scholarly journals The methodology of the Logical Framework with a Risk Management Approach to Improve the Sustainability in the International Development Projects

2022 ◽  
Vol 14 (2) ◽  
pp. 756
Author(s):  
Rocío Rodríguez-Rivero ◽  
Isabel Ortiz-Marcos
Keyword(s):  
Risk Management ◽  
International Development ◽  
Management Approach ◽  
Development Projects ◽  
Logical Framework ◽  
Case Study Analysis ◽  
Analysis And Design ◽  
Framework Approach ◽  
Research Questions

When working with international development projects (IDPs), the use of the logical framework approach (LFA) prevails as the most important tool to plan and manage these projects. This paper presents how the methodology has been enriched, including risk management (LFRMA logical framework with risk management approach), proposing an original contribution, tested with professionals that will improve the effectiveness of IDPs by increasing their success rate and their sustainability. The steps followed to design the methodology (problem statement (literature review, interview with experts, questionnaire for professionals. and statistical analysis), case study analysis (eight case studies in Colombia, interviews with IDPs managers, focus groups, questionnaire for participants, qualitative analysis, and fuzzy analysis) and design of LFRMA (focus group with experts)) and the methodology itself (how to introduce risk management during all the life cycle through the methodology steps) are presented. Conclusions answer the research questions: can the effectiveness and sustainability of IDPs be improved? Can risk management help to improve IDPs effectiveness? Would it be useful to introduce risk management into the LFA? The LFRMA methodology consists of two fields of application, the first at the organization level and the second at the project level.

scholarly journals Managing an Integrated Project - Experiences from the Realigning Agriculture to Improve Nutrition project

2016 ◽  
Vol 3 ◽  
pp. 5035 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kai Matturi ◽  
Chris Pain
Keyword(s):  
Project Management ◽  
International Development ◽  
Project Manager ◽  
Management Approach ◽  
Development Projects ◽  
Donor Funding ◽  
New Approach ◽  
Working Together ◽  
Common Goals ◽  
Integrated Project

Over the last number of decades there has been a tendency within the international development sector to privilege the management of projects in a siloed manner. This translates to projects managed in a narrow way according to pre-defined parameters of say the education or health sectors. As a project manager you are held accountable for delivering education or health outputs. A shift in donor funding to focus on development projects that are considered easy to administer partly explains this siloed approach to project management within the development sector. However, there is a gradual kick back against the siloed project management approach. Instead we are seeing a return to an integrated managerial approach.An integrated managerial approach involves bringing together various technical specialists to work on common objectives in a coordinated and collaborative manner. A growing number of development actors such as Concern Worldwide are embracing this ‘new approach’. For Concern Worldwide integrated projects are interventions which address multiple needs through coordination across a variety of sectors and with the participation of all relevant stakeholders to achieve common goals. Integrated projects are about sector projects working together with the same target group in the same area in a coordinated manner. This paper reflects on Concern’s experience and evidence to date with integration drawing on the agency’s work in Zambia. The Realigning Agriculture to Improve Nutrition project in Zambia highlights the practical challenges and lessons of managing an integrated project.   

Risk Management Decisions and Organizational Structure in the Case of a Development Management Firm

2013 ◽  
pp. 181-202
Author(s):  
Mohammad Baydoun
Keyword(s):  
Risk Management ◽  
Saudi Arabia ◽  
Organizational Structure ◽  
Large Scale ◽  
Management Practices ◽  
Decision Makers ◽  
Management Approach ◽  
Development Projects ◽  
High Level ◽  
Large Scale Project

This case aims to analyze risk management practices of Millennium Development International (MDI) and suggest enhancements based on a theoretical framework derived from the literature while considering the implications to its organizational structure. Al-Shamiyah project in Makkah, Saudi Arabia, is used as an example to illustrate the practices of MDI. Due to a high level of risk associated with large-scale development projects, it is argued that the traditional risk management approach is not convenient to the context of these projects. Each large-scale project has a high level of uniqueness that renders benchmarks generated out of previous projects obsolete. Hence, a reactive risk management approach is being promoted. For the purpose of optimizing this approach, engaging necessary experts and securing the presence of key decision makers in the process, the formulated system defines key milestones at which risks need to be assessed and proper decisions need to be taken.

