scholarly journals Public Healthcare: Citizen’s Preferences in Spain

Healthcare ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (4) ◽  
pp. 467
Author(s):  
Silvia Prieto-Herraez ◽  
Teresa González-Arteaga ◽  
Rocío de Andrés Calle

This paper analyzes the stability of citizens’ preferences on public healthcare services in Spain. Nowadays, the increasing privatization of some healthcare services and the rapid emergence of private hospitals have caused changes in people’s preferences on public healthcare systems. This paper focuses on analyzing the preferences of Spaniards on their healthcare system over time under the assumption that citizens’ preferences are represented by complete pre-orders. Data for this study were collected from the Spanish Health Barometer survey, and they were searched from 1995 until 2018. The results show that preferences on the public healthcare system are very stable along time.

2016 ◽  
Vol 2016 ◽  
pp. 1-8 ◽  
Author(s):  
Felippe Leopoldo Dexheimer Neto ◽  
Regis Goulart Rosa ◽  
Bruno Achutti Duso ◽  
Jaqueline Sanguiogo Haas ◽  
Augusto Savi ◽  
...  

Purpose.The long-term outcomes of patients after discharge from tertiary ICUs as they relate to the public versus private healthcare systems in Brazil have not yet been evaluated.Materials and Methods.A multicenter prospective cohort study was conducted to compare the all-cause mortality and the physical functional status (PFS) 24 months after discharge from the ICU between adult patients treated in the public and private healthcare systems. A propensity score- (PS-) matched comparison of all causes of mortality and PFS 24 months after discharge from the ICU was performed.Results.In total, 928 patients were discharged from the ICU including 172 (18.6%) patients in the public and 756 (81.4%) patients in the private healthcare system. The results of the PS-matched comparison of all-cause mortality revealed higher mortality rates among the patients of the public healthcare system compared to those of the private healthcare system (47.3% versus 27.6%,P=0.003). The comparison of the PS-matched Karnofsky performance and Lawton activities of daily living scores between the ICU survivors of the public and private healthcare systems revealed no significant differences.Conclusions.The patients of private healthcare system exhibited significantly greater survival rates than the patients of the public healthcare system with similar PFS following ICU discharge.


2021 ◽  
Vol 65 (4) ◽  
pp. 302-309
Author(s):  
Nina V. Zaitseva ◽  
Dmitriy A. Kiryanov ◽  
Marat R. Kamaltdinov ◽  
Olga Yu. Ustinova ◽  
Svetlana V. Babina ◽  
...  

Introduction. Preservation and growth of the country population is the top national priority in the Russian Federation. A contemporary approach focuses on several especially urgent demographic issues that can be resolved, among other things, due to public healthcare systems becoming more efficient. The present research work is vital due to the necessity to achieve target medical and demographic parameters fixed in the national and federal projects and regional programs. These parameters include life expectancy and mortality caused by cardiovascular and oncologic diseases. The goal of this work is a development of new approaches for the complex evaluation of potential management reserves of health population indicators and the prognosis of efficiency of targeted activities performed within public healthcare systems and aimed at increasing life expectancy through reducing mortality among the population caused by cardiovascular diseases and oncologic diseases. Material and methods. The work dwells on solving a “direct” task in the “medical activities - morbidity - mortality” triple analysis system; the solution involves predicting changes in morbidity and mortality under preset, planned, or scenario changes in parameters related to the public healthcare system. We modelled cause-and-effect relations in the above system, applying mathematical statistics techniques (correlation-regression analysis and factor analysis) with the consequent medical expertise of obtained results. Results. These procedures allow assessing health losses and spot out priorities in activities performed within the public healthcare system as well as ranking managerial decisions, already taken or only planned, as per their efficiency, taking into account territories; sex and age structure of the population; diseases, their subclasses and gravity; specific activities performed within the public healthcare system (prevention, diagnostics, or treatment). We should stress that the most significant potential management reserves of reducing mortality are achieved on territories with maximum mortality levels due to reserves for the reduction in it; these reserves are manageable due to prevention and early diagnostics. Conclusion. Research techniques and results described in the present work can be used in practice to achieve target parameters fixed by national and regional priorities and to select an optimal set of activities aimed at reducing mortality among the population.


