scholarly journals The Efficacy and Safety of Balloon Enteroscopy-Assisted Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiography in Pediatric Patients with Surgically Altered Gastrointestinal Anatomy

2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (17) ◽  
pp. 3936
Author(s):  
Kensuke Yokoyama ◽  
Tomonori Yano ◽  
Atsushi Kanno ◽  
Eriko Ikeda ◽  
Kozue Ando ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Success Rate ◽  
Pediatric Patients ◽  
Clinical Success ◽  
Clinical Success Rate ◽  
Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiography ◽  
Adult Patients ◽  
Efficacy And Safety ◽  
Duodenal Papilla ◽  
Endoscopic Retrograde ◽  
Balloon Enteroscopy

Balloon enteroscopy-assisted endoscopic retrograde cholangiography (BEA-ERC) is useful and feasible in adults with pancreatobiliary diseases, but its efficacy and safety have not been established in pediatric patients. We compared the success rate and safety of BEA-ERC between adults and pediatric patients. This single-center retrospective study reviewed 348 patients (pediatric: 57, adult: 291) with surgically altered gastrointestinal anatomies who underwent BEA-ERC for biliary disorders from January 2007 to December 2019. The success rate of reaching the anastomosis or duodenal papilla was significantly lower in pediatric patients than in adult patients (66.7% vs. 88.0%, p < 0.01). The clinical success rate was also significantly lower in pediatric patients (64.9% vs. 80.4%, p = 0.014). The rate of adverse events was significantly higher in pediatric patients than in adults (14.2% vs. 7.7%, p = 0.037). However, if the anastomotic sites were reached in pediatric patients, the treatment was highly successful (97.3%). The time of reaching target site was significantly longer in pediatric patients than in adult patients. This study shows that BEA-ERC in pediatric patients is more difficult than that in adult patients. However, in patients where the balloon enteroscope was advanced to the anastomosis, clinical outcomes comparable to those in adults can be achieved.

scholarly journals Initial experience with a homemade “hybrid-tome” for needle-knife precut in patients with difficult biliary cannulation

2021 ◽  
Vol 09 (11) ◽  
pp. E1611-E1616
Author(s):  
Emilio J. De la Morena Madrigal ◽  
Isabel Rodríguez García ◽  
Ana Belén Galera Ródenas ◽  
Elena Pérez Arellano
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Success ◽  
Clinical Success Rate ◽  
Objective Data ◽  
Efficacy And Safety ◽  
Duodenal Papilla ◽  
Technical Success ◽  
Biliary Cannulation ◽  
Improve Compliance ◽  
Difficult Biliary Cannulation ◽  
Needle Knife

Abstract Background and study aims Current clinical guidelines recommend needle-knife precut (NKP) as the primary and best method for performing a biliary cannulation (BC) when simple techniques fail and the criteria are met for difficult BC (DBC). However, many endoscopists avoid or defer early NKP in favor of alternative, simpler techniques that have not been shown to be either safer or more effective. Our goal is to test a device that provides the needle-knife papillotome (NKPT) with traction capability and which can facilitate the learning and execution of NKP. Patients and methods This was a descriptive bicentric observational study of a personal cohort of patients undergoing early NKP to analyse the efficacy and safety of the technique with a “hybrid-tome” (HT) built using the isolated core of a NKPT and a conventional canulotome. Results Over a 4-year period, we performed 43 NKPs with the HT, achieving BC in one or two steps in all cases. The 100 % technical success was matched by a 95 % clinical success rate. We recorded 11 adverse events (23 %): five hemorrhages, four pancreatitis, and two cholangitis. In addition to the objective data, we confirmed that HT facilitates alignment with the duodenal papilla and the execution of pre-cutting, especially if the papilla is intradiverticular or hidden by folds. Conclusions The HT tested seems to help trained endoscopists to perform NKP, especially in some anatomic situations, which can improve compliance with the guidelines recommended for early NKP in patients with DBC.

scholarly journals The Efficacy and Safety of Doripenem in the Treatment of Acute Bacterial Infections—A Systemic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

