  
Ülkü Yalçintas Arslan ◽  
Abdurrahman Isikdogan ◽  
Berna Oksuzoglu ◽  
Mevlude Inanc ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Triple Negative ◽  
Molecular Subtypes ◽  
Distant Recurrence ◽  
Breast Cancer Patients ◽  
Luminal A ◽  
Her2 Positive ◽  
Curative Surgery ◽  
Luminal B ◽  
First Relapse

e11559 Background: Relapse is one of the most important risk factors in overall survival, and distant recurrence is related to a complex biologic interaction of seed and soil factors. The aim of the study was to investigate the association between the molecular subtypes and patterns of relapse in patients with curative surgery performed breast cancer. Methods: We retrospectively evaluated clinical data from 1126 breast cancer patients with relapses after their curative surgery between 1998 and 2012 from referral centers of Turkey. Study population was divided into four biological subtypes according to their hormone receptor status and HER2 expression.Patients were divided into four biological subtypes according to IHC: triple negative (ER negative, PR negative, and HER2 negative), HER2 overexpressing (ER negative, PR negative, and HER2 positive), luminal B (ER and/or PR positive, HER2 positive), and luminal A (ER and/or PR positive, HER2 negative). Results: The proportion of patients with luminal A, Luminal B, HER2-overexpressing, and triple negative breast cancer was 42.0% (n=473), 23.0% (n=259), 13.3% (n=150), and 21,7% (n=244), respectively. Median time to relapse was 26.6 months. 22.5% of the patients (n=253) had multiple relapse sites. The incidence of first distant recurrence site was significantly different among the subtypes. Liver (31.8% vs. 22.4%, p=0.008), bone (42.2% vs 37.0%, p<0.001), and lung metastases (30.9% vs. 22.2%, p=0.019) were increased in HER2 overexpressing, luminal A and triple negative group as first relapse site compared with other groups, respectively. Brain metastasis was increased in HER2 overexpressing and triple negative groups (17.7%), compared with Luminal A and B groups (8.0%, p<0.001). Conclusions: Organ-specific metastasis may depend on the molecular subtype of breast cancer. Tailored strategies against distant metastasis concerning the molecular subtypes in breast cancer may be considered.

Co-expression of ER-beta and HER2 associated with poorer prognosis in primary breast cancer

2009 ◽  
Vol 32 (3) ◽  
pp. 250 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wen-sheng Qui ◽  
Lu Yue ◽  
Ai-ping Ding ◽  
Jian Sun ◽  
Yang Yao ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Cell Differentiation ◽  
Primary Breast Cancer ◽  
Tumour Size ◽  
Univariate Analysis ◽  
Growth Factor Receptor ◽  
Disease Free Survival ◽  
Breast Cancer Patients ◽  
Her2 Positive ◽  
Er Alpha

Purpose: To assess the prognostic value of co-expression of estrogen receptor (ER)-beta and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) in primary breast cancer patients in China. Methods: Tumour specimens from 308 patients undergoing surgery for primary breast cancer were evaluated. Expression of ER-beta and HER-2 was investigated by the immunohistochemistry. Results: 123 patients (40%) were ER-beta positive and 58 (18.5 %) were HER2 positive. Among the 58 HER2 positive patients, 44 were ER-beta positive and 14 were ER-beta negative. ER-beta positive was associated with HER2 positive (75.9%, P=0.018) as well as ER-alpha positive (79.7%, P=0.023), poor cell differentiation (77.2% grade 2 or 3, P=0.010) and menopause age < 45 yr (55.3%, P=0.031). HER2 positive was associated with poor cell differentiation (93.1%, P=0.001), ?3cm tumour size (67.2%, P=0.011). Conclusion: Both ER-beta positive and HER2 positive status was associated with poorer overall survival (OS) by univariate analysis. In both HER2 positive and HER2 negative subgroups, ER-beta positive was associated with poorer distant disease free survival (DDFS) but not OS, which implied that ER-beta might relate to metastasis in breast cancer.

scholarly journals Inflammatory Breast Cancer: Clinical Characteristics and Influence of Molecular Subtypes on Treatment Response

2021 ◽  
Vol 107 (1_suppl) ◽  
pp. 12-12
Author(s):  
D Aissaoui ◽  
M Bohli ◽  
R Ben Amor ◽  
J Yahyaoui ◽  
A Hamdoun ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Treatment Response ◽  
Inflammatory Breast Cancer ◽  
Hormone Receptor ◽  
Triple Negative ◽  
Molecular Subtypes ◽  
Luminal A ◽  
Her2 Positive ◽  
Luminal B ◽  
Significant Difference

Introduction: Inflammatory Breast Cancer (IBC) is a rare and very aggressive breast cancer with poor prognosis. The prevalence is different from a country to another. In Tunisia, it is about 5 to 7% of breast cancer. The aim of this study is to describe the epidemiological and histopathological features of patients with inflammatory breast cancer and to evaluate the treatment response according to the molecular subtypes. Methods: This retrospective review identified 31 patients with no metastatic IBC treated in our radiotherapy department between December 2019 and November 2020. IBC was confirmed using the clinical criteria. Baseline clinic-pathological and treatment information was retrieved from medical records. Statistical analysis was performed with IBM SPSS V.20. Results: Median age was 51.3 years [27-68]. 48% of tumors were grade 3. The average tumor size was 36mm [10-90]. The histological type was ductal carcinoma in 97%. Vascular invasion was noted in 24 patients (77%). Thirty patients were classified as stage IIIB and one patient was IIIC. 74% were hormone receptor positive and 45% were HER2 positive. Luminal B was the predominant subtype (52%) followed by Her2 positive (32%), Luminal A (23%), and triple negative (3%) All patients had chemotherapy: neoadjuvant for 26 patients (84%) and adjuvant for 5 patients (16%). Nine patients (29%) had tumor pathological complete response (pCR). Partial response was observed in 18 patients (58%). Lymph node pCR was noted in 16% of cases (n=5). Endocrine therapy and trastuzumab were given to 76% and 45% of patients, respectively. The influence of the molecular subtype was not statistically significant on the response to neoadjuvant treatment. The highest rate of pCR were 43% for Her2positive, then 27%, 21% and 9% for Luminal B, Luminal A and Triple negative, respectively (p=0.2). Conclusion: Our study showed a high percentage of hormone receptor and Her2+ (74% and 45% respectively) in IBC. Luminal B was the most frequent subtype. Anthracycline-based chemotherapy and trastuzumab improved the pCR rate: 44% for Her2positive. Triple negative showed poorer pCR than other breast cancer subtype without a significant difference. A larger study is warranted to confirm our findings.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document