scholarly journals Adapting primary care for new migrants: a formative assessment

BJGP Open ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. bjgpopen17X100701 ◽  
Author(s):  
Elizabeth Such ◽  
Elizabeth Walton ◽  
Brigitte Delaney ◽  
Janet Harris ◽  
Sarah Salway
Keyword(s):  
Primary Care ◽  
Case Studies ◽  
Online Survey ◽  
Resource Constraints ◽  
Sample Survey ◽  
Service Development ◽  
Care Provision ◽  
Care Services ◽  
Primary Care Services ◽  
The Uk

BackgroundImmigration rates have increased recently in the UK. Migrant patients may have particular needs that are inadequately met by existing primary care provision. In the absence of national guidance, local adaptations are emerging in response to these new demands.AimTo formatively assess the primary care services offered to new migrants and the ways in which practitioners and practices are adapting to meet need.Design & settingOnline survey and case studies of current practice across primary care in the UK. Case studies were selected from mainstream and specialist general practice as well as primary care provision in the third sector.MethodNon-probability sample survey of primary care practitioners (n = 70) with descriptive statistical analysis. Qualitative case studies (n = 8) selected purposively; in-depth exploration of organisational and practitioner adaptations to services. Analysis is structured around the principles of equitable care.ResultsSurvey results indicated that practitioners focused on working with communities and external agencies and adapting processes of, for example, screening, vaccination, and health checks. Lack of funding was cited most frequently as a barrier to service development (n = 51; 73%). Case studies highlighted the prominence partnership working and of an organisational and practitioner focus on equitable care. Adaptations centred on addressing wider social determinants, trauma, and violence, and additional individual needs; and on delivering culturally-competent care.ConclusionDespite significant resource constraints, some primary care services are adapting to the needs of new migrants. Many adapted approaches can be characterised as equity-oriented.

scholarly journals Psychiatry Residents' Perceptions and Reported Practices in Providing Primary Care

2017 ◽  
Vol 9 (2) ◽  
pp. 237-240 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lisa M. Wehr ◽  
Erik R. Vanderlip ◽  
Patrick H. Gibbons ◽  
Jess G. Fiedorowicz
Keyword(s):  
Primary Care ◽  
Online Survey ◽  
Psychiatry Residents ◽  
Medical Conditions ◽  
Residency Programs ◽  
Care Services ◽  
Preventive Counseling ◽  
Primary Care Services ◽  
Primary Care Specialty ◽  
Improve Health

ABSTRACT Background Patients with psychiatric disorders have higher rates of chronic medical conditions and decreased life expectancy. Integrating medical and psychiatric care is likely to improve health outcomes for these patients. Objective This study examined what proportion of psychiatry residents viewed psychiatry as a primary care specialty, how important they felt it was to provide primary care to patients, and how this perception altered self-reported comfort and practice patterns in providing screening and treatment for select general medical conditions. Methods An online survey was sent to current psychiatry residents of US residency programs. Results A total of 268 residents from 40 programs completed the survey (25% response rate), with 55% (147 of 265) of respondents considering psychiatry to be a primary care specialty. Residents who held this opinion gave higher ratings for the importance of providing preventive counseling and reported counseling a higher percentage of patients on a variety of topics. They also reported screening more patients for several medical conditions. Residents who considered psychiatry to be primary care did not report greater comfort with treating these conditions, with the exception of dyslipidemia. The most commonly cited barrier to integrating primary care services was lack of time. Conclusions Residents' perceptions of psychiatry as a primary care field appears to be associated with a higher reported likelihood of counseling about, and screening for, medical conditions in their patients.

scholarly journals Seeking Healthcare During Lockdown: Challenges, Opportunities and Lessons for the Future

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fiona Imlach ◽  
Eileen McKinlay ◽  
Jonathan Kennedy ◽  
Megan Pledger ◽  
Lesley Middleton ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Primary Care ◽  
Clinical Practice ◽  
Health Services ◽  
Online Survey ◽  
Influential Factors ◽  
System Level ◽  
Practice Environment ◽  
Care Services ◽  
Primary Care Services ◽  
Primary Care Practices

