scholarly journals Development and validation of a notational system to study the offensive process in football

Medicina ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 46 (6) ◽  
pp. 401 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hugo Sarmento ◽  
Teresa Anguera ◽  
Jorge Campaniço ◽  
José Leitão
Keyword(s):  
Ad Hoc ◽  
Intraobserver Agreement ◽  
Content Validation ◽  
Striking Change ◽  
Development And Validation ◽  
Notational System ◽  
Sophisticated Technology

The most striking change within football development is the application of science to its problems and in particular the use of increasingly sophisticated technology that, supported by scientifi c data, allows us to establish a “code of reading” the reality of the game. Therefore, this study describes the process of the development and validation of an ad hoc system of categorization, which allows the different methods of offensive game in football and the interaction to be analyzed. Therefore, through an exploratory phase of the study, we identified 10 vertebrate criteria and the respective behaviors observed for each of these criteria. We heard a panel of five experts with the purpose of a content validation. The resulting instrument is characterized by a combination of fi eld formats and systems of categories. The reliability of the instrument was calculated by the intraobserver agreement, and values above 0.95 for all criteria were achieved. Two FC Barcelona games were coded and analyzed, which allowed the detection of various Tpatterns. The results show that the instrument serves the purpose for which it was developed and can provide important information for the understanding of game interaction in football.

scholarly journals Development and Validation of the Psychotherapeutic Effectiveness Attribution Questionnaire (PEAQ-12) in a Spanish Population

2021 ◽  
Vol 18 (19) ◽  
pp. 10372
Author(s):  
Antonio Romero-Moreno ◽  
Alberto Paramio ◽  
Serafín J. Cruces-Montes ◽  
Antonio Zayas ◽  
Diego Gómez-Carmona ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Principal Component ◽  
Fit Indices ◽  
Content Validation ◽  
Theoretical Orientations ◽  
Confirmatory Factor ◽  
Attribution Questionnaire ◽  
Patient’S Perception ◽  
Development And Validation ◽  
Number Of Individuals ◽  
Initial Process

In recent decades, the study of psychotherapy effectiveness has been one of the pillars of clinical research because of its implication for therapeutic cure. However, although many studies have focused their interest on the patient’s perception, there are no instruments oriented to the study of psychotherapists’ attributions of effectiveness: to what factors psychotherapists attribute responsibility for the cure of the therapies they provide. The present study aimed to develop and validate an instrument for assessing the attribution of the effectiveness of psychotherapy in a population of 69 psychotherapists of different theoretical orientations. After an initial process of inter-judge content validation, 12 items were selected for validation in the targeted population, adequately fulfilling the quality requirements in the validity–reliability tests, and grouped into four factors after principal component analysis. These factors were as follows: (1) therapeutic alliance enhancers; (2) psychotherapist emotional characteristics; (3) therapy-specific variables; and (4) facilitators of patient engagement with therapy. This four-factor structure also showed a good fit for the fit indices checked in confirmatory factor analysis. In summary, we can conclude that the Psychotherapeutic Effectiveness Attribution Questionnaire (PEAQ-12) developed in our research can be helpful if tested on a larger number of individuals. The results can be replicated in other populations of psychotherapists.

scholarly journals Development and validation of an instrument for evaluating the ludicity of games in health education

2015 ◽  
Vol 49 (6) ◽  
pp. 978-987 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maria Raquel Gomes Maia Pires ◽  
Leila Bernarda Donato Göttems ◽  
Laianna Victoria Santiago Silva ◽  
Paloma Aparecida Carvalho ◽  
Gislane Ferreira de Melo ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Content Analysis ◽  
Graduate Students ◽  
Health Education ◽  
Kappa Coefficient ◽  
Content Validation ◽  
Validity Index ◽  
Descriptive Research ◽  
Two Stages ◽  
Development And Validation

Abstract OBJECTIVE Developing and validating an instrument to evaluate the playfulness of games in health education contexts. METHODOLOGY A methodological, exploratory and descriptive research, developed in two stages: 1. Application of an open questionnaire to 50 graduate students, with content analysis of the answers and calculation of Kappa coefficient for defining items; 2. Procedures for construction of scales, with content validation by judges and analysis of the consensus estimate byContent Validity Index(CVI). RESULTS 53 items regarding the restless character of the games in the dimensions of playfulness, the formative components of learning and the profiles of the players. CONCLUSION Ludicity can be assessed by validated items related to the degree of involvement, immersion and reinvention of the subjects in the game along with the dynamics and playability of the game.

scholarly journals Teaching Digital Competence and Eco-Responsible Use of Technologies: Development and Validation of a Scale

2020 ◽  
Vol 12 (18) ◽  
pp. 7721 ◽  
Author(s):  
Raquel Barragán-Sánchez ◽  
María-Carmen Corujo-Vélez ◽  
Antonio Palacios-Rodríguez ◽  
Pedro Román-Graván
Keyword(s):  
Structural Equation Modeling ◽  
Structural Equation ◽  
Reliability And Validity ◽  
Digital Technologies ◽  
Equation Modeling ◽  
Content Validation ◽  
Digital Competence ◽  
Validation Process ◽  
Modeling Techniques ◽  
Development And Validation

