Association of LRP1B pathogenic genomic alterations with favorable outcomes with immune checkpoint inhibitors across multiple tumor types.

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 3007-3007 ◽  
Author(s):  
Landon Carter Brown ◽  
Ramy Sedhom ◽  
Eric B Schwartz ◽  
Jason Zhu ◽  
Chester Kao ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Immune Checkpoint ◽  
Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Density Lipoprotein ◽  
Primary Objective ◽  
Missense Mutations ◽  
Multiple Tumor ◽  
Tumor Types

3007 Background: Low-density lipoprotein receptor-related protein 1b (LRP1b) is a putative tumor suppressor and one of the most frequently altered genes in cancer. Our prior single-center work suggested that LRP1B alterations may enrich for responses to immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) in solid tumors including prostate cancer; however, validation of these findings is needed. Methods: We conducted a multicenter, retrospective analysis of patients with LRP1B alterations (on tissue-based next-generation sequencing panels) treated with ICI at Duke, Johns Hopkins (JHU), and University of Michigan (UM). The primary objective was to assess the association between objective response rate (ORR) to ICI and pathogenic LRP1B alterations, defined as deletions or truncating alterations, when compared with LRP1B variants of undetermined significance (VUS), defined as missense mutations not predicted to be pathogenic in COSMIC. Missense changes with a COSCMIC FATHMM score of > 0.8 were categorized separately as likely pathogenic. Summary statistics, ORR, progression free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) were calculated. Results: 101 patients (44 Duke, 35 JHU, 22 UM) with LRP1B alterations were treated with ICI. Median age was 61 (range 32-82). The most common tumor types by alteration (pathogenic or likely pathogenic/VUS%) were lung (33/47%), GI (17/13%), prostate (11/7%), sarcoma (2/9%), melanoma (11/0%), and others (26/24%). 93% of patients received single-agent PD-(L)1 inhibition. The ORR for patients with either pathogenic/likely pathogenic alterations, or VUS alterations was 57% and 18%, respectively. After excluding MSI-high or TMB-high ( > 10 mut/Mb) tumors, ORR was 14/25 (56%) and 6/36 (17%), respectively. Pathogenic or likely pathogenic LRP1B alterations were associated with longer PFS (HR 0.39, 95% CI 0.24-0.63) and OS (HR 0.58, 95% CI 0.36-0.95). Conclusions: This multicenter study shows impressive and durable objective response rates to ICI for patients harboring pathogenic LRP1B alterations when compared to those with LRP1B VUS, independent of TMB/MSI status. Further mechanistic insights and prospective validation studies are warranted. [Table: see text]

scholarly journals Enhance the Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors Efficacy with Radiotherapy Induced Immunogenic Cell Death: A Comprehensive Review and Latest Developments

Cancers ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (4) ◽  
pp. 678 ◽  
Author(s):  
Adrien Procureur ◽  
Audrey Simonaggio ◽  
Jean-Emmanuel Bibault ◽  
Stéphane Oudard ◽  
Yann-Alexandre Vano
Keyword(s):  
Cell Death ◽  
Immune Checkpoint ◽  
Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Tumor Antigens ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Mitotic Cell ◽  
Immunogenic Cell Death ◽  
Dna Damages ◽  
Multiple Tumor ◽  
Tumor Types

The immunogenic cell death (ICD) is defined as a regulated cell death able to induce an adaptive immunity. It depends on different parameters including sufficient antigenicity, adjuvanticity and favorable microenvironment conditions. Radiation therapy (RT), a pillar of modern cancer treatment, is being used in many tumor types in curative, (neo) adjuvant, as well as metastatic settings. The anti-tumor effects of RT have been traditionally attributed to the mitotic cell death resulting from the DNA damages triggered by the release of reactive oxygen species. Recent evidence suggests that RT may also exert its anti-tumor effect by recruiting tumor-specific immunity. RT is able to induce the release of tumor antigens, to act as an immune adjuvant and thus to synergize with the anti-tumor immunity. The advent of new efficient immunotherapeutic agents, such as immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI), in multiple tumor types sheds new light on the opportunity of combining RT and ICI. Here, we will describe the biological and radiobiological rationale of the RT-induced ICD. We will then focus on the interest to combine RT and ICI, from bench to bedside, and summarize the clinical data existing with this combination. Finally, RT technical adaptations to optimize the ICD induction will be discussed.