Background: In Aotearoa/New Zealand, the first nation-wide coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) lockdown occurred from March 23, 2020 to May 13, 2020, requiring most people to stay at home. Health services had to suddenly change how they delivered healthcare and some services were limited or postponed. This study investigated access to healthcare during this lockdown period, whether patients delayed seeking healthcare and reasons for these delays, focusing on the accessibility of primary care services. Methods: Adults (aged 18 years or older) who had contact with primary care services were invited through social media and email lists to participate in an online survey (n = 1010) and 38 people were recruited for in-depth interviews. We thematically analysed qualitative data from the survey and interviews, reported alongside relevant descriptive survey results. Results: More than half (55%) of survey respondents delayed seeking healthcare during lockdown. Factors at a national or health system-level that could influence delay were changing public service messages, an excessive focus on COVID-19 and urgent issues, and poor service integration. Influential factors at a primary care-level were communication and outreach, use of technology, gatekeeping, staff manner and the safety of the clinical practice environment. Factors that influenced patients’ individual decisions to seek healthcare were the ability to self-manage and self-triage, consciousness of perceived pressure on health services and fear of infection. Conclusion: In future pandemic lockdowns or crises, appropriate access to primary care services can be improved by unambiguous national messages and better integration of services. Primary care practices should adopt rapid proactive outreach to patients, fostering a calm but safe clinical practice environment. More support for patients to self-manage and self-triage appropriately could benefit over-burdened health systems during lockdowns and as part of business as usual in less extraordinary times.

scholarly journals 736. Delays in Malaria Recognition and Door to Anti-malarial Time in a South London Hospital

2021 ◽  
Vol 8 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S466-S466
Author(s):  
Nisha Patel ◽  
Tomasz Materski ◽  
Elisa Gonzalez ◽  
Solomon Russom ◽  
Gurjinder Sandhu
Keyword(s):  
Primary Care ◽  
Emergency Department ◽  
Care Physician ◽  
African Countries ◽  
College Hospital ◽  
Travel History ◽  
Care Services ◽  
Primary Care Services ◽  
Sub Saharan ◽  
The Uk

Abstract Background The prompt recognition and treatment of Plasmodium falciparum is necessary to prevent death. We reviewed data from a cohort of patients presenting with malaria to Kings College Hospital NHS Trust, London. Methods Retrospective review of electronic records and drug charts of patients diagnosed with malaria from Jan 2019- March 2021. Results 109 cases of malaria were identified representing travellers from 11 Sub-Saharan African countries: Nigeria(38%), Sierra Leone(33%), Ivory Coast(10%). The age range varied from 4 to 76 years with a mean of 44, 66% of the cohort was male. 22 cases occurred during the COVID-19 Pandemic. The commonest symptoms were Fever (97%), Headache (92%) and malaise (72%). P. falciparum was present in 99% cases. A travel history was taken in 94% of cases. Malaria was considered by the first clinician in 82% of cases with the second highest differential being a viral illness. In 6 cases, it took 4 to 11 medical reviews before malaria was considered. 29 patients met the UK criteria for severe malaria. Door to antimalarial time varied from 1 to 128 hours, with a median of 7.4 hours. 46% of the cohort received intravenous Artesunate as their first antimalarial. Extreme delays occurred were clinicians did not consider malaria, patients had negative films or a patient did not declare a travel history when asked. 1 patient died of cerebral malaria with a door to needle time of 2hr 3min. Where a reason for delay is documented, drug availability represented the highest cause with mean delay from prescribing antimalarial to giving antimalarial of 2.7 hours. There was no difference in door to antimalarial administration during the COVID-19 Pandemic, but patients did have a delay in presentation to hospital from onset of symptoms, mean 6.2 days pre-pandemic, 10.5 days during pandemic, this was not statistically significant (P= 0.198). 3 patients presenting during the Pandemic had covid-19 swabs prior to admission and 10 had attended primary care services. Number of days between onset of malaria symptoms and presentation to the Emergency Department Box plot demonstrating that patients were waiting longer post symptom onset to access care in the Emergency Department. 3 patients had covid swabs in the community and 10 accessed care through their primary care physician. Conclusion Our data show that malaria is being considered early in the emergency department however there remain significant delays in administration of treatment. In 6 cases where malaria was not considered early there were delays in diagnosis of up to 5 days. An audit cycle will be completed with the aim of reducing door to antimalarial time. Disclosures All Authors: No reported disclosures

scholarly journals 191 A classification of primary care pathways in emergency departments: a multi-methods study comprising cross-sectional survey; site visits with observations; semi-structured and informal interviews

2020 ◽  
Vol 37 (12) ◽  
pp. 841.2-842
Author(s):  
Michelle Edwards ◽  
Alison Cooper ◽  
Davies Freya ◽  
Andrew Carson-Stevens ◽  
Thomas Hughes ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Primary Care ◽  
Emergency Department ◽  
Emergency Departments ◽  
Online Survey ◽  
Local Context ◽  
Framework Analysis ◽  
Front Door ◽  
Care Services ◽  
Primary Care Services

