scholarly journals A Population-Based Retrospective Study of Biliary Tract Cancers in Alberta, Canada

2021 ◽  
Vol 28 (1) ◽  
pp. 417-427
Author(s):  
Carissa Beaulieu ◽  
Arthur Lui ◽  
Dimas Yusuf ◽  
Zainab Abdelaziz ◽  
Brock Randolph ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Biliary Tract ◽  
Demographic Data ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group ◽  
Intrahepatic Bile Duct ◽  
Population Based ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
First Line ◽  
Biliary Tract Cancers

Background: Biliary tract cancers (BTC) are uncommon malignancies and are underrepresented in the literature. Methods: We performed a retrospective population-based review of adult patients with biopsy-confirmed BTC in Alberta from 2000 to 2015. Demographic data, risk factors, symptoms, treatment, and staging data were collected and analyzed. Survival analyses were completed. Results: A total of 1604 patients were included in our study, of which 766 (47.8%) were male. The median age at diagnosis was 68 (range 19–99). There were 374 (23.3%) patients with resectable tumors at diagnosis versus 597 (37.2%) with unresectable tumors. Of the patients, 380 (21.5%) received chemotherapy (CT) and 81 (5.0%) underwent radiation therapy. There was a clear trend with worsening stage and performance status associated with shorter median overall survival (OS). Ampulla of Vater tumors had the best median OS (25.69 months), while intrahepatic bile duct cancers had the worst (5.78 months). First-line palliative CT regimens included gemcitabine+cisplatin (OS 14.98 months (mo), n = 212), single agent gemcitabine (OS 12.42 mo, n = 22), capecitabine (OS 8.12 mo, n = 8), and capecitabine+gemcitabine (OS 6.93 mo, n = 13). Patients with advanced or metastatic disease who received first-line gemcitabine+cisplatin had a median OS of 11.8 months (n = 119). Conclusion: BTCs have poor survival. Worse outcomes occur in higher stage and poorer Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status patients across all tumor subtypes. Tumor resectability at diagnosis was associated with better OS. Our study supports the use of gemcitabine+cisplatin as a combination first-line palliative CT, as patients treated in Alberta have a comparable OS to that reported in the ABC-02 phase III study.

scholarly journals Phase III Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Trial of Docetaxel With or Without Gefitinib in Recurrent or Metastatic Head and Neck Cancer: An Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Trial

2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (11) ◽  
pp. 1405-1414 ◽  
Author(s):  
Athanassios Argiris ◽  
Musie Ghebremichael ◽  
Jill Gilbert ◽  
Ju-Whei Lee ◽  
Kamakshi Sachidanandam ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Head And Neck ◽  
Disease Progression ◽  
Kinase Inhibitor ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Oncology Group ◽  
Ecog Performance Status ◽  
Grade 3

Purpose We hypothesized that the addition of gefitinib, an epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitor, to docetaxel would enhance therapeutic efficacy in squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (SCCHN). Patients and Methods Patients with recurrent or metastatic SCCHN with Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of 2, or patients with ECOG performance status of 0 to 2 but were previously treated with chemotherapy, were randomly assigned to receive weekly docetaxel plus either placebo (arm A) or gefitinib 250 mg/d, orally (arm B) until disease progression. At the time of progression, patients in the placebo arm could receive single-agent gefitinib. EGFR, c-MET, and KRAS mutations and polymorphisms in drug metabolizing enzymes and transporters were evaluated by pyrosequencing. Results Two hundred seventy patients were enrolled before the study was closed early at interim analysis (arm A, n = 136; arm B, n = 134). Median overall survival was 6.0 months in arm A versus 7.3 months in arm B (hazard ratio, 0.93; 95% CI, 0.72 to 1.21; P = .60). An unplanned subset analysis showed that gefitinib improved survival in patients younger than 65 years (median 7.6 v 5.2 months; P = .04). Also, there was a trend for improved survival in patients with c-MET wild-type (5.7 v 3.6 months; P = .09) regardless of treatment. Grade 3/4 toxicities were comparable between the two arms except that grade 3/4 diarrhea was more common with docetaxel/gefitinib. Of 18 eligible patients who received gefitinib after disease progression in arm A, one patient had a partial response. Conclusion The addition of gefitinib to docetaxel was well tolerated but did not improve outcomes in poor prognosis but otherwise unselected patients with SCCHN.

