Well-Being of Healthcare Workers and the General Public during the COVID-19 Pandemic in Vietnam: An Online Survey

The COVID-19 pandemic and associated restrictive measures implemented may considerably affect people’s lives. This study aimed to assess the well-being of Vietnamese people after COVID-19 lockdown measures were lifted and life gradually returned to normal. An online survey was organized from 21 to 25 April 2020 among Vietnamese residents aged 18 and over. The survey was launched by the Hue University of Medicine and Pharmacy. The WHO-5 Well-Being Index (scored 0–25) was used to score participants’ well-being. A multivariate logistic regression model was used to determine the predictors of well-being. A total of 1922 responses were analyzed (mean age: 31 years; 30.5% male; 88.2% health professionals or students in the health sector). The mean well-being score was 17.35 ± 4.97. Determinants of a high well-being score (≥13) included older age, eating healthy food, practicing physical exercise, working from home, and adhering to the COVID-19 preventive measures. Female participants, persons worried about their relatives’ health, and smokers were more likely to have a low well-being score. In conclusion, after the lockdown measures were lifted, the Vietnamese have people continued to follow COVID-19 preventive measures, and most of them scored high on the well-being scale. Waiting to achieve large-scale COVID-19 vaccine coverage, promoting preventive COVID-19 measures remains important, together with strategies to guarantee the well-being of the Vietnamese people.

Download Full-text

Vietnamese People’s Well-Being During the COVID-19 Pandemic: An Online Survey

10.20944/preprints202103.0646.v1 ◽

2021 ◽

Author(s):

Tuyen Dinh Hoang ◽

Robert Colebunders ◽

Joseph Nelson Siewe Fodjo ◽

Nhan Phuc Thanh Nguyen ◽

Trung Dinh Tran ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Large Scale ◽

Online Survey ◽

Logistic Regression Model ◽

Preventive Measures ◽

Vaccine Coverage ◽

Well Being ◽

Multivariate Logistic Regression Model ◽

Multivariate Logistic Regression ◽

Related Data ◽

Restrictive Measures

The COVID-19 pandemic and associated restrictive measures implemented may considerably affect people’s lives. This study aimed to assess the well-being of Vietnamese people after COVID-19 lockdown measures were lifted and life gradually returned to normal. An online survey was organized from 21st to 25th April 2020 among Vietnamese residents aged 18 and over. Besides collecting socio-demographic and COVID-19-related data, the WHO-5 Well-Being Index (scored 0–25) was used to score participants’ well-being. A multivariate logistic regression model was used to determine the predictors of well-being. A total of 1922 responses were analyzed (mean age: 31 years; 30.5% male). Mean well-being score was 17.35±4.97. Determinants of high well-being score (≥13) included older age, eating healthy food, practising physical exercise, working from home, and adhering to the COVID-19 preventive measures. Female participants, persons worried about their relatives’ health, and smokers were more likely to have a low well-being score. In conclusion, after the lockdown measures were lifted, the Vietnamese people continued to follow COVID-19 preventive measures and most of them scored high on the well-being scale. Waiting to achieve large scale COVID-19 vaccine coverage, promoting preventive COVID-19 measures remains important, together with strategies to guarantee the well-being of the Vietnamese people.

Download Full-text

Vietnamese People’s Well-Being During the COVID-19 Pandemic: An Online Survey

10.21203/rs.3.rs-77346/v1 ◽

2020 ◽

Author(s):

Tuyen Dinh Hoang ◽

Robert Colebunders ◽

Joseph Nelson Siewe Fodjo ◽

Nhan Phuc Thanh Nguyen ◽

Trung Dinh Tran ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Mental Health ◽

