scholarly journals Sustainability Reporting in Cooperatives

Risks ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (6) ◽  
pp. 117
Author(s):  
Gamze Yakar Pritchard ◽  
Kıymet Tunca Çalıyurt
Keyword(s):  
Financial Services ◽  
Large Scale ◽  
Performance Indicator ◽  
Social Performance ◽  
Sustainability Reporting ◽  
Healthcare Services ◽  
Global Reporting Initiative ◽  
Decent Work ◽  
Sustainability Disclosure ◽  
Sustainability Reports

The aim of the present study is to examine the sustainability reports of cooperatives, which may play an important role in achieving the sustainable development goals and help to identify which economic, environmental, and social sustainability indicators cooperatives are currently reporting. For this purpose, a total of 168 sustainability reports were examined for cooperatives that use the Global Reporting Initiative (GRI) G4 reporting, and that are included in the Sustainability Disclosure Database (SDD-GRI). As a result of this study, it was determined that the economic performance indicator disclosure levels of cooperatives that are active in the financial services sector are higher compared with those of cooperatives that are active in other sectors. In addition, it was also observed that the labor practices and decent work sub-category indicator disclosure levels of cooperatives active in the agriculture sector are lower compared to those of cooperatives that are active in the healthcare services and financial services sectors. Another outcome of this study was the finding that the social performance indicator disclosure levels for large-scale cooperatives are greater than those of small- and medium-sized (SME) cooperatives.

The Determinants of Sustainability Reporting of the Portuguese Public Sector Entities

2019 ◽  
pp. 653-678
Author(s):  
Maria da Conceição C. Tavares ◽  
Lúcia Lima Rodrigues
Keyword(s):  
Corporate Social Responsibility ◽  
Content Analysis ◽  
Public Sector ◽  
Social Responsibility ◽  
Sustainability Reporting ◽  
Global Reporting Initiative ◽  
Sustainability Disclosure ◽  
Sustainability Reports ◽  
Csr Disclosure ◽  
Corporate Social

Based on legitimacy and on stakeholder theories, this study analyses the level of disclosure of Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) in the sustainability reports of the Portuguese public sector entities for the years 2008 and 2012, prepared in accordance with the guidelines of the Global Reporting Initiative (GRI). The authors also aim to determine the factors that influence this level of disclosure. Using content analysis, an index of CSR disclosure was constructed based on the sustainability reports of 58 public sector entities. It was concluded that the level of sustainability disclosure is related to the organisation's size, industry, awards and certifications received, and visibility measured in terms of consumer proximity. This study offers new empirical evidence of a different context – public sector entities in Portugal, providing valuable insights into the factors that explain CSR disclosures in public sector entities.

scholarly journals Investigating performance indicators disclosure in sustainability reports of large mining companies in Ghana

2017 ◽  
Vol 17 (4) ◽  
pp. 643-660 ◽  
Author(s):  
Clement Lamboi Arthur ◽  
Junjie Wu ◽  
Milton Yago ◽  
Jinhua Zhang
Keyword(s):  
Content Analysis ◽  
Performance Indicators ◽  
Large Scale ◽  
Sustainability Reporting ◽  
Current Status ◽  
Global Reporting Initiative ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Mining Companies ◽  
Sustainability Reports ◽  
The Government

Purpose The purpose of this study is to examine the degree, contents and trend development of Global Reporting Initiative (GRI) performance indicators disclosed in sustainability reports of large mining companies in Ghana. Design/methodology/approach Content analysis methods are used to analyse 50 sustainability reports of ten large-scale mining companies in Ghana, covering the period 2008-2012. Findings The study finds that there has been a widening and increasing trend in the disclosure of performance indicators in sustainability reports of the large mining companies in Ghana, in accordance with GRI guidelines. The findings suggest that good progress in the strategic sector has been made in the voluntary adoption of the GRI guidelines to increase transparency, credibility and comparability in sustainability reporting. The findings also indicate areas to be improved. Practical implications The Government of Ghana and the Ghana Chamber of Mines could learn from the findings about the current status of this matter in order for them to formulate policies and regulations which would encourage the mining sector in moving forward in the adoption of international reporting standards. Originality/value This paper initializes investigation into the degree, contents and trends of performance indicators in sustainability reports of large mining companies in Ghana using content analysis.