A phase II trial of pemetrexed (P) in patients (pts) with performance status (PS) 2 and 3 as first- and second-line treatment for advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC)

2007 ◽  
Vol 25 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 18149-18149 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. Zinner ◽  
F. V. Fossella ◽  
M. S. Kies ◽  
R. S. Herbst ◽  
C. Lu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Performance Status ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Stage Iiib ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Second Line ◽  
First Line ◽  
Minor Response ◽  
Men 2 ◽  
Line Of Therapy ◽  
Few Data

18149 P (Alimta) is approved as second-line therapy in pts with advanced NSCLC. In a phase III trial comparing P with docetaxel (D), median survival was 8.3 mos (P) vs 7.9 mos (D); P had a more favorable safety profile than D (Hanna, 2004). There are few data on pts with PS 3, and ASCO 2003 guidelines recommend that chemotherapy be reserved for pts with PS 0, 1 and possibly 2. Since P is well tolerated, PS3 pts may tolerate and benefit from it. In this trial, we treated 20 pts with stage IIIb/IV NSCLC and PS 2–3 who were chemo-naive or had received 1 prior regimen. Pts received P 500 mg/m2 IV D1 Q 3 wks. All pts received folic acid, vitamin B12 and dexamethasone prophylaxis. Serial blood samples were obtained to monitor inflammatory cytokines, and symptoms were monitored using the validated MDASI instrument. All pts were assessable for toxicity-symptoms, and 17 pts were evaluable for response (assessed after first cycle). Pt characteristics: 8 pts were PS 3 (4/8 first line) and 12 pts were PS 2 (6/12 first line). Median age was 69 for PS3 and 68 for PS2. 5/8 PS3 pts and 6/12 PS2 pts were men. 2/8 PS3 pts and 4/12 PS2 pts had stage IIIb. 4/8 PS3 pts and 6/12 PS2 pts were chemo-naive. Grade 3–4 toxicities for PS3/PS2 cohorts were: neutropenia 0/1 pt, anemia 1/2, fatigue 2/0, pneumonia 1/1, hypotension 1/1, neutropenic fever 0/1, atrial fibrillation 1/1. Response rates (RR) in PS3 pts were minor response (MR) 1/8, stable disease (SD) 5/8, progressive disease (PD) 2/8; RR in PS2 pts were partial response (PR) 1/12, MR 2/12, SD 3/12, PD 3/12, inevaluable 3/12. RR by line of therapy: first-line 6/10 SD, 2/10 PD, 2/10 inevaluable, and second-line, 1/10 PR, 2/10 MR, 3/10 SD, 3/10 PD, and 1/10 inevaluable. Reasons for PS3 pts coming off study were progression (4/8), constitutional toxicity (3/8), fatal pulmonary emboli (1/8); PS2 pts came off study due to progression (5/12), constitutional toxicity (2/12), and pneumonia (1/12). 4/12 PS2 pts are still on study. These preliminary data suggest that single-agent P is well-tolerated and has a promising RR in poor PS pts. Total planned accrual is 30 PS3 and 45 PS2 pts. Survival, symptom, cytokine data will be presented. [Table: see text]

Randomized phase III trial of gemcitabine and cisplatin versus gemcitabine alone in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and a performance status (PS) 2: CAPPA-2 study.