Online Survey ◽

Mental Health Problems ◽

Preventive Measures ◽

Well Being ◽

Factors Associated ◽

Preventive Behaviour ◽

Restrictive Measures ◽

Underlying Diseases ◽

Vulnerable Persons

Abstract BackgroundThe COVID-19 pandemic, alongside the restrictive measures implemented for its control, may considerably affect people’s lives particularly vulnerable persons such as children, elderly and people with underlying diseases. This study aimed to assess the well-being of Vietnamese people after COVID-19 lockdown measures were lifted and life gradually returned to normal in Vietnam.MethodsAn online survey was organized from 21st to 25th April 2020 among Vietnamese residents aged 18 and over. Data were collected concerning the participants’ health status, COVID-19 preventive behaviour, and consequences of the preventive measures. The WHO-5 Well-Being Index was used to score participants’ well-being.ResultsA total of 1922 responses were analyzed (mean age was 31 years; range: 18-76). Factors associated with a high well-being score included older age, eating healthy food, practising physical exercise, working from home, and adherence to the COVID-19 preventive measures. Female participants, persons worried about their relatives’ health, and smokers were more likely to have a low well-being score.ConclusionsThe Vietnamese people continued to follow COVID-19 preventive measures even after the lockdown was lifted. Most respondents scored high on the well-being scale. However, the emergence of a new COVID-19 outbreak with an epicenter in Da Nang city is expected to increase public anxiety and mental health problems. It is clear that together with preventive measures, developing strategies to guarantee the well-being of the Vietnamese people’s is equally important.

Download Full-text

Vietnamese people’s well-being during the COVID-19 pandemic: an online survey

10.21203/rs.3.rs-77482/v1 ◽

2020 ◽

Author(s):

Tuyen Dinh Hoang ◽

Robert Colebunders ◽

Joseph Nelson Siewe Fodjo ◽

Nhan Phuc Thanh Nguyen ◽

Trung Dinh Tran ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Mental Health ◽

Online Survey ◽

Mental Health Problems ◽

Preventive Measures ◽

Well Being ◽

Factors Associated ◽

Preventive Behaviour ◽

Restrictive Measures ◽

Underlying Diseases ◽

Vulnerable Persons

Abstract Background: The COVID-19 pandemic, alongside the restrictive measures implemented for its control, may considerably affect people’s lives particularly vulnerable persons such as children, elderly and people with underlying diseases. This study aimed to assess the well-being of Vietnamese people after COVID-19 lockdown measures were lifted and life gradually returned to normal in Vietnam.Methods: An online survey was organized from 21st to 25th April 2020 among Vietnamese residents aged 18 and over. Data were collected concerning the participants’ health status, COVID-19 preventive behaviour, and consequences of the preventive measures. The WHO-5 Well-Being Index was used to score participants’ well-being.Results: A total of 1922 responses were analyzed (mean age was 31 years; range: 18-76). Factors associated with a high well-being score included older age, eating healthy food, practising physical exercise, working from home, and adherence to the COVID-19 preventive measures. Female participants, persons worried about their relatives’ health, and smokers were more likely to have a low well-being score.Conclusions: The Vietnamese people continued to follow COVID-19 preventive measures even after the lockdown was lifted. Most respondents scored high on the well-being scale. However, the emergence of a new COVID-19 outbreak with an epicenter in Da Nang city is expected to increase public anxiety and mental health problems. It is clear that together with preventive measures, developing strategies to guarantee the well-being of the Vietnamese people’s is equally important.

Download Full-text

Exploring the Frequency of Anxiety and Depression Symptoms in a Brazilian Sample during the COVID-19 Outbreak

International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health ◽

10.3390/ijerph18094847 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 18 (9) ◽

pp. 4847

Author(s):

Fabiana Silva Ribeiro ◽

Flávia H. Santos ◽

Luis Anunciação ◽

Lucas Barrozo ◽

Jesus Landeira-Fernandez ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Mental Health Professionals ◽

