scholarly journals Reovirus Low-Density Particles Package Cellular RNA

Viruses ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (6) ◽  
pp. 1096
Author(s):  
Timothy W. Thoner ◽  
Xiang Ye ◽  
John Karijolich ◽  
Kristen M. Ogden
Keyword(s):  
Rna Polymerase ◽  
Viral Proteins ◽  
Viral Rna ◽  
Low Density ◽  
Rna Packaging ◽  
Genome Packaging ◽  
Double Stranded Rna ◽  
Viral Genomes ◽  
Mammalian Orthoreovirus ◽  
Insight Into

Packaging of segmented, double-stranded RNA viral genomes requires coordination of viral proteins and RNA segments. For mammalian orthoreovirus (reovirus), evidence suggests either all ten or zero viral RNA segments are simultaneously packaged in a highly coordinated process hypothesized to exclude host RNA. Accordingly, reovirus generates genome-containing virions and “genomeless” top component particles. Whether reovirus virions or top component particles package host RNA is unknown. To gain insight into reovirus packaging potential and mechanisms, we employed next-generation RNA-sequencing to define the RNA content of enriched reovirus particles. Reovirus virions exclusively packaged viral double-stranded RNA. In contrast, reovirus top component particles contained similar proportions but reduced amounts of viral double-stranded RNA and were selectively enriched for numerous host RNA species, especially short, non-polyadenylated transcripts. Host RNA selection was not dependent on RNA abundance in the cell, and specifically enriched host RNAs varied for two reovirus strains and were not selected solely by the viral RNA polymerase. Collectively, these findings indicate that genome packaging into reovirus virions is exquisitely selective, while incorporation of host RNAs into top component particles is differentially selective and may contribute to or result from inefficient viral RNA packaging.

scholarly journals RNA Structures and Their Role in Selective Genome Packaging

Viruses ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (9) ◽  
pp. 1788
Author(s):  
Liqing Ye ◽  
Uddhav B. Ambi ◽  
Marco Olguin-Nava ◽  
Anne-Sophie Gribling-Burrer ◽  
Shazeb Ahmad ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Viral Evolution ◽  
Complex Mixture ◽  
Rna Structures ◽  
Rna Packaging ◽  
Genome Packaging ◽  
Viral Genomes ◽  
Viral Particles ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Packaging Signals

To generate infectious viral particles, viruses must specifically select their genomic RNA from milieu that contains a complex mixture of cellular or non-genomic viral RNAs. In this review, we focus on the role of viral encoded RNA structures in genome packaging. We first discuss how packaging signals are constructed from local and long-range base pairings within viral genomes, as well as inter-molecular interactions between viral and host RNAs. Then, how genome packaging is regulated by the biophysical properties of RNA. Finally, we examine the impact of RNA packaging signals on viral evolution.

scholarly journals Structural basis of ribosomal frameshifting during translation of the SARS-CoV-2 RNA genome

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pramod R. Bhatt ◽  
Alain Scaiola ◽  
Gary Loughran ◽  
Marc Leibundgut ◽  
Annika Kratzel ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Rna Polymerase ◽  
Viral Proteins ◽  
Viral Rna ◽  
Structural Basis ◽  
Rna Dependent Rna Polymerase ◽  
Ribosomal Frameshifting ◽  
Infected Cells ◽  
Rna Genome ◽  
Exit Tunnel ◽  
Viral Polyprotein

AbstractProgrammed ribosomal frameshifting is the key event during translation of the SARS-CoV-2 RNA genome allowing synthesis of the viral RNA-dependent RNA polymerase and downstream viral proteins. Here we present the cryo-EM structure of the mammalian ribosome in the process of translating viral RNA paused in a conformation primed for frameshifting. We observe that the viral RNA adopts a pseudoknot structure lodged at the mRNA entry channel of the ribosome to generate tension in the mRNA that leads to frameshifting. The nascent viral polyprotein that is being synthesized by the ribosome paused at the frameshifting site forms distinct interactions with the ribosomal polypeptide exit tunnel. We use biochemical experiments to validate our structural observations and to reveal mechanistic and regulatory features that influence the frameshifting efficiency. Finally, a compound previously shown to reduce frameshifting is able to inhibit SARS-CoV-2 replication in infected cells, establishing coronavirus frameshifting as target for antiviral intervention.