scholarly journals Is There a Place for Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors in Vulvar Neoplasms? A State of the Art Review

2020 ◽  
Vol 22 (1) ◽  
pp. 190
Author(s):  
Fulvio Borella ◽  
Mario Preti ◽  
Luca Bertero ◽  
Giammarco Collemi ◽  
Isabella Castellano ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Immune Checkpoint ◽  
Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
State Of The Art ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Early Stage ◽  
Survival Rates ◽  
Younger Women ◽  
Multiple Tumor ◽  
Tumor Types

Vulvar cancer (VC) is a rare neoplasm, usually arising in postmenopausal women, although human papilloma virus (HPV)-associated VC usually develop in younger women. Incidences of VCs are rising in many countries. Surgery is the cornerstone of early-stage VC management, whereas therapies for advanced VC are multimodal and not standardized, combining chemotherapy and radiotherapy to avoid exenterative surgery. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) are scarce due to the rarity of the disease and prognosis has not improved. Hence, new therapies are needed to improve the outcomes of these patients. In recent years, improved knowledge regarding the crosstalk between neoplastic and tumor cells has allowed researchers to develop a novel therapeutic approach exploiting these molecular interactions. Both the innate and adaptive immune systems play a key role in anti-tumor immunesurveillance. Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have demonstrated efficacy in multiple tumor types, improving survival rates and disease outcomes. In some gynecologic cancers (e.g., cervical cancer), many studies are showing promising results and a growing interest is emerging about the potential use of ICIs in VC. The aim of this manuscript is to summarize the latest developments in the field of VC immunoncology, to present the role of state-of-the-art ICIs in VC management and to discuss new potential immunotherapeutic approaches.

scholarly journals The Lung Immune Prognostic Index Discriminates Survival Outcomes in Patients with Solid Tumors Treated with Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors

Cancers ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 11 (11) ◽  
pp. 1713 ◽  
Author(s):  
Meyers ◽  
Stukalin ◽  
Vallerand ◽  
Lewinson ◽  
Suo ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Solid Tumors ◽  
Real World ◽  
Immune Checkpoint ◽  
Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Prognostic Index ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Clinical Tools ◽  
Tumor Types

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) have revolutionized the treatment landscape of several solid tumor types. However, as patient outcomes are heterogeneous, clinical tools to aid in prognostication are needed. The Lung Immune Prognostic Index (LIPI) correlates with outcomes in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) treated with ICI, but its applicability beyond NSCLC is poorly defined. We sought to determine whether LIPI is associated with overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS) and objective response rate (ORR) in a pooled, real-world, retrospective cohort of patients with solid tumors treated with ICI. Of the total pooled cohort (N = 578), 47.2%, 38.2% and 14.5% of patients were stratified into good, intermediate and poor LIPI group, respectively. Median OS were 22.8 (95% CI 17.4–29.5), 7.8 (95% CI 6.6–9.6), and 2.5 months (95% CI 1.4–3.4) (p < 0.0001). Median PFS were 9.9 (95% CI 7.2–11.5), 3.6 (95% CI 2.7–4.3), and 1.4 months (95% CI 1.2–2.2) (p < 0.0001). ORR was also associated with LIPI group (p < 0.001). Intermediate and poor LIPI were independently prognostic of OS compared to good LIPI, with hazard ratios (HR) of 1.8 (95% CI 1.4–2.3, p < 0.001) and 3.6 (95% CI 2.5–5.1, p < 0.001), respectively. These data are the first to suggest that in a real-world setting, the prognostic value of LIPI may be tumor agnostic.

Efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors for the treatment of metastatic melanoma (MM) in patients with concurrent chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL).