2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 8066-8066
Author(s):  
Alessandro Morabito ◽  
Vittorio Gebbia ◽  
Saverio Cinieri ◽  
Maria Grazia Viganò ◽  
Roberto Bianco ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Advanced Nsclc ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Stage Iv ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Line Treatment ◽  
First Line ◽  
Platinum Based Chemotherapy ◽  
Nsclc Patients ◽  
First Line Treatment

8066 Background: Platinum-based chemotherapy (CT) is the standard treatment for patients (pts) with advanced NSCLC, but the evidence of its efficacy among ECOG PS2 pts is weak, because these pts are usually excluded from clinical trials; concern exists about tolerability and feasibility of standard CT in these pts. No prospective randomized trial has tested the addition of cisplatin to single-agent CT in pts with advanced NSCLC and PS2. Methods: CAPPA-2 was a multicentre, randomized phase III study for first-line treatment of PS2 pts with advanced NSCLC. Patients, aged 18-70, were eligible if they had stage IV or IIIB with malignant pleural effusion or metastatic supraclavicular nodes (TNM VI ed.) and adequate organ function. Patients in standard arm received gemcitabine 1,200 mg/m2 dd1 and 8.Patients in experimental arm received cispaltin 60 mg/m2 d1 plus gemcitabine 1,000 mg/m2 dd1 and 8. All treatments were repeated q3w, up to 4 cycles, unless disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Primary endpoint was overall survival (OS). To have 80% power of detecting hazard ratio (HR) 0.71, corresponding to an increase in median OS from 4.8 to 6.8 months, 285 deaths were required. Results: The study was stopped in June 2012 after the enrolment of 57 pts, due to the slow accrual and the report of positive results from a similar study. Median OS was 3.0 months with single-agent gemcitabine and 5.9 months with cisplatin + gemcitabine (HR 0.52, 95% CI 0.28-0.98, p=0.039). Combination CT produced longer PFS (median 1.7 vs. 3.3 months, HR 0.49, 95% CI 0.27-0.89, p=0.017) and higher response rate (4% vs. 18%, p=0.19), without substantial increase in toxicity. Conclusions: Addition of cisplatin to single-agent gemcitabine improves survival as first-line treatment of PS2 patients with advanced NSCLC. Clinical trial information: NCT00526643.

Axitinib versus sorafenib as first‑line therapy in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC).

2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (6_suppl) ◽  
pp. LBA348-LBA348 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thomas E. Hutson ◽  
Jorge Gallardo ◽  
Vladmir Lesovoy ◽  
Salman Al-Shukri ◽  
Viktor Stus ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Primary Endpoint ◽  
Survival Data ◽  
Group Performance ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
First Line ◽  
First Line Therapy ◽  
Line Therapy

LBA348 Background: In the phase III AXIS trial, second-line therapy with axitinib resulted in significantly longer progression-free survival (PFS) versus sorafenib for mRCC. We conducted a multicenter, randomized, open-label, phase III trial to compare PFS of axitinib vs sorafenib as first-line therapy. Methods: Patients with untreated, measurable (RECIST v1.0), clear‑cell mRCC and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (PS) 0 or 1 were randomized 2:1 to axitinib 5 mg twice daily (BID) or sorafenib 400 mg BID. Randomization was stratified by PS. Primary endpoint was PFS per independent radiology committee. The study had 90% power to detect a 78% PFS improvement from 5.5 mo with sorafenib to 9.8 mo with axitinib, corresponding to a hazard ratio (HR) of 0.561 (overall 1-sided α=0.025). Results: Patients (N=288) were mainly from Eastern Europe (51%), Asia (25%), North America (14%), or South America (10%).Patient baseline characteristics for axitinib (n=192) vs sorafenib (n=96) included: median age, 58y vs 58y; male, 70% vs 77%; white, 71% vs 69%; favorable risk, 49% vs 55%; PS 0, 57% vs 57%; nephrectomy, 85% vs 90%. Median (m) PFS was 10.1 vs 6.5 mo with axitinib vs sorafenib (HR adjusted for PS, 0.767; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.559–1.053; 1‑sided P=0.0377). In patients with PS 0 and 1, respectively, mPFS with axitinib vs sorafenib was 13.7 vs 6.6 mo (HR, 0.644; 95% CI, 0.419–0.991; 1‑sided P=0.022) and 6.5 vs 6.4 mo (HR, 0.931; 95% CI, 0.585–1.482; 1‑sided P=0.38). Objective response rates (ORRs) with axitinib vs sorafenib were 32.3% vs 14.6% (1‑sided P=0.0006 adjusted for PS). Overall survival data were not mature. All-grade all‑causality adverse events (≥20%) with axitinib vs sorafenib were diarrhea (50% vs 40%), hypertension (49% vs 29%), weight decreased (37% vs 24%), fatigue (33% vs 26%), decreased appetite (29% vs 19%), palmar-plantar erythrodysesthesia (26% vs 39%), dysphonia (23% vs 10%), asthenia (21% vs 16%), and hypothyroidism (21% vs 7%). Conclusions: The study did not achieve its primary endpoint statistically, but axitinib demonstrated numerically longer mPFS and significantly higher ORR vs sorafenib, with an acceptable safety profile, as first-line therapy for mRCC. Clinical trial information: NCT00920816.

