scholarly journals A Novel Approach to Stabilize Foam Using Fluorinated Surfactants

Energies ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 12 (6) ◽  
pp. 1163 ◽  
Author(s):  
Muhammad Kamal
Keyword(s):  
High Temperature ◽  
Enhanced Oil Recovery ◽  
Oil Recovery ◽  
Foam Stability ◽  
Life Time ◽  
Reservoir Rock ◽  
Zwitterionic Surfactant ◽  
Foam Generation ◽  
Novel Approach ◽  
Selection Of

Selection of surfactants for enhanced oil recovery and other upstream applications is a challenging task. For enhanced oil recovery applications, a surfactant should be thermally stable, compatible with reservoir brine, and have lower adsorption on reservoir rock, have high foamability and foam stability, and should be economically viable. Foam improves the oil recovery by increasing the viscosity of the displacing fluid and by reducing the capillary forces due to a reduction in interfacial tension. In this work, foamability and foam stability of two different surfactants were evaluated using a dynamic foam analyzer. These surfactants were fluorinated zwitterionic, and hydrocarbon zwitterionic surfactants. The effect of various parameters such as surfactant type and structure, temperature, salinity, and type of injected gas was investigated on foamability and foam stability. The foamability was assessed using the volume of foam produced by injecting a constant volume of gas and foam stability was determined by half-life time. The maximum foam generation was obtained using hydrocarbon zwitterionic surfactant. However, the foam generated using fluorinated zwitterionic surfactant was more stable. A mixture of zwitterionic fluorinated and hydrocarbon fluorinated surfactant showed better foam generation and foam stability. The foam generated using CO2 has less stability compared to the foam generated using air injection. Presence of salts increases the foam stability and foam generation. At high temperature, the foamability of the surfactants increased. However, the foam stability was reduced at high temperature for all type of surfactants. This study helps in optimizing the surfactant formulations consisting of a fluorinated and hydrocarbon zwitterionic surfactant for foam injections.

Advances in Evaluation of Surfactant Performances at High Temperature by Static Foam Tests

2016 ◽  
Vol 1133 ◽  
pp. 634-638 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mudassar Mumtaz ◽  
Isa Mohd Tan ◽  
Muhammad Mushtaq ◽  
Muhammad Sagir
Keyword(s):  
High Temperature ◽  
Enhanced Oil Recovery ◽  
Oil Recovery ◽  
Foam Stability ◽  
Foam Height ◽  
Surfactant Molecule ◽  
Sweep Efficiency ◽  
Endurance Time ◽  
Alpha Olefin ◽  
Designed Experiment

—Foam stability and mobility reduction are the key parameters for foam assisted enhanced oil recovery. The harsh conditions such as high temperature, pressure and salinity present in an oil reservoir tend to destabilise the foam leading to poor sweep efficiency. Screening for the best performing foaming recipes has been performed to ascertain foam stability in the presence and absence of oil. Static foam test has been performed in order to study the foam stability and foam oil interactions at 90°C. Two anionic surfactants, alpha olefin sulphonate (AOS14-16) and methyl ester sulphonate (MES16-18) were mixed with betaine (foam booster) in different proportions to design the formulations. In addition to the ternary formulations, binary formulation involving surfactant and betaine were also evaluated for foam stability. For the study of oil effects on foaming performance of surfactant formulation, n-decane, diesel and Dulang crude oil are used. The recipes were evaluated by static foam tests to note the foam height and endurance time. It was found that the anionic surfactant played a major role in foam stability and the betaine was found less significant. However, the betaine alone was found effective for foaming and was poor for endurance time. While in mixture, the surfactant and betaine were found to interact strongly and a profound synergistic effect was noted. During oil interaction studies, the alkane type oils of low molecular weight become solubilised with surfactant molecule forming an emulsion and hence decimate the foam stability. However, higher alkanes with molecular chain more than ten carbon atoms (decane) stabilised the foam because of low solubilisation efficiency between surfactant and oil to form emulsions. The obtained results of the designed experiment have been analysed and discussed in detail to understand the contribution of individual component as well as their interactions with each other in order to stabilize foams.Keywords—Static Foam, Foam-Oil interactions, AOS, MES, Enhanced Oil Recovery

scholarly journals Laboratory Analysis of Foam Generating Surfactants and Their Thermal Stability for Enhanced Oil Recovery Application

2020 ◽  
Vol 39 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Muhammad Khan Memon ◽  
Ubedullah Ansari ◽  
Habib U Zaman Memon
Keyword(s):  
Enhanced Oil Recovery ◽  
Oil Recovery ◽  
Foam Stability ◽  
Sodium Dodecyl ◽  
Life Time ◽  
Alpha Olefin Sulfonate ◽  
Alpha Olefin ◽  
Secondary Oil Recovery ◽  
The Stability ◽  
Brine Salinity

