scholarly journals Impact of HLA Mismatching on Early Subclinical Inflammation in Low-Immunological-Risk Kidney Transplant Recipients

2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (9) ◽  
pp. 1934
Author(s):  
Domingo Hernández ◽  
Teresa Vázquez ◽  
Juana Alonso-Titos ◽  
Myriam León ◽  
Abelardo Caballero ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factor ◽  
Kidney Transplant ◽  
Graft Function ◽  
Human Leukocyte ◽  
Subclinical Inflammation ◽  
Kidney Transplant Recipients ◽  
Protocol Biopsy ◽  
Recipient Age ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Hla Mismatches

The impact of human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-mismatching on the early appearance of subclinical inflammation (SCI) in low-immunological-risk kidney transplant (KT) recipients is undetermined. We aimed to assess whether HLA-mismatching (A-B-C-DR-DQ) is a risk factor for early SCI. As part of a clinical trial (Clinicaltrials.gov, number NCT02284464), a total of 105 low-immunological-risk KT patients underwent a protocol biopsy on the third month post-KT. As a result, 54 presented SCI, showing a greater number of total HLA-mismatches (p = 0.008) and worse allograft function compared with the no inflammation group (48.5 ± 13.6 vs. 60 ± 23.4 mL/min; p = 0.003). Multiple logistic regression showed that the only risk factor associated with SCI was the total HLA-mismatch score (OR 1.32, 95%CI 1.06–1.64, p = 0.013) or class II HLA mismatching (OR 1.51; 95%CI 1.04–2.19, p = 0.032) after adjusting for confounder variables (recipient age, delayed graft function, transfusion prior KT, and tacrolimus levels). The ROC curve illustrated that the HLA mismatching of six antigens was the optimal value in terms of sensitivity and specificity for predicting the SCI. Finally, a significantly higher proportion of SCI was seen in patients with >6 vs. ≤6 HLA-mismatches (62.3 vs. 37.7%; p = 0.008). HLA compatibility is an independent risk factor associated with early SCI. Thus, transplant physicians should perhaps be more aware of HLA mismatching to reduce these early harmful lesions.

scholarly journals Is delayed graft function associated with ureteral stenosis in the kidney transplant recipient? A case-control study

2019 ◽  
Vol 13 (11) ◽  
Author(s):  
Axel Cayetano-Alcaraz ◽  
Juan Sebastian Rodriguez-Alvarez ◽  
Mario Vilatobá-Chapa ◽  
Josefina Alberú-Gómez ◽  
Bernardo Gabilondo-Pliego ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factor ◽  
Kidney Transplant ◽  
Kidney Transplant Recipient ◽  
Graft Function ◽  
Transplant Recipients ◽  
Kidney Transplant Recipients ◽  
Transplant Patients ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
Kidney Transplant Patients ◽  
Control Study

Introduction: Ureteral stricture (US) in the kidney transplant recipient is a rare complication that can lead to morbidity and graft loss. Risk factor recognition is crucial in the prevention and management of this entity. Delayed graft function (DGF), as defined by the need for dialysis in the first week after transplantation, has been proposed as a risk factor in previous studies. Our objective is to determine the impact of DGF in US development in kidney transplant patients. Methods: We designed a matched case-control study. US cases in kidney transplant recipients were identified in the 2008–2017 period. We defined US as the rise in serum creatinine associated with findings suggesting obstruction in ultrasound, scintigraphy, or retrograde pyelogram; any other cause of graft dysfunction was excluded. Controls were defined as kidney transplant recipients from the same population and period without US, matched in a 1:2 fashion by age, sex, and donor type. Results: From 532 kidney transplant patients, 31 cases and 62 controls were included. Cumulative US incidence was 58 per 1000 cases. When calculating for odds ratio (OR), post-operative urinoma (OR 3.2; 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.36–4.37) and ureteral duplication (OR 3.29; 95% CI 2.40–4.51) were associated with an increased risk for US, while DGF was not found to be statistically significant as a risk factor (OR 3.3; 95% CI 0.96–11.52). No statistically significant differences were found between groups in other pre- and post-transplant-related factors. Conclusions: DGF was not associated with US in our cohort; however, ureteral duplication and postoperative urinoma were associated with an increased risk of graft ureteral stenosis development.

scholarly journals Impact of Acute Rejection on Kidney Allograft Outcomes in Recipients on Rapid Steroid Withdrawal

2011 ◽  
Vol 2011 ◽  
pp. 1-8 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. L. Heilman ◽  
S. Nijim ◽  
H. A. Chakkera ◽  
Y. Devarapalli ◽  
A. A. Moss ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Acute Rejection ◽  
Kidney Transplant ◽  
Graft Survival ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Steroid Withdrawal ◽  
Transplant Recipients ◽  
Kidney Transplant Recipients ◽  
Protocol Biopsy ◽  
And Control ◽  
The Impact

