scholarly journals Mutual Regulation of RNA Silencing and the IFN Response as an Antiviral Defense System in Mammalian Cells

2020 ◽  
Vol 21 (4) ◽  
pp. 1348 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tomoko Takahashi ◽  
Kumiko Ui-Tei
Keyword(s):  
Protein Interactions ◽  
Rna Silencing ◽  
Mammalian Cells ◽  
Rna Binding ◽  
Rna Binding Proteins ◽  
Structural Features ◽  
Type I ◽  
Antiviral Defense ◽  
Defense System ◽  
Mutual Regulation

RNA silencing is a posttranscriptional gene silencing mechanism directed by endogenous small non-coding RNAs called microRNAs (miRNAs). By contrast, the type-I interferon (IFN) response is an innate immune response induced by exogenous RNAs, such as viral RNAs. Endogenous and exogenous RNAs have typical structural features and are recognized accurately by specific RNA-binding proteins in each pathway. In mammalian cells, both RNA silencing and the IFN response are induced by double-stranded RNAs (dsRNAs) in the cytoplasm, but have long been considered two independent pathways. However, recent reports have shed light on crosstalk between the two pathways, which are mutually regulated by protein–protein interactions triggered by viral infection. This review provides brief overviews of RNA silencing and the IFN response and an outline of the molecular mechanism of their crosstalk and its biological implications. Crosstalk between RNA silencing and the IFN response may reveal a novel antiviral defense system that is regulated by miRNAs in mammalian cells.

scholarly journals Human DICER helicase domain recruits PKR and modulates its antiviral activity

2021 ◽  
Vol 17 (5) ◽  
pp. e1009549
Author(s):  
Thomas C. Montavon ◽  
Morgane Baldaccini ◽  
Mathieu Lefèvre ◽  
Erika Girardi ◽  
Béatrice Chane-Woon-Ming ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Rna Silencing ◽  
Mammalian Cells ◽  
Sindbis Virus ◽  
Rna Binding ◽  
Semliki Forest Virus ◽  
Rna Binding Proteins ◽  
Helicase Domain ◽  
Type I ◽  
Dependent Manner ◽  
Rna Helicases

The antiviral innate immune response mainly involves type I interferon (IFN) in mammalian cells. The contribution of the RNA silencing machinery remains to be established, but several recent studies indicate that the ribonuclease DICER can generate viral siRNAs in specific conditions. It has also been proposed that type I IFN and RNA silencing could be mutually exclusive antiviral responses. In order to decipher the implication of DICER during infection of human cells with alphaviruses such as the Sindbis virus and Semliki forest virus, we determined its interactome by proteomics analysis. We show that DICER specifically interacts with several double-stranded RNA binding proteins and RNA helicases during viral infection. In particular, proteins such as DHX9, ADAR-1 and the protein kinase RNA-activated (PKR) are enriched with DICER in virus-infected cells. We demonstrate that the helicase domain of DICER is essential for this interaction and that its deletion confers antiviral properties to this protein in an RNAi-independent, PKR-dependent, manner.

scholarly journals Human Dicer helicase domain recruits PKR and dsRNA binding proteins during viral infection

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thomas C. Montavon ◽  
Morgane Baldaccini ◽  
Mathieu Lefèvre ◽  
Erika Girardi ◽  
Béatrice Chane-Woon-Ming ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Viral Infection ◽  
Rna Silencing ◽  
Mammalian Cells ◽  
Cellular Response ◽  
Binding Proteins ◽  
Rna Binding ◽  
Rna Binding Proteins ◽  
Helicase Domain ◽  
Type I ◽  
Rna Helicases

AbstractThe antiviral innate immune response mainly involves type I interferon (IFN) in mammalian cells. The contribution of the RNA silencing machinery remains to be established, but several recent studies indicate that the ribonuclease DICER can generate viral siRNAs in specific conditions. It has also been proposed that type I IFN and RNA silencing could be mutually exclusive antiviral responses. In order to decipher the implication of DICER during infection of human cells with the Sindbis virus, we determined its interactome by proteomics analysis. We show that DICER specifically interacts with several double-stranded RNA binding proteins and RNA helicases during viral infection. In particular, proteins such as DHX9, ADAR-1 and the protein kinase RNA-activated (PKR) are enriched with DICER in virus-infected cells. We demonstrate the importance of DICER helicase domain in its interaction with PKR and showed that it has functional consequences for the cellular response to viral infection.

scholarly journals Structural features within the NORAD long noncoding RNA underlie efficient repression of Pumilio activity

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Omer Ziv ◽  
Svetlana Farberov ◽  
Jian You Lau ◽  
Eric A Miska ◽  
Grzegorz Kudla ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Rna Structure ◽  
Mammalian Cells ◽  
Noncoding Rna ◽  
Rna Binding ◽  
Rna Binding Proteins ◽  
Structural Features ◽  
Structural Domain ◽  
Mrna Targets ◽  
Structural Principles ◽  
Pumilio Proteins