The Determinants of Sustainability Reporting of the Portuguese Public Sector Entities

2016 ◽  
pp. 226-251
Author(s):  
Maria da Conceição C. Tavares ◽  
Lúcia Lima Rodrigues
Keyword(s):  
Corporate Social Responsibility ◽  
Content Analysis ◽  
Public Sector ◽  
Social Responsibility ◽  
Sustainability Reporting ◽  
Global Reporting Initiative ◽  
Sustainability Disclosure ◽  
Sustainability Reports ◽  
Csr Disclosure ◽  
Corporate Social

Based on legitimacy and on stakeholder theories, this study analyses the level of disclosure of Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) in the sustainability reports of the Portuguese public sector entities for the years 2008 and 2012, prepared in accordance with the guidelines of the Global Reporting Initiative (GRI). The authors also aim to determine the factors that influence this level of disclosure. Using content analysis, an index of CSR disclosure was constructed based on the sustainability reports of 58 public sector entities. It was concluded that the level of sustainability disclosure is related to the organisation's size, industry, awards and certifications received, and visibility measured in terms of consumer proximity. This study offers new empirical evidence of a different context – public sector entities in Portugal, providing valuable insights into the factors that explain CSR disclosures in public sector entities.

scholarly journals A Study of Sustainable Disclosure Practices of Indian Corporates

2016 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Shilpa S. Motwani ◽  
Hemal B. Pandya
Keyword(s):  
Stock Exchange ◽  
Sustainability Reporting ◽  
Global Reporting Initiative ◽  
Bottom Line ◽  
Non Profit ◽  
Social Governance ◽  
Sustainability Disclosure ◽  
Sustainability Reports ◽  
Social Environmental ◽  
Market Capitalisation

<div><p><em>The corporate governing bodies have worked towards governance, socially responsibility over the last couple of decades. They are now emphasising sustainability reporting. The focus has now shifted from financial to the non-financial aspects of reporting. Sustainability reporting also termed as Triple-bottom-line reporting, which means the company has now to report on non financial aspects like environmental, social, governance along with the economic aspect. This is evident by the release of the National voluntary guidelines on Social, Environmental and Economic responsibility of business (NVG-SEE) by Ministry of Corporate Affairs, India in 2011; followed by SEBI mandating Clause 55 of the listing agreement with stock exchange in India in 2012; making Business responsibility reporting (BRR) compulsory for the top 100 listed companies (by market capitalisation). These non financial aspects have been well incorporated by the Global Reporting Initiative (GRI); a non-profit organisation providing sustainability guidance.</em></p><p><em> </em></p><p><em>This paper is an attempt to study the comparative analysis of sustainability disclosure practices of Indian companies using GRI based index. The sustainability disclosures have been studies company-wise and Industry-wise. The study concludes that Indian companies have recognized the importance of sustainability reporting and the major companies are reporting on it. However, Indian companies do not give much consideration to their industries characteristics while disclosing information in their sustainability reports.</em></p></div>

Corporate Sustainability Reporting and Stakeholder Concerns: Is There a Disconnect?

2016 ◽  
Vol 31 (1) ◽  
pp. 83-102 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marianne Bradford ◽  
Julia B. Earp ◽  
D. Scott Showalter ◽  
Paul F. Williams
Keyword(s):  
Large Scale ◽  
Corporate Sustainability ◽  
Sustainability Reporting ◽  
Global Reporting Initiative ◽  
Economic Dimension ◽  
Stakeholder Groups ◽  
Wide Variability ◽  
Different Dimensions ◽  
Stakeholder Evaluation ◽  
Sustainability Reports

SYNOPSIS The number of companies reporting their corporate sustainability (CS) activities has significantly increased over the last decade. The result being a wide variability in the types of activities being reported and the ways the information is presented. An unanswered question is whether the information being reported by companies following the Global Reporting Initiative (GRI) CS framework is of interest to arguably one of the primary stakeholder groups, customers. Our study seeks to fill this knowledge gap by comparing the content of CS reports to results from a large-scale consumer stakeholder survey. By performing factor analysis on stakeholder evaluation of the importance of CS activities, we find that consumers see different dimensions than those put forth by the GRI framework, thereby suggesting a disconnect between corporate sustainability reporting and stakeholder views and interests. Our results indicate that risk and compliance are dimensions of interest to customers, while the GRI economic dimension is not viewed as important. Additionally, a new dimension of social justice is the most important to consumer stakeholders. Furthermore, the study highlights particular activities within each factor that are most important to the consumer stakeholder group. This research has implications for preparers of sustainability reports and organizations, such as the GRI, that establish guidance for sustainability reporting.