Online Survey ◽

Age Groups ◽

Health Sector ◽

Severe Depression ◽

Well Being ◽

Sociodemographic Factors ◽

Anxiety And Depression ◽

Depression Symptoms ◽

Brazilian Sample

The COVID-19 pandemic is a public health emergency of international concern, and the main measures to contain the spread of the coronavirus causing COVID-19 were social distancing, quarantine, and self-isolation. Although these policies are effective in containing the spread of the virus, they might represent a challenge to psychological well-being, increasing levels of depressive and anxiety-related symptoms. Aims: We explored the frequency of anxiety and depression symptoms during COVID-19 restrictions and associations with sociodemographic factors in a Brazilian sample. Method: Data of a total of 936 Brazilian adults (68.2% women) aged 18 to 77 years old (M = 38.95, SD = 13.91) were collected through an online survey. Results: In general, we observed a frequency of 17.36% for severe anxiety and 66.13% for severe depression symptoms, in which younger participants (18–39 years old) and women showed higher scores in anxiety and depression scales compared to older age groups. Logistic regressions showed that women were more likely to present severe symptoms of anxiety (20.4%) compared to men (10.9%), as well as respondents in the educational sector (24.3%) compared to those in the health sector (10%). Conclusions: We highlight the importance of mental health professionals in developing strategies to help younger adults to mitigate the effects of social restriction.

Download Full-text

Stress, Burnout, and Resilience among Healthcare Workers during the COVID-19 Emergency: The Role of Defense Mechanisms

International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health ◽

10.3390/ijerph18105258 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 18 (10) ◽

pp. 5258

Author(s):

Mariagrazia Di Giuseppe ◽

Gianni Nepa ◽

Tracy A. Prout ◽

Fabrizio Albertini ◽

Stefano Marcelli ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Healthcare Workers ◽

Defense Mechanisms ◽

Online Survey ◽

Healthcare Professionals ◽

Well Being ◽

Personal Accomplishment ◽

Traumatic Experience ◽

Psychological Resources ◽

Defensive Functioning ◽

The Impact

The experience of working on the frontlines of the COVID-19 healthcare crisis has presented a cumulative traumatic experience that affects healthcare professionals’ well-being. Psychological resources such as resilience and adaptive defense mechanisms are essential in protecting individuals from severe stress and burnout. During September 2020, 233 healthcare workers responded to an online survey to test the impact of demographic variables, COVID-19 exposure, and psychological resources in determining stress and burnout during the COVID-19 emergency. Frontline workers reported higher scores for stress, emotional exhaustion, and depersonalization (p < 0.001) as compared to colleagues working in units not directly serving patients with COVID-19. Mature defensive functioning was associated with resilience and personal accomplishment (r = 0.320; p < 0.001), while neurotic and immature defenses were related to perceived stress and burnout. Stress and burnout were predicted by lower age, female gender, greater exposure to COVID-19, lower resilience, and immature defensive functioning among healthcare professionals (R2 = 463; p < 0.001). Working on the frontlines of the COVID-19 pandemic appears to provoke greater stress and burnout. On the other hand, resilience and adaptive defense mechanisms predicted better adjustment. Future reaction plans should promote effective programs offering support for healthcare workers who provide direct care to patients with COVID-19.

Download Full-text

Knowledge, Attitude and Practice of Personal Safety Measures Adopted by Medical Practioners during the Covid-19 Pandemic

Journal of Evolution of Medical and Dental Sciences ◽

10.14260/jemds/2021/190 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 10 (12) ◽

pp. 883-887

Author(s):

Hemapriya L ◽

Maureen Prativa Tigga ◽

Anil Kumar M.R ◽

Prathap T ◽

Neha Wali ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Personal Protective Equipment ◽

Urban Areas ◽

Healthcare Workers ◽

Online Survey ◽

Healthcare Professionals ◽

Well Being ◽

World Health ◽

Protective Equipment ◽

Personal Safety ◽

Safety Measures

BACKGROUND A novel coronavirus (now termed as SARS-CoV-2) was detected as the causative agent of severe pneumonia in Wuhan, Hubei Province, China, in December 2019. Declared by the World Health Organization (WHO) as a global pandemic in March 2020, it has created profound changes in global economy and healthcare systems. This study evaluates the knowledge and practice with regard to various personal safety measures used by the healthcare professionals. METHODS We conducted a questionnaire study after obtaining approval, from the Institutional ethical committee. An online survey was conducted using a preformatted questionnaire consisting of multiple-choice questions which assessed the knowledge and practices adopted by various healthcare professionals. The survey was done between 1st and 30th of June 2020 and a total of 536 responses was analysed. RESULTS 58.4 % of the participants were females, 66 % of the healthcare workers worked at a private hospital / private medical college with 82.1 % being located in urban areas. Of the 536 respondents, 90.1 % practiced bathing immediately after returning home and 86.8 % sanitized their accessories. 86.9 % of the professionals used frequent sanitization with use of mask and gloves whereas only 12.3 % used full personal protective equipment. 58 % of females had used hydroxychloroquine as prophylaxis whereas only 41 % of males used it (statistically significant, P = 0.005). Healthcare workers in younger age group (23 - 40 years) were more likely to maintain distance with family members, and government doctors were significantly more likely to do so (P < 0.001) as compared to private practitioners. CONCLUSIONS With the medical professionals being at high risk for contracting the infection, the need to provide the healthcare professionals with adequate personal protective equipment is of utmost importance. There is also a need to maintain the well-being of the healthcare professionals as they are the weakest link in the chain. KEY WORDS Medical Practitioners, Personal Protective Equipment, Safety Measures