The environmental impact produced by digital technologies is one of the fundamental contents to be developed by teachers of the 21st century. Different investigations raise the need to redesign education towards sustainable models and promote a critical look at digital technologies. The main objective of this manuscript is to design a valid, reliable and useful scale to measure self-perceived teacher digital competence regarding the eco-responsible use of technologies. The instrument has been designed based on a detailed analysis of the main frameworks for the development of digital competence in Europe: INTEF and DigCompEdu. A content validation process has been followed through the expert judgment method. Subsequently, its reliability and validity are estimated using structural equation modeling techniques. The results obtained guarantee the reliability and validity of the model. Therefore, the need to establish environmental teacher training plans and more awareness about the eco-responsible use of technologies is established.

Advertising appeals and Malaysian culture norms

2018 ◽  
Vol 28 (1) ◽  
pp. 61-82 ◽  
Author(s):  
Syed Hassan Raza ◽  
Hassan Abu Bakar ◽  
Bahtiar Mohamad
Keyword(s):  
Cultural Context ◽  
Strategic Communication ◽  
Cultural Dimensions ◽  
Content Validation ◽  
Measurement Instruments ◽  
Advertising Appeals ◽  
Expert Rating ◽  
Validation Procedure ◽  
Development And Validation ◽  
The Impact

Abstract The ongoing development of the strategic communication research in the area of the advertising calls for the development and validation of the measurement instruments that can address the indulgence of the advertising appeals in a specific cultural context. Therefore, the present study examines and validate advertising appeals by considering the norms based on the GLOBE nine cultural dimensions in Malaysian context. The analysis involved data from 10 advertising expert for content validation, followed by 10 advertising expert rating and ranking of the scale of its relevance and clarity to assess the item-level content validation. The results provided to support the impact of cultural norms are substantial for Malaysian advertising, which are identified from content validation procedure.

scholarly journals Development and Validation of a Well-Being Measure on Young Basketball Players: The NFAPW Scale

2020 ◽  
Vol 17 (21) ◽  
pp. 7987
Author(s):  
Jorge Lorenzo Calvo ◽  
Jorge García-González ◽  
Monica Flo García ◽  
Daniel Mon-López
Keyword(s):  
Ad Hoc ◽  
Technical Skills ◽  
Well Being ◽  
Basketball Players ◽  
Psychological Variables ◽  
Factors Affecting ◽  
Future Studies ◽  
Reliable Instrument ◽  
Development And Validation ◽  
Negative Factors

Basketball is a sport in which, beyond the physical and technical skills, the psychological aspects are a decisive factor and could negatively affect the well-being of the player. The present study analyzes how 11 items belonging to two stakeholders (coach and player) could negatively affect the well-being of the athlete. A sample of elite young basketball players (n = 121) consisting of 55 males and 66 females, ranging in age from 16 to 23 (M = 20.12 ± 1.71), completed the Negative Factors Affecting Players’ Well-being (NFAPW) Questionnaire. This questionnaire was designed ad hoc and demonstrated good psychometric properties that confirmed that it is a valid and reliable instrument to measure how those factors negatively affect their well-being. The results showed that females have a greater perception of the factors that negatively affect their well-being, especially those related to the actions of the coach. However, no differences were found regarding the experience. Although this research provides an initial tool for measuring the well-being of the player during competition, future studies are encouraged to provide guidance to the coaches and players in dealing with the psychological variables in a better way.

scholarly journals Development and Validation of an Online Survey to Assess Perception of Diabetes Risk and Barriers and Facilitators to Weight Loss Following Gestational Diabetes

2021 ◽  
Vol 18 (2) ◽  
pp. 480
Author(s):  
Kristy L. Gray ◽  
Mayya Grebenshchikova ◽  
Sharleen L. O’Reilly ◽  
Lois McKellar ◽  
Peter M. Clifton ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Weight Loss ◽  
Gestational Diabetes ◽  
Theoretical Domains Framework ◽  
Diabetes Risk ◽  
Expert Evaluation ◽  
Content Validation ◽  
Pilot Testing ◽  
Response Options ◽  
Expert Review ◽  
Development And Validation

Our objective was to describe the development and validation of a survey investigating barriers to weight loss, perception of diabetes risk, and views of diet strategies following gestational diabetes (GDM). The survey underwent three stages of development: generation of items, expert evaluation, and pilot testing. A content validation index (CVI) was calculated from expert responses regarding item relevance, coherence, clarity, and response options. Experts also responded to the domain fit of questions linked to the Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF). Pilot responders answered the survey and responded to review questions. Six experts in the field of nutrition, midwifery, psychology, or other health or medical research completed the expert review stage of the survey. In the pilot test, there were 20 responders who were women with previous GDM and who were living in Australia. The overall CVI from the expert review was 0.91. All questions except one received an I-CVI of >0.78 for relevance (n = 35). Fourteen of the 27 items linked to the TDF received an agreement ratio of <1.0. Twenty-seven of the 31 pilot questions were completed by ≥90% of responders. Pilot review questions revealed an agreement percentage of ≥86% (n = 12) regarding the survey’s ease to complete, understand, importance, length, and interest level. The final survey tool consists of 30 items and achieved content validation through expert evaluation and pilot testing.