Aims/Objectives/BackgroundWe aim to describe and classify the predominant streaming pathways on arrival in Emergency Departments (EDs) in England and Wales and explain how they operate in different models of emergency department primary care services. Recent policy has encouraged a method whereby nurses stream from the emergency department front door to GPs working in a separate GP service operating within or alongside an ED. However, there is variation in methods of assessing and streaming patients on arrival at EDs. Conflated terminology causes difficulties in assessing relative performance, improving quality or gathering evidence about safety, clinical effectiveness. Our findings present a new classification of current streaming pathways from emergency departments to primary care services.Methods/DesignWe used a multi-stage method approach, including an online survey completed by 77 EDs across England & Wales, interviews with 21 clinical leads, and finally, undertaking case studies of 13 EDs. Qualitative data were triangulated and analysed using a framework analysis approach.Results/ConclusionsThe most common ED pathways to primary care services were: front door streaming before ED registration; streaming inside the ED; or without streaming but GPs selecting patients. Pathways were often adapted, to suit local circumstances such as department layout, patient demand levels, skill mix and interests of GPs practitioners and the accessibility of community primary care services. Pathways to redirect patients with non-urgent primary care problems to community primary care services were also used, with local variation in protocols based on staffing, patient demand and links to community primary care services. Local clinical leads and managers need to consider which pathway(s) may best suit their local context and needs. Consistency of terminology used to describe pathways between EDs and primary care services is necessary for multi-site evaluation, quality improvement and performance measurement.

scholarly journals Evaluation of primary care services in Hungary: a comprehensive description of provision, professional competences, cooperation, financing, and infrastructure, based on the findings of the Hungarian-arm of the QUALICOPC study

2021 ◽  
Vol 22 ◽  
Author(s):  
Imre Rurik ◽  
Anna Nánási ◽  
Zoltán Jancsó ◽  
László Kalabay ◽  
Levente István Lánczi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Primary Care ◽  
Health Care ◽  
Financial Incentives ◽  
Descriptive Analysis ◽  
Health Care Provision ◽  
Care Provision ◽  
Process Indicators ◽  
Care Services ◽  
Primary Care Services ◽  
Almost All

Abstract Background: Primary health care provision in terms of quality, equity, and costs are different by countries. The Quality and Costs of Primary Care (QUALICOPC) study evaluated these domains and parameters in 35 countries, using uniformized method with validated questionnaires filled out by family physicians/general practitioners (GPs). This paper aims to provide data of the Hungarian-arm of the QUALICOPC study and to give an overview about the recent Hungarian primary care (PC) system. Methods: The questionnaires were completed in 222 Hungarian GP practices, delivered by fieldworkers, in a geographically representative distribution. Descriptive analysis was performed on the data. Findings: Financing is based mostly on capitation, with additional compensatory elements and minor financial incentives. The gate-keeping function is weak. The communication between GPs and specialists is often insufficient. The number of available devices and equipment are appropriate. Single-handed practices are predominant. Appointment instead of queuing is a new option and is becoming more popular, mainly among better-educated and urban patients. GPs are involved in the management of almost all chronic condition of all generations. Despite the burden of administrative tasks, half of the GPs estimate their job as still interesting, burn-out symptoms were rarely found. Among the evaluated process indicators, access, continuity, comprehensiveness, and coordination were rated as satisfactory, together with equity among health outcome indicators. Financing is insufficient; therefore, many GPs are involved in additional income-generating activities. The old age of the GPs and the lack of the younger GPs generation contributes to a shortage in manpower. Cooperation and communication between different levels of health care provision should be improved, focusing better on community orientation and on preventive services. Financing needs continuous improvement and appropriate incentives should be implemented. There is a need for specific PC-oriented guidelines to define properly the tasks and competences of GPs.

Sexually transmitted infections in primary care

2021 ◽  
Vol 14 (3) ◽  
pp. 168-174
Author(s):  
Harsha Dhokia
Keyword(s):  
Primary Care ◽  
Sexually Transmitted Infections ◽  
Sexually Transmitted ◽  
Care Services ◽  
Primary Care Services ◽  
Genitourinary Medicine ◽  
The Uk

Sexually transmitted infections (STIs) have often been managed in genitourinary medicine clinics. However, with increasing rates of STIs, more patients are now presenting to primary care services. It can be a sensitive subject for patients, who may be embarrassed to attend. A non-judgemental approach and knowledge about STIs are important in easing patients’ anxieties. This article provides an overview of the most common STIs in the UK, including presenting features and primary care investigation and management.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document