scholarly journals PERLINDUNGAN HUKUM PIHAK KETIGA DALAM TINDAK PIDANA ILLEGAL LOGGING MENURUT UNDANG-UNDANG NOMOR 18 TAHUN 2013 TENTANG PENCEGAHAN DAN PEMBERANTASAN KERUSAKAN HUTAN

2019 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
pp. 172-196
Author(s):  
Patria Patria
Keyword(s):  
Supreme Court ◽  
Research Method ◽  
Legal Protection ◽  
Forest Products ◽  
Third Parties ◽  
Third Party ◽  
Illegal Logging ◽  
The Public ◽  
The Supreme Court ◽  
Ratio Decidendi

ABSTRAKHutan Indonesia merupakan salah satu pusat keanekaragaman hayati di dunia yang perlu dijaga kelestariannya oleh semua pihak. Namun dalam berbagai kesempatan banyak perusakan hutan dilakukan oleh oknum yang tidak bertanggung jawab baik perorangan maupun Korporasi, Karena itu dibuatlah Undang-undang Nomor 18 Tahun 2013 Tentang Pеncеgahan dan Pеmbеrantasan Pеrusakan Hutan Permasalahan yang diangkat, yaitu : (1). Ratio Decidendi Putusan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 2317 K/Pid.Sus/2015 dan (2). Perlindungan hukum pihak ketiga Dalam Tindak Pidana Pelaku Illegal Logging.Metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah metode penelitian yuridis normatif karena menggunakan bahan hukum primer dan skunder dengan pendekatan konseptual,pendekatan perundang-undangan dan pendekatan kasus.Berdasarkan hasil penelitian dapat disimpulkan Ratio Decidendi Putusan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 2317 K/Pid.Sus/2015 yang telah mengabulkan Kasasi Penuntut Umum atas Putusan Pengadilan Tinggi Palu Nomor 44/PID.SUS/2015/ PT PALtanggal 6 Juli 2015 yang memperbaiki Putusan Pengadilan Negeri Donggala Nomor 54/Pid.B/2015/PN.DGL, tanggal 27 Mei 2015 terhadap barang bukti berupa : 1 (satu) unit mobil Truck merk Mitsubishi canter warna kuning kas merah nomor registrasi DN 8614 VD dirampas untuk Negara, yang secara imperatif telah ditentukan dalam Penjelasan Pasal 16 Undang-Undang Nomor 18 Tahun 2013 tentang Pencegahan dan Pemberantasan Perusakan Hutan, yang menyatakan “Di samping hasil hutan yang tidak disertai dengan Surat Keterangan Sahnya Hasil Hutan, alat angkut, baik darat maupun perairan yang dipergunakan untuk mengangkut hasil hutan dimaksud dirampas untuk Negara, hal itu dimaksudkan agar pemilik jasa angkutan/pengangkut ikut bertanggung jawab atas keabsahan hasil hutan yang diangkut”Pihak ketiga pemilik barang dalam perkara pidana sering kali kurang mendapatkan perlindungan hukum dalam memperoleh kembali barang miliknya yang terkait dengan tindak pidana. Tidak semua undang -undang yang memerintahkan penyitaan dan perampasan terhadap barang yang terkait dengan tindak pidana memberikan perlindungan kepada pihak ketiga dalam memperoleh barang miliknya. Hasil penelitian diperoleh kesimpulan bahwa pihak ketiga dapat diberikan perlindungan hukum dan konsekuensi hukumnya dengan mengajukan gugatan secara perdata atau melakukan intervensi sebelum perkara diputus agar hakim dalam putusannya tidak merampas barang milik pihak ketiga tersebut, dan yang paling utama perlindungan hukum tersebut diberikan oleh hakim melalui putusannya yang mempunyai visi pemikiran ke depan dan mempunyai keberanian moral untuk melakukan terobosan hukum, di mana dalam suatu ketentuan undang-undang yang ada bertentangan dengan