scholarly journals Is There a Role for Direct Oral Anticoagulants in the Primary and Secondary Prevention of Myeloproliferative Neoplasm Associated Thrombosis?

Hemato ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 2 (4) ◽  
pp. 769-780
Author(s):  
Uzma Faruqi ◽  
Karen A. Breen
Keyword(s):  
Myeloproliferative Neoplasms ◽  
Oral Anticoagulants ◽  
Direct Oral Anticoagulants ◽  
Philadelphia Chromosome ◽  
Myeloproliferative Neoplasm ◽  
Haematopoietic Stem Cell ◽  
Polycythaemia Vera ◽  
Unusual Site ◽  
Thrombotic Risk ◽  
Randomised Control Trials

Philadelphia chromosome negative myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPN) are clonal haematopoietic stem cell disorders. Of the MPNs, polycythaemia vera (PV) and essential thrombocythaemia (ET) confer a high thrombotic risk which may be the presenting feature of the disease. Thrombotic complications consist of both arterial and venous events and the presence of the JAK2 V617F mutation is associated with higher risk. Patients presenting with an unprovoked thrombus, particularly at an unusual site, e.g., splanchnic circulation, should be screened for the presence of this mutation. Historically, warfarin has been the only option for oral anticoagulation; however, there is now increasing evidence and practise to use direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) in cancer. The seminal randomised control trials have demonstrated non-inferiority compared to low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) with a preferable bleeding profile. DOACs are now the first line treatment for atrial fibrillation and venous thromboembolic disease, as recommended by NICE, and therefore there is increasing familiarity with these agents. Furthermore, there are now targeted antidotes available. This paper reviews evidence for efficacy and safety of DOACs in MPN. Whilst no randomised control trials have been performed, several retrospective studies and reviews of registry data have reproducibly demonstrated that, alongside cytoreduction, DOACs represent an effective modality of anticoagulation for treatment of venous thromboembolism in MPN. Furthermore, dosing regimens provide the option for longer term secondary prophylaxis. Use of DOACs in arterial thrombosis is an area for future development and there is already some evidence for utility in peripheral vascular disease.

Leukaemic Transformation of Philadelphia-chromosome-negative Myeloproliferative Neoplasms — A Review of the Molecular Background

2011 ◽  
Vol 07 (01) ◽  
pp. 59
Author(s):  
Nils H Thoennissen ◽  
H Phillip Koeffler ◽  
◽  
Keyword(s):  
Chromosomal Abnormalities ◽  
Myeloproliferative Neoplasms ◽  
Philadelphia Chromosome ◽  
Chronic Phase ◽  
Myeloid Cell ◽  
Primary Myelofibrosis ◽  
Haematopoietic Stem Cell ◽  
Polycythaemia Vera ◽  
Causative Role ◽  
Blast Phase

Philadelphia-chromosome-negative myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs), including polycythaemia vera (PV), primary myelofibrosis (PMF) and essential thrombocythaemia (ET), are clonal haematopoietic stem cell disorders characterised by proliferation of one or more myeloid cell lineages. They are closely associated with theJAK2V617F mutation, whose detection is used as a clonal marker in the differential diagnosis of MPN. Despite recent improvements in the molecular diagnosis and therapeutic regimen of these chronic disorders, haematological evolution to blast phase remains a major cause of long-term mortality. The mechanism of MPN transformation is still a matter of some controversy because of insufficient insights into the underlying molecular pathogenesis. The purpose of this article is to summarise the increasing data concerning the mechanism of leukaemic evolution of patients diagnosed with chronic MPN. Chromosomal abnormalities and genes that have been shown to play a potential causative role in chronic-phase acceleration are discussed, as are aberrations that may serve as prognostic markers in the blast phase of MPN.

scholarly journals Practice patterns and outcomes of direct oral anticoagulant use in myeloproliferative neoplasm patients

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (11) ◽  
Author(s):  
Joan How ◽  
Charlotte Story ◽  
Siyang Ren ◽  
Donna Neuberg ◽  
Rachel P. Rosovsky ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Practice Patterns ◽  
Myeloproliferative Neoplasms ◽  
Vitamin K Antagonists ◽  
Oral Anticoagulants ◽  
Direct Oral Anticoagulants ◽  
Multivariable Analysis ◽  
Myeloproliferative Neoplasm ◽  
Bleeding Risk ◽  
Prior History ◽  
Increased Risk

AbstractMyeloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs) are characterized by an increased risk of thrombosis and bleeding. Vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) are the historic anticoagulant recommended for use in MPNs. Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are being increasingly used in general and cancer populations. However, DOAC safety and efficacy in MPN patients remains unclear. We characterized real-world practice patterns of DOAC use in MPN patients and evaluated thrombosis and bleeding risk. We conducted a retrospective cohort study of 133 MPN patients prescribed DOACs for venous thromboembolism (VTE), atrial fibrillation, or arterial thromboembolism (ATE). Practice patterns including duration of anticoagulation, dosing, and concomitant use of antiplatelet/cytoreductive agents, were heterogeneous among MPN patients. The 1-year cumulative incidence of thrombosis and bleeding on DOAC was 5.5% (1.5–9.5%) and 12.3% (6.4–18.2%) respectively. In comparison, reported bleeding rates in MPN patients on DOAC and VKAs are 1–3%. On multivariable analysis, prior history of thrombosis, use of dabigatran or edoxaban, and younger age were significantly associated with a higher risk of recurrent thrombosis, while leukocytosis was associated with a higher risk of bleeding on DOAC. The higher-than-expected bleeding rate found in our study indicates the continued need for rigorous evaluation of DOACs in this population.

scholarly journals Direct Oral Anticoagulants in Patients with Myeloproliferative Neoplasms: A Single Institution Retrospective Study

Blood ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 132 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 5067-5067
Author(s):  
Emma P. Deloughery ◽  
Robert D. McBane ◽  
Aneel A. Ashrani ◽  
Ayalew Tefferi ◽  
Joshua P Slusser ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
De Novo ◽  
Conflicts Of Interest ◽  
Myeloproliferative Neoplasms ◽  
Oral Anticoagulants ◽  
Direct Oral Anticoagulants ◽  
Myeloproliferative Neoplasm ◽  
Clinical Databases ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
Hemorrhagic Events ◽  
Risk Of Hemorrhage

Abstract Introduction: Myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPN) are associated with an increased risk of venous (VTE) and arterial (ATE) thromboembolic events (TE). Anticoagulation needs to be balanced between the risk of incident and recurrent TE and risk of hemorrhage. While data on outcomes of anticoagulation with warfarin in patients with MPN are available, data on safety and efficacy of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) in this subgroup are not. Herein, we present outcomes of use of DOACs in patients with MPN at our institution. Methods: In this retrospective cohort study, we searched the Mayo Clinic clinical databases for patients meeting the WHO criteria for MPN who had been prescribed a DOAC between 2011 and 2017. The MPN diagnosis had to have predated the DOAC prescription. Medical records of consenting patients meeting study criteria were reviewed and data on demographics, diagnosis of MPN, indication for DOAC prescription, and their efficacy (incident or recurrent TE) and safety (hemorrhagic events) were abstracted. Results: Over the study period, 19 patients (female = 10) met inclusion criteria. The median age of patients at MPN diagnosis was 67 years (35-83), and 73 years (53-86) at initiation of DOAC. Prescribed DOACs included rivaroxaban (n=12), apixaban (n=6), and dabigatran (n=2) (one patient received rivaroxaban and was switched to apixaban). MPN diagnoses included polycythemia vera (PV) (n=9), essential thrombocythemia and chronic myeloproliferative neoplasm NOS (3 each), chronic myeloid leukemia and myelofibrosis (2 each). Indications for DOAC included thromboembolism (n=13; 68%) (arterial:2 and venous:11), and atrial fibrillation (afib) (n=6; 31%). The median duration of DOAC therapy was 241.5 days (range 13-1879). Five patients were switched from warfarin to rivaroxaban (n=4) and apixaban (n=1) at patient and/or provider preference; the rest were initiated on the DOAC de novo based on provider preference. Of the 19 patients, one patient each experienced a major hemorrhagic and TE event. One patient with PV who was on rivaroxaban for afib required hospitalization for gastrointestinal hemorrhage due to gastritis; DOAC was discontinued following this episode. One other patient with PV had a non-ST elevation myocardial infarction while on rivaroxaban for afib and prior stroke; DOAC was continued. There were no deaths attributable to DOAC use. Discussion: Our limited data suggests that use of DOACs in patients with MPN is feasible with an acceptable balance between risk of hemorrhage and recurrent thrombosis. Additional data on long term outcomes of DOACs in MPNs are needed. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

scholarly journals Combining antiplatelet and anticoagulant therapy in cardiovascular disease