2019 ◽  
Vol 8 (7) ◽  
pp. 958 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chih-Cheng Lai ◽  
I-Ling Cheng ◽  
Yu-Hung Chen ◽  
Hung-Jen Tang
Keyword(s):  
Adverse Events ◽  
Success Rate ◽  
Bacterial Infections ◽  
Eradication Rate ◽  
Clinical Success ◽  
Clinical Success Rate ◽  
Controlled Trials ◽  
Efficacy And Safety ◽  
Randomized Controlled ◽  
Acute Bacterial Infections

This study aims to assess the efficacy and safety of doripenem on treating patients with acute bacterial infections. The Pubmed, Embase, and Cochrane databases were searched up to April 2019. Only randomized clinical trials comparing doripenem and other comparators for the treatment of acute bacterial infection were included. The primary outcome was the clinical success rate and the secondary outcomes were microbiological eradication rate and risk of adverse events. Eight randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were included. Overall, doripenem had a similar clinical success rate with comparators (odds ratio [OR], 1.15; 95% CI, 0.79–1.66, I2 = 58%). Similar clinical success rates were noted between doripenem and comparators for pneumonia (OR, 0.84; 95% CI, 0.46–1.53, I2 = 72%) and for intra-abdominal infections (OR, 1.00; 95% CI, 0.57–1.72). For complicated urinary tract infection, doripenem was associated with higher success rate than comparators (OR, 1.89, 95% CI, 1.13–3.17, I2 = 0%). The pool analysis comparing doripenem and other carbapenems showed no significant differences between each other (OR, 0.96, 95% CI, 0.59–1.58, I2 = 63%). Doripenem also had a similar microbiological eradication rate with comparators (OR, 1.08; 95% CI, 0.86–1.36, I2 = 0%). Finally, doripenem had a similar risk of treatment-emergent adverse events as comparators (OR, 0.98; 95% CI, 0.83–1.17, I2 = 33%). In conclusion, the clinical efficacy of doripenem is as high as that of the comparator drugs in the treatment of acute bacterial infection; furthermore, this antibiotic is as well tolerated as the comparators.

scholarly journals Novel beta-lactam/beta-lactamase inhibitors plus metronidazole versus carbapenem for complicated intra-abdominal infections: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Haoyue Che ◽  
Jin Wang ◽  
Rui Wang ◽  
Yun Cai
Keyword(s):  
Randomized Controlled Trials ◽  
Success Rate ◽  
Clinical Success ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Clinical Success Rate ◽  
Cochrane Library ◽  
Controlled Trials ◽  
Efficacy And Safety ◽  
Randomized Controlled ◽  
Abdominal Infections

Abstract Background Complicated intra-abdominal infections (cIAIs) remain a leading cause of death in surgical wards, in which antibiotic treatment is crucial. We aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of novel β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitors (BL/BLIs) in combination with metronidazole and carbapenems in the treatment of cIAIs. Methods A comprehensive search of the randomized controlled trials (RCTs) was performed using databases of Medline, Embase and Cochrane Library, which compared the efficacy and safety of novel BL/BLIs and carbapenems for the treatment of cIAIs. Results Six RCTs consisting of 2,254 patients were included. The meta-analysis showed that novel BL/BLIs in combination with metronidazole had a lower clinical success rate (RD, -0.05; 95%CI, [-0.07, -0.02]; I2= 0%), and lower microbiological success rate (RD, -0.04; 95%CI, [-0.08, -0.00]; I2= 0%). No difference was found between two groups in the incidence of AEs (RD, 0.02; 95%CI, [-0.01, 0.06]; I2= 0%), serious adverse events (SAEs) (RD, 0.01; 95%CI, [-0.02, 0.03]; I2= 0%) and mortality (RD, 0.01; 95%CI, [-0.00, 0.02]). However, ceftazidime/avibactam had a higher risk of vomiting (RD, 0.03; 95% CI, [0.01, 0.05]; I2= 47%), and ceftolozane/tazobactam subgroup showed a higher incidence of SAEs (RD, 0.12; 95% CI, [0.01, 0.03]). Conclusions The efficacy of novel BL/BLIs in combination with metronidazole was not as good as carbapenems. Although no significant differences were found with respect to overall AEs, SAEs and mortality, the novel BL/BLIs has a higher risk of vomiting. Clinical application of new anti-infective combination still needs to be cautious. Trial registration PROSPERO ID: 42020166061