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e22044-e22044
Author(s):  
Veronica Guerra ◽  
Gabriel O. Ologun ◽  
Lauren Elaine Haydu ◽  
Emily Zhi-Yun Keung ◽  
Elizabeth M. Burton ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Immune Checkpoint ◽  
Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Early Stage ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Cell Subset ◽  
Primary Objective ◽  
Lymphocytic Leukemia ◽  
Melanoma Diagnosis ◽  
The Impact

e22044 Background: Patients with CLL have immune impairment with abnormalities in T-cell subset composition and immune synapse formation. The impact of these defects on response to immune checkpoint inhibitors (CPI) is not known. Given the high incidence of melanoma in patients with CLL we sought to evaluate the response to CPI in patients with concomitant MM and CLL. Methods: Retrospective analysis of 24 patients (pts) with concurrent CLL and MM who received a total of 38 CPI therapies between July 1997 and July 2019. Primary objective was to determine objective response rate (ORR), defined as complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) by RECIST1.1. Secondary outcomes included event-free survival; overall survival (OS), and duration of response (DOR). Results: The median age at CLL and melanoma diagnosis was 62 and 63 years, respectively. 71% of patients were male. Most presented with early stage CLL at diagnosis (67%), 60% had mutated IGVH, and 47% had deletion of 13q by FISH. 71% remained on observation for their CLL. Median time from melanoma diagnosis to CPI initiation was 13.5 months. 83% had stage IV MM and 17% stage III MM at the time of therapy. 17% had increased LDH. The most common melanoma mutations were BRAF(35%), BRAFV600 (26%), TP53 (30%) and NRAS (26%). Median follow up was 37 months and the ORR was 24% (Table). Median DOR was 41 months and median OS is 26.4 months. Immune-mediated adverse events occurred in 42%, including 13% fever, 11% thrombotic events, 8% endocrine dysfunction. 13 pts are alive and 11 pts died (8 pts due to MM progression). There were no significant changes in absolute lymphocyte counts during CPI therapy. 2 pts received CPI while on ibrutinib or ibrutinib+venetoclax therapy with ongoing CLL responses. Conclusions: Our experience indicates that CPIs can be effective for the treatment of MM in patients with concurrent CLL, achieving durable responses. Immuno-mediated toxicities were frequently observed. A lower ORR was observed in first-line CPI in MM, however the numbers of pts are small. Further studies are needed to determine if initial or concurrent treatment for CLL could improve CPI outcomes and survival. Additional studies evaluating T cells function and tissue infiltration in these patients are ongoing. [Table: see text]

scholarly journals LRP1B mutations are associated with favorable outcomes to immune checkpoint inhibitors across multiple cancer types

2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (3) ◽  
pp. e001792
Author(s):  
Landon C Brown ◽  
Matthew D Tucker ◽  
Ramy Sedhom ◽  
Eric B Schwartz ◽  
Jason Zhu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Immune Checkpoint ◽  
Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Low Density Lipoprotein ◽  
Density Lipoprotein ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Preliminary Evidence ◽  
Primary Objective ◽  
Multiple Cancer ◽  
Variants Of Unknown Significance

BackgroundLow-density lipoprotein receptor-related protein 1b (encoded by LRP1B) is a putative tumor suppressor, and preliminary evidence suggests LRP1B-mutated cancers may have improved outcomes with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI).MethodsWe conducted a multicenter, retrospective pan-cancer analysis of patients with LRP1B alterations treated with ICI at Duke University, Johns Hopkins University (JHU) and University of Michigan (UM). The primary objective was to assess the association between overall response rate (ORR) to ICI and pathogenic or likely pathogenic (P/LP) LRP1B alterations compared with LRP1B variants of unknown significance (VUS). Secondary outcomes were the associations with progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) by LRP1B status.ResultsWe identified 101 patients (44 Duke, 35 JHU, 22 UM) with LRP1B alterations who were treated with ICI. The most common tumor types by alteration (P/LP vs VUS%) were lung (36% vs 49%), prostate (9% vs 7%), sarcoma (5% vs 7%), melanoma (9% vs 0%) and breast cancer (3% vs 7%). The ORR for patients with LRP1B P/LP versus VUS alterations was 54% and 13%, respectively (OR 7.5, 95% CI 2.9 to 22.3, p=0.0009). P/LP LRP1B alterations were associated with longer PFS (HR 0.42, 95% CI 0.26 to 0.68, p=0.0003) and OS (HR 0.62, 95% CI 0.39 to 1.01, p=0.053). These results remained consistent when excluding patients harboring microsatellite instability (MSI) and controlling for tumor mutational burden (TMB).ConclusionsThis multicenter study shows significantly better outcomes with ICI therapy in patients harboring P/LP versus VUS LRP1B alterations, independently of TMB/MSI status. Further mechanistic and prospective validation studies are warranted.

