scholarly journals Effect of Cement Layer Thickness on the Immediate and Long-Term Bond Strength and Residual Stress between Lithium Disilicate Glass-Ceramic and Human Dentin

Materials ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 14 (18) ◽  
pp. 5153
Author(s):  
João Paulo Mendes Tribst ◽  
Alison Flavio Campos dos Santos ◽  
Giuliane da Cruz Santos ◽  
Larissa Sandy da Silva Leite ◽  
Julio Chávez Lozada ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Residual Stress ◽  
Bond Strength ◽  
Layer Thickness ◽  
Lithium Disilicate ◽  
Short Term ◽  
Polymerization Shrinkage ◽  
Cement Layer ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Human Dentin ◽  
Diamond Saw

This study tested whether three different cement layer thicknesses (60, 120 and 180 μm) would provide the same bonding capacity between adhesively luted lithium disilicate and human dentin. Ceramic blocks were cut to 20 blocks with a low-speed diamond saw under cooling water and were then cemented to human flat dentin with an adhesive protocol. The assembly was sectioned into 1 mm2 cross-section beams composed of ceramic/cement/dentin. Cement layer thickness was measured, and three groups were formed. Half of the samples were immediately tested to evaluate the short-term bond strength and the other half were submitted to an aging simulation. The microtensile test was performed in a universal testing machine, and the bond strength (MPa) was calculated. The fractured specimens were examined under stereomicroscopy. Applying the finite element method, the residual stress of polymerization shrinkage according to cement layer thickness was also calculated using first principal stress as analysis criteria. Kruskal–Wallis tests showed that the ‘‘cement layer thickness’’ factor significantly influenced the bond strength results for the aged samples (p = 0.028); however, no statistically significant difference was found between the immediately tested groups (p = 0.569). The higher the cement layer thickness, the higher the residual stress generated at the adhesive interface due to cement polymerization shrinkage. In conclusion, the cement layer thickness does not affect the immediate bond strength in lithium disilicate restorations; however, thinner cement layers are most stable in the short term, showing constant bond strength and lower residual stress.

scholarly journals Effect of Nd:YAG Laser with/without Graphite Coating on Bonding of Lithium Disilicate Glass-Ceramic to Human Dentin

2021 ◽  
Vol 2021 ◽  
pp. 1-7
Author(s):  
Amjad Abu Hasna ◽  
Stephanie Semmelmann ◽  
Fernanda Alves Feitosa ◽  
Danilo De Souza Andrade ◽  
Franklin R Tay ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Bond Strength ◽  
Glass Ceramic ◽  
Nd:Yag Laser ◽  
Testing Machine ◽  
Glass Ceramics ◽  
Lithium Disilicate ◽  
Resin Cement ◽  
Cylindrical Shape ◽  
Universal Testing ◽  
Human Dentin

This study evaluated the effect of different surface treatments on the tensile bond strength between lithium disilicate glass-ceramics, resin cement, and dentin. Fifty truncated cone-shape glass-ceramics were divided into five groups (n = 10): G1, control: 10% hydrofluoric acid (HF); G2, Nd:YAG laser + silane; G3, Sil + Nd:YAG laser; G4, graphite + Nd:YAG laser + Sil; and G5, graphite + Sil + Nd:YAG laser. Fifty human third-molars were cut to cylindrical shape and polished to standardize the bonding surfaces. The glass-ceramic specimens were bonded to dentin with a dual-cured resin cement and stored in distilled water for 24 h at 37ºC. Tensile testing was performed on a universal testing machine (10 Kgf load cell at 1 mm/min) until failure. The bond strength values (mean ± SD) in MPa were G1 (9.4 ± 2.3), G2 (9.7 ± 2.0), G3 (6.7 ± 1.9), G4 (4.6 ± 1.1), and G5 (1.2 ± 0.3). Nd:YAG laser and HF improve the bond strength between lithium disilicate glass-ceramics, resin cement, and dentin. The application of a graphite layer prior to Nd:YAG laser irradiation negatively affects this bonding and presented inferior results.