Clinical effectiveness of high dose versus standard dose of meropenem in ventilator-associated pneumonia caused by multidrug-resistant bacteria: a randomized single-blind clinical trial

2020 ◽  
Vol 20 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mahila Monajati ◽  
Shahram Ala ◽  
Masoud Aliyali ◽  
Roya Ghasemian ◽  
Fatemeh Heidari ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Success Rate ◽  
Sofa Score ◽  
Dose Group ◽  
Clinical Success ◽  
Standard Dose ◽  
Clinical Success Rate ◽  
High Dose Group ◽  
Resistant Bacteria ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Ventilator Associated Pneumonia

Background: Meropenem standard doses are based on the minimum inhibitory concentration of sensitive pathogens and the pharmacokinetic parameter of not critically ill patients. We compared the efficacy of high versus standard dose of meropenem in ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP). Methods: 24 out of 34 eligible patients were randomized to receive meropenem 3 g q8h (high dose group, 11 patients) or 2 g q8h (standard dose group, 13 patients) as a 3h infusion. Primary outcome was considered as clinical success that was defined as stable hemodynamic, improved sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA) score, stable or improved PaO2/FiO2 after 7 days. A sputum culture was taken before intervention. Results: Clinical success rate was not significantly different between the high and standard dose group (54.5% vs. 38.5%, P= 0.431). There was a significant difference in reduction of clinical pulmonary infection score (CPIS) compared to high dose with standard group (P=0.038). SOFA score declined significantly in high dose group through the study (P=0.006). A shorter duration of VAP treatment was recorded in high dose group (P=0.061). We did not observe any significant adverse event related to meropenem. Acinetobacter spp. (34.8%), Klebsiella spp. (32.6%) and, Pseudomonas aeruginosa (19.5%) isolated more frequently from sputum cultures. Conclusion: Treatment with high dose of meropenem seems to be safe. However, it did not provide significantly higher clinical success rate in comparison with the standard dose, but could be considered as an appropriate empirical treatment in patients with severe infection due to reducing in SOFA and CPIS.

Ferric sulfate as pulpotomy agent in primary teeth: twenty month clinical follow-up

2000 ◽  
Vol 24 (4) ◽  
pp. 269-272 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hamijeta Ibricevic ◽  
Qumasha Al-Jame
Keyword(s):  
Success Rate ◽  
Primary Teeth ◽  
Root Resorption ◽  
Clinical Success ◽  
Clinical Success Rate ◽  
Ferric Sulfate ◽  
Primary Molar ◽  
Molar Teeth ◽  
The Moment

Seventy primary molar teeth, carious exposed, symptom free, without any sign of root resorption in children aged from 3 to 6 years (main age 4.3yr) were treated with conventional pulpotomy procedures. Ferric sulfate 15.5% solution (applied for 15 second for 35 teeth) and formocresol solution (five minute procedure of Buckley's formula for next 35 teeth) have been used as pulpotomy agents. In both groups, pulp stumps were covered with zinc-oxide eugenol paste. Permanent restorations were stainless steel crowns. Clinical check up was every three-months and radiographic follow-up time was six and twenty months after treatment. Our results within this period revealed 100% clinical success rate in both groups. Radiographic success rate was in both groups 97.2%, while in 2.8% cases has shown internal root resorption. On the basis of these results, we can recommend ferric sulfate as a pulpotomy agent in primary teeth in substitution for formocresol at the moment.