scholarly journals Use of DNA, RNA, and Chimeric Templates by a Viral RNA-Dependent RNA Polymerase: Evolutionary Implications for the Transition from the RNA to the DNA World

1999 ◽  
Vol 73 (8) ◽  
pp. 6424-6429 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert W. Siegel ◽  
Laurent Bellon ◽  
Leonid Beigelman ◽  
C. Cheng Kao
Keyword(s):  
Rna Polymerase ◽  
Mosaic Virus ◽  
Rna Synthesis ◽  
Brome Mosaic Virus ◽  
Viral Rna ◽  
Competition Assay ◽  
Rna Dependent Rna Polymerase ◽  
Dna Molecule ◽  
Mechanism Of Catalysis ◽  
Insight Into

ABSTRACT All polynucleotide polymerases have a similar structure and mechanism of catalysis, consistent with their evolution from one progenitor polymerase. Viral RNA-dependent RNA polymerases (RdRp) are expected to have properties comparable to those from this progenitor and therefore may offer insight into the commonalities of all classes of polymerases. We examined RNA synthesis by the brome mosaic virus RdRp on DNA, RNA, and hybrid templates and found that precise initiation of RNA synthesis can take place from all of these templates. Furthermore, initiation can take place from either internal or penultimate initiation sites. Using a template competition assay, we found that the BMV RdRp interacts with DNA only three- to fourfold less well than it interacts with RNA. Moreover, a DNA molecule with a ribonucleotide at position −11 relative to the initiation nucleotide was able to interact with RdRp at levels comparable to that observed with RNA. These results suggest that relatively few conditions were needed for an ancestral RdRp to replicate DNA genomes.

Antiviral activity of double‐stranded RNA‐binding protein PACT against influenza A virus mediated via suppression of viral RNA polymerase

2018 ◽  
Vol 32 (8) ◽  
pp. 4380-4393 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chi‐Ping Chan ◽  
Chun‐Kit Yuen ◽  
Pak‐Hin Hinson Cheung ◽  
Sin‐Yee Fung ◽  
Pak‐Yin Lui ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Antiviral Activity ◽  
Rna Polymerase ◽  
Influenza A Virus ◽  
Influenza A ◽  
Rna Binding ◽  
Binding Protein ◽  
Rna Binding Protein ◽  
Viral Rna ◽  
Double Stranded Rna

scholarly journals Unpaired Guanosines in the 5′ Untranslated Region of HIV-1 RNA Act Synergistically To Mediate Genome Packaging

2020 ◽  
Vol 94 (21) ◽  
Author(s):  
Olga A. Nikolaitchik ◽  
Xayathed Somoulay ◽  
Jonathan M. O. Rawson ◽  
Jennifer A. Yoo ◽  
Vinay K. Pathak ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Binding Sites ◽  
Untranslated Region ◽  
Virus Assembly ◽  
Viral Rna ◽  
Rna Packaging ◽  
Genome Packaging ◽  
Stem Loop ◽  
Rna Genome ◽  
Genome Encapsidation ◽  
Hiv 1