scholarly journals Approaches on the Screening Methods for Materiality in Sustainability Reporting

2018 ◽  
Vol 10 (9) ◽  
pp. 3233 ◽  
Author(s):  
Susie Wu ◽  
Changliang Shao ◽  
Jiquan Chen
Keyword(s):  
Corporate Sustainability ◽  
Accounting Standards ◽  
Social Sustainability ◽  
Sustainability Reporting ◽  
Global Reporting Initiative ◽  
Screening Methods ◽  
Comparison Study ◽  
Life Cycle Perspective ◽  
Sustainability Disclosure ◽  
Different Levels

Recent decades have seen a surge in corporate sustainability reports (SRs); their proliferation, however, does not ensure effective and consistent reporting on materiality. To improve the completeness, consistency and uniformity of SRs, this study aims at providing a review on the definition and identification of materiality and to propose screening methods for materiality assessments using publicly available resources. We found that most acknowledged standards and initiatives diverge in their definitions and approaches towards materiality. Four screening methods are proposed, including two that are directly usable: (1) Sustainability Accounting Standards Board Materiality Map™ and (2) Global Reporting Initiative (GRI) Sustainability Topics for Sectors; and two involving more desktop research: (3) GRI’s Sustainability Disclosure Database and (4) modeling from a life-cycle perspective. The second and third approaches are tested through a comparison study for the apparel and energy industries in selected regions using content analysis. The results indicate that the two approaches, with different levels of complexity, yield inconsistency in obtaining the most (i.e., the top three) material topics. The GRI’s Sustainability Disclosure Database is recommended for practitioners due to its balanced disclosure on management, economic, environmental and social sustainability themes.

Impression Management in Sustainability Reports: An Empirical Investigation of the Use of Graphs

2012 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
pp. 16-37 ◽  
Author(s):  
Charles H. Cho ◽  
Giovanna Michelon ◽  
Dennis M. Patten
Keyword(s):  
Public Relations ◽  
Impression Management ◽  
Environmental Performance ◽  
Social Performance ◽  
Corporate Sustainability ◽  
Sustainability Reporting ◽  
Environmental Disclosure ◽  
Social And Environmental Disclosure ◽  
Sustainability Reports ◽  
Social And Environmental Performance

ABSTRACT The purpose of this paper is to investigate whether firms use graphs in their sustainability reports in order to present a more favorable view of their social and environmental performance. Further, because prior research indicates that companies use social and environmental disclosure as a tool to reduce their exposure to social and political pressures (the legitimacy argument), we also examine whether differences in the extent of impression management are associated with differences in social and environmental performance. Based on an analysis of graphs in sustainability reports for a sample of 77 U.S. companies for 2006, we find considerable evidence of favorable selectivity bias in the choice of items graphed, and moderate evidence that where distortion in graphing occurs, it also has a favorable bias. Our results regarding the relation between impression management and performance are mixed. Whereas we find that graphs of social items in sustainability reports for companies with worse social performance exhibit more impression management, no significant relation between environmental performance and impression management in the use of environmental graphs is found. Overall, our results provide additional evidence that corporate sustainability reporting, as it currently exists, appears to be more about fostering positive public relations than providing a meaningful accounting of the social and environmental impacts of the firm.

scholarly journals Impact of Sustainability Reporting on Brand Value: An Examination of 100 Leading Brands in Singapore

2020 ◽  
Vol 12 (18) ◽  
pp. 7392
Author(s):  
Lawrence Loh ◽  
Sharmine Tan
Keyword(s):  
Sustainability Reporting ◽  
Public Perceptions ◽  
Environmental Indicators ◽  
Global Reporting Initiative ◽  
Brand Value ◽  
Sustainability Performance ◽  
Sustainability Reports ◽  
Local Companies ◽  
Multi Stakeholder ◽  
Lagged Effect