scholarly journals DEVELOPMENT AND VALIDATION OF A SMARTPHONE EDUCATIONAL GAME REGARDING HEALTHY LIFESTYLE HABITS FOR ADOLESCENTS

2019 ◽  
Vol 28 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thais Norberta Bezerra de Moura ◽  
Thereza Maria Magalhães Moreira ◽  
Alcilene Dalília de Sousa ◽  
Antonino Calisto dos Santos Neto ◽  
Renan Xavier e Sousa ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Healthy Lifestyle ◽  
Scientific Information ◽  
The Other ◽  
Educational Game ◽  
Living Room ◽  
Protective Behaviors ◽  
Content Validation ◽  
Methodological Study ◽  
Lifestyle Habits ◽  
Development And Validation

ABSTRACT Objective: to elaborate and validate the content and appearance of an educational game regarding healthy lifestyle habits for adolescents Method: methodological study carried, in 2016 out in Picos (Brazil). In order to develop the initial version of the game, a survey gathered scientific information and the content. In the end, the game was divided into: home screen and the living room, kitchen and the square scene, where the sports scene was inserted. To validate the instrument, 15 experts were selected, who evaluated the content, didactics and appearance of the game. Ten adolescents evaluated the appearance and usability. In addition, one questionnaire was used for the specialists and another for the adolescents. The Content Validation Index was used to validate the game, which considered the instrument and the items as validated when an index ≥ 0.78 was obtained. Results: the room scene had access to the kitchen and the square. The sport scene was designed for physical activity and the purchase of food, which would be consumed in the kitchen scene. The experts gave the game a Content Validation Index of 0.88 for the item "objectives", 0.87 for "structure and presentation" and 0.99 for "relevance", reaching a overall Content Validation Index of 0.89. For adolescents, the item "appearance" reached the index 0.97 and for the other items, 1.0 and overal index of 0.99. Conclusion: the game was validated in terms of content and appearance and could be validated clinically with adolescents as an incentive to adopt protective behaviors for their health.

Development and Validation of the ECART Code for the Safety Analysis of Nuclear Installations

2006 ◽  
Author(s):  
F. Parozzi ◽  
S. Paci
Keyword(s):  
Ad Hoc ◽  
Severe Accident ◽  
Dust Transport ◽  
Fusion Safety ◽  
Safety Studies ◽  
Combustion Of Gases ◽  
Accident Conditions ◽  
Fire Accidents ◽  
New Applications ◽  
Development And Validation

ECART can simulate the thermal-hydraulic behavior of LWR and GCR plants under severe accident conditions together with the transport of radiotoxic substances. This tool is still under improvement and assessment for new applications in non-nuclear risk studies, new advanced and fusion reactors. As regards accidents with fires within closed environments, specific models can simulate both thermal and chemical processes, accounting for combustion of gases and solids, as well as pool fires. The radiative heat transfer and the action of water sprays on atmosphere cooling and aerosol removal are properly taken into account, as verified by comparing the code predictions to full-scale experiments and to the consequences of fire accidents really occurred. About its application on tokamak fusion plants, a large validation activity is underway, mainly based on the analyses of ad hoc experimental programs or code benchmark promoted inside EURATOM Fusion Technology Programme. The correct simulation of the main phenomena occurring in ICE and STARDUST facilities, as well as the comparison with the results of codes employed in the fusion safety studies, demonstrates the applicability of ECART models in performing a realistic prediction of the whole incidental sequence, accounting both thermal-hydraulics and dust transport also inside fusion plants.

Content Validation Is Useful for Many Things, but Validity Isn't One of Them

2009 ◽  
Vol 2 (4) ◽  
pp. 453-464 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kevin R. Murphy
Keyword(s):  
Predictive Validity ◽  
Test Development ◽  
Empirical Support ◽  
Structural Factors ◽  
Content Validation ◽  
Legal Proceedings ◽  
Positive Correlations ◽  
Development And Validation ◽  
Job Content

Content-oriented validation strategies establish the validity of selection tests as predictors of performance by comparing the content of the tests with the content of the job. These comparisons turn out to have little if any bearing on the predictive validity of selection tests. There is little empirical support for the hypothesis that the match between job content and test content influences validity, and there are often structural factors in selection (e.g., positive correlations among selection tests) that strongly limit the possible influence of test content on validity. Comparisons between test content and job content have important implications for the acceptability of testing, the defensibility of tests in legal proceedings, and the transparency of test development and validation, but these comparisons have little if any bearing on validity.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document