ABSTRACT The viral protein Gag selects full-length HIV-1 RNA from a large pool of mRNAs as virion genome during virus assembly. Currently, the precise mechanism that mediates the genome selection is not understood. Previous studies have identified several sites in the 5′ untranslated region (5′ UTR) of HIV-1 RNA that are bound by nucleocapsid (NC) protein, which is derived from Gag during virus maturation. However, whether these NC binding sites direct HIV-1 RNA genome packaging has not been fully investigated. In this report, we examined the roles of single-stranded exposed guanosines at NC binding sites in RNA genome packaging using stable cell lines expressing competing wild-type and mutant HIV-1 RNAs. Mutant RNA packaging efficiencies were determined by comparing their prevalences in cytoplasmic RNA and in virion RNA. We observed that multiple NC binding sites affected RNA packaging; of the sites tested, those located within stem-loop 1 of the 5′ UTR had the most significant effects. These sites were previously reported as the primary NC binding sites by using a chemical probe reverse-footprinting assay and as the major Gag binding sites by using an in vitro assay. Of the mutants tested in this report, substituting 3 to 4 guanosines resulted in <2-fold defects in packaging. However, when mutations at different NC binding sites were combined, severe defects were observed. Furthermore, combining the mutations resulted in synergistic defects in RNA packaging, suggesting redundancy in Gag-RNA interactions and a requirement for multiple Gag binding on viral RNA during HIV-1 genome encapsidation. IMPORTANCE HIV-1 must package its RNA genome during virus assembly to generate infectious viruses. To better understand how HIV-1 packages its RNA genome, we examined the roles of RNA elements identified as binding sites for NC, a Gag-derived RNA-binding protein. Our results demonstrate that binding sites within stem-loop 1 of the 5′ untranslated region play important roles in genome packaging. Although mutating one or two NC-binding sites caused only mild defects in packaging, mutating multiple sites resulted in severe defects in genome encapsidation, indicating that unpaired guanosines act synergistically to promote packaging. Our results suggest that Gag-RNA interactions occur at multiple RNA sites during genome packaging; furthermore, there are functionally redundant binding sites in viral RNA.

scholarly journals Competition between the Sendai Virus N mRNA Start Site and the Genome 3′-End Promoter for Viral RNA Polymerase

2003 ◽  
Vol 77 (17) ◽  
pp. 9147-9155 ◽  
Author(s):  
Philippe Le Mercier ◽  
Dominique Garcin ◽  
Eduardo Garcia ◽  
Daniel Kolakofsky
Keyword(s):  
Rna Polymerase ◽  
Sendai Virus ◽  
Viral Rna ◽  
Promoter Strength ◽  
Start Site ◽  
Negative Effects ◽  
Gene Start ◽  
Or Gene ◽  
Insight Into ◽  
Dual Functions

ABSTRACT The genomic and antigenomic 3′-end replication promoters of Sendai virus are bipartite in nature and symmetrical, composed of le or tr sequences; a gene start or gene end site, respectively; and a simple hexameric repeat. The relative strengths of these 3′-end promoters determines the ratios of genomes and antigenomes formed during infection and whether model mini-genomes can be rescued from DNA by nondefective helper viruses. Using these tests of promoter strength, we have confirmed that tr is stronger than le in this respect. We have also found that the presence of a gene start site within either 3′-end promoter strongly reduces 3′-end promoter strength. The negative effects of the gene start site on the 3′-end promoter suggest that these closely spaced RNA start sites compete with each other for a common pool of viral RNA polymerase. The manner in which this competition could occur for polymerase off the template (in trans) and polymerase on the template (in cis) adds insight into how the viral RNA polymerase switches between its dual functions as transcriptase and replicase.

scholarly journals A mechanism for prime-realignment during influenza A virus replication

2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Judith Oymans ◽  
Aartjan J.W. te Velthuis
Keyword(s):  
Influenza Virus ◽  
Rna Polymerase ◽  
Viral Replication ◽  
Influenza A Virus ◽  
Virus Replication ◽  
Influenza A ◽  
De Novo ◽  
Severe Disease ◽  
Viral Rna ◽  
Insight Into

AbstractThe influenza A virus genome consists of eight segments of single-stranded RNA. These segments are replicated and transcribed by a viral RNA-dependent RNA polymerase (RdRp) that is made up of the influenza virus proteins PB1, PB2 and PA. To copy the viral RNA (vRNA) genome segments and the complementary RNA (cRNA) segments, the replicative intermediate of viral replication, the RdRp must use two promoters and two differentde novoinitiation mechanisms. On the vRNA promoter, the RdRp initiates on the 3’ terminus, while on the cRNA promoter the RdRp initiates internally and subsequently realigns the nascent vRNA product to ensure that the template is copied in full. In particular the latter process, which is also used by other RNA viruses, is not understood. Here we provide mechanistic insight into prime-realignment during influenza virus replication and show that it is controlled by the priming loop and a helix-loop-helix motif of the PB1 subunit of the RdRp. Overall, these observations advance our understanding of how the influenza A virus initiates viral replication and amplifies the genome correctly.ImportanceInfluenza A viruses cause severe disease in humans and are considered a major threat to our economy and health. The viruses replicate and transcribe their genome using an enzyme called the RNA polymerases. To ensure that the genome is amplified faithfully and abundant viral mRNAs are made for viral protein synthesis, the RNA polymerase must work correctly. In this report, we provide insight into the mechanism that the RNA polymerase employs to ensure that the viral genome is copied correctly.