Comparison of alteplase and urokinase for pharmacomechanical thrombolysis of clotted hemodialysis access

2018 ◽  
Vol 20 (5) ◽  
pp. 501-506 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ru Yu Tan ◽  
Suh Chien Pang ◽  
Swee Ping Teh ◽  
Kian Guan Lee ◽  
Tze Tec Chong ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Success Rate ◽  
Vascular Access ◽  
Clinical Success ◽  
Univariate Analysis ◽  
Clinical Success Rate ◽  
Skin Dose ◽  
Hemodialysis Access ◽  
Procedure Time ◽  
Technical Success Rate ◽  
Tertiary Teaching

Background: Percutaneous pharmacomechanical thrombolysis is increasingly used to salvage thrombosed hemodialysis access. We aim to evaluate the effectiveness of alteplase compared to urokinase in percutaneous pharmacomechanical thrombolysis clotted access. Methods: Records of patients who underwent pharmacomechanical thrombolysis at Interventional Nephrology Suite in a tertiary teaching hospital from 1 January 2016 to 31 December 2016 were reviewed. Technical and clinical success rates, thrombosis-free and cumulative survivals, procedure time, and radiation dose imparted to patients were compared for pharmacomechanical thrombolysis with urokinase versus alteplase. Results: A total of 122 incident patients underwent pharmacothrombolysis (n = 53 for urokinase, n = 69 for alteplase) during the study period. The mean dose of urokinase and alteplase used was 176,897 ± 73,418 units and 3.7 ± 0.8 mg, respectively. Pharmacomechnical thrombolysis using urokinase versus alteplase has similar technical success rate (98.1% vs 97.1%, p = 0.599), clinical success rate (88.7% vs 97.1%, p = 0.068), complication rate (9.4% vs 13.0%, p = 0.373), and primary patency rates at 3 months (57.1% vs 70.1%, p = 0.106). Thrombosis-free survivals of the vascular access were 113.2 (35.3, 196) days versus 122 (84, 239) days (p = 0.168). Cumulative survivals were 239 (116, 320) vs 213 (110.5, 316.5) days (p = 0.801). Procedure time, fluoroscopy time, skin dose, and dose were significantly lower for pharmacomechanical thrombolysis using alteplase compared to urokinase (p = 0.045, p < 0.0001, p = 0.006, p = 0.001, respectively). Stenting was found to be associated with successful dialysis following thrombolysis on univariate analysis (odds ratio: 9.167, 95% confidence interval: 1.391–19.846, p = 0.021), although this was no longer significant in multivariate analysis (p = 0.078). Conclusion: Alteplase is an effective and safe alternative to urokinase for pharmacomechanical thrombolysis of clotted vascular access.

scholarly journals Efficacy and Safety of Fospropofol Disodium for Injection in General Anesthesia Induction for Adult Patients: A Phase 3 Trial

2021 ◽  
Vol 12 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chao-Meng Wu ◽  
Wen-Sheng Zhang ◽  
Jin Liu ◽  
Wei-Yi Zhang ◽  
Bo-Wen Ke
Keyword(s):  
Adverse Events ◽  
General Anesthesia ◽  
Success Rate ◽  
Blood Pressure Reduction ◽  
Intervention Group ◽  
Adult Patients ◽  
Anesthesia Induction ◽  
Efficacy And Safety ◽  
Serious Adverse Events ◽  
Study Drug Administration

