scholarly journals Comparison of the Performance of the Leap Motion ControllerTM with a Standard Marker-Based Motion Capture System

Sensors ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (5) ◽  
pp. 1750
Author(s):  
Amartya Ganguly ◽  
Gabriel Rashidi ◽  
Katja Mombaur
Keyword(s):  
Motion Capture ◽  
Gold Standard ◽  
Low Cost ◽  
Ring Finger ◽  
Healthcare Services ◽  
Leap Motion ◽  
Motion Capture System ◽  
Flexion Extension ◽  
Standard Marker ◽  
Motion Capture Systems

Over the last few years, the Leap Motion Controller™ (LMC) has been increasingly used in clinical environments to track hand, wrist and forearm positions as an alternative to the gold-standard motion capture systems. Since the LMC is marker-less, portable, easy-to-use and low-cost, it is rapidly being adopted in healthcare services. This paper demonstrates the comparison of finger kinematic data between the LMC and a gold-standard marker-based motion capture system, Qualisys Track Manager (QTM). Both systems were time synchronised, and the participants performed abduction/adduction of the thumb and flexion/extension movements of all fingers. The LMC and QTM were compared in both static measuring finger segment lengths and dynamic flexion movements of all fingers. A Bland–Altman plot was used to demonstrate the performance of the LMC versus QTM with Pearson’s correlation (r) to demonstrate trends in the data. Only the proximal interphalangeal joint (PIP) joint of the middle and ring finger during flexion/extension demonstrated acceptable agreement (r = 0.9062; r = 0.8978), but with a high mean bias. In conclusion, the study shows that currently, the LMC is not suitable to replace gold-standard motion capture systems in clinical settings. Further studies should be conducted to validate the performance of the LMC as it is updated and upgraded.

scholarly journals Accuracy of a Low-Cost 3D-Printed Wearable Goniometer for Measuring Wrist Motion

Sensors ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (14) ◽  
pp. 4799
Author(s):  
Calvin Young ◽  
Sarah DeDecker ◽  
Drew Anderson ◽  
Michele L. Oliver ◽  
Karen D. Gordon
Keyword(s):  
Motion Capture ◽  
Low Cost ◽  
Wearable Device ◽  
Matching Task ◽  
Motion Capture System ◽  
Wrist Motion ◽  
Flexion Extension ◽  
Optical Motion ◽  
3D Printed ◽  
Optical Motion Capture

Wrist motion provides an important metric for disease monitoring and occupational risk assessment. The collection of wrist kinematics in occupational or other real-world environments could augment traditional observational or video-analysis based assessment. We have developed a low-cost 3D printed wearable device, capable of being produced on consumer grade desktop 3D printers. Here we present a preliminary validation of the device against a gold standard optical motion capture system. Data were collected from 10 participants performing a static angle matching task while seated at a desk. The wearable device output was significantly correlated with the optical motion capture system yielding a coefficient of determination (R2) of 0.991 and 0.972 for flexion/extension (FE) and radial/ulnar deviation (RUD) respectively (p < 0.0001). Error was similarly low with a root mean squared error of 4.9° (FE) and 3.9° (RUD). Agreement between the two systems was quantified using Bland–Altman analysis, with bias and 95% limits of agreement of 3.1° ± 7.4° and −0.16° ± 7.7° for FE and RUD, respectively. These results compare favourably with current methods for occupational assessment, suggesting strong potential for field implementation.

Validation of wearable inertial sensor-based gait analysis system for measurement of spatiotemporal parameters and lower extremity joint kinematics in sagittal plane

2022 ◽  
pp. 095441192110729
Author(s):  
Gunjan Patel ◽  
Rajani Mullerpatan ◽  
Bela Agarwal ◽  
Triveni Shetty ◽  
Rajdeep Ojha ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Gait Analysis ◽  
Motion Analysis ◽  
Motion Capture ◽  
Inertial Sensor ◽  
Joint Kinematics ◽  
Percentage Error ◽  
Motion Capture System ◽  
Spatiotemporal Parameters ◽  
Analysis System ◽  
Motion Capture Systems