Bond Strength and Microleakage of Different Designs of Occlusal Veeners

2021 ◽  
Vol 19 (1) ◽  
pp. 62-66
Author(s):  
Mohamed G. Hussein ◽  
Cherif A. Mohsen
Keyword(s):  
Standard Deviation ◽  
Bond Strength ◽  
Fracture Strength ◽  
Lithium Disilicate ◽  
Mean Value ◽  
P Value ◽  
Finish Line ◽  
Nonsignificant Difference ◽  
Diamond Saw ◽  
Line Design

The purpose of this study was to investigate fracture strength of different lithium disilicate occlusal veneers designs with different tooth preparations. Material and method: Fifty-six extracted human mandibular molars were collected with relatively comparable size and standardization done by diamond saw and it will receive. 6mm lithium disilicate occlusal veneers. Specimens will be divided into two main groups, each of these groups contains 28 samples (group A&B), the first group represents occlusal veneers with 1.0 ml with radial shoulder finish line design includes axial surfaces for a2 ml length, while the second group represents occlusal veneers preparation without finish line. Each main group will be subdivided into 2 subtypes groups (A1, A2, B1, B2), each subtype group contains 14 samples, the first subtype group will receive a buccal groove, while the second subgroup will be without grooves. Each subgroup will be divided into 2 classes (7 samples) according to the type of test it will be subjected to: microleakage, bond strength. Results: The fracture strength is (mean value+ standard deviation) in plain occlusal reduction without vs with buccal groove(890.36±42.51N), (865.69±36.79N). The fracture strength is (mean value ± standard deviation) in occlusal reduction with radial shoulder, without or with buccal groove (835.36±42.51N), (820.69±36.79N), with nonsignificant difference p value <0.05. Conclusions: All tested occlusal veneer designs proved to withstand normal and parafunctional masticatory forces with non-significant statistical difference.

scholarly journals Influence of Air Abrasion and Sonic Technique on Microtensile Bond Strength of One-Step Self-Etch Adhesive on Human Dentin

2015 ◽  
Vol 2015 ◽  
pp. 1-6 ◽  
Author(s):  
Baraba Anja ◽  
Dukić Walter ◽  
Chieffi Nicoletta ◽  
Ferrari Marco ◽  
Sonja Pezelj Ribarić ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Bond Strength ◽  
Testing Machine ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Air Abrasion ◽  
Microtensile Bond Strength ◽  
Dentin Surface ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Human Dentin ◽  
One Step ◽  
Self Etch

The purpose of thisin vitrostudy was to evaluate the microtensile bond strength of one-step self-etch adhesive to human dentin surface modified with air abrasion and sonic technique and to assess the morphological characteristics of the pretreated dentin surface. The occlusal enamel was removed to obtain a flat dentin surface for thirty-six human molar teeth. The teeth were randomly divided into three experimental groups (n= 12 per group), according to the pretreatment of the dentin: (1) control group, (2) air abrasion group, and (3) sonic preparation group. Microtensile bond strength test was performed on a universal testing machine. Two specimens from each experimental group were subjected to SEM examination. There was no statistically significant difference in bond strength between the three experimental groups (P> 0.05). Mean microtensile bond strength (MPa) values were 35.3 ± 12.8 for control group, 35.8 ± 13.5 for air abrasion group, and 37.7 ± 12.0 for sonic preparation group. The use of air abrasion and sonic preparation with one-step self-etch adhesive does not appear to enhance or impair microtensile bond strength in dentin.

Effect of Repeated Firings on Microtensile Bond Strength of Bi-layered Lithium Disilicate Ceramics (e.max CAD and e.max Press)

2016 ◽  
Vol 17 (7) ◽  
pp. 530-535 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hamid Jalali ◽  
Zeinab Bahrani ◽  
Somayeh Zeighami
Keyword(s):  
Bond Strength ◽  
Computer Aided Design ◽  
Tensile Load ◽  
Lithium Disilicate ◽  
Firing Cycle ◽  
Microtensile Bond Strength ◽  
The Core ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Computer Aided ◽  
Aided Design

