scholarly journals Checkpoint Inhibitors in Multiple Myeloma: Intriguing Potential and Unfulfilled Promises

Cancers ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 14 (1) ◽  
pp. 113
Author(s):  
Omar Alkharabsheh ◽  
Zachary Trisel ◽  
Sunil Badami ◽  
Mohammed A. Aljama ◽  
M. Hasib Sidiqi
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Immune Checkpoint ◽  
Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Plasma Cells ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Wide Spectrum ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Immune Surveillance ◽  
Clinical Trial Data ◽  
Failure Patterns

Immune dysregulation and alteration of the bone marrow microenvironment allowing plasma cells to escape immune surveillance are well-known factors associated with the proliferation of clonal plasma cells and development of multiple myeloma (MM). Whilst immunotherapeutic approaches are now commonplace in a wide spectrum of malignancies, this aberration of myeloma development gives rise to the biological rationale for the use of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in MM. However, the initial experience with these agents has been challenging with limited single agent efficacy, significant toxicity, and side effects. Herein, we review the biological and immunological aspects of MM and ICIs. We discuss the basic biology of immune checkpoint inhibitors, mechanisms of resistance, and drug failure patterns, review the published clinical trial data for ICIs in MM, and look towards the future of ICIs for MM treatment.

scholarly journals Immune-related adverse kidney events by immune checkpoint inhibitors; a narrative review on current studies

2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (2) ◽  
pp. e22-e22
Author(s):  
Tella Sadighpour ◽  
Celeste Cagnazzo ◽  
Shahrzad Alimohammadi ◽  
Anahita Emami ◽  
Azadeh Khayyat ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Side Effects ◽  
Immune Checkpoint ◽  
Renal Injury ◽  
Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Plasma Cells ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Immune Surveillance ◽  
Exact Nature ◽  
Autoimmune Reaction ◽  
Renal Tubular Cells

Chemotherapy-associated renal injury is considered one of the major concerns among nephrological and oncological practice. The use of novel anti-neoplastic therapies that target carcinomas has helped in the detection of this form of renal injury. Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICPIs) are a group of monoclonal antibodies targeting inhibitory receptors that exist on tumor cells and T cells. ICPIs are able to suppress tumors that might have escaped from the immune surveillance. Meanwhile, although ICPIs have shown promising efficacy in cancer treatment, their immune-related side effects limit their widespread use in cancer therapy schedules. One of the major side effects limiting ICPIs’ usage is nephrotoxicity. Glomerular disease, acute interstitial nephritis (AIN), and acute tubular necrosis (ATN) are considered different infusion-related adverse events. Infiltration of eosinophils, T lymphocytes, and plasma cells, as well as interstitial inflammation and edema, leading to acute tubulointerstitial nephritis (ATIN). It is conceivable that the rupture of self-tolerance by ICPIs induces an autoimmune reaction against some specific self-antigens in the organs including kidneys. The exact nature of the antigen is unclear; however, it is possible that it is found in the renal tubular cells, as indicated by a greater frequency of ATIN in kidney biopsies. The current review paper discusses the relationship between ICPIs therapy and kidney disorders or more specifically, their possible role in renal damage along with renal toxicity profile in the setting of ICPIs treatment.

scholarly journals Combinatorial benefit without synergy in recent clinical trials of immune checkpoint inhibitors

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Adam C. Palmer ◽  
Benjamin Izar ◽  
Peter K. Sorger
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trials ◽  
Immune Checkpoint ◽  
Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Combination Therapies ◽  
Anti Tumor Activity

ABSTRACTHundreds of clinical trials are testing whether combination therapies can increase the anti-tumor activity of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors (ICIs). We find that the benefits of recently reported and approved combinations involving ICIs are fully accounted for by increasing the chance of a single-agent response (drug independence), with no requirement for additive or synergistic efficacy. Thus, the degree of success of combinations involving ICIs with other therapies is largely predictable.

scholarly journals Efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors for in-transit melanoma

2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
pp. e000440 ◽  
Author(s):  
Emilia Nan Tie ◽  
Julia Lai-Kwon ◽  
Michael Alexander Rtshiladze ◽  
Lumine Na ◽  
James Bozzi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Immune Checkpoint ◽  
Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Distant Metastases ◽  
Mek Inhibitor ◽  
Disease Recurrence ◽  
In Transit