It is increasingly appreciated that long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs) carry out important functions in mammalian cells, but how these are encoded in their sequences and manifested in their structures remains largely unknown. Some lncRNAs bind to and modulate the availability of RNA binding proteins, but the structural principles that underlie this mode of regulation are underexplored. Here, we focused on the NORAD lncRNA, which binds Pumilio proteins and modulates their ability to repress hundreds of mRNA targets. We probed the RNA structure and long-range RNA-RNA interactions formed by NORAD inside cells, under different stressful conditions. We discovered that NORAD structure is highly modular, and consists of well-defined domains that contribute independently to NORAD function. We discovered that NORAD structure spatially clusters the Pumilio binding sites along NORAD in a manner that contributes to the de-repression of Pumilio target proteins. Following arsenite stress, the majority of NORAD structure undergoes relaxation and forms inter-molecular interactions with RNAs that are targeted to stress granules. NORAD sequence thus dictates elaborated structural domain organization that facilitates its function on multiple levels, and which helps explain the extensive evolutionary sequence conservation of NORAD regions that are not predicted to directly bind Pumilio proteins.

scholarly journals Virus Sensor RIG-I Represses RNA Interference by Interacting with TRBP through LGP2 in Mammalian Cells

Genes ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 9 (10) ◽  
pp. 511 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tomoko Takahashi ◽  
Yuko Nakano ◽  
Koji Onomoto ◽  
Mitsutoshi Yoneyama ◽  
Kumiko Ui-Tei
Keyword(s):  
Rna Interference ◽  
Rna Silencing ◽  
Mammalian Cells ◽  
Rna Binding ◽  
Type I ◽  
Hairpin Rna ◽  
Tar Rna ◽  
Sensor Proteins ◽  
The Relationship ◽  
Inducible Gene

Exogenous double-stranded RNAs (dsRNAs) similar to viral RNAs induce antiviral RNA silencing or RNA interference (RNAi) in plants or invertebrates, whereas interferon (IFN) response is induced through activation of virus sensor proteins including Toll like receptor 3 (TLR3) or retinoic acid-inducible gene I (RIG-I) like receptors (RLRs) in mammalian cells. Both RNA silencing and IFN response are triggered by dsRNAs. However, the relationship between these two pathways has remained unclear. Laboratory of genetics and physiology 2 (LGP2) is one of the RLRs, but its function has remained unclear. Recently, we reported that LGP2 regulates endogenous microRNA-mediated RNA silencing by interacting with an RNA silencing enhancer, TAR-RNA binding protein (TRBP). Here, we investigated the contribution of other RLRs, RIG-I and melanoma-differentiation-associated gene 5 (MDA5), in the regulation of RNA silencing. We found that RIG-I, but not MDA5, also represses short hairpin RNA (shRNA)-induced RNAi by type-I IFN. Our finding suggests that RIG-I, but not MDA5, interacts with TRBP indirectly through LGP2 to function as an RNAi modulator in mammalian cells.

scholarly journals Unbiased dynamic characterization of RNA-protein interactions by OOPS

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rayner M. L. Queiroz ◽  
Tom Smith ◽  
Eneko Villanueva ◽  
Mie Monti ◽  
Mariavittoria Pizzinga ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Protein Interactions ◽  
Mammalian Cells ◽  
Rna Binding ◽  
Rna Binding Proteins ◽  
High Yield ◽  
Cycle Arrest ◽  
Bacterial Rna ◽  
Unbiased Manner ◽  
Cellular Compartments

AbstractCurrent methods for the identification of RNA–protein interactions require a quantity and quality of sample that hinders their application, especially for dynamic biological systems or when sample material is limiting. Here, we present a new approach to enrich RNA-Binding Proteins (RBPs): Orthogonal Organic Phase Separation (OOPS), which is compatible with downstream proteomics and RNA sequencing. OOPS enables recovery of RBPs and free protein, or protein-bound RNA and free RNA, from a single sample in an unbiased manner. By applying OOPS to human cell lines, we extract the majority of known RBPs, and importantly identify additional novel RBPs, including those from previously under-represented cellular compartments. The high yield and unbiased nature of OOPS facilitates its application in both dynamic and inaccessible systems. Thus, we have identified changes in RNA-protein interactions in mammalian cells following nocodazole cell-cycle arrest, and defined the first bacterial RNA-interactome. Overall, OOPS provides an easy-to-use and flexible technique that opens new opportunities to characterize RNA-protein interactions and explore their dynamic behaviour.

scholarly journals LGP2 virus sensor enhances apoptosis by upregulating apoptosis regulatory genes through TRBP-bound miRNAs during viral infection

2019 ◽  
Vol 48 (3) ◽  
pp. 1494-1507 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tomoko Takahashi ◽  
Yuko Nakano ◽  
Koji Onomoto ◽  
Mitsutoshi Yoneyama ◽  
Kumiko Ui-Tei
Keyword(s):  
Viral Infection ◽  
Rna Silencing ◽  
Mammalian Cells ◽  
Rna Binding ◽  
Sendai Virus ◽  
Cysteine Proteases ◽  
Regulatory Genes ◽  
Type I ◽  
Member Laboratory ◽  
Sensor Proteins