Efficacy of the addition of cisplatin to single-agent first-line chemotherapy in elderly patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC): A joint analysis of the multicenter, randomized phase III MILES-3 and MILES-4 studies.

2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 9002-9002 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cesare Gridelli ◽  
Alessandro Morabito ◽  
Luigi Cavanna ◽  
Andrea Luciani ◽  
Paolo Maione ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Elderly Patients ◽  
Advanced Nsclc ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Joint Analysis ◽  
Hematologic Toxicity ◽  
First Line ◽  
Single Agent Chemotherapy

9002 Background: The role of platinum in first line treatment of elderly patients with advanced NSCLC is still debated. We tested its efficacy in two parallel phase 3 trials. Methods: Advanced NSCLC patients, > 70 years, ECOG performance status 0-1, were eligible. In MILES-3 (started in 2011) patients with any tumor histology were randomly assigned 1:1 to cisplatin/gemcitabine (C 60 mg/m² d1, G 1000mg/m² dd1,8) or gemcitabine (G 1200 mg/m² dd1,8). In MILES-4 (started in 2013 with a factorial design) patients with non-squamous histology were randomly assigned 1:1:1:1 to CG, G, cisplatin/pemetrexed (C 60 mg/m² d1, P 500 mg/m² d1) or pemetrexed (P 500 mg/m² d1). Six cycles were planned. In each trial, to have 80% power in detecting a HR of death 0.75 (corresponding to 3-month prolongation of median survival), with 0.05 two-tailed α, 382 events were required. The two trials were closed prematurely because of slow accrual but a joint analysis allowed to properly perform the final analysis, according to IDMC advice. Analysis was based on intention-to treat and adjusted by possible confounding factors. Results: From Mar 2011 to Aug 2016, 531 patients (MILES-3: 299, MILES-4: 232) were assigned to cisplatin-doublet (n = 263) or single-agent chemotherapy (n = 268). Median age was 75, 79% were male, 70% had non-squamous histology. Median number of cycles was 4 and 3 with and without cisplatin, respectively. With a median follow-up of 2 years, 384 deaths and 448 progression-free survival (PFS) events were reported. With and without cisplatin, median OS was 9.6 vs 7.5 months (HR 0.86, 95% CI: 0.70-1.04, p = 0.14); median PFS was 4.6 vs 3.0 months (HR 0.76, 95% CI: 0.63-0.92, p = 0.005); response rate was 15.5% vs 8.5% (p = 0.02). Significantly more severe hematologic toxicity and fatigue were reported with cisplatin. Conclusions: Although improving PFS and response rate, addition of cisplatin to single-agent chemotherapy does not significantly prolong overall survival of elderly patients with advanced NSCLC. QOL data will be reported separately. Partially supported by AIFA (grant FARM8KAJZK) and Eli Lilly. Clinical trial information: NCT01405586 and NCT01656551.