BackgroundThe efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) in metastatic melanoma is well established. However, there are limited data regarding their efficacy in in-transit melanoma (ITM). This study assessed the efficacy of ICI in patients with ITM.MethodsA retrospective review of patients with ITM commenced on an ICI between March 2013 and February 2018 at three tertiary centers in Australia. Patients were excluded if they had previous or synchronous distant metastases. Overall response rate (ORR), progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were based on a composite of radiological and clinical assessments.ResultsFifty-four patients were included: 27 (50%) female; median age 75 (range 26–94); 12 (22%) stage IIIB, 40 (74%) stage IIIC and 2 (4%) stage IIID; 10 (19%) BRAF mutant. Forty (74%) received single-agent anti-PD-1 (pembrolizumab or nivolumab), 8 (15%) single agent anti-CTLA-4 (ipilimumab), 5 (9%) combination anti-PD-1/anti-CTLA-4 (ipilimumab and nivolumab or pembrolizumab) and 1 (2%) combination anti-PD-L1 (atezolizumab) and MEK inhibitor (cobimetinib). The median follow-up was 15 months (2–46).ORR to ICI was 54%: 14 (26%) complete responses; 15 (28%) partial responses; 9 (17%) stable disease; 16 (30%) progressive disease. Thirteen (46%) responders had only one ITM lesion. ORR was 58% for single-agent anti-PD-1, 38% for single-agent anti-CTLA4 and 40% for anti-PD-1/anti-CTLA-4. The median PFS was 11.7 months (6.6-not reached). 1-year and 2-year PFS were 48% and 39%, respectively,. Fourteen progressed locoregionally and 11 progressed distantly. The median OS was not reached. 1-year and 2-year OS were 85% and 63%, respectively. No clinicopathological features were associated with ORR.Conclusions and relevanceICI produce objective responses in ITM and should be considered in patients with unresectable ITM or disease recurrence.

scholarly journals ATIM-20. A RETROSPECTIVE STUDY EVALUATING THE SAFETY AND SURVIVAL OF THE COMBINATION OF PD-1 IMMUNE CHECKPOINT BLOCKADE AND BEVACIZUMAB IN RECURRENT GLIOBLASTOMA

2019 ◽  
Vol 21 (Supplement_6) ◽  
pp. vi5-vi5
Author(s):  
Joshua Friedman ◽  
Adilia Hormigo
Keyword(s):  
Retrospective Study ◽  
Immune Checkpoint ◽  
Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Recurrent Disease ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Immune Surveillance ◽  
Immune Checkpoint Blockade ◽  
Recurrent Glioblastoma ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Recurrent Gbm

Abstract INTRODUCTION Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) have demonstrated clinical efficacy in a variety of cancers. It is known that cancer including glioblastoma (GBM) induces an immunosuppression. Bevacizumab by normalizing blood vessels in the tumor can facilitate immune surveillance and potentially improve the efficacy of ICI in GBM patients. We analyze GBM patients with recurrent disease treated with ICI and bevacizumab. METHODS We retrospectively review records of patients diagnosed with recurrent GBM treated at our institution with Pembrolizumab or Nivolumab and bevacizumab and evaluate for tolerance and outcomes. RESULTS Twenty-one patients, 12 men and 9 women with median age 62 (range 36–78) and KPS 70 (range 60–90) were treated with a median of 10 ICI cycles (range 4–29) and 5 of bevacizumab (range 0–21). A total of 8 patients (38%) had immune-related adverse events (IRAE): 3 grade 1, 3 grade 2 and 2 grade 3. A patient with pneumonitis required cessation of ICI. Median OS for the 21 patients was 22 months (range 6–41). The 7 patients that had MGMT detected in their tumors had a median OS of 27 months (range 23–41) compared to a survival of 21 months (range 6–24) for the 13 patients that had MGMT undetected. One had undetermined MGMT and her OS was 21 months. The median survival for all the patients from onset of ICI was 10 months (range 1–25) and 10 of them (47.6%) survived > 12 months. DISCUSSION The development of IRAE was common but self-limiting, allowing continuation of the treatment in all but one patient. The combination of ICI and bevacizumab increased survival. Our data needs to be interpreted with caution, as it is a retrospective analysis of a small group of patients. However, these results warrant prospective studies using the combination of ICI and bevacizumab to treat recurrent GBM.

A living systematic review of immune checkpoint inhibitors in cancer patients: A novel platform for evidence synthesis in oncology.