Background. Our aim was to study the impact of clinical acute rejection (CR) and subclinical rejection (SR) on outcomes in kidney transplant recipients treated with rapid steroid withdrawal (RSW).Methods. All patients who received a living or deceased donor kidney transplant and were treated with RSW were included. The primary outcome was death-censored graft survival. Biopsies with Banff borderline changes were included with the rejection groups.Results. 457 kidney transplant recipients treated with RSW were included; 46 (10%) experienced SR, and 36 (7.8%) had CR. Mean HLA mismatch was significantly higher in the CR group. The Banff grade of rejection was higher in the CR group. There was a larger proportion of patients in both rejection groups with the combination of IFTA and persistent inflammation on the follow-up protocol biopsy done at 1 year. The estimated 5-year death-censored graft survival was 81% in SR, 78% in CR, and 97% in the control group (P<.0001). Significant differences were observed in allograft survival between the CR and control group (HR 9.06, 95% CI 3.39–24.2) and between the SR and control group (HR 4.22, 95% CI 1.30–13.7).Conclusion. Both SR and CR are associated with an inferior graft survival in recipients on RSW.

scholarly journals The Protective Role of Protocol Biopsy for Allograft Kidney Maintenance in Kidney Transplantation

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Okjoo Lee ◽  
Kyo Won Lee ◽  
Jae Berm Park ◽  
Jung Eun Lee ◽  
Na Young Hwang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Chronic Kidney Disease ◽  
Kidney Disease ◽  
Kidney Transplant ◽  
Graft Survival ◽  
Graft Function ◽  
Protective Role ◽  
Transplant Recipients ◽  
Kidney Transplant Recipients ◽  
Protocol Biopsy ◽  
Kidney Disease Progression

Abstract Many studies have reported that protocol biopsy (PB) may help preserve kidney function in kidney transplant recipients. Early detection and treatment of subclinical rejection may reduce the incidence of chronic allograft nephropathy and graft failure. However, no consensus has been reached regarding PB effectiveness, timing, and policy. This study aimed to evaluate the protective role of routine PB performed 2 weeks and 1 year after kidney transplantation. We reviewed 854 kidney transplant recipients at the Samsung Medical Center between July 2007 and August 2017, with PBs planned at 2 weeks and 1 year after transplantation. We compared the trends in graft function, chronic kidney disease progression, new-onset chronic kidney disease, infection, and patient and graft survival between the 504 patients who underwent PB and 350 who did not undergo PB. The PB group was again divided into two groups: the single PB group (n = 207) and the double PB group (n = 297). In the PB group, the donors and recipients were significantly older and there was a greater presence of recipient diabetes mellitus and donor hypertension, donor-specific antigen, and a higher proportion of ABO-incompatible kidney transplantations. The PB group was significantly different from the no-PB group in terms of the trends in graft function (estimated glomerular filtration rate). The Kaplan-Meier curve showed that PB did not significantly improve graft survival or overall patient survival. However, in the multivariate Cox analysis, the double PB group had advantages in graft survival, chronic kidney disease progression, and new-onset chronic kidney disease. PB can play a protective role in the maintenance of kidney grafts in kidney transplant recipients.

scholarly journals Impact of tacrolimus versus cyclosporine on one-year renal transplant outcomes: A single-centre retrospective cohort study

2020 ◽  
Vol 29 (4) ◽  
pp. 217-222
Author(s):  
Pei Wen Ong ◽  
Terence Kee ◽  
Quan Yao Ho
Keyword(s):  
Kidney Transplant ◽  
Opportunistic Infections ◽  
Local Population ◽  
Graft Function ◽  
Single Centre ◽  
Post Transplant ◽  
Transplant Outcomes ◽  
One Year ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Hla Mismatches