Author(s):  
Ching Siang Tan ◽  
Saim Lokman ◽  
Yao Rao ◽  
Szu Hua Kok ◽  
Long Chiau Ming

AbstractOver the last year, the dangerous severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) has spread rapidly around the world. Malaysia has not been excluded from this COVID-19 pandemic. The resurgence of COVID-19 cases has overwhelmed the public healthcare system and overloaded the healthcare resources. Ministry of Health (MOH) Malaysia has adopted an Emergency Ordinance (EO) to instruct private hospitals to receive both COVID-19 and non-COVID-19 patients to reduce the strain on public facilities. The treatment of COVID-19 patients at private hospitals could help to boost the bed and critical care occupancy. However, with the absence of insurance coverage because COVID-19 is categorised as pandemic-related diseases, there are some challenges and opportunities posed by the treatment fees management. Another major issue in the collaboration between public and private hospitals is the willingness of private medical consultants to participate in the management of COVID-19 patients, because medical consultants in private hospitals in Malaysia are not hospital employees, but what are termed “private contractors” who provide patient care services to the hospitals. Other collaborative measures with private healthcare providers, e.g. tele-conferencing by private medical clinics to monitor COVID-19 patients and the rollout of national vaccination programme. The public and private healthcare partnership must be enhanced, and continue to find effective ways to collaborate further to combat the pandemic. The MOH, private healthcare sectors and insurance providers need to have a synergistic COVID-19 treatment plans to ensure public as well as insurance policy holders have equal opportunities for COVID-19 screening tests, vaccinations and treatment.


2016 ◽  
Vol 32 (suppl 2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Laís Silveira Costa

Abstract: The contemporary context of population aging, itsthe population's different health and disease characteristics, and the growing incorporation of technologies by healthcare systems have highlighted the need to adjust the healthcare structure as a whole. The defense of a democratic and sustainable system reveals the importance of understanding how changes in healthcare take place. The current article aims to contribute to the understanding of innovation in healthcare services. The study's results indicate that the existence of certain knowledge gaps means that public policies tend to overlook a whole rangeseries of innovations normally associated with social changes, with a consequentwith an impact on human development, social cohesion, equality, and equity, allcentral issues that are central toin the field of collective public healthcare field. The article concludes that the lack of a mature theoretical framework negatively impacts the formulation of such policies, further aggravated in Brazil by growing differences in quality and access between population segments that depend on the public and private healthcare systems.


2021 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Sanghamitra Das ◽  
Samhita Das

Media reports of the COVID-19 pandemic in India have highlighted the important role that India’s female community health workers, the Accredited Social Health Activists (ASHAs), have played in managing COVID infections in India. This paper explores the epistemic basis of ASHA work to understand the significance of their role. Through a discourse analysis of textual media articles, we show that the ASHAs’ routine and COVID-related caregiving practices are a form of embodied, intimate labor rooted in their situated, community-oriented knowledge. This labor is devalued as emotional and feminized care work, which denies the ASHAs professional status in the public healthcare system of India and, in turn, reflects a hierarchy among health practitioners that stems from the status of objectivity/disembodiment in biomedicine. We find that, despite their low status in the public health system, ASHA workers develop a self-concept that enables them to self-identify as healthcare professionals, motivating them to continue providing essential healthcare services during the pandemic. We argue that an official recognition of the epistemic value of ASHA work would help to overcome the age-old nature/culture dichotomy that informs what counts as valuable, legitimate, formal medical knowledge. Furthermore, our analysis provides a critique of the gendered devaluation of care work within a political economy of health increasingly dictated by a neoliberal logic.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document