Background: Fospropofol disodium for injection (FospropofolFD) is a prodrug that is metabolized into propofol to produce a general anesthesia effect when administered intravenously.Objective: This study aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of FospropofolFD in comparison with propofol medium/long-chain fat emulsion injections (propofol-MCT/LCT) for general anesthesia induction in adult patients undergoing elective surgeries.Setting: Nine academic medical centers in China.Method: This multicenter, randomized, double-blind, double-simulated, controlled, and non-inferiority trial evaluated 540 eligible adult patients randomly assigned (2:1) to the intervention (20 mg/kg FospropofolFD) or control (2 mg/kg propofol-MCT/LCT) groups.Main Outcome Measure: The primary efficacy endpoint was the success rate, defined as a Modified Observer’s Assessment of Alertness/Sedation Scale score of 1 within 5 min after study drug administration. The safety endpoints consisted of adverse events (AEs) related to consciousness, cognitive function, hemodynamic status, liver and kidney function, and blood tests.Results: A total of 347 (96.3%) and 175 (97.2%) patients in the intervention and control groups, respectively, completed the study. The success rate for the primary outcome was 97.7% for both study drugs. The most frequent AEs in the intervention group were abnormal feeling (62.0%), blood pressure reduction (13.5%), and injection site pain (13.3%). No AEs related to consciousness and mental and cognitive functions or serious adverse events were reported.Conclusion: FospropofolFD (20 mg/kg) is not inferior to propofol-MCT/LCT (2 mg/kg) in general anesthesia induction for American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status I-II adult patients undergoing elective surgeries. It is safe and effective for clinical use under anesthesiologist monitoring.Impact on Practice Statement: FospropofolFD can produce a general anesthesia effect and reduce the incidence of pain at the site of injection.

scholarly journals Selective Arterial Embolization of Renal Angiomyolipoma: Efficacy, Tumor Volume Reduction and Complications

2021 ◽  
Vol 73 (5) ◽  
Author(s):  
Walailak Chaiyasoot ◽  
Jirawadee Yodying ◽  
Thanita Limsiri
Keyword(s):  
Success Rate ◽  
Clinical Success ◽  
Three Dimensional ◽  
Clinical Success Rate ◽  
Arterial Embolization ◽  
P Value ◽  
Renal Angiomyolipoma ◽  
Tumor Rupture ◽  
Selective Arterial Embolization ◽  
Density Histogram

Objective: To evaluate the efficacy and complications of selective arterial embolization in renal angiomyolipoma and to identify predictive factors for tumor rupture.Materials and Methods: Overall, 21 patients with 25 renal angiomyolipoma (AML) underwent selective arterial embolization (SAE) between January 2008 and June 2019, comprising 15 cases involving prophylaxis embolization of a tumor >4 cm diameter and 10 involving embolization for a ruptured tumor. Multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) was performed pre- and post-SAE, using the 2D tumor diameter in the ruptured AMLs. Three-dimensional volumetry and density histogram were performed for determining the total tumor volume, fat, and angiomyogenic component reduction in the unruptured AMLs. The predictive factors for tumor rupture, the treatment outcome and complications were analyzed. Results: The clinical success rate was 84% (21/25 cases) and the technical success rate was 96% (24/25 cases). The 3D volume post-SAE within 1-3 months showed a greater decrement of the enhanced angiomyogenic component than the fat component, with median percentages of -62.2% and -18.4%, respectively (p-value = 0.333). Minor complications were post-embolization syndrome (5 case, 20%) and minimal renal infarction (4 cases, 16%). Renal abscesses were the major complications (3 cases, 12%). A factor associated with tumor rupture was the presence of an intra-tumoral aneurysm (p-value < 0.05).Conclusion: SAE is an effective treatment for renal AML with a high technical and clinical success rate and limited complications. Three-dimensional volume measurement and density histogram analysis might be better tools than two-dimensional CT to evaluate post-SAE response, which is crucial for management planning.

Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Drainage and Treatment of Symptomatic Pancreatic Fluid Collection following Acute or Acute-on-Chronic Pancreatitis – A Single Center Case Series

2018 ◽  
Vol 143 (06) ◽  
pp. 577-585
Author(s):  
Dominik Kaczmarek ◽  
Jacob Nattermann ◽  
Christian Strassburg ◽  
Tobias Weismüller
Keyword(s):  
Success Rate ◽  
Endoscopic Ultrasound ◽  
Clinical Success ◽  
Fluid Collection ◽  
Clinical Success Rate ◽  
Long Term Results ◽  
Pancreatic Fluid Collection ◽  
Endoscopic Procedures ◽  
Pancreatic Fluid