Evaluation of the impact of thyroiditis development in patients receiving immunotherapy with programmed cell death-1 inhibitors

2019 ◽  
Vol 25 (6) ◽  
pp. 1402-1411 ◽  
Author(s):  
Matthew Lei ◽  
Angela Michael ◽  
Seema Patel ◽  
Ding Wang
Keyword(s):  
Immune Checkpoint ◽  
Objective Response Rate ◽  
Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Tumor Response ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Tumor Types

Purpose We evaluated if the development of thyroiditis in patients who received treatment with immune checkpoint inhibitors across various tumor types was associated with tumor response. Methods In this retrospective, single-center, cross-sectional study, patients with various tumor types who received treatment with nivolumab or pembrolizumab as standard of care were evaluated. The primary endpoint was to evaluate the objective response rate in patients who developed thyroiditis compared with patients who did not develop thyroiditis. Secondary endpoints included disease control rate, progression-free survival, and overall survival. Results One hundred and three patients were included for analysis with a median follow-up duration of 12.8 months (range, 4.0–21.6). The data cutoff was 31 December 2016. The objective response rate was 38.2% among the 34 patients in the thyroiditis group and 17.4% in the 69 patients in the non-thyroiditis group (p = 0.028). Progression-free survival was longer in the thyroiditis group than in the non-thyroiditis group. The median progression-free survival was 10.1 months (95% CI, 1.6–18.5) in the thyroiditis group and 3.7 months (95% CI, 2.5–4.9) in the non-thyroiditis group (hazard ratio, 0.45; 95% CI, 0.27–0.76; p = 0.002). Conclusion Patients with various tumor types who received treatment with immune checkpoint inhibitors and developed thyroiditis had a higher objective response rate than those who did not develop thyroiditis. The development of thyroiditis should be investigated further in the context of prospective randomized trials as a surrogate marker for tumor response to treatment with immune checkpoint inhibitor therapies.

scholarly journals Pharmacological Treatment of Advanced, Persistent or Metastatic Endometrial Cancer: State of the Art and Perspectives of Clinical Research for the Special Issue “Diagnosis and Management of Endometrial Cancer”

Cancers ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (24) ◽  
pp. 6155
Author(s):  
Angiolo Gadducci ◽  
Stefania Cosio
Keyword(s):  
Endometrial Cancer ◽  
Hormonal Therapy ◽  
Immune Checkpoint ◽  
Pharmacological Treatment ◽  
Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
First Line ◽  
Platinum Based Chemotherapy

Patients with metastatic or recurrent endometrial cancer (EC) not suitable for surgery and/or radiotherapy are candidates for pharmacological treatment frequently with unsatisfactory clinical outcomes. The purpose of this paper was to review the results obtained with chemotherapy, hormonal therapy, biological agents and immune checkpoint inhibitors in this clinical setting. The combination of carboplatin (CBDCA) + paclitaxel (PTX) is the standard first-line chemotherapy capable of achieving objective response rates (ORRs) of 43–62%, a median progression-free survival (PFS) of 5.3–15 months and a median overall survival (OS) of 13.2–37.0 months, respectively, whereas hormonal therapy is sometimes used in selected patients with slow-growing steroid receptor-positive EC. The combination of endocrine therapy with m-TOR inhibitors or cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitors is currently under evaluation. Disappointing ORRs have been associated with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) inhibitors, HER-2 inhibitors and multi-tyrosine kinase inhibitors used as single agents, and clinical trials evaluating the addition of bevacizumab to CBDCA + PTX have reported conflicting results. Immune checkpoint inhibitors, and especially pembrolizumab and dostarlimab, have achieved an objective response in 27–47% of highly pretreated patients with microsatellite instability-high (MSI-H)/mismatch repair (MMR)-deficient (-d) EC. In a recent study, the combination of lenvatinib + pembrolizumab produced a 24-week response rate of 38% in patients with highly pretreated EC, ranging from 64% in patients with MSI-H/MMR-d to 36% in those with microsatellite stable/MMR-proficient tumors. Four trials are currently investigating the addition of immune checkpoint inhibitors to PTX + CBDCA in primary advanced or recurrent EC, and two trials are comparing pembrolizumab + lenvatinib versus either CBDCA + PTX as a first-line treatment of advanced or recurrent EC or versus single-agent chemotherapy in advanced, recurrent or metastatic EC after one prior platinum-based chemotherapy.