scholarly journals A Mechanism for Priming and Realignment during Influenza A Virus Replication

2017 ◽  
Vol 92 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Judith Oymans ◽  
Aartjan J. W. te Velthuis
Keyword(s):  
Influenza Virus ◽  
Rna Polymerase ◽  
Viral Replication ◽  
Influenza A Virus ◽  
Virus Replication ◽  
Influenza A ◽  
De Novo ◽  
Severe Disease ◽  
Viral Rna ◽  
Insight Into

ABSTRACTThe influenza A virus genome consists of eight segments of single-stranded RNA. These segments are replicated and transcribed by a viral RNA-dependent RNA polymerase (RdRp) that is made up of the influenza virus proteins PB1, PB2, and PA. To copy the viral RNA (vRNA) genome segments and the cRNA segments, the replicative intermediate of viral replication, the RdRp must use two promoters and two differentde novoinitiation mechanisms. On the vRNA promoter, the RdRp initiates on the 3′ terminus, while on the cRNA promoter, the RdRp initiates internally and subsequently realigns the nascent vRNA product to ensure that the template is copied in full. In particular, the latter process, which is also used by other RNA viruses, is not understood. Here we provide mechanistic insight into priming and realignment during influenza virus replication and show that it is controlled by the priming loop and a helix-loop-helix motif of the PB1 subunit of the RdRp. Overall, these observations advance our understanding of how the influenza A virus initiates viral replication and amplifies the genome correctly.IMPORTANCEInfluenza A viruses cause severe disease in humans and are considered a major threat to our economy and health. The viruses replicate and transcribe their genome by using an enzyme called the RNA polymerases. To ensure that the genome is amplified faithfully and that abundant viral mRNAs are made for viral protein synthesis, the RNA polymerase must work correctly. In this report, we provide insight into the mechanism that the RNA polymerase employs to ensure that the viral genome is copied correctly.

scholarly journals Nonspecific Nucleoside Triphosphatase P4 of Double-Stranded RNA Bacteriophage φ6 Is Required for Single-Stranded RNA Packaging and Transcription

2002 ◽  
Vol 76 (20) ◽  
pp. 10122-10127 ◽  
Author(s):  
Markus J. Pirttimaa ◽  
Anja O. Paatero ◽  
Mikko J. Frilander ◽  
Dennis H. Bamford
Keyword(s):  
Viral Proteins ◽  
Wild Type ◽  
Rna Packaging ◽  
Double Stranded Rna ◽  
Viral Packaging ◽  
Polymerase Complex ◽  
Synthesis Activity ◽  
Energy Dependent ◽  
Kinetics Of ◽  
Nucleoside Triphosphatase

ABSTRACT Bacteriophage φ6 has a segmented double-stranded RNA genome. The genomic single-stranded RNA (ssRNA) precursors are packaged into a preformed protein capsid, the polymerase complex, composed of viral proteins P1, P2, P4, and P7. Packaging of the genomic precursors is an energy-dependent process requiring nucleoside triphosphates. Protein P4, a nonspecific nucleoside triphosphatase, has previously been suggested to be the prime candidate for the viral packaging engine, based on its location at the vertices of the viral capsid and its biochemical characteristics. In this study we were able to obtain stable polymerase complex particles that are completely devoid of P4. Such particles were not able to package ssRNA segments and did not display RNA polymerase (either minus- or plus-strand synthesis) activity. Surprisingly, a mutation in P4, S250Q, which reduced the level of P4 in the particles to about 10% of the wild-type level, did not affect RNA packaging activity or change the kinetics of packaging. Moreover, such particles displayed minus-strand synthesis activity. However, no plus-strand synthesis was observed, suggesting that P4 has a role in the plus-strand synthesis reaction also.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document