Abstract During viral infection, viral nucleic acids are detected by virus sensor proteins including toll-like receptor 3 or retinoic acid-inducible gene I-like receptors (RLRs) in mammalian cells. Activation of these virus sensor proteins induces type-I interferon production and represses viral replication. Recently, we reported that an RLR family member, laboratory of genetics and physiology 2 (LGP2), modulates RNA silencing by interacting with an RNA silencing enhancer, TAR-RNA binding protein (TRBP). However, the biological implications remained unclear. Here, we show that LGP2 enhances apoptosis by upregulating apoptosis regulatory genes during viral infection. Sendai virus (SeV) infection increased LGP2 expression approximately 900 times compared to that in non-virus-infected cells. Then, the induced LGP2 interacted with TRBP, resulting in the inhibition of maturation of the TRBP-bound microRNA (miRNA) and its subsequent RNA silencing activity. Gene expression profiling revealed that apoptosis regulatory genes were upregulated during SeV infection: caspases-2, -8, -3 and -7, four cysteine proteases with key roles in apoptosis, were upregulated directly or indirectly through the repression of a typical TRBP-bound miRNA, miR-106b. Our findings may shed light on the mechanism of apoptosis, induced by the TRBP-bound miRNAs through the interaction of TRBP with LGP2, as an antiviral defense system in mammalian cells.

Role of double-stranded RNA-binding proteins in RNA silencing and antiviral defense

2014 ◽  
pp. 1-16
Author(s):  
Jasleen Singh ◽  
Xiuchun Zhang ◽  
Lucy R. Stewart ◽  
Thomas Mitchell ◽  
Feng Qu
Keyword(s):  
Rna Silencing ◽  
Binding Proteins ◽  
Rna Binding ◽  
Rna Binding Proteins ◽  
Antiviral Defense ◽  
Double Stranded Rna

PlncRNADB: A Repository of Plant lncRNAs and lncRNA-RBP Protein Interactions

2019 ◽  
Vol 14 (7) ◽  
pp. 621-627 ◽  
Author(s):  
Youhuang Bai ◽  
Xiaozhuan Dai ◽  
Tiantian Ye ◽  
Peijing Zhang ◽  
Xu Yan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Protein Interactions ◽  
Binding Proteins ◽  
Rna Binding ◽  
Rna Binding Proteins ◽  
Populus Trichocarpa ◽  
Noncoding Rnas ◽  
Reference Database ◽  
Protein Coding ◽  
Arabidopsis Lyrata ◽  
User Friendly

Background: Long noncoding RNAs (lncRNAs) are endogenous noncoding RNAs, arbitrarily longer than 200 nucleotides, that play critical roles in diverse biological processes. LncRNAs exist in different genomes ranging from animals to plants. Objective: PlncRNADB is a searchable database of lncRNA sequences and annotation in plants. Methods: We built a pipeline for lncRNA prediction in plants, providing a convenient utility for users to quickly distinguish potential noncoding RNAs from protein-coding transcripts. Results: More than five thousand lncRNAs are collected from four plant species (Arabidopsis thaliana, Arabidopsis lyrata, Populus trichocarpa and Zea mays) in PlncRNADB. Moreover, our database provides the relationship between lncRNAs and various RNA-binding proteins (RBPs), which can be displayed through a user-friendly web interface. Conclusion: PlncRNADB can serve as a reference database to investigate the lncRNAs and their interaction with RNA-binding proteins in plants. The PlncRNADB is freely available at http://bis.zju.edu.cn/PlncRNADB/.

scholarly journals Compendium of Methods to Uncover RNA-Protein Interactions In Vivo

2021 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. 22
Author(s):  
Mrinmoyee Majumder ◽  
Viswanathan Palanisamy
Keyword(s):  
Gene Expression ◽  
Protein Interactions ◽  
Rna Binding ◽  
Rna Binding Proteins ◽  
Expression Patterns ◽  
Control Of Gene Expression ◽  
Regulatory Pathways ◽  
Advantages And Disadvantages ◽  
Protein Nucleic Acid

Control of gene expression is critical in shaping the pro-and eukaryotic organisms’ genotype and phenotype. The gene expression regulatory pathways solely rely on protein–protein and protein–nucleic acid interactions, which determine the fate of the nucleic acids. RNA–protein interactions play a significant role in co- and post-transcriptional regulation to control gene expression. RNA-binding proteins (RBPs) are a diverse group of macromolecules that bind to RNA and play an essential role in RNA biology by regulating pre-mRNA processing, maturation, nuclear transport, stability, and translation. Hence, the studies aimed at investigating RNA–protein interactions are essential to advance our knowledge in gene expression patterns associated with health and disease. Here we discuss the long-established and current technologies that are widely used to study RNA–protein interactions in vivo. We also present the advantages and disadvantages of each method discussed in the review.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document