kepentingan umum, kepatutan, kesusilaan, dan kemanusiaan, yakni nilai-nilai yang hidup dalam masyarakat, maka hakim bebas dan berwenang mengambil putusan yang bertentangan dengan pasal undang-undang yang bersangkutan dengan tujuan untuk mencapai kebenaran dan keadilan, sehingga putusan tersebut dapat dijadikan yurisprudensi tetap.Kata Kunci: Perlindungan Pihak Ketiga, dan Illegal Logging.ABSTRACTIndonesian forest is one of the centers of biodiversity in the world that needs to be preserved by all parties. However, in many opportunities, forest destruction is carried out by individuals who are not responsible for either individuals or corporations. Therefore Law No. 18 of 2013 concerning Land and Forest Destruction is made. The issues raised are: (1). Ratio Decidendi Decision of the Supreme Court Number 2317 K / Pid.Sus / 2015 and (2). Third party protection in the crime of illegal logging.The research method used is a normative juridical research method because it uses primary and secondary legal materials with a conceptual approach, a legal approach and a case approach.Based on the results of the study it can be concluded that the Decision Ratio Decidendi of the Supreme Court Number 2317 K / Pid.Sus / 2015 has granted the Cassation of the Public Prosecutor for the Decision of the Palu High Court Number 44 / PID.SUS / 2015 / PT PAL dated July 6, 2015 which corrects the Donggala District Court Decision Number 54 / Pid.B / 2015 / PN.DGL, dated May 27, 2015 for evidence in the form of: 1 (one) Truck unit Mitsubishi brand canter yellow red cash registration number DN 8614 VD seized for the State, which has been imperatively determined in the Elucidation of Article 16 of Law Number 18 of 2013 concerning Prevention and Eradication of Forest Destruction, which states "In addition to forest products not accompanied by a Certificate of Legality of Forest Products, transportation equipment, both land and water used to transport forest products, is seized for the State, this is intended so that the owners of transport services / transporters are also responsible for the legitimacy of the forest products being transported.The third party owner of the goods in a criminal case often lacks legal protection in recovering his property related to a criminal act. Not all laws that ordered the seizure and seizure of goods related to criminal acts provided protection to third parties in obtaining their property. The results of the study concluded that third parties could be given legal protection and legal consequences by filing a lawsuit or intervening before the case was decided so that the judge in his decision did not seize the property of the third party, and the most important legal protection was given by the judge through his decision have a vision of the future and have moral courage to make a legal breakthrough, in which in the provisions of existing laws are contrary to the public interest, decency, decency, and humanity, namely the values that live in society, the judge is free and authorized take decisions that are contrary to the articles of the law concerned with the aim of achieving truth and justice, so that the decision can be made permanent jurisprudence.Keywords: Third Party Protection, and Illegal Logging.