The recent sustainability reporting (SR) mandate by the Singapore Exchange has heightened stakeholder awareness and propelled sustainability disclosures. Albeit encouraging, more than half of listed companies in Singapore do not produce sustainability reports. This signifies a lack of sustainability commitment, or perhaps, local companies have limited understanding on the potential value of sustainability. Our study aims to fill this gap by examining if (1) the 100 leading brands in Singapore similarly benefit from a higher brand value when they produce sustainability reports; (2) if more disclosure leads to higher brand value; (3) if a lagged effect is present. The methodology of this study included the collation of sustainability information from the 100 leading brands in Singapore, scoring each company’s sustainability performance using the Global Reporting Initiative (GRI) framework. Finally, we examine the correlations using regression analysis to compare the companies’ sustainability performance with the reputed brand rankings by Brand Finance. Our findings revealed that one-fifth of the 100 leading brands in Singapore do not engage in sustainability, despite the positive correlation between sustainability reporting and brand value. Our results also suggest that greater disclosure leads to higher brand value, yet social and environmental indicators are undermanaged. Moreover, there is a lagged effect as public perceptions take time to shape. Internalising a company’s sustainability vision through a multi-stakeholder consultative approach is critical. Brand managers and sustainability practitioners must be aware that failures to meet stakeholder expectations today may consequently impact investors’ decisions.

scholarly journals Coverage of G4-indicators in GRI-sustainability reports by electric utilities

2020 ◽  
Vol 32 (3) ◽  
pp. 359-378 ◽  
Author(s):  
Johannes Slacik ◽  
Dorothea Greiling
Keyword(s):  
Stakeholder Theory ◽  
Stock Exchange ◽  
Sustainability Reporting ◽  
Electric Utility ◽  
Electricity Sector ◽  
Global Reporting Initiative ◽  
Bottom Line ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Sustainability Reports ◽  
Coverage Rates

PurposeElectric utility companies (EUC) are expected to play a key role toward implementing ambitious climate change aims being under critical scrutiny by regulators and stakeholders. However, EUC provide an under-researched field regarding sustainability reporting with the focus on economic, social and ecological concerns. This paper aims to gain insights of the sustainability reporting practice of EUC and the coverage of indicators based on the Global Reporting Initiative (GRI)-Guidelines.Design/methodology/approachA twofold documentary analysis of 186 GRI-G4 sustainability reports by EUC globally is conducted to investigate the coverage rates of G4-indicators. Neo-institutionalism and strategic stakeholder theory serve as theoretical lenses. A regression analysis is used to examine ownership, stock-exchange listing, area of activity and region as potential drivers of sustainability reporting.FindingsResults show that the coverage of indicators based on triple-bottom-line dimensions is moderate in EUC leaving room for improvement. The coverage of sector-specific indicators lacks behind the coverage of standard disclosure indicators. Results show that private and listed EUC show better coverage rates than public and not-listed EUC.Research limitations/implicationsNeo-institutionalism shows limited homogenization in the sector. Strategic stakeholder theory demonstrates insufficient stakeholder compliance of public and not-listed EUC.Originality/valueThis study contributes to sustainability reporting research by focusing on the under-researched electricity sector. It provides practical reporting insights for EUC, the GRI and regulators.

“Green washing” or “authentic effort”? An empirical investigation of the quality of sustainability reporting by banks

2020 ◽  
Vol ahead-of-print (ahead-of-print) ◽  
Author(s):  
Habib Zaman Khan ◽  
Sudipta Bose ◽  
Abu Taher Mollik ◽  
Harun Harun
Keyword(s):  
Social Performance ◽  
Sustainability Reporting ◽  
Global Reporting Initiative ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Performance Factors ◽  
Holistic Understanding ◽  
Regulatory Guidelines ◽  
External Reporting ◽  
The Impact

PurposeThis study explores the quality of sustainability reporting (QSR) and the impact of regulatory guidelines, social performance and a standardised reporting framework (using the Global Reporting Initiative [GRI] guidelines) on QSR in the context of banks in Bangladesh.Design/methodology/approachUsing a sample of 315 banking firm-year observations over 13 years (2002–2014), a content analysis technique is used to develop the 11-item QSR index. Regression analysis is used to test the research hypotheses.FindingsInitially, QSR evolved symbolically in Bangladesh's banks but, over our investigation period, with QSR indicators gradually improving, the trends became substantive. The influences on QSR were sustainable banking practice regulatory guidelines, social performance and use of the GRI guidelines. However, until banks improve reporting information, such as external verification and trends over time, QSR cannot be regarded as fully substantive.Research limitations/implicationsThis study advances QSR research and debate among academic researchers. With regulatory agencies and stakeholders increasingly using sustainability reporting information for decision making, the information's quality is vital.Originality/valueThis study is the first on QSR in the banking industry context, with previous research mostly investigating the quantity of sustainability reporting. The current study also synthesises QSR with sustainability regulation and social performance factors which have rarely been used in the sustainability literature. To gain a holistic understanding of QSR, existing QSR measures are advanced by combining external reporting efforts with banks' internalisation initiatives.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document