scholarly journals Anti-Cancer Activity of PAK4/NAMPT Inhibitor and Programmed Cell Death Protein-1 Antibody in Kidney Cancer

Kidney360 ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 1 (5) ◽  
pp. 376-388
Author(s):  
Josephine F. Trott ◽  
Omran Abu Aboud ◽  
Bridget McLaughlin ◽  
Katie L. Anderson ◽  
Jaime F. Modiano ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cell Death ◽  
Programmed Cell Death ◽  
Kidney Cancer ◽  
Renal Cell ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
The United States ◽  
Nicotinamide Phosphoribosyltransferase ◽  
Programmed Cell Death 1 ◽  
Anti Cancer ◽  
Cell Death Protein

BackgroundKidney cancer (or renal cell carcinoma, RCC) is the sixth most common malignancy in the United States and is increasing in incidence. Despite new therapies, including targeted therapies and immunotherapies, most RCCs are resistant to treatment. Thus, several laboratories have been evaluating new approaches to therapy, both with single agents as well as combinations. Although we have previously shown efficacy of the dual PAK4/nicotinamide phosphoribosyltransferase (NAMPT) inhibitor KPT-9274, and the immune checkpoint inhibitors (CPI) have shown utility in the clinic, there has been no evaluation of this combination either clinically or in an immunocompetent animal model of kidney cancer.MethodsIn this study, we use the renal cell adenocarcinoma (RENCA) model of spontaneous murine kidney cancer. Male BALB/cJ mice were injected subcutaneously with RENCA cells and, after tumors were palpable, they were treated with KPT-9274 and/or anti–programmed cell death 1 (PDCD1; PD1) antibody for 21 days. Tumors were measured and then removed at animal euthanasia for subsequent studies.ResultsWe demonstrate a significant decrease in allograft growth with the combination treatment of KPT-9274 and anti-PD1 antibody without significant weight loss by the animals. This is associated with decreased (MOUSE) Naprt expression, indicating dependence of these tumors on NAMPT in parallel to what we have observed in human RCC. Histology of the tumors showed substantial necrosis regardless of treatment condition, and flow cytometry of antibody-stained tumor cells revealed that the enhanced therapeutic effect of KPT-9274 and anti-PD1 antibody was not driven by infiltration of T cells into tumors.ConclusionsThis study highlights the potential of the RENCA model for evaluating immunologic responses to KPT-9274 and checkpoint inhibitor (CPI) and suggests that therapy with this combination could improve efficacy in RCC beyond what is achievable with CPI alone.

scholarly journals Gastrointestinal disorders as immune-related adverse events

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniele Balducci ◽  
Claudia Quatraccioni ◽  
Antonio Benedetti ◽  
Marco Marzioni ◽  
Luca Maroni
Keyword(s):  
Cell Death ◽  
Cancer Therapy ◽  
Programmed Cell Death ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Cytotoxic T Lymphocyte ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Survival Rates ◽  
Programmed Cell Death 1 ◽  
Anti Cancer ◽  
Life Threatening

Immune checkpoint inhibitors, such as cytotoxic T-lymphocyte antigen 4 inhibitors, programmed cell death 1 inhibitors and programmed cell death-ligand 1 inhibitors, have recently emerged as novel drugs in the anti-cancer therapy. Their use in different types of advanced cancer has shown good results and an increase in survival rates. However, immune-related adverse events (irAEs) are frequent and often require special care. IrAEs may affect all the organs, but they are most commonly seen in skin, lungs, endocrine glands and in the gastrointestinal tract where small bowel, colon, the liver and/or the pancreas can be involved. Despite being usually mild and self-resolving, irAEs may present in severe and life-threatening forms, causing the withdrawal of anti-cancer therapy. IrAEs, therefore, represent a challenging condition to manage that often requires the cooperation between the oncologists and the gastroenterologists in order to identify and treat them adequately.

scholarly journals Current status of treatment with immune checkpoint inhibitors for gastrointestinal, hepatobiliary, and pancreatic cancers

2020 ◽  
Vol 13 ◽  
pp. 175628482094877
Author(s):  
Yuji Eso ◽  
Hiroshi Seno
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trials ◽  
Cell Death ◽  
Programmed Cell Death ◽  
Solid Tumors ◽  
Immune Checkpoint ◽  
Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
The United States ◽  
Pancreatic Cancers ◽  
Cell Death Protein

The development of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) targeting cytotoxic T lymphocyte antigen 4 (CTLA-4), programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1), or programmed cell death protein ligand 1 (PD-L1) has revolutionized the treatment strategy in various types of cancers. In addition, recent studies have revealed that tumor microsatellite instability (MSI) status and tumor mutation burden (TMB) contribute significantly to the therapeutic response to anti-PD-1 monoclonal antibody (mAb), which led to an accelerated approval to pembrolizumab for the treatment of MSI-high or mismatch-repair-deficient solid tumors after conventional chemotherapies in 2017 and for the treatment of TMB-high solid tumors in 2020 by the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA). In the field of gastrointestinal cancers, many clinical trials evaluating the safety and efficacy of various regimens such as ICI monotherapy, the combination of anti-CTLA-4 mAb and anti-PD-1/PD-L1 mAb, and combination of ICI and conventional chemotherapy or tyrosine kinase inhibitor have been reported or are in progress. This review summarizes MSI status and TMB in gastrointestinal, hepatobiliary, and pancreatic cancers, and provides the results of most relevant clinical trials evaluating ICIs. We also discuss the development of biomarkers required for improving the selection of patients with a high probability of benefiting from treatment with ICIs, and potential therapeutic strategies that could help to enhance anticancer responses of ICIs.

scholarly journals Predicting Responses to Checkpoint Inhibitors in Lymphoma: Are We Up to the Standards of Solid Tumors?