The residual oil after primary or secondary oil recovery can be recovered by the methods of EOR (Enhanced Oil Recovery). The objective of this study is screening the surfactants that generate maximum stable foam in the presence of brine salinity at 92oC. Laboratory experiments have been performed to examine and compare the stability of generated foam by individual and blended surfactants in the synthetic brine water. AOS C14-16 (Alpha Olefin Sulfonate) and SDS (Sodium Dodecyl Sulfonate) were selected as main surfactants. Aqueous stability test of AOS C14-16 and SDS with brine water salinity 62070ppm was performed at 92oC. AAS (Alcohol Alkoxy Sulfate) was blended with SDS and AOS C14-16. The solution was stable in the presence of brine salinity at same conditions. Salt tolerance experimental study revealed that AOS C14-16 did not produce precipitates at 92oC. Further, the foam stability of surfactant blend was performed. Result shows that, the maximum life time of generated foam was observed by using blend of 0.2wt% SDS+0.2wt% AOS+0.2wt% AS-1246 and 0.2wt% AOS+0.2wt% IOSC15-18+0.2wt% AAS surfactants as compared to the foam generated by individual surfactants. The success of generated foam by these surfactant solutions in the presence of brine water is the primary screening of surfactant stability and foamability for EOR applications in reservoirs type of reservoirs.

Enhanced Oil Recovery Application of Nanoparticles in Niger Delta Water-Wet Reservoir Rock

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tinuola Udoh
Keyword(s):  
Enhanced Oil Recovery ◽  
Oil Recovery ◽  
Niger Delta ◽  
Oil Production ◽  
Reservoir Rock ◽  
Core Flooding ◽  
Core Samples ◽  
Recovery Potential ◽  
Secondary Formation ◽  
Injection Modes

Abstract In this paper, the enhanced oil recovery potential of the application of nanoparticles in Niger Delta water-wet reservoir rock was investigated. Core flooding experiments were conducted on the sandstone core samples at 25 °C with the applications of nanoparticles in secondary and tertiary injection modes. The oil production during flooding was used to evaluate the enhanced oil recovery potential of the nanoparticles in the reservoir rock. The results of the study showed that the application of nanoparticles in tertiary mode after the secondary formation brine flooding increased oil production by 16.19% OIIP. Also, a comparison between the oil recoveries from secondary formation brine and nanoparticles flooding showed that higher oil recovery of 81% OIIP was made with secondary nanoparticles flooding against 57% OIIP made with formation brine flooding. Finally, better oil recovery of 7.67% OIIP was achieved with secondary application of nanoparticles relative to the tertiary application of formation brine and nanoparticles flooding. The results of this study are significant for the design of the application of nanoparticles in Niger Delta reservoirs.

Modeling to support physicochemical enhancement techniques

2021 ◽  
pp. 79-90
Author(s):  
Т. A. Pospelova
Keyword(s):  
Enhanced Oil Recovery ◽  
Oil Recovery ◽  
Oil And Gas ◽  
Chemical Modeling ◽  
Comparative Structure ◽  
Water Cut ◽  
Physical And Chemical ◽  
Oil And Gas Companies ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Selection Of

The article discusses ways to increase the oil recovery factor in already developed fields, special attention is paid to the methods of enhanced oil recovery. The comparative structure of oil production in Russia in the medium term is given. The experience of oil and gas companies in the application of enhanced oil recovery in the fields is analyzed and the dynamics of the growth in the use of various enhanced oil recovery in Russia is estimated. With an increase in the number of operations in the fields, the requirements for the selection of candidates inevitably increase, therefore, the work focuses on hydrodynamic modeling of physical and chemical modeling, highlights the features and disadvantages of existing simulators. The main dependences for adequate modeling during polymer flooding are given. The calculation with different concentration of polymer solution is presented, which significantly affects the water cut and further reduction of operating costs for the preparation of the produced fluid. The possibility of creating a specialized hydrodynamic simulator for low-volume chemical enhanced oil recovery is considered, since mainly simulators are applicable for chemical waterflooding and the impact is on the formation as a whole.

ASP Flooding: A Solution for Chemical Enhanced Oil Recovery in High Temperature, Low Salinity Reservoir

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cai Hongyan ◽  
Cheng Jie ◽  
Fan Jian ◽  
Luan Hexin ◽  
Wang Qing ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
High Temperature ◽  
Enhanced Oil Recovery ◽  
Oil Recovery ◽  
Low Salinity ◽  
Asp Flooding
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document