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 6596-6596
Author(s):  
Irbaz Bin Riaz ◽  
Rabbia Siddiqi ◽  
Saad Malik ◽  
Elizabeth Jane Cathcart-Rake ◽  
Ognjen Gajic ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Immune Checkpoint ◽  
Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Clinical Decision Making ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Evidence Synthesis ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Phase 2 ◽  
New Evidence

6596 Background: Several previous systematic reviews and meta-analyses have attempted to summarize toxicity of Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). However, very soon after each one of these reviews has been published, it became outdated. ICIs are currently used in 14 different cancers and data is rapidly evolving from new clinical trials. A living Systematic review, which is defined as a systematic review that is continually updated to incorporate relevant new evidence as it becomes available, is necessary in this situations. Therefore, we performed an updated systematic review and a meta-analysis which will serve as a foundation of a living Systematic review. Methods: MEDLINE, EMBASE and Cochrane were searched to identify phase 2 and 3 RCTs of PD-1/PD-L1 ICIs. Included studies compared either immunotherapy alone or combination with existing standard of care treatment and reported data for AE’s of interest. DerSimonian-Laird random effects Meta-Analysis was performed to derive pooled odds Ratio (OR) estimates for AE’s of interest. An infrastructure of a living systematic review is being developed and it includes monthly literature searches, cumulative meta-analysis and an online reporting platform. Results: We screened 6746 studies and 31 phase 3 and 2 phase 2 RCTs (n = 21,421) were included in the analysis. 22 RCTs used PD-1/PD-L1 ICIs as a single agent and 11 as a combination therapy. Selected toxicity estimates are summarized in a table. Conclusions: The meta-analysis updates previously published toxicity estimates and provides additional information about the risk of toxicities in single versus combination regimens. We have initiated the first living systematic review in oncology that will be continuously updated, incorporating relevant new evidence as it becomes available, and will provide accurate and up to date toxicity estimates to support clinical decision making. [Table: see text]

Preliminary safety, efficacy, and pharmacokinetics (PK) results of KN046 (bispecific anti-PD-L1/CTLA4) from a first-in-human study in subjects with advanced solid tumors.

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 2554-2554 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jermaine Coward ◽  
Vinod Ganju ◽  
Ramin Behzadigohar ◽  
Kenneth Kwong ◽  
June Xu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Solid Tumors ◽  
Immune Checkpoint ◽  
Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Human Study ◽  
Safety Data ◽  
Advanced Solid Tumors ◽  
Duration Of Treatment ◽  
Efficacy Evaluation

2554 Background: KN046 is a novel bispecific antibody that blocks both PD-L1 interaction with PD1 and CTLA-4 interaction with CD80/CD86. KN046 has a wild type IgG1 Fc portion that preserves intact effector functions, such as depletion of Tregs in tumor microenvironments. This first-in-human study evaluated the safety, tolerability, PK and preliminary efficacy of KN046 in subjects with advanced solid tumors. Methods: This traditional “3+3” dose-escalation design study enrolled patients (pts) with advanced unresectable or metastatic solid tumors refractory or intolerant to standard therapies. Previous treatment from PD1 or PD-L1 immune checkpoint inhibitors was allowed. KN046 was administered intravenously Q2W. Dose limit toxicity (DLT) evaluation period is 28 days. The planned dose levels (DL) were 0.3, 1, 3, 5 and 10 mg/kg. Efficacy evaluation was performed by RECIST 1.1 every 8 weeks. Results: As of Dec 13, 2018, 10 pts had been enrolled (0.3 mg/kg, n = 1; 1 mg/kg, n = 3; 3 mg/kg, n = 3; and 5 mg/kg, n = 3). Median duration of treatment was 8 (range: 2-24) weeks. 1 DLT was observed at 5 mg/kg dose (a grade 3 immune-related hepatitis without elevation in total bilirubin; reversible in two weeks). The most common (≥30%) treatment-emergent AEs (TEAE) were Fatigue, Diarrhea, Nausea, Vomiting. Six immune-related TEAEs (Abdominal pain lower, Arthralgia, Hepatic function abnormal, Hyperthyroidism, Nausea and Transaminitis) were observed in 3 pts. One pt with NSCLC from 3 mg/kg cohort had confirmed completed response. Two pts (TNBC and nivolumab refractory RCC) from 1 mg/kg cohort had shown long-term stable disease ( > 12 weeks). Faster clearance of KN046 was observed at lower dose might be due to target-mediated clearance. T1/2 is approximately 7~9 days at doses of 3 mg/kg and above when saturation occurs. Conclusions: Single agent KN046 has an acceptable safety profile and is in line with previously reported safety data from other immune checkpoint inhibitors. Preliminary efficacy results are promising. PK data from initial 4 cohorts support Q2W schedule. The study is currently ongoing at dose level of 5 mg/kg Q2W. Clinical trial information: NCT03529526.