2020 ◽  
Vol 14 ◽  
pp. 117955492097636
Author(s):  
Ah-Reum Jeong ◽  
Edward D Ball ◽  
Aaron Michael Goodman
Keyword(s):  
Cell Death ◽  
Programmed Cell Death ◽  
B Cell ◽  
Solid Tumors ◽  
Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
B Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Hematologic Malignancies ◽  
Checkpoint Blockade ◽  
Programmed Cell Death 1

Treatment of cancer has transformed with the introduction of checkpoint inhibitors. However, the majority of solid tumor patients do not respond to checkpoint blockade. In contrast, the response rate to programmed cell death 1 (PD-1) blockade in relapsed/refractory classical Hodgkin lymphoma (cHL) is 65% to 84% which is the highest among all cancers. Currently, checkpoint inhibitors are only approved for cHL and primary mediastinal B-cell lymphoma as the responses to single-agent checkpoint blockade in other hematologic malignancies is disappointingly low. Various established biomarkers such as programmed cell death 1 ligand 1 (PD-L1) protein surface expression, mismatch repair (MMR) status, and tumor mutational burden (TMB) are routinely used in clinical decision-making in solid tumors. In this review, we will explore these biomarkers in the context of hematologic malignancies. We review characteristic 9p24.1 structural alteration in cHL and primary mediastinal B-cell lymphoma (PMBCL) as a basis for response to PD-1 inhibition, as well as the role of antigen presentation pathways. We also explore the reported frequencies of MMR deficiency in various hematologic malignancies and investigate TMB as a predictive marker.

scholarly journals Clinical Applications of Immunotherapy Combination Methods and New Opportunities for the Future

2017 ◽  
Vol 2017 ◽  
pp. 1-10 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ece Esin
Keyword(s):  
Cell Death ◽  
Programmed Cell Death ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Innate Immune ◽  
Small Subset ◽  
New Class ◽  
Combination Strategies ◽  
Combination Methods ◽  
Immune Editing ◽  
Cell Death Protein

In the last decade, we have gained a deeper understanding of innate immune system. The mechanism of the continuous guarding of progressive mutations happening in a single cell was discovered and the production and the recognition of tumor associated antigens by the T-cells and elimination of numerous tumors by immune-editing were further understood. The new discoveries on immune mechanisms and its relation with carcinogenesis have led to development of a new class of drugs called immunotherapeutics. T lymphocyte-associated antigen 4, programmed cell death protein 1, and programmed cell death protein ligand 1 are the classes drugs based on immunologic manipulation and are collectively known as the “checkpoint inhibitors.” Checkpoint inhibitors have shown remarkable antitumor efficacy in a broad spectrum of malignancies; however, the strongest and most durable immune responses do not last long and the more durable responses only occur in a small subset of patients. One of the solutions which have been put forth to overcome these challenges is combination strategies. Among the dual use of methods, a backbone with either PD-1 or PD-L1 antagonist drugs alongside with certain cytotoxic chemotherapies, radiation, targeted drugs, and novel checkpoint stimulators is the most promising approach and will be on stage in forthcoming years.

Side effects of immune-checkpoint inhibitors: Can multiple side effects be seen in a patient?

2021 ◽  
pp. 107815522110381
Author(s):  
Esra Özyurt ◽  
Serhat Özçelik ◽  
Heves Sürmeli ◽  
Mehmet Çelik ◽  
Murat Ayhan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
T Cells ◽  
Cell Death ◽  
Side Effects ◽  
Programmed Cell Death ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Host Cells ◽  
Immunoglobulin G4 ◽  
Programmed Cell Death 1 ◽  
Recurrent Renal Cell Carcinoma

Introduction Nivolumab is a human immunoglobulin G4 monoclonal antibody that inhibits programmed cell death-1 activity by binding to the programmed cell death-1 receptors. Cancer cells express increased number of programmed cell death-1 ligands and this allows them to escape the cytotoxic effects of the T cells. Therefore, the negative programmed cell death-1 receptor signal regulates T-cell proliferation and activation is disrupted. However, this change in the activity of the T cells can cause them to lose their ability to recognize host cells. The immune response enabled by these agents has led to side effects, commonly known as “immune-related adverse events.” Case report We report a case of a 66-year-old male patient who was treated with nivolumab for recurrent renal cell carcinoma presented with hepatitis and adrenalitis. Three weeks after starting nivolumab, the patient had abdominal pain and weakness, and then aspartate and alanine transaminase levels were found to be elevated. Management and outcome Hepatitis was predicted to be due to nivolumab, because other causes were excluded. He started using oral methylprednisolone and then, hepatitis improved. However, while receiving methylprednisolone treatment, fludrocortisone was started with the pre-diagnosis of adrenalitis due to the persistence of fatigue, weakness, and hyponatremia and hyperkalemia. With both treatments, the patient's symptoms and sodium and potassium level returned to normal. Discussion This case emphasizes the need for patient's education and awareness of immune-related adverse events, and the importance of understanding the management of life-threatening complications of the checkpoint inhibitors, because these side effects require prompt recognition and treatment.

scholarly journals Resumption of anti‐programmed cell death 1 monotherapy for severe immune‐related adverse events experienced patient with renal cell carcinoma

2020 ◽  
Vol 3 (5) ◽  
pp. 176-179 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yoko Maegawa ◽  
Taigo Kato ◽  
Shinichiro Fukuhara ◽  
Hiroshi Kiuchi ◽  
Ryoichi Imamura ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Renal Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Cell Death ◽  
Programmed Cell Death ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Renal Cell ◽  
Experienced Patient ◽  
Programmed Cell Death 1
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document