Effectiveness study of gemcitabine, oxaliplatin, and capecitabine as first-line treatment for nonresectable biliary tract cancer.

2014 ◽  
Vol 32 (3_suppl) ◽  
pp. 334-334
Author(s):  
Lars Henrik Jensen ◽  
Anne Haahr Mellergaard ◽  
Dan Hoegdall ◽  
Ole Larsen
Keyword(s):  
Biliary Tract ◽  
Biliary Tract Cancer ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
First Line ◽  
Pivotal Phase ◽  
Tract Cancer ◽  
Gemcitabine And Cisplatin

334 Background: Since 2010, the doublet gemcitabine and cisplatin has been standard first-line systemic treatment for non-resectable biliary tract cancer. In a phase I-II trial of the well-tolerated triplet of gemcitabine, oxaliplatin, and capecitabine, the median progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were 6.9 and 12.5 months, respectively. Overall response rate was 34%. Since 2005 the regimen has been used in Denmark. We wanted to investigate the effectiveness of the triplet regimen given in daily clinic. Methods: We included 192 patients from two institutions. Patients had to have non-resectable biliary tract cancer and to be suitable for combination chemotherapy on doctor’s discretion. Gemcitabine 1000 mg/m2 and oxaliplatin 60 mg/m2 were given every two weeks followed by capecitabine 1000 mg/m2 b.i.d. for one week. At one institution the oxaliplatin dose was 50 mg/m2 and capecitabine dose 650 mg/m2 b.i.d. continuously. One cycle included two treatments and was typically administered for up to six cycles/months, but was allowed for longer time until progression. Results: At institution A, 117 patients were included and 73 (62%) were women. Median age was 66 years (range 25-80). Median treatment duration was six cycles/months (range 1-12). Thirty-five, 69, 12, and one patient(s) were in performance status 0, 1, 2, and 3, respectively. Ninety patients were evaluable for response and 6 (7%) had complete response, 18 (20%) partial response, 53 (59%) stable disease, and 13 (14%) progression as best response. Median PFS was 9.7 months (95% CI 8.5-11.7) and median OS 11.7 months (9.8-14.0). The results were comparable to institution B, where the response rate in 56 patients with measurable disease was 30%. In 75 patients evaluable for survival analysis, PFS was 8.1 months and OS 12.0 months for performance status 0-1 (n=55). Patients in performance status 2 (n=25) had a PFS and OS of only 1.7 and 2.8 months, respectively. Conclusions: A triplet of gemcitabine, oxaliplatin, and capecitabine given in daily clinic was well tolerated and has effectiveness comparable to results from a phase II trial and the pivotal phase III trial of gemcitabine and cisplatin.

The Significance of Combination Chemotherapy in Epithelial Ovarian Cancer

2014 ◽  
Vol 24 (2) ◽  
pp. 226-232 ◽  
Author(s):  
Janice S. Kwon ◽  
Colleen McGahan ◽  
Ulrike Dehaeck ◽  
Jennifer Santos ◽  
Kenneth Swenerton ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ovarian Cancer ◽  
Epithelial Ovarian Cancer ◽  
Combination Chemotherapy ◽  
Practice Patterns ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Population Level ◽  
Population Based ◽  
First Line ◽  
Line Chemotherapy