scholarly journals Epigenetic Mechanisms of Resistance to Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors

Biomolecules ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (7) ◽  
pp. 1061 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alexandre Perrier ◽  
Audrey Didelot ◽  
Pierre Laurent-Puig ◽  
Hélène Blons ◽  
Simon Garinet
Keyword(s):  
Dna Methylation ◽  
Tumor Microenvironment ◽  
Solid Tumors ◽  
Immune Checkpoint ◽  
Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Immune Surveillance ◽  
Response Rates ◽  
Cell Phenotype ◽  
Epigenetic Biomarkers

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have demonstrated to be highly efficient in treating solid tumors; however, many patients have limited benefits in terms of response and survival. This rapidly led to the investigation of combination therapies to enhance response rates. Moreover, predictive biomarkers were assessed to better select patients. Although PD-L1 expression remains the only validated marker in clinics, molecular profiling has brought valuable information, showing that the tumor mutation load and microsatellite instability (MSI) status were associated to higher response rates in nearly all cancer types. Moreover, in lung cancer, EGFR and MET mutations, oncogene fusions or STK11 inactivating mutations were associated with low response rates. Cancer progression towards invasive phenotypes that impede immune surveillance relies on complex regulatory networks and cell interactions within the tumor microenvironment. Epigenetic modifications, such as the alteration of histone patterns, chromatin structure, DNA methylation status at specific promoters and changes in microRNA levels, may alter the cell phenotype and reshape the tumor microenvironment, allowing cells to grow and escape from immune surveillance. The objective of this review is to make an update on the identified epigenetic changes that target immune surveillance and, ultimately, ICI responses, such as histone marks, DNA methylation and miR signatures. Translational studies or clinical trials, when available, and potential epigenetic biomarkers will be discussed as perspectives in the context of combination treatment strategies to enhance ICI responses in patients with solid tumors.

Association of LRP1B pathogenic genomic alterations with favorable outcomes with immune checkpoint inhibitors across multiple tumor types.

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 3007-3007 ◽  
Author(s):  
Landon Carter Brown ◽  
Ramy Sedhom ◽  
Eric B Schwartz ◽  
Jason Zhu ◽  
Chester Kao ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Immune Checkpoint ◽  
Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Density Lipoprotein ◽  
Primary Objective ◽  
Missense Mutations ◽  
Multiple Tumor ◽  
Tumor Types

3007 Background: Low-density lipoprotein receptor-related protein 1b (LRP1b) is a putative tumor suppressor and one of the most frequently altered genes in cancer. Our prior single-center work suggested that LRP1B alterations may enrich for responses to immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) in solid tumors including prostate cancer; however, validation of these findings is needed. Methods: We conducted a multicenter, retrospective analysis of patients with LRP1B alterations (on tissue-based next-generation sequencing panels) treated with ICI at Duke, Johns Hopkins (JHU), and University of Michigan (UM). The primary objective was to assess the association between objective response rate (ORR) to ICI and pathogenic LRP1B alterations, defined as deletions or truncating alterations, when compared with LRP1B variants of undetermined significance (VUS), defined as missense mutations not predicted to be pathogenic in COSMIC. Missense changes with a COSCMIC FATHMM score of > 0.8 were categorized separately as likely pathogenic. Summary statistics, ORR, progression free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) were calculated. Results: 101 patients (44 Duke, 35 JHU, 22 UM) with LRP1B alterations were treated with ICI. Median age was 61 (range 32-82). The most common tumor types by alteration (pathogenic or likely pathogenic/VUS%) were lung (33/47%), GI (17/13%), prostate (11/7%), sarcoma (2/9%), melanoma (11/0%), and others (26/24%). 93% of patients received single-agent PD-(L)1 inhibition. The ORR for patients with either pathogenic/likely pathogenic alterations, or VUS alterations was 57% and 18%, respectively. After excluding MSI-high or TMB-high ( > 10 mut/Mb) tumors, ORR was 14/25 (56%) and 6/36 (17%), respectively. Pathogenic or likely pathogenic LRP1B alterations were associated with longer PFS (HR 0.39, 95% CI 0.24-0.63) and OS (HR 0.58, 95% CI 0.36-0.95). Conclusions: This multicenter study shows impressive and durable objective response rates to ICI for patients harboring pathogenic LRP1B alterations when compared to those with LRP1B VUS, independent of TMB/MSI status. Further mechanistic insights and prospective validation studies are warranted. [Table: see text]

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document