Impact of body mass index on survival rates in patients receiving immune checkpoint inhibitors.

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e15108-e15108
Author(s):  
Diana Maslov ◽  
Karine Tawagi ◽  
Victoria Simenson ◽  
Helen Yuan ◽  
Cameron Parent ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Body Mass Index ◽  
Body Mass ◽  
Significant Relationship ◽  
Immune Checkpoint ◽  
Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Metastatic Cancer ◽  
Obese Patients ◽  
Multiple Tumor ◽  
Tumor Types

e15108 Background: Obesity is associated with 13 different cancer types, accounting for 40% of all cancers1. A few studies have linked a higher Body Mass Index (BMI) with longer Progression Free Survival (PFS) and Overall Survival (OS) from immune checkpoint inhibitors (CPI)s in patients with advanced melanoma, non-small cell lung cancer, and renal cell carcinoma2,3,4. Our study evaluates CPI efficacy in patients with multiple tumor types in relation to Body Mass Index (BMI). Methods: We retrospectively collected data from patients treated with CPIs alone who also received steroids during their treatment from a single institution. This data included demographics such as age, sex, and BMI. Response and progression were defined per RECIST v1.1. The association of BMI and PFS was assessed by exact chi-square test. Kaplan Meier and Cox proportional hazard regression methods were used to estimate the survival probability and hazard ratios. Results: We identified a total of 129 overweight or obese patients (49%) with stage IV cancer who received CPI therapy. CDC guidelines define overweight as BMI > 25 and obese as BMI > 30. There was a significant relationship between PFS and BMI. Median PFS for those overweight was 287 days and 479 days for obese. Those with BMI 18.5-25 (normal), median PFS was 128 days and 103 days for those underweight (BMI < 18.5), (p = .0024). There was also a significant relationship between OS and BMI. Median OS for those obese was 751 days, for those overweight was 462 days. Median OS for those normal weight was 281 days and those underweight was 273 days (p = .0005). Obese patients had a 48% reduced risk of progression of disease/death as compared to those who had normal BMI (Hazard Ratio 0.52, p = .019). Overweight had a 31.5% relative risk reduction (HR 0.685, p = .05). Overall Response Rate was not significant between the two groups but there was a strong trend (p = .087). Conclusions: Higher BMI was associated with improved PFS and OS in patients with metastatic cancer across 20 different tumor types. Further investigation into the immune mechanisms behind this may lead to improvement in CPI efficacy for all patients.

scholarly journals Ipilimumab and nivolumab/pembrolizumab in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma refractory to prior immune checkpoint inhibitors

2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (2) ◽  
pp. e001945 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jeffrey Sum Lung Wong ◽  
Gerry Gin Wai Kwok ◽  
Vikki Tang ◽  
Bryan Cho Wing Li ◽  
Roland Leung ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Hepatocellular Carcinoma ◽  
Immune Checkpoint ◽  
Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Acquired Resistance ◽  
Survival Rates ◽  
Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma ◽  
Primary Resistance ◽  
Advanced Hcc