ObjectiveSince the publication of International Collaborative Ovarian Neoplasm 3, various practice patterns have evolved with respect to practice patterns and survival among women with epithelial ovarian cancer in British Columbia, Canada. The objectives of this study were to evaluate different strategies for first-line chemotherapy in ovarian cancer and to determine their effect on survival at a population level.Methods and MaterialsThis was a retrospective population-based cohort study of 854 women with epithelial ovarian cancer in British Columbia from 2005 to 2008. Details were ascertained on stage, grade, histotype, performance status, surgeon type, extent of debulking, first-line chemotherapy including type and number of cycles, and cause and date of death. A Cox regression model was used to evaluate the association of covariates on overall survival.ResultsOf the 817 women eligible for chemotherapy, 729 (89.2%) received treatment, including 106 (14.5%) women who received single-agent carboplatin and 623 (85.5%) women who received combination platinum-based chemotherapy. Chemotherapy was evaluated as a time-varying covariate. Median numbers of single-agent carboplatin and combination chemotherapy cycles were 5 (range, 1–11) and 6 (range, 1–12), respectively. After adjustment for demographic, disease, and treatment factors, the covariates significantly associated with survival were stage, performance status, extent of debulking, and chemotherapy type. Single-agent carboplatin had a mortality hazards ratio of 5.15 (95% confidence interval, 2.39–11.11) relative to combination chemotherapy.ConclusionsIn this population-based study, first-line platinum-based combination chemotherapy was associated with improved survival compared with single-agent carboplatin after adjustment for covariates in ovarian cancer. Higher rates of combination chemotherapy may improve outcomes at a population level.

scholarly journals Real-World Evidence on Palliative Gemcitabine and Oxaliplatin (GemOx) Combination Chemotherapy in Advanced Biliary Tract Cancer

Cancers ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (14) ◽  
pp. 3507
Author(s):  
Hanna Lagenfelt ◽  
Hakon Blomstrand ◽  
Nils O. Elander
Keyword(s):  
Biliary Tract ◽  
Biliary Tract Cancer ◽  
Real World ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group ◽  
Real Life ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Combination Regimen ◽  
Neutrophil Lymphocyte Ratio ◽  
Tract Cancer

Background: Gemcitabine and oxaliplatin (GemOx) is a standard combination regimen in advanced biliary tract cancer (BTC). There is limited evidence on its efficacy and safety in real life. Methods: A retrospective multicentre cohort study in the South East Region of Sweden, covering nine years (2011–2020) and three hospitals where GemOx was treatment of choice, was designed. Clinicopathological prognostic parameters were explored. Results: One hundred and twenty-one patients with advanced BTC were identified. Median overall and progression-free survival (OS and PFS) were 8.9 (95% CI = 7.2–10.6) and 5.3 (95% CI = 3.8–6.7) months. Performance status according to Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (PS according to ECOG) 1–2 and primary gallbladder carcinoma were independent predictors for poor OS. PS and derived neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio were predictive for PFS. The most common severe type of myelosuppresion was grade 3 neutropenia that was recorded in 8%. Fifty-three (43.8%) experienced at least one episode of unplanned hospitalisation. One hundred and seventeen (97%) received oxaliplatin with lower dosage than was utilized in previous phase III trials (80–85 vs. 100 mg/m2) and a majority received further dose reductions of oxaliplatin and/or gemcitabine. Conclusion: The outcome of GemOx in advanced BTC appears comparable in controlled trials and real-world contexts. A lower dose of oxaliplatin seems more tolerable without compromising the outcome.

Advanced Biliary Tract Cancers

2012 ◽  
pp. 281-282
Author(s):  
Laura Williams Goff ◽  
Jordan D. Berlin
Keyword(s):  
Biliary Tract ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Growth Factor Receptor ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Preliminary Evidence ◽  
Best Supportive Care ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Standards Of Care ◽  
Phase Ii Trials ◽  
Biliary Tract Cancers

Overview: Single-agent management of metastatic biliary tract cancers with 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) or gemcitabine has shown limited efficacy, although 5-FU has been shown to be more effective than best supportive care alone. An analysis of phase II trials has suggested that platinums enhanced the efficacy of single-agent fluoropyrimidines. In a phase III randomized trial comparing single-agent gemcitabine with gemcitabine plus cisplatin, the gemcitabine/cisplatin combination significantly improved median overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS), which established a new option for standard of care. However, the future of cancer medicine lies in newer, targeted agents. In the management of biliary tract cancers, preliminary evidence with epidermal growth factor receptor inhibitors has already demonstrated activity. This article reviews systemic therapies for metastatic biliary tract cancers as they relate to current and emerging standards of care.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document