Wearable inertial sensor-based motion analysis systems are promising alternatives to standard camera-based motion capture systems for the measurement of gait parameters and joint kinematics. These wearable sensors, unlike camera-based gold standard systems, find usefulness in outdoor natural environment along with confined indoor laboratory-based environment due to miniature size and wireless data transmission. This study reports validation of our developed (i-Sens) wearable motion analysis system against standard motion capture system. Gait analysis was performed at self-selected speed on non-disabled volunteers in indoor ( n = 15) and outdoor ( n = 8) environments. Two i-Sens units were placed at the level of knee and hip along with passive markers (for indoor study only) for simultaneous 3D motion capture using a motion capture system. Mean absolute percentage error (MAPE) was computed for spatiotemporal parameters from the i-Sens system versus the motion capture system as a true reference. Mean and standard deviation of kinematic data for a gait cycle were plotted for both systems against normative data. Joint kinematics data were analyzed to compute the root mean squared error (RMSE) and Pearson’s correlation coefficient. Kinematic plots indicate a high degree of accuracy of the i-Sens system with the reference system. Excellent positive correlation was observed between the two systems in terms of hip and knee joint angles (Indoor: hip 3.98° ± 1.03°, knee 6.48° ± 1.91°, Outdoor: hip 3.94° ± 0.78°, knee 5.82° ± 0.99°) with low RMSE. Reliability characteristics (defined using standard statistical thresholds of MAPE) of stride length, cadence, walking speed in both outdoor and indoor environment were well within the “Good” category. The i-Sens system has emerged as a potentially cost-effective, valid, accurate, and reliable alternative to expensive, standard motion capture systems for gait analysis. Further clinical trials using the i-Sens system are warranted on participants across different age groups.

DEVELOPMENT OF A MOTION CAPTURE SYSTEM USING KINECT

2015 ◽  
Vol 76 (11) ◽  
Author(s):  
Katherina Bujang ◽  
Ahmad Faiz Ahmad Nazri ◽  
Ahmad Fidaudin Ahmad Azam ◽  
Jamaluddin Mahmud
Keyword(s):  
Motion Capture ◽  
Low Cost ◽  
Microsoft Kinect ◽  
Motion Capture Data ◽  
Motion Capture System ◽  
Interface Motion ◽  
Measurement Analysis ◽  
Potential Alternative ◽  
Repeatability And Reproducibility ◽  
Data Tracking

Microsoft Kinect has been identified as a potential alternative tool in the field of motion capture due to its simplicity and low cost. To date, the application and potential of Microsoft Kinect has been vigorously explored especially for entertainment and gaming purposes. However, its motion capture capability in terms of repeatability and reproducibility is still not well addressed. Therefore, this study aims to explore and develop a motion capture system using Microsoft Kinect; focusing on developing the interface, motion capture protocol as well as measurement analysis. The work is divided into several stages which include installation (Microsoft Kinect and MATLAB); parameters and experimental setup, interface development; protocols development; motion capture; data tracking and measurement analysis. The results are promising, where the variances are found to be less than 1% for both repeatability and reproducibility analysis. This proves that the current study is significant and the gained knowledge could contribute

A Mobile Motion Capture System Based on Inertial Sensors and Smart Shoes

2013 ◽  
Vol 136 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Pyeong-Gook Jung ◽  
Sehoon Oh ◽  
Gukchan Lim ◽  
Kyoungchul Kong
Keyword(s):  
Motion Capture ◽  
Inertial Sensors ◽  
Kinematic Model ◽  
Three Dimensional ◽  
Health Condition ◽  
Body Motion ◽  
Whole Body ◽  
Motion Capture System ◽  
Outdoor Sports ◽  
Motion Capture Systems

Motion capture systems play an important role in health-care and sport-training systems. In particular, there exists a great demand on a mobile motion capture system that enables people to monitor their health condition and to practice sport postures anywhere at any time. The motion capture systems with infrared or vision cameras, however, require a special setting, which hinders their application to a mobile system. In this paper, a mobile three-dimensional motion capture system is developed based on inertial sensors and smart shoes. Sensor signals are measured and processed by a mobile computer; thus, the proposed system enables the analysis and diagnosis of postures during outdoor sports, as well as indoor activities. The measured signals are transformed into quaternion to avoid the Gimbal lock effect. In order to improve the precision of the proposed motion capture system in an open and outdoor space, a frequency-adaptive sensor fusion method and a kinematic model are utilized to construct the whole body motion in real-time. The reference point is continuously updated by smart shoes that measure the ground reaction forces.

scholarly journals SnakeStrike: A Low-Cost Open-Source High-Speed Multi-Camera Motion Capture System

2020 ◽  
Vol 14 ◽  
Author(s):  
Grady W. Jensen ◽  
Patrick van der Smagt ◽  
Egon Heiss ◽  
Hans Straka ◽  
Tobias Kohl
Keyword(s):  
Open Source ◽  
Motion Capture ◽  
High Speed ◽  
Low Cost ◽  
Camera Motion ◽  
Motion Capture System

scholarly journals Dual Kinect v2 system can capture lower limb kinematics reasonably well in a clinical setting: concurrent validity of a dual camera markerless motion capture system in professional football players