Background: Calcineurin inhibitors are the cornerstone of maintenance immunosuppression after kidney transplant. While studies on predominantly Caucasian populations recommend tacrolimus over cyclosporine, the effects on Singapore’s local population remain unclear. Objectives: This study aimed to compare the impact of tacrolimus against cyclosporine on post-transplant outcomes in our local kidney transplant population. Methods: A single-centre retrospective chart review was conducted on ABO- and human leucocyte antigen (HLA)-compatible kidney transplantations between 1 January 2011 and 15 August 2018. Patients who received basiliximab induction, prednisolone, mycophenolate and either tacrolimus or cyclosporine were included and followed up for at least one year. Recipients of transplantations at other institutions or other immunosuppressive regimens were excluded. Patient and graft outcomes and adverse effects were collected. Results: Overall, 120 patients on tacrolimus and 49 on cyclosporine were included. Patients on tacrolimus were older. This group had more deceased donor transplants, a higher proportion with donor-specific antibodies (DSAs) present and more HLA mismatches. There were no differences in patient and graft survival, graft function and acute rejections at one year, despite adjusting for age, transplant type, presence of DSAs and total HLA mismatches. The tacrolimus group had more infectious admissions (odds ratio=0.27, 95% confidence interval 0.098–0.73, p=0.01) after adjusting for age, transplant type, HLA mismatches, presence of DSAs and acute rejections, with increased severity and more opportunistic infections. More patients on cyclosporine required a change to alternative immunosuppressants (p=0.003). Conclusion: Our study demonstrated comparable short-term post-transplant outcomes between cyclosporine and tacrolimus. Tacrolimus appears more tolerable but may be associated with infection risks.

scholarly journals Management of Immunosuppression in Kidney Transplant Recipients Who Develop Malignancy

2019 ◽  
Vol 8 (12) ◽  
pp. 2189 ◽  
Author(s):  
Danwen Yang ◽  
Natanong Thamcharoen ◽  
Francesca Cardarelli
Keyword(s):  
Kidney Transplant ◽  
Graft Survival ◽  
Graft Function ◽  
Calcineurin Inhibitors ◽  
Transplant Recipients ◽  
Kidney Transplant Recipients ◽  
Mortality And Morbidity ◽  
Transplant Patients ◽  
Risk Of Cancer ◽  
The Impact

The risk of cancer increases after transplantation. However, the consensus on immunosuppression (IS) adjustment after diagnosis of malignancy is lacking. Our study aims to assess the impact of IS adjustment on mortality of post-kidney transplant patients and allograft outcomes. We retrospectively reviewed the data in our center of 110 subjects. Our results showed IS dose adjustment was not statistically associated with mortality risk (HR 1.94, 95%CI 0.85–4.41, p = 0.12), and chemotherapy was the only factor that was significantly related to mortality (HR 2.3, 95%CI 1.21–4.35, p = 0.01). IS reduction was not statistically associated with worsening graft function (OR 3.8, 95%CI 0.77–18.71, p = 0.10), nor with graft survival (SHR 4.46, 95%CI 0.58–34.48, p = 0.15) after variables adjustment. Creatinine at cancer diagnosis and history of rejection were both negatively associated with graft survival (SHR 1.72, 95%CI 1.28–2.30, p < 0.01 and SHR 3.44, 95%CI 1.25–9.49, p = 0.02). Reduction of both mycophenolate and calcineurin inhibitors was associated with worsening graft function and lower graft survival in subgroup analysis (OR 6.14, 95%CI 1.14–33.15, p = 0.04; HR 17.97, 95%CI 1.81–178.78, p = 0.01). In summary, cancer causes high mortality and morbidity in kidney transplant recipients; the importance of cancer screening should be emphasized.

scholarly journals Immunosuppression minimization in kidney transplant recipients hospitalized for COVID-19

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paula Anton Pampols ◽  
Hernando Trujillo ◽  
Edoardo Melilli ◽  
Blanca Urban ◽  
Justo Sandino ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Kidney Transplant ◽  
De Novo ◽  
Graft Function ◽  
Immunosuppressive Agent ◽  
Immunosuppressive Drugs ◽  
Transplant Recipients ◽  
Kidney Transplant Recipients ◽  
Immunosuppressed Patients ◽  
The Impact

Abstract Background Immunosuppressed patients such as kidney transplant recipients (KTs) have increased mortality risk in the setting of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). The role and management of chronic immunosuppressive therapies during COVID-19 must be characterized. Methods Herein, we report the follow-up of a cohort of 47 KTs admitted at two Spanish Kidney Transplant Units, who survived COVID-19. The impact of the management of immunosuppression during COVID-19 on graft function and immunologic events was evaluated. Results At least one immunosuppressive agent was withdrawn in 83% of patients, with antimetabolites being the most frequent. Steroids were generally not stopped and the dose was even increased in 15% of patients as part of the treatment of COVID-19. Although immunosuppressive drugs were suspended during a median time of 17 days, no rejection episodes or de novo donor-specific antibodies were observed up to 3 months after discharge, and no significant changes occurred in calculated panel reactive antibodies. Acute graft dysfunction was common (55%) and the severity was related to tacrolimus trough levels, which were higher in patients receiving antivirals. At the end of follow-up, all patients recovered baseline kidney function. Conclusions Our observational study suggests that immunosuppression in KTs hospitalized due to COVID-19 could be safely minimized.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document