Risk Management Decisions and Organizational Structure in the Case of a Development Management Firm

2016 ◽  
pp. 1220-1237 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mohammad Baydoun
Keyword(s):  
Risk Management ◽  
Saudi Arabia ◽  
Organizational Structure ◽  
Large Scale ◽  
Management Practices ◽  
Decision Makers ◽  
Management Approach ◽  
Development Projects ◽  
High Level ◽  
Large Scale Project

This case aims to analyze risk management practices of Millennium Development International (MDI) and suggest enhancements based on a theoretical framework derived from the literature while considering the implications to its organizational structure. Al-Shamiyah project in Makkah, Saudi Arabia, is used as an example to illustrate the practices of MDI. Due to a high level of risk associated with large-scale development projects, it is argued that the traditional risk management approach is not convenient to the context of these projects. Each large-scale project has a high level of uniqueness that renders benchmarks generated out of previous projects obsolete. Hence, a reactive risk management approach is being promoted. For the purpose of optimizing this approach, engaging necessary experts and securing the presence of key decision makers in the process, the formulated system defines key milestones at which risks need to be assessed and proper decisions need to be taken.

scholarly journals Finding the Links between Risk Management and Project Success: Evidence from International Development Projects in Colombia

2020 ◽  
Vol 12 (21) ◽  
pp. 9294
Author(s):  
Rocío Rodríguez-Rivero ◽  
Isabel Ortiz-Marcos ◽  
Javier Romero ◽  
Luis Ballesteros-Sánchez
Keyword(s):  
Risk Management ◽  
Fuzzy Logic ◽  
Comparative Analysis ◽  
International Development ◽  
Cultural Differences ◽  
Direct Relationship ◽  
Project Success ◽  
Qualitative Comparative Analysis ◽  
Development Projects ◽  
Political Factors

The aim of this research is to help improve the effectiveness of international development projects (IDPs) with a focus on enhancing their success. For this purpose, this work seeks to identify links between the management of risks among five projects executed in Cauca (Colombia) and the success of these projects in terms of project management and impacts on the beneficiary communities. An analysis of these projects reveals the most critical risks encountered and the relationships between the management of those risks and the success of the projects. The use of fuzzy logic through the fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis (fsQCA) program is key to performing this difficult task. The results of a qualitative study reveal that the most important risks correspond to economic, cultural, and political factors. A quantitative analysis by fsQCA shows a direct relationship between the management of cultural differences and the positive impacts of IDPs on the beneficiary communities.

The success of an international development project: lessons drawn from a case between Morocco and Canada

2013 ◽  
Vol 79 (1) ◽  
pp. 165-186 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sophie Brière ◽  
Denis Proulx
Keyword(s):  
International Development ◽  
Public Administration ◽  
Gender Equality ◽  
Analytical Framework ◽  
Development Project ◽  
Development Projects ◽  
Governance Structures ◽  
Tier 1 ◽  
Project Lifecycle

According to the literature on decisive criteria for the success of international development projects, this article presents a case of cooperation between Morocco and Canada on the implementation of projects to institutionalize gender equality within the Moroccan public administration. Based on a triangulation of data and starting from an analytical framework on the factors decisive for the success of international development projects, this case study illustrates the limited success of the project. Although the elements that are decisive for the success of Tier 1 of the FAES projects have resulted in the involvement of stakeholders in the implementation of the projects, the creation of local expertise and the production of tools and strategies that aid institutionalization of gender equality, this study highlights significant barriers to institutionalization. These relate mainly to the difficulty of involving stakeholders throughout the project lifecycle, the lame functioning of the projects’ governance structures and the struggle to take ownership of projects designed on the basis of a management by results logic based on models specific to the donor. This case feeds the critical reflection on the various issues and challenges inherent to the management of international development projects and suggests various avenues of research. Points for practitioners The case presented in this article involves the implementation of projects to institutionalize gender equality within the Moroccan civil service supported by the Canadian cooperation agency. Although its success requires the involvement of the stakeholders, the development of local expertise and the production of institutionalization tools, this case brings to light significant obstacles to institutionalization, such as the difficulty of involving the stakeholders in the project, the limited functioning of the governance structures and the struggle to secure the ownership of the projects, designed according to models specific to the donor. It also reveals the limits of a management by results style and its consequences.