BackgroundProgrammed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) pathway blockade with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) is a standard therapy in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) nowadays. No strategies to overcome ICI resistance have been described. We aimed to evaluate the use of ipilimumab and anti-PD-1 ICIs (nivolumab or pembrolizumab) combinations in patients with advanced HCC with progression on prior ICIs.MethodsPatients with advanced HCC with documented tumor progression on prior ICIs and subsequently received ipilimumab with nivolumab/pembrolizumab were analyzed. Objective response rate (ORR), median duration of response (DOR), time-to-progression (TTP), overall survival (OS), and treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) were assessed.ResultsTwenty-five patients were included. The median age was 62 (range: 51–83). About 68% were of Child-Pugh (CP) Grade A and 48% had primary resistance to prior ICI. At median follow-up of 37.7 months, the ORR was 16% with a median DOR of 11.5 months (range: 2.76–30.3). Three patients achieved complete response. The median TTP was 2.96 months (95% CI: 1.61 to 4.31). Median OS was 10.9 months (95% CI: 3.99 to 17.8) and the 1 year, 2 year and 3 year survival rates were 42.4%, 32.3% and 21.6%, respectively. The ORR was 16.7% in primary resistance group and 15.4% in acquired resistance group (p=1.00). All responders were of CP A and Albumin-Bilirubin (ALBI) Grade 1 or 2. CP and ALBI Grades were significantly associated with OS (p=0.006 and p<0.001, respectively). Overall, 52% of patients experienced TRAEs and 12% experienced Grade 3 or above TRAEs.ConclusionsIpilimumab and nivolumab/pembrolizumab can achieve durable antitumor activity and encouraging survival outcomes with acceptable toxicity in patients with advanced HCC who had prior treatment with ICIs.

scholarly journals 363 Vactosertib and durvalumab as second or later line treatment for PD-L1 positive non-small cell lung cancer: interim result

2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (Suppl 3) ◽  
pp. A388-A388
Author(s):  
Byoung Chul Cho ◽  
Ki Hyeong Lee ◽  
Ji-Youn Han ◽  
Byoung Yong Shim ◽  
Hye Ryun Kim ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Immune Checkpoint ◽  
Objective Response Rate ◽  
Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Advanced Nsclc ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Platinum Based Chemotherapy ◽  
Number Of Patients ◽  
Anti Tumor Activity

BackgroundTargeting transforming growth factor-β (TGF-β) is reported to augment the efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) through either enhanced anti-tumor immunity or the correction of tumor microenvironment (TME). Therefore, the combination of vactosertib, a highly selective TGF-β RI kinase inhibitor, and durvalumab is anticipated to improve anti-tumor activity of the ICI. A phase 1b/2a study was conducted to evaluate the combination of vactosertib and durvalumab in patients with advanced NSCLC who progressed after platinum-based chemotherapy.MethodsPatients were treated with vactosertib at a dose of 200 mg twice daily (five days on and two days off) and durvalumab at a dose of 1500 mg every four weeks. Eligible patients were ≥19 years old with good performance status (ECOG 0–1) and have no prior exposure to immune checkpoint inhibitors or other TGF- β R1 kinase inhibitors. The objectives of this analysis were to evaluate the safety, antitumor activity including objective response rate (ORR), duration of response (DOR), and time to response (TTR) as well as circulating pharmacodynamic biomarkers related to TGF-β signaling. Response was assessed per RECIST (v1.1).ResultsBy August 4 2020, twenty-six PD-L1 positive (SP263 assay) patients were analyzed. Median age was 61.5 years (range 48–83), 69.2% were male, median number of previous lines of chemotherapy was 1 (range 1–4), and all patients were PD-L1 positive (15 patients with PD-L1≥25% and 11 patients with PD-L1 1–24%). The most frequently reported treatment-related adverse events (TRAE) were itching (38.5%) and skin rash (34.6%), but no Gr≥3 itching and rash were observed. Each case of the following was reported as Grade 3 TRAEs: adrenal insufficiency, anemia, and pneumonitis; Grade 4 TRAE, CPK increase, was observed in one patient. Objective response rate was 30.8% and 40.0% in patients with PD-L1≥1% and ≥25% respectively. Circulating PAI-1 and CTGF evaluated in 15 patients decreased significantly on Cycle 1 day 5. Ongoing biomarker results will be presented.ConclusionsThe combination of vactosertib and durvalumab has demonstrated a manageable safety profile and encouraging anti-tumor activity as a potential therapeutic strategy in patients with advanced NSCLC. The efficacy outcomes of this combination in a larger number of patients with advanced NSCLC will be followed.Trial RegistrationNCT03732274Ethics ApprovalThe study was approved by Ethics Board of Severance Hospital (4-2018-0892), National Cancer Center (NCC2019-0057), St. Vincent’s Hospital (VC19MDDF0205), and Chungbuk National University Hospital (2019-08-015).

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document