Download Full-text

The incidence and management of workplace violence among medical professionals in the United States: A methodological pilot study

Journal of Hospital Administration ◽

10.5430/jha.v8n1p56 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 8 (1) ◽

pp. 56

Author(s):

Ashleigh Chinelo Oguagha ◽

Jing Chen

Keyword(s):

United States ◽

Workplace Violence ◽

Healthcare Workers ◽

Online Survey ◽

Health Sector ◽

Medical Personnel ◽

The United States ◽

Medical Professionals ◽

Psychological Violence ◽

Physical And Psychological Violence

This study aimed to investigate workplace violence (WPV) experienced by medical professionals in the United States as well as individual and managerial actions following violent episodes and further, predict estimators of WPV. A modified version of the Workplace Violence in the Health Sector: Country Case Studies Research Instruments Survey Questionnaire was used to assess the incidence and management of workplace violence experienced by healthcare workers. Medical personnel from two social aggregation websites were recruited to participate in an online survey. 226 valid questionnaires were received. 48.5\% and 76.1\% of respondents, respectively, experienced physical and psychological violence in the past year. Risk factors for violence included occupation, patient population, ethnicity, and higher levels of anxiety regarding violence in hospitals. Overall, 17.7\% of reported incidents were investigated, 52.4\% of cases saw no consequences meted out to perpetrators and 51.7\% of victims suffered from negative emotions or aftereffects following a violent episode. Only 30.1\% of victims formally reported their experience with violence. The prevalence of violence was high and medical professionals were negatively affected by violence; however, formal reporting of episodes was low and measures combating violence were inadequate. Harsher penalties for perpetrators of violence are needed and hospitals need to implement guidelines that track the management of violence.

Download Full-text

The psychological impacts of COVID-19: a study of frontline physicians and nurses in the Arab world

Irish Journal of Psychological Medicine ◽

10.1017/ipm.2020.119 ◽

2020 ◽

pp. 1-6

Author(s):

N. Al Mahyijari ◽

A. Badahdah ◽

F. Khamis

Keyword(s):

Perceived Stress ◽

Healthcare Workers ◽

Online Survey ◽

Healthcare Professionals ◽

Arab World ◽

Close Contact ◽

Well Being ◽

Sultanate Of Oman ◽

Stress Scale ◽

Harmful Effects

Objectives: The COVID-19 (SARS-CoV2) pandemic is wreaking havoc on healthcare systems and causing serious economic, social, and psychological anguish around the globe. Healthcare workers (HCWs) who diagnose and care for COVID-19 patients have been shown to suffer burnout, stress, and anxiety. Methods: In this study, we collected data from 150 frontline HCWs who had close contact with COVID-19 patients at several health facilities in the Sultanate of Oman. The participants completed an online survey that included the Perceived Stress Scale, the Generalized Anxiety Disorder Scale, and the WHO-5 Well-Being Index. Results: The study found that a substantial number of healthcare professionals experienced relatively high levels of stress and anxiety, as well as suboptimal levels of well-being. Perceived stress and anxiety were significant predictors of HCWs’ well-being. Conclusions: This study adds to the increasing literature indicating harmful effects of COVID-19 on the mental health of HCWs.