Hematology ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 2020 (1) ◽  
pp. 642-648
Author(s):  
Geoffrey D. Barnes
Keyword(s):  
Randomized Clinical Trials ◽  
Oral Anticoagulants ◽  
Direct Oral Anticoagulants ◽  
Thrombotic Event ◽  
Bleeding Risk ◽  
Antithrombotic Agents ◽  
Thrombotic Risk ◽  
Coronary Syndrome ◽  
Combined Use ◽  
Life Threatening

Abstract Up to 10% of the >3 million Americans with atrial fibrillation will experience an acute coronary syndrome or undergo percutaneous coronary intervention. Therefore, concurrent indications for multiple antithrombotic agents is a common clinical scenario. Although each helps reduce thrombotic risk, their combined use significantly increases the risk of major bleeding events, which can be life threatening. In the past 5 years, a number of randomized clinical trials have explored different combinations of anticoagulation plus antiplatelet agents aimed at minimizing bleeding risk while preserving low thrombotic event rates. In general, shorter courses with fewer antithrombotic agents have been found to be effective, particularly when direct oral anticoagulants are combined with clopidogrel. Combined use of very low-dose rivaroxaban plus aspirin has also demonstrated benefit in atherosclerotic diseases, including coronary and peripheral artery disease. Use of proton pump inhibitor therapy while patients are taking multiple antithrombotic agents has the potential to further reduce upper gastrointestinal bleeding risk in select populations. Applying this evidence to patients with multiple thrombotic conditions will help to avoid costly and life-threatening adverse medication events.

scholarly journals Body Mass Index and Total Symptom Burden in Myeloproliferative Neoplasms Discovery of a U-shaped Association

Cancers ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 12 (8) ◽  
pp. 2202 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sarah Friis Christensen ◽  
Robyn Marie Scherber ◽  
Nana Brochmann ◽  
Martin Goros ◽  
Jonathan Gelfond ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Body Mass Index ◽  
Body Mass ◽  
Myeloproliferative Neoplasms ◽  
Philadelphia Chromosome ◽  
Myeloproliferative Neoplasm ◽  
Symptom Burden ◽  
Normal Weight ◽  
Analysis Of Covariance ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Increased Risk

Elevated body mass index (BMI) is a global health problem, leading to enhanced mortality and the increased risk of several cancers including essential thrombocythemia (ET), a subtype of the Philadelphia-chromosome negative myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPN). Furthermore, evidence states that BMI is associated with the severity of symptom burden among cancer patients. MPN patients often suffer from severe symptom burden. The purpose of this study was to examine whether deviations from a normal BMI in an MPN population are associated with higher symptom burden and reduced quality of life (QoL). A combined analysis of two large cross-sectional surveys, the Danish Population-based Study, MPNhealthSurvey (n = 2044), and the international Fatigue Study (n = 1070), was performed. Symptoms and QoL were assessed using the validated Myeloproliferative Neoplasm Symptom Assessment Form (MPN-SAF). Analysis of covariance was used to estimate the effects of different BMI categories on symptom scores while adjusting for age, sex, and MPN subtype. A U-shaped association between BMI and Total Symptom Burden was observed in both datasets with significantly higher mean scores for underweight and obese patients relative to normal weight (mean difference: underweight 5.51 (25.8%), p = 0.006; obese 5.70 (26.6%) p < 0.001). This is an important finding, as BMI is a potentially modifiable factor in the care of MPN patients.

scholarly journals Use of Direct Oral Anticoagulants in Patients on Immunomodulatory Agents

Blood ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 128 (22) ◽  
pp. 1449-1449 ◽  
Author(s):  
Louise Man ◽  
Amy L Morris ◽  
Jacqueline Brown ◽  
Surabhi Palkimas ◽  
Kelly Mercer Davidson
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Oral Anticoagulants ◽  
Direct Oral Anticoagulants ◽  
Thrombotic Event ◽  
Antiplatelet Agent ◽  
Bleeding Events ◽  
Thrombotic Risk ◽  
Vte Prophylaxis ◽  
Warfarin Group ◽  
Risk Patients