2018 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. e000441 ◽  
Author(s):  
Argyro Kotsifaki ◽  
Rodney Whiteley ◽  
Clint Hansen
Keyword(s):  
Motion Capture ◽  
Excellent Agreement ◽  
Lower Limb ◽  
Motion Capture System ◽  
Kinect V2 ◽  
Markerless Motion Capture ◽  
Flexion Extension ◽  
Limb Kinematics ◽  
Kinematic Evaluation ◽  
Lower Limb Kinematics

ObjectivesTo determine whether a dual-camera markerless motion capture system can be used for lower limb kinematic evaluation in athletes in a preseason screening setting.DesignDescriptive laboratory study.SettingLaboratory setting.ParticipantsThirty-four (n=34) healthy athletes.Main outcome measuresThree dimensional lower limb kinematics during three functional tests: Single Leg Squat (SLS), Single Leg Jump, Modified Counter-movement Jump. The tests were simultaneously recorded using both a marker-based motion capture system and two Kinect v2 cameras using iPi Mocap Studio software.ResultsExcellent agreement between systems for the flexion/extension range of motion of the shin during all tests and for the thigh abduction/adduction during SLS were seen. For peak angles, results showed excellent agreement for knee flexion. Poor correlation was seen for the rotation movements.ConclusionsThis study supports the use of dual Kinect v2 configuration with the iPi software as a valid tool for assessment of sagittal and frontal plane hip and knee kinematic parameters but not axial rotation in athletes.

DEVELOPMENT OF MOTION CAPTURE SYSTEM USING DUAL VIDEO CAMERAS FOR THE GAIT DESIGN OF A BIPED ROBOT

2011 ◽  
Vol 08 (02) ◽  
pp. 275-299 ◽  
Author(s):  
JUNG-YUP KIM ◽  
YOUNG-SEOG KIM
Keyword(s):  
Motion Capture ◽  
Human Walking ◽  
Human Gait ◽  
Motion Capture System ◽  
System Calibration ◽  
Walking Gait ◽  
Video Cameras ◽  
Optical Motion ◽  
Optical Motion Capture ◽  
Motion Capture Systems

This paper, describes the development of a motion capture system with novel features for biped robots. In general, motion capture is effectively utilized in the field of computer animation. In the field of humanoid robotics, the number of studies attempting to design human-like gaits by using expensive optical motion capture systems is increasing. The optical motion capture systems used in these studies have involved a large number of cameras because such systems use small-sized ball markers; hence the position accuracy of the markers and the system calibration are very significant. However, since the human walking gait is a simple periodic motion rather than a complex motion, we have developed a specialized motion capture system for this study using dual video cameras and large band-type markers without high-level system calibration in order to capture the human walking gait. In addition to its lower complexity, the proposed capture method requires only a low-cost system and has high space efficiency. An image processing algorithm is also proposed for deriving the human gait data. Finally, we verify the reliability and accuracy of our system by comparing a zero moment point (ZMP) trajectory calculated by the motion captured data with a ZMP trajectory measured by foot force sensors.

scholarly journals Next-Generation Low-Cost Motion Capture Systems Can Provide Comparable Spatial Accuracy to High-End Systems

2013 ◽  
Vol 29 (1) ◽  
pp. 112-117 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dominic Thewlis ◽  
Chris Bishop ◽  
Nathan Daniell ◽  
Gunther Paul
Keyword(s):  
Motion Capture ◽  
Low Cost ◽  
Three Dimensional ◽  
Gait Kinematics ◽  
Occupational Tasks ◽  
Soft Tissue Artifact ◽  
New Generation ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Linear Accuracy ◽  
Motion Capture Systems

The objective quantification of three-dimensional kinematics during different functional and occupational tasks is now more in demand than ever. The introduction of new generation of low-cost passive motion capture systems from a number of manufacturers has made this technology accessible for teaching, clinical practice and in small/medium industry. Despite the attractive nature of these systems, their accuracy remains unproved in independent tests. We assessed static linear accuracy, dynamic linear accuracy and compared gait kinematics from a Vicon MX-f20 system to a Natural Point OptiTrack system. In all experiments data were sampled simultaneously. We identified both systems perform excellently in linear accuracy tests with absolute errors not exceeding 1%. In gait data there was again strong agreement between the two systems in sagittal and coronal plane kinematics. Transverse plane kinematics differed by up to 3° at the knee and hip, which we attributed to the impact of soft tissue artifact accelerations on the data. We suggest that low-cost systems are comparably accurate to their high-end competitors and offer a platform with accuracy acceptable in research for laboratories with a limited budget.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document