Abstracts Introduction Pancreatic fluid collection (PFC) is a common complication of acute pancreatitis. Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided drainage, which is often followed by direct endoscopic necrosectomy (DEN), has become the primary approach to treat PFC, including pancreatic pseudocysts (PP) and walled-off necrosis (WON). We aimed to determine retrospectively the short- and long-term results of patients treated in our endoscopy unit and to identify parameters that are associated with treatment efficacy and outcome. Methods The data of 41 consecutive patients with post-pancreatitic PFC, who underwent endoscopic transmural intervention between 2014 and 2016, were analyzed retrospectively. After an initial EUS-guided puncture, one or more plastic stents were placed and DEN was performed if necrotic tissue remained. Results The mean diameter of the PFC was 74.0 ± 4.8 mm. Of the PFCs, 29.3% were classified as PP and 70.7% as WON. Altogether, 196 transmural endoscopic procedures were performed, including 73 endoscopic necrosectomies in a subgroup of 21 patients (20 WON, 1 PP). Initial technical success was achieved in 97.6% of patients and the short-term clinical success rate was 90.2%. The long-term clinical success rate was 82.9%, since four patients died from septic shock and/or multiple organ failure and three patients developed recurrent PFC some months after the initial discharge from endoscopic treatment. Procedural complications were registered in 9 patients during 10 of 196 endoscopic procedures (5.1%): bleeding (6), cardiorespiratory insufficiency (2), perforation with pneumoperitoneum (1), aspiration with respiratory insufficiency (1), and non-perforating superficial damage of the gastric wall (1). Neither the size of the PFC nor the initial value of C-reactive protein (CRP) or other biochemical markers were correlated with efficacy or outcome of treatment. Only the cumulative number of days with CRP > 50 mg/L significantly correlated with the number of follow-up endoscopic sessions and DEN. Fungal colonization of PFC correlated significantly (p < 0.05) with the risk of mortality (44% vs. 0%), need for intensive care treatment (66.7% vs. 25%), and sepsis (55.6% vs. 12.5%). Conclusions We confirm that EUS-guided drainage followed by DEN in patients with solid necrotic material is an effective and relatively safe therapeutic approach. Prolonged elevation of CRP and fungal colonisation of the PFC are associated with a worse course of the disease.

scholarly journals Long-Term Management of Recurrent Cholecystitis after Initial Conservative Treatment: Endoscopic Transpapillary Gallbladder Stenting

2018 ◽  
Vol 2018 ◽  
pp. 1-7
Author(s):  
Hideki Kamada ◽  
Hideki Kobara ◽  
Naohito Uchida ◽  
Kiyohito Kato ◽  
Takayuki Fujimori ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
High Risk ◽  
Acute Cholecystitis ◽  
Success Rate ◽  
Clinical Success ◽  
Clinical Success Rate ◽  
Technical Success ◽  
Technical Success Rate ◽  
High Risk Patients ◽  
Risk Patients

Background. Endoscopic transpapillary gallbladder stenting (ETGBS) is an effective procedure for treating high-risk patients with acute cholecystitis and severe comorbidities. However, the efficacy of ETGBS for recurrent cholecystitis (RC) remains unclear. This study aimed to explore its efficacy in patients with RC for whom cholecystectomy is contraindicated because of its high surgical risk.Methods. Data on 19 high-risk patients who had undergone ETGBS for RC after initial conservative therapy in our institution between June 2006 and May 2012 were retrospectively examined. The primary outcome was the clinical success rate, which was defined as no recurrences of acute cholecystitis after ETGBS until death or the end of the follow-up period. Secondary outcomes were technical success rate and adverse events (AEs).Results. The clinical success rate of ETGBS was 100%, the technical success rate 94.7%, and AE rate 5%: one patient developed procedure-related mild acute pancreatitis. The clinical courses of all patients were as follows: four died of nonbiliary disease, and the remaining 15 were subsequently treated conservatively. The median duration of follow-up was 14.95 months (range 3–42 months).Conclusions. ETGBS is an effective alternative for managing RC in high-risk patients with severe comorbidities.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document