scholarly journals UPAYA HUKUM YANG DILAKUKAN KORBAN KEJAHATAN DIKAJI DARI PERSPEKTIF SISTEM PERADILAN PIDANA DALAM PUTUSAN MAHKAMAH AGUNG RI

2012 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 1
Author(s):  
Lilik Mulyadi
Keyword(s):  
Supreme Court ◽  
Judicial Review ◽  
Criminal Procedure ◽  
Third Parties ◽  
Third Party ◽  
Public Prosecutor ◽  
The Public ◽  
Quality Reporting ◽  
Procedure Code ◽  
The Supreme Court

Positive Legal Indonesia provides protection against crime victims who are not directly in the Penal Code, Criminal Procedure Code, as well as outside the Criminal Code and Criminal Procedure Code. Later in the Code of Criminal Procedure formulatif policies and by laws to understanding the victim used different terminology, namely the complainant, the complainant, witnesses, interested third parties and the injured party. In practice, the request made by the applicant with the PK as the quality of the witnesses, interested third parties, the Legal Adviser or by the Public Prosecutor and apparently only remedy reconsideration made by the Public Prosecutor and Third Party concerned (Judicial Review Decision No. 4 PK / PID/2000 November 28 2001), which was granted by the Supreme Court while the petition for judicial review filed applicant witnesses (Judicial Review Decision No. 11 PK/PID/2003 August 6, 2003), or the reporting witness stated by the Supreme Court was not accepted by because the applicant is not qualified to appeal judicial review. From the theoretical dimension turns doing different interpretations of the Supreme Court as provided Art. 263 paragraph (1) Criminal Procedure Code that the applicant is granted a judicial review conducted by the Public Prosecutor and the Third Party concerned on the one hand while on the other side of the applicant's application for judicial review of quality reporting victims or witnesses can not be accepted. Keywords: remedies, victims of crime, judicial review

scholarly journals Implementation of Parate Executie Object of Liability

2021 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Redi Res
Keyword(s):  
Supreme Court ◽  
Legal Protection ◽  
Supreme Court Decision ◽  
Court Decision ◽  
District Court ◽  
The Public ◽  
The Supreme Court ◽  
Ratio Decidendi

Parate executive is the primary purpose of establishing Law Number 4 of 1996 concerning Mortgage Rights to provide solid legal protection for creditors holding mortgage objects. The easy and inexpensive execution process should make the parate executive the leading choice for creditors in auctioning mortgage objects if the debtor defaults. However, in reality, the parate execution could not be carried out properly because of the Supreme Court Decision No. 3210 K/Pdt/1984, in which one of the ratio decidendi in it that the public auction conducted by the Bandung KPKNL is invalid, and this is also supported by book II of the Supreme Court's guidelines which requires fiat execution from the District Court. This paper will explain how the two conflicting legal bases will impact the implementation of parate executives in the field. Keywords: Parate Executie;  Mortgage; Land.

scholarly journals Asas Itikad Baik Sebagai Upaya Perlindungan Hukum terhadap Pelaku Usaha Dalam Pembiayaan Konsumen (Studi Putusan Mahkamah Agung Republik Indonesia Nomor 1041 K/Pdt.Sus-BPSK/2017)

2019 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 381
Author(s):  
Arfi Azhari ◽  
Siti Nurbaiti
Keyword(s):  
Supreme Court ◽  
Research Method ◽  
Legal Protection ◽  
Financial Service ◽  
Good Faith ◽  
Interview Data ◽  
Consumer Finance ◽  
The Supreme Court ◽  
The Republic

Consumer Finance is a financing activity for the procurement of goods based on consumer needs with payment in installments. In consumer financing, the parties must have good intentions for the smooth running of the agreement, but in practice the principle of good faith is often violated by the parties such as in the Decision of the Supreme Court of the Republic of Indonesia No. 1041 / K-Pdt.Sus-BPSK/2017 decides to grant a request from Martha Sitorus (consumer) with consideration of Article 2 of the UUPK and the principle of good faith, which in this case with the existence of the decision clearly has harmed PT. Toyota Astra Financial Service Medan (business actor) for consumer financing agreements. The problem studied is how the legal protection of business actors carried out by consumers in consumer financing and how the RI Decision No. 1041 / K-Pdt.Sus-BPSK/2017 towards legal protection of business actors carried out by consumers in consumer financing. The research method used is a normative method supported by interview data. The results of the writing illustrate that the business actor does not receive legal protection as stipulated in Article 6 letter (b) UUPK and in the Decision of the Supreme Court of the Republic of Indonesia No. 1041 / K-Pdt.Sus-BPSK/2017 The Panel of Judges is not right in making decisions.

scholarly journals OPTIMALISASI ASAS KEMANFAATAN HASIL LELANG EKSEKUSI DALAM PERSPEKTIF HUKUM INVESTASI

2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (1) ◽  
pp. 46
Author(s):  
Rusmin Wijaya ◽  
Achmad Jaka Santos Adiwijaya
Keyword(s):  
Research Method ◽  
Swot Analysis ◽  
Legal Protection ◽  
Third Parties ◽  
Good Faith ◽  
Online Auction ◽  
Legal Certainty ◽  
The Public ◽  
Legal Remedies ◽  
Police Report