Abstract The risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE) is increased in individuals with cancer, particularly in those with multiple myeloma. The immunomodulatory agents (IMiDs) thalidomide, lenalidomide and pomalidomide are commonly used to treat multiple myeloma and other hematologic malignancies and are associated with increased risk of VTE. Current National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) guidelines (v.1.2016) on cancer-associated VTE utilize a risk assessment model based on a few small studies to guide VTE prophylaxis for multiple myeloma patients being treated with an IMiD (Palumbo, et al. Leukemia, 2008). Aspirin is recommended for lower risk patients while prophylactic-dose low molecular weight heparin or therapeutic warfarin are recommended for higher risk patients. The use of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) for cancer-associated VTE is currently under investigation (Raskob, et al. Lancet Haematol, 2016). Little is known about their role in VTE prophylaxis in patients on IMiDs. The purpose of this study was to explore the use of DOACs in patients receiving IMiDs. We performed a retrospective chart review of all patients at the University of Virginia Health System who received an IMiD and who were taking either a DOAC or warfarin between January 1, 2010 and December 31, 2015. DOACs included dabigatran, rivaroxaban, and apixaban. IMiDs included lenalidomide, thalidomide, and pomalidomide. The primary endpoint was to assess the safety of DOACs as compared to warfarin, and the secondary endpoint was to assess their efficacy. We collected baseline patient information, as well as diagnosis, IMiD, anticoagulant, antiplatelet agent and dose, duration of treatment, concurrent antineoplastic therapies, and thrombotic risk factors. We utilized the NCCN definitions of individual and myeloma-related thrombotic risk factors. Many patients had changes in their IMiD or anticoagulation. Thus, separate encounters were collected, where an encounter was the combination of an IMiD agent and dose, the anticoagulant, the antiplatelet agent (if any), and the thrombotic risk profile for that time period. Descriptive analyses were performed on all encounters in both groups. Rates of bleeding and thrombotic events were calculated. There were 21 discrete patients in the DOAC group and 16 in the warfarin group. Characteristics and outcomes are described in Table 1. There were four non-major bleeding events in the DOAC group; two of the four bleeding events occurred while on concomitant aspirin therapy. The patient with hematuria stopped anticoagulation and cystoscopy revealed bladder cancer. The other patients did not change or stop therapy. There were six bleeding events in the warfarin group: two were major and four were non-major. The two major events were gastrointestinal bleeding (GIB) and a subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH). Neither event occurred while on concomitant antiplatelet therapy. The GIB required cessation of therapy, hospitalization, and transfusions. The INR at the time is unknown. The SAH was preceded by a fall while INR was in therapeutic range. Both major and two of the non-major bleeding events occurred in the same patient at different time points and accounted for most of the warfarin-related bleeding events. There was one thrombotic event in the DOAC group. The patient had a non-ST segment elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) while on prophylactic-dose rivaroxaban. She was not on concomitant antiplatelet therapy. Arterial thrombotic events are not typically seen with IMiDs, and the NSTEMI was thought to be related to the recent initiation of carfilzomib. There were no thrombotic events in the warfarin group. This was a retrospective, single-institution study assessing the safety and efficacy of DOACs as compared to warfarin in patients on IMiDs. In our study, all bleeding events in the DOAC group were non-major, while patients on warfarin experienced both major and non-major bleeds. Only one thrombotic event was recorded in the DOAC group. DOACs may represent an attractive alternative to warfarin for VTE prophylaxis in these patients, given no need for routine monitoring and fewer dietary restrictions. Prospective studies in this population are warranted. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Latium (Italy) Epidemiology of Philadelphia Chromosome-Negative Myeloproliferative Neoplasms (MPNs) from 2011 to 2015: A Prospective Analysis from Gruppo Laziale of Ph Negative MPN

Blood ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 128 (22) ◽  
pp. 5473-5473
Author(s):  
Marianna De Muro ◽  
Ambra Di Veroli ◽  
Marco Montanaro ◽  
Roberto Latagliata ◽  
Cristina Santoro ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Incidence Rate ◽  
Myeloproliferative Neoplasms ◽  
Philadelphia Chromosome ◽  
Primary Myelofibrosis ◽  
Driver Mutations ◽  
Community Based ◽  
Thrombotic Risk ◽  
Inflammatory Bowel ◽  
Perspective Analysis ◽  
Observation Period