ABSTRACT Aim To achieve acceptable contour, color, esthetics, and occlusal relations, the porcelain may be subjected to several firing cycles. This study sought to assess the effect of multiple firing cycles on the microtensile bond strength (MTBS) of lithium disilicate-based ceramics (e.max Press, e.max CAD). Materials and methods IPS e.max computer aided design (CAD) cores were fabricated using CAD/(Computer Aided Manufacturing (CAM)) technology, and IPS e.max Press cores were fabricated using the heat-pressing technique (12 × 12 × 4 mm3). Cores in each group were divided into three subgroups based on the number of firing cycles (three, five, and seven cycles). After porcelain application, the samples were sectioned into microbars and a total of 20 sound microbars in each group were subjected to tensile load in a microtensile tester at a crosshead speed of 1 mm/minute. Microtensile bond strength of the core to the veneering porcelain was analyzed using one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA). Pairwise comparisons were made using the Tukey's test (p < 0.05). Results In the e.max CAD, the mean MTBS values were 22.07 ± 6.63, 34.68 ± 7.07, and 26.05 ± 10.29 MPa following three, five, and seven firing cycles respectively. These values for the e.max Press were 34.46 ± 9.28, 23.09 ± 5.02, and 31.26 ± 12.25 MPa respectively. There was significant difference in bond strength of e.max CAD (p < 0.003) and e.max Press (p < 0.002) based on the number of firing cycles. Conclusion Increasing the number of porcelain firing cycles decreased the bond strength of the core to the veneering porcelain in both ceramics. Clinical significance It is better to decrease the number of firing cycle as much as possible. How to cite this article Jalali H, Bahrani Z, Zeighami S. Effect of Repeated Firings on Microtensile Bond Strength of Bi-layered Lithium Disilicate Ceramics (e.max CAD and e.max Press). J Contemp Dent Pract 2016;17(7):530-535.

scholarly journals Microshear Bond Strength of Resin Cements to Lithium Disilicate Substrates as a Function of Surface Preparation

2015 ◽  
Vol 40 (5) ◽  
pp. 524-532 ◽  
Author(s):  
DP Lise ◽  
J Perdigão ◽  
A Van Ende ◽  
O Zidan ◽  
GC Lopes
Keyword(s):  
Bond Strength ◽  
Surface Treatment ◽  
Lithium Disilicate ◽  
Resin Cement ◽  
Resin Cements ◽  
Relyx Unicem ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Microshear Bond Strength ◽  
Silane Solution

SUMMARY Objectives To investigate the effect of hydrofluoric acid (HF) etching, silane solution, and adhesive system application on the microshear bond strength (μSBS) of lithium disilicate glass-ceramic (LD) to three resin cements. Materials and Methods Circular bonding areas were delimited on the lithium disilicate surfaces using a perforated adhesive tape. Specimens were assigned to 18 subgroups (n=12) according to surface treatment: NT = no treatment; HF = 4.8% HF for 20 seconds; silane solution: (1) no silane; (2) Monobond Plus, a silane/10-methacryloyloxydecyl dihydrogen phosphate solution for 60 seconds; (3) Monobond Plus+ExciTE F DSC, a dual-cure adhesive; and resin cement: (1) Variolink II, a bisphenol A diglycidyl ether dimethacrylate (bis-GMA)–based, hand-mixed, dual-cure resin cement; (2) Multilink Automix, a bis-GMA–based, auto-mixed, dual-cure resin cement; (3) RelyX Unicem 2, a self-adhesive, auto-mixed, dual-cure resin cement. Tygon tubes (Ø=0.8 mm) were used as cylinder matrices for resin cement application. After 24 hours of water storage, the specimens were submitted to the μSBS test. Mode of failure was evaluated under an optical microscope and classified as adhesive, mixed, cohesive in resin cement, or cohesive in ceramic. Data were statistically analyzed with three-way analysis of variance and Dunnett test (p&lt;0.05). Results When means were pooled for the factor surface treatment, HF resulted in a significantly higher μSBS than did NT (p&lt;0.0001). Regarding the use of a silane solution, the mean μSBS values obtained with Monobond Plus and Monobond Plus+ExciTE F DSC were not significantly different but were higher than those obtained with no silane (p&lt;0.001). Considering the factor resin cement, Variolink II resulted in a significantly higher mean μSBS than did RelyX Unicem 2 (p&lt;0.03). The mean μSBS for Multilink Automix was not significantly different from those of Variolink II and RelyX Unicem 2. According to Dunnett post hoc test (p&lt;0.05), there was no significant difference in μSBS between the different resin cements for HF-etched and silanized (with or without adhesive application) LD surfaces. Conclusion LD may benefit from pretreatment of the inner surface with HF and silanization, regardless of the resin cement used.