The auction activity is the sale of goods open to the public with a written and / or verbal price quote that is increasing or decreasing to reach the highest price, which is preceded by an auction announcement. Auction activities can grow the country's economy, this activity can be optimized through investment. The research method used in this research is normative juridical, and the data are analyzed qualitatively using SWOT analysis. The results of this research there are opportunities and challenges where the Mortgage Certificate has an executorial power, the Regulation supports Investors / Buyers to Invest by buying auction assets, the online auction system aims to enable KPKNL to respond quickly, cheaply, efficiently every request of potential buyers / Investors without have to go through a long bureaucracy, buyers in good faith get legal protection. As for obstacles or challenges in optimizing auction results through investment, namely the presence of auction blockage before the auction, interference or intervention from third parties, and the existence of legal remedies in the form of lawsuits, resistance, rebuttal submitted by the Respondent / debtor at the Court for reasons that are too low or Police Report. With regard to investor legal certainty, namely obtaining legal certainty and legal protection for the purchase of auction assets at the KPKNL in accordance with the provisions stipulated in article 14 of Law Number 25 of 2007 concerning Investment.Keywords : Utility Principle; Auction; Invesment Law.

scholarly journals Juridical Analysis of the Acquittal in a Murder Crime

2020 ◽  
Vol 2 (3) ◽  
pp. 29-33
Author(s):  
Chairul Nopriansyah
Keyword(s):  
Supreme Court ◽  
Research Method ◽  
Criminal Procedure ◽  
Public Prosecutor ◽  
The Public ◽  
Procedure Code ◽  
The Supreme Court

The judge plays an important role in the judiciary because the judge has the authority to examine, hear and decide on a case so that he is obliged to look for values ​​of justice in the application of progressive and responsive laws, so the judge in issuing decisions must pay attention to various considerations. Article 183 of the Criminal Procedure Code contains several elements of judges' considerations when making decisions. In the case of an acquittal, the judge needs carefulness and carefulness to consider so that a matter must be truly convincing. This research is a doctrinal research method that is taking the opinions of experts regarding free decisions and through legal products in the form of legislation and judges' decisions. The conclusion of this paper is First, the basic consideration of the judge in passing a free verdict (vrijspraak) is not fulfilling the minimum limit of evidence by the public prosecutor so that the judge will release the defendant because the evidence that can blame the defendant is insufficient and based on the elaboration of the writer above, the Supreme Court allows legal efforts to overturn an acquittal (vrijspraak) namely an appeal on an acquittal, but not all verdicts requested for appeal are always accepted by the Supreme Court.

scholarly journals Pembatasan Kasasi Perkara Pidana Oleh Mahkamah Agung Ditinjau Dari Hak Rakyat Untuk Memperoleh Keadilan

ADALAH ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 5 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Aurelia Verina Withania ◽  
Ahmad Mahyani
Keyword(s):  
Supreme Court ◽  
Research Method ◽  
Conceptual Approach ◽  
The Public ◽  
Analysis Techniques ◽  
Procedure Code ◽  
The Supreme Court ◽  
Basic Purpose ◽  
The Republic ◽  
Prescriptive Analysis

The existence of rules limiting the cassation becomes an obstacle for the public to obtain justice and is not in accordance with the principles of the state of Indonesia as a state of law which is stated in the provisions of the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia in Article 28D. Problem: Is the limitation of cassation in Article 45A of the Supreme Court Law in accordance with the provisions of the 1945 Constitution and the Criminal Procedure Code. This research is a normative research method with a statutory approach and a conceptual approach as well as prescriptive analysis techniques. The cassation legal effort should return to its basic purpose, namely maintaining legal uniformity and unity and providing justice for the community.

scholarly journals Perlindungan Hukum Bagi Kreditor Terhadap Pelunasan Piutang Dari Harta Pailit