Download Full-text

(P2-68) Mental State of Healthcare Workers in a Designated H1N1 Screening Center

Prehospital and Disaster Medicine ◽

10.1017/s1049023x11005127 ◽

2011 ◽

Vol 26 (S1) ◽

pp. s157-s158

Author(s):

E. Seow ◽

G. Hsin kai ◽

A. Vasu

Keyword(s):

Healthcare Workers ◽

General Health Questionnaire ◽

Well Being ◽

Psychological Morbidity ◽

Emergency Setting ◽

Administrative Staff ◽

Wide Range ◽

Ancillary Staff ◽

The Mean ◽

H1n1 Outbreak

IntroductionIn Singapore, the H1N1 outbreak lasted 108 days. The study emergency department (ED) was designated as Singapore's H1N1 screening centre for the borders and the country's primary care centers. Our aim was to determine the psychological morbidity among ED physicians, nurses, administrative and ancillary staff during the H1N1 outbreak.MethodsWe conducted a survey on all ED healthcare worker (n = 305) using the 12-item General Health Questionnaire (GHQ-12). The bimodal scoring of GHQ-12 was dichotomised into non-cases (score 0 – 2) and potential cases (score ≥ 3). Participation was strictly voluntary.ResultsThe overall response rate was 273 (89.5%). Most respondents were females (73.3%); the mean age was 33 (SD 10.6) years. The mean GHQ score was found to be 1.9 (SD 2.7) with no gender-related differences. A comparison of the dichotomised GHQ-12 scores, found psychological morbidity to be more common in administrative staff (40%) and physicians (38.1%) than ancillary (24.2%) and nurses (19%) (p = 0.011). The average prevalence of psychological morbidity among ED staff was 25.3%. When we considered the 12 items of the GHQ separately and analyzed them by occupational group, we found physicians scoring the worst on item 6 - “Could not overcome difficulties” - than nurses, administrative and ancillary staff (p < 0.001). Physicians and administrative staff alike felt constantly under strain and were unable to concentrate compared to nurses and ancillary staff (p = 0.001).ConclusionHealthcare workers in an emergency setting unlike those in the rest of the hospital, face a wide range of risks on the job and this has a substantial effect on their mental well-being and job satisfaction.

Download Full-text

Effect of a hospital-wide campaign on COVID-19 vaccination uptake among healthcare workers in the context of raised concerns for life-threatening side effects

PLoS ONE ◽

10.1371/journal.pone.0258236 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 16 (10) ◽

pp. e0258236

Author(s):

Min Hyung Kim ◽

Nak-Hoon Son ◽

Yoon Soo Park ◽

Ju Hyun Lee ◽

Da Ae Kim ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Healthcare Workers ◽

Online Survey ◽

Vaccine Coverage ◽

Intervention Strategy ◽

National Policy ◽

Vaccine Dose ◽

Vaccination Uptake ◽

Severance Hospital ◽

Life Threatening ◽

To Receive

Background All healthcare workers (HCWs) in Yongin Severance Hospital were allocated to receive the ChAdOx1 nCov-19 vaccine according to national policy. A report of thrombosis and thrombocytopenia syndrome (TTS) associated with ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 led to hesitancy about receiving the second dose among HCWs who had received the first dose. Methods From 7 to 14 May, 2021, we performed a survey to identify the factors associated with hesitancy about receiving the second vaccine dose among HCWs at the hospital who had received the first dose of the vaccine. Based on survey results, a hospital-wide campaign was implemented on 18 May 2021 to improve vaccine coverage. HCWs who completed the second dose completed a self-administered questionnaire to evaluate the effect of the campaign. Findings Of 1,171 HCWs who had received the first dose of the vaccine, 71.5% completed the online survey, of whom 3.7% refused to take the second dose and 22.3% showed hesitancy. Hesitancy to receive a second dose was significantly associated with age under 30 years and concerns about TTS, and was less common among those who trusted effectiveness and safety of the vaccine. Among HCWs who received the first dose, 96.2% completed vaccination with the second dose between 27 May and 4 June, 2021. Of those who answered the questionnaire asked about the timing of their decision to receive the second dose, 57.1% reported that they were motivated by the hospital-wide campaign. Conclusion A tailored intervention strategy based on a survey can improve COVID-19 vaccination uptake among HCWs.

Download Full-text