Abstract Background: MPNs including Polycythemia Vera (PV), Essential Thrombocythemia (ET) and Primary Myelofibrosis (PMF), are clonal hematopoietic diseases in which the discovery of molecular driver mutations (JAK2, CALR, MPL) has deeply modified diagnostic approach in recent years. To date available data on epidemiology of MPNs and perspective analysis are rare. Our aim is to study the incidence of MPN Ph negative in a specific region of Italy named Latium and its variability across five years. Moreover we prospectively report the general features of our population. Method: We present here the prospective epidemiologic analysis of 1116 adult patients affected by MPNs (PV=289, ET=550, PMF=209) diagnosed according to 2008 WHO criteria, from January 2011 to December 2015 in 15 hematological Centers (5 academic and 10 community-based Hospitals) in Latium. A total of 289 PV, 550 ET and 209PMF were identified. The overall incidence rate of 289PV was 1.0/105 in 2011 and 2012, 1.1/105 in 2013, 0.9/105 in 2014 and 2015. The overall incidence rate of 550ET was 2.0/105 in 2011, 2.4/105 in 2012, 2.2/105 in 2013, 1.8/105 in 2014 and 1,2/105 in 2015 and the overall incidence rate of 209PMF was 0.7/105 in 2011 and 2012, 1.0/105 in 2013, 0.7/105 in 2014 and 0.5/105 in 2015. We have observed also 63 cases of MPNu (36M/32F) and the incidence rate was 0.3/105 in 2011 and 2012, 0.14/105 in 2013, 0.24/105 in 2014 and 0.22/105 in 2015. Baseline features of PV, ET and PMF patients are summarized in table 1. We have also analyzed the presence of comorbidities including obesity, arhythmia and neoplasia observed at the diagnosis in 1.6, 6.2 and 4% of all population, respectively; thirty-five percent of 1116 pts presented other comorbidities such as diabetes, inflammatory bowel disease, renal and liver failure. As thrombotic risk factors we considered diabetes, dislipidemia, smoke, essential hypertension and thrombophilia observed in 11,8, 16,2, 13,2, 51,7 and 3% of total pts, respectively. Conclusions: We confirm in our prospective observational protocol the overall incidence of MPN Ph negative, previously reported in the literature and the major incidence of male gender in PV and PMF, female in of ET. The annual incidence from 2011-2015 in Latium is remained substantially the same during the observation period. The decreasing trend observed in 2015 is probably due to the different update of some Centers that was done in October 2015 not including patients diagnosed in the last two months. Disclosures Latagliata: Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria; Bristol Myers Squibb: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria; Shire: Honoraria. Breccia:Pfizer: Honoraria; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria; Bristol Myers Squibb: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria; Ariad: Honoraria. Cimino:Celgene: Honoraria; Bristol-Mayer: Honoraria.

scholarly journals Anticoagulation for Splanchnic Vein Thrombosis in Myeloproliferative Neoplasms: The Drug and the Duration

Hemato ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 255-263
Author(s):  
Wafik G. Sedhom ◽  
Brady Lee Stein
Keyword(s):  
Complete Blood Count ◽  
Myeloproliferative Neoplasms ◽  
Vitamin K Antagonists ◽  
Oral Anticoagulants ◽  
Direct Oral Anticoagulants ◽  
Pegylated Interferon ◽  
Janus Kinase ◽  
Splanchnic Vein Thrombosis ◽  
Vein Thrombosis ◽  
Complementary Role

Myeloproliferative neoplasms are a common cause of splanchnic vein thrombosis, which causes significant morbidity and mortality. Indefinite anticoagulation is the mainstay of therapy, and vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) are routinely used since hematologists have the most experience with this drug class. The role of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) is promising, but still undergoing evaluation. Cytoreduction with hydroxyurea or pegylated interferon is often used when cytosis is present, but their roles are yet to be defined when the complete blood count is normal. Janus kinase (JAK) inhibition may have a complementary role in reducing splenomegaly and portal hypertension.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document