2018 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Hamdi Hamdi ◽  
Sulaiman S ◽  
Teuku Yudi Afrizal
Keyword(s):  
Supreme Court ◽  
Capital Investment ◽  
Research Method ◽  
Mining Industry ◽  
Legal Protection ◽  
Supreme Court Decision ◽  
District Court ◽  
Court Of Appeals ◽  
The Supreme Court ◽  
Debt Payment

The concept of legal protection in bankruptcy has so far been seen as a way out of the problem of accounts receivable debt which coincides with a bankrupt debtor, where the debtor no longer has the ability to repay the debts which are past due to their creditors, so that the steps to submit a request for the determination of bankruptcy status by the Court Commerce of the debtor is a possible step to resolve the bankruptcy case. Bankruptcy was originally regulated in Law Number 37 of 2004 concerning Bankruptcy and Suspension of Debt Payment Obligations (UUK and PKPU). Furthermore, if the parties submitting bankruptcy applications, the Commercial Court Judges at the District Court are required to examine and hear the case being submitted. The research method used is the normative legal research method or library research with the statute aprroach approach and the case aprroach approach. Based on the results of the study, it is known that the form of legal protection for creditors against paying off debts from bankrupt assets in the Supreme Court Decision Number 511 / K / Pdt. Yinchenindo Mining Industry (in bankruptcy) by law becomes a guarantee for its debts to preferred creditors, in this case the Head of the Second Foreign Capital Investment Service Tax Office. Furthermore, the UUK and PKPU also guarantee the rights of creditors in bankruptcy, especially the rights of preferred creditors who have a special position with peace efforts and the postponement of obligations to pay debts of bankrupt debtors to their creditors as stipulated in Article 222 of the UUK and PKPU. The concept of the distribution of bankrupt assets distributed to preferred creditors after deducting bankruptcy fees and compensation for curatorial services where the payment process is settled based on the principle of fairness and balance set forth in Article 265 of the UUK and PKPU, where the preferred creditor parties receive the remaining payment of the receivables amounting to 62.5% ( sixty two point five percent) of the bankruptcy assets.It is expected that the Judges of the Commercial Court and the Court of Appeals at the Supreme Court consider the rights of preferred creditors who pay off their receivables first. The Debtor should be able to immediately submit a request to postpone the debt payment obligation so that the remaining outstanding debt receivables cannot be paid off to the preferred creditors through the sale of free assets. Keywords: Protections of the law, creditor, Treasures of starc

scholarly journals Insurance related problems in bareboat charter agreements

2021 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Albano Gilabert Gascón
Keyword(s):  
United Kingdom ◽  
Supreme Court ◽  
Third Parties ◽  
Insurance Contract ◽  
The United Kingdom ◽  
The Supreme Court ◽  
The One ◽  
The Baltic ◽  
The Relationship

AbstractIn 2017, the majority of the United Kingdom Supreme Court held in its judgment in the Gard Marine and Energy v China National Chartering (The Ocean Victory) case that, in bareboat charters under the ‘BARECON 89’ form, if both the owner and the charterer are jointly insured under a hull policy, the damages caused to the vessel by the charterer cannot be claimed by the insurer by way of subrogation after indemnifying the owner. The interpretation of the charter party leads to the conclusion that the liability between the parties is excluded. Faced with the Supreme Court’s decision, the Baltic and International Maritime Council (BIMCO) adopted a new standard bareboat charter agreement only a few months later, the ‘BARECON 2017’ form, which amends, among other clauses, the one related to insurance. The present paper analyses (i) the new wording of the clause mentioned above and (ii) its incidence on the relationship between the parties of both the charter agreement and the insurance contract and its consequences for possible third parties. Despite BIMCO’s attempt to change the solution adopted by the Supreme Court and his willingness to allow the insurer to claim in subrogation against the person who causes the loss, the consequences, as it will be seen, do not differ much in practice when the wrongdoer is the co-insured charterer. On the contrary, when the loss is caused by a time charter or a sub-charter, in principle, there will be no impediment for the insurer to sue him.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document