scholarly journals Effect of tooth age on bond strength to dentin

2003 ◽  
Vol 11 (4) ◽  
pp. 342-347 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marcelo Giannini ◽  
Patrícia Chaves ◽  
Marcelo Tavares de Oliveira
Keyword(s):  
Bond Strength ◽  
Resin Composite ◽  
Testing Machine ◽  
Age Groups ◽  
In Vitro Study ◽  
Adhesive System ◽  
Tensile Bond Strength ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Diamond Saw

This in vitro study evaluated the effect of tooth age on the tensile bond strength of Prime & Bond NT adhesive system to dentin. Human third molars from the five age groups were analyzed: A- 17 to 20yrs, B- 21 to 30yrs, C- 31 to 40yrs, D- 41 to 50yrs and E- 51 to 63yrs. The occlusal enamel was removed using a diamond saw under water cooling and the dentin surface was wet-ground with 600-grit SiC paper to obtain flat surfaces. The adhesive system was applied according to the manufacturer's instructions and a 6-mm high resin "crown" was built-up with resin composite. Teeth were stored for 24 hours in distilled water at 37ºC and prepared for micro-tensile testing. Each specimen was mounted in a testing jig attached to a universal testing machine and stressed in tension at a crosshead speed of 0.5mm/min until failure. The means of tensile bond strength were (MPa): A- 21.42 ± 7.52ª; B- 30.13 ± 10.19ª; C- 31.69 ± 11.78ª; D- 30.69 ± 8.47ª and E- 35.66 ± 9.54ª. No statistically significant difference was observed among the age groups (p > 0.05). The results suggested that the tensile bond strength of the adhesive system was not significantly affected by dentin aging.

Effect of Silver Diamine Fluoride on Microtensile Bond Strength to Dentin

2012 ◽  
Vol 37 (6) ◽  
pp. 610-616 ◽  
Author(s):  
RL Quock ◽  
JA Barros ◽  
SW Yang ◽  
SA Patel
Keyword(s):  
Bond Strength ◽  
Resin Composite ◽  
Bonding Agent ◽  
Microtensile Bond Strength ◽  
Silver Diamine Fluoride ◽  
Microtensile Testing ◽  
Etch And Rinse ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Diamond Saw ◽  
Self Etch

SUMMARY The aim of this in vitro study was to investigate the effect of the cariostatic and preventive agent silver diamine fluoride (SDF) on the microtensile bond strength of resin composite to dentin. Forty-two caries-free, extracted molars were flattened occlusally and apically using a diamond saw, and the exposed occlusal dentin was polished with a series of silicon carbide papers, all under water irrigation. The teeth were then randomly divided into six groups of seven teeth each that were treated as follows: 1) Peak SE self-etch bonding agent; 2) 12% SDF + Peak SE; 3) 38% SDF + Peak SE; 4) Peak LC etch-and-rinse bonding agent; 5) 12% SDF + Peak LC; and 6) 38% SDF + Peak LC. Four-millimeter buildups of Amelogen Plus were incrementally placed on all teeth; after a 24-hour storage period in distilled water, the specimens were sectioned perpendicular to the adhesive interface to produce beams of cross-sectional surface area measuring approximately 1 mm2. The beams were placed on a microtensile testing machine, which utilized a single-speed pump motor and force gauge at 20 kgf × 0.01 second to record maximum tensile force before failure occurred. Two-way analysis of variance and post hoc Tukey tests were performed to compare the effects of the SDF on microtensile bond strength, with statistical significance set at α = 0.05. None of the experimental groups treated with different concentrations of SDF showed a significant difference in bond strength compared to the control groups, and there was no significant difference in bond strength between self-etch and etch-and-rinse groups. However, the effect of SDF on self-etch bonded teeth compared to etch-and-rinse bonded teeth was statistically significant (p=0.0363), specifically at the 12% concentration. SDF does not adversely affect the bond strength of resin composite to noncarious dentin.