scholarly journals MODELING DESIGN STUDIO PEDAGOGY: A MENTORED REFLECTIVE PRACTICE

2020 ◽  
Vol 1 ◽  
pp. 1765-1774 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. Milovanovic ◽  
J. Gero
Keyword(s):  
Reflective Practice ◽  
Protocol Analysis ◽  
Design Studio ◽  
Study Analysis ◽  
Case Study Analysis ◽  
Analysis Methodology ◽  
Studio Pedagogy ◽  
Design Representations ◽  
Research Questions

AbstractThis paper explores the notion of mentored reflective practice to describe design studio pedagogy. Students learn how to design by doing design in the studio. Design critiques are a key element in design studio pedagogy as they capture a moment where students get feedback from their tutors on their designs. The research questions addressed concern the roles of each participant during design studio reviews and their interactions with design representations. The protocol analysis methodology and the Function Behavior Structure ontology are utilized to convey our case study analysis.

scholarly journals What Might International Development Assistance Be Able to Tell Us About Contemporary “Policy Government” in Developed Countries?

2015 ◽  
Vol 50 (3) ◽  
pp. 372-401 ◽  
Author(s):  
Adam Fforde
Keyword(s):  
International Development ◽  
Knowledge Production ◽  
Predictive Power ◽  
Development Assistance ◽  
Developed Countries ◽  
Organizational Form ◽  
Logical Framework ◽  
Framework Approach ◽  
Production Practices ◽  
Rich Countries

The article examines international development assistance—aid. Donors assert that experts possess predictive knowledge and project belief in such knowledge into organizational form—the Logical Framework Approach. While such beliefs lack predictive power, as aid operates under multiple sovereignty conditions, no single authority determines truth. Donors ease pressure on experts by accepting variation in intervention logics, yet assert the validity of “single truth” knowledge; knowledge production practices have not basically changed. Belief that what is believed is true, revealed in aid work, illuminates the nature of policy in rich countries and helps explain low confidence in government.

scholarly journals Mitigation of indirect environmental effects of GM crops

2007 ◽  
Vol 274 (1617) ◽  
pp. 1475-1479 ◽  
Author(s):  
J.D Pidgeon ◽  
M.J May ◽  
J.N Perry ◽  
G.M Poppy
Keyword(s):  
Risk Management ◽  
Seed Production ◽  
Land Use Changes ◽  
Agricultural Practices ◽  
Economic Benefits ◽  
Environmental Harm ◽  
Management Approach ◽  
Weed Biomass ◽  
Bow Tie

Currently, the UK has no procedure for the approval of novel agricultural practices that is based on environmental risk management principles. Here, we make a first application of the ‘bow-tie’ risk management approach in agriculture, for assessment of land use changes, in a case study of the introduction of genetically modified herbicide tolerant (GMHT) sugar beet. There are agronomic and economic benefits, but indirect environmental harm from increased weed control is a hazard. The Farm Scale Evaluation (FSE) trials demonstrated reduced broad-leaved weed biomass and seed production at the field scale. The simplest mitigation measure is to leave a proportion of rows unsprayed in each GMHT crop field. Our calculations, based on FSE data, show that a maximum of 2% of field area left unsprayed is required to mitigate weed seed production and 4% to mitigate weed biomass production. Tilled margin effects could simply be mitigated by increasing the margin width from 0.5 to 1.5 m. Such changes are cheap and simple to implement in farming practices. This case study demonstrates the usefulness of the bow-tie risk management approach and the transparency with which hazards can be addressed. If adopted generally, it would help to enable agriculture to adopt new practices with due environmental precaution.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document