scholarly journals Polymerization Shrinkage of Bulk Fill Composites and its Correlation with Bond Strength

2018 ◽  
Vol 29 (3) ◽  
pp. 261-267 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lauber Jose dos Santos Almeida Junior ◽  
Estevam Carlos de Oliveira Lula ◽  
Karla Janilee de Souza Penha ◽  
Vinicius Souza Correia ◽  
Fernando Augusto Cintra Magalhães ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Bond Strength ◽  
Testing Machine ◽  
Class I ◽  
Third Molars ◽  
Microtensile Bond Strength ◽  
Polymerization Shrinkage ◽  
Universal Testing ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Light Curing ◽  
Factor C

Abstract The present study aimed to evaluates polymerization shrinkage (PS) using microcomputed tomography (μCT) and microtensile bond strength (μTBS) in bulk fill composites (BFC) and conventional class I restorations as well as the correlation between these factors. Class I cavities (4 x 5 x 4 mm), factor-C = 4.2, were created in third molars that were free of caries, which were randomly divided in 4 groups (n = 6): XTI (Filtek Supreme XTE: incremental technique); XTB (Filtek Supreme XTE: single fill technique); TBF (Tetric Bulk Fill); and SF (SonicFill). Each tooth was scanned twice in μCT: T0 was after filling the cavity with composite, and T1 was after light curing. The data were analyzed by subtracting the composite volume for each time (T1 - T0). After 1 week, the teeth were sectioned crosswise in the buccolingual and mesiodistal directions to obtain specimens with approximately 1 mm² thickness and fixed in a universal testing machine to perform μTBS. The Kruskal-Wallis and Dunn tests showed a statistically significant difference for shrinkage in µCT among the XTI and XTB and between the SF and XTB. Regarding the μTBS, all the groups differed from XTB. Bulk fill composites type presents a PS similar to that of the conventional nanoparticulate composite inserted using the incremental technique, but the bond strength was higher for the incremental group, which presented a lower number of pre-test failures when compared to BFC. No correlation was observed between the polymerization shrinkage and bond strength in the studied composites.

scholarly journals Bond Capability of Universal Adhesive Systems to Dentin in Self-etch Mode after Short-term Storage and Cyclic Loading

2017 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
pp. 276-283 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniele Morosini Costa ◽  
Deise Caren Somacal ◽  
Gilberto Antonio Borges ◽  
Ana Maria Spohr
Keyword(s):  
Cyclic Loading ◽  
Bond Strength ◽  
Testing Machine ◽  
Tensile Bond Strength ◽  
Short Term ◽  
Universal Adhesive ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Self Etch ◽  
Term Storage

Objective: The aim was to evaluate, in vitro, the tensile bond strength to dentin of Scotchbond Universal (SU), All-Bond Universal (AU) and One Coat 7 Universal (OC7) adhesives applied in self-etch mode, after 24 h of storage and after 500,000 loading cycles, using Clearfil SE Bond (SE) as a control. Materials and Methods: The adhesives were applied on the dentin of bovine teeth, followed by the application of a composite resin. Thirty specimens were obtained for each adhesive. Half of the specimens were submitted to cyclic loading for 500,000 cycles. All specimens were submitted to a tensile bond strength test in a universal testing machine at a crosshead speed of 0.5 mm/minute. Results: According to two-way ANOVA and Tukey’s test (α=5%), the interaction between the adhesive and cyclic loading factors was significant (p=0.001). The means followed by the same letter represent no significant difference in the bond strength (MPa) after 24 h: OC7=7.86A (±2.90), SU=6.78AB (±2.03), AU=5.61BC (±2.32), and SE=3.53C (±1.89). After cyclic loading, SE, SU and AU maintained bond strength comparable to 24 h period. There was a significant decrease only for OC7. Conclusion: SU, AU and OC7 had bond strength to dentin comparable to that of SE. Only OC7 had decreased bond strength to dentin after cyclic loading.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document