scholarly journals LEGAL NATURE OF CONTRACTS IN THE FIELD OF ENTREPRENEURIAL FISHING

Author(s):  
Yu.E. Budnikova

The article analyzes the legal nature of contractual relations arising from the implementation of entrepreneurial fishing (industrial and coastal). The question under examination is to which type of contracts we can attribute obligations in the field of fisheries: civil law, business or natural resources. Norms of which branch of legislation should govern contractual relations in the field of fisheries? Contracts that generate entrepreneurial obligations in the field of fisheries, as well as provide the right to harvest (catch) aquatic biological resources, are at the same time the basis for the emergence of the right to conduct entrepreneurial activity and the basis for the transfer of a property right to natural resource. The article substantiates the conclusion that these contractual relations are entrepreneurial in the field of environmental management, have a public-law nature and are subject to complex regulation not only by the norms of natural resources law, but also entrepreneurial legislation, but not civil law. To this end, it is proposed to develop a new legal mechanism for regulating entrepreneurial obligations in the field of fisheries.

2021 ◽  
Vol 12 (2) ◽  
pp. 441-454
Author(s):  
Larisa Mastilovich ◽  

The article provides a critical analysis of bankruptcy prevention procedures in the context of interactions between the principle of self-regulation (interaction between free legal will of creditors and the debtor) and the principle “cross-class cram-down” (the right of a court to prevail over the principle of self-regulation). The judicial authority, within the framework of European preventive restructuring law, has the absolute right to discretionally decide on any issue if it is approved by the debtor (freedom of entrepreneurial activity is guaranteed to every solvent debtor). Interference in the business of the solvent and insolvent debtor by judicial authority is not allowed in any other procedures including traditional insolvency court procedures (the majority of creditors are empowered to make decisions). In all legal orders, the traditional insolvency court procedures prioritize the principle of “majority of creditors” to the principle of self-regulation in contrast to European preventive restructuring procedures, where the principle of self-regulation dominates. Therefore, European preventive restructuring cannot be unambiguously attributed to either a civil law legal nature or a bankruptcy law legal nature. In Russia pre-insolvency procedures represent only the civil law legal nature during all procedure. The author introduces new pre-bankruptcy terms: “normative legal collectivity” — mandatory distribution of consequences to all parties, “actual collectivity” — the voluntary consent of all creditors in a particular case and “regulatory actual collectivity” — the requirements for voluntary consent of all creditors. The final result of the European preventive restructuring procedure is unknown until the very end (the same for traditional insolvency court procedures), while according to Art. 31 of the Bankruptcy Law Act of the Russian Federation, the result is fully known from the beginning where it works according to the principle: “either everything and immediately, or nothing”.


2020 ◽  
Vol 2 (5) ◽  
pp. 89-92
Author(s):  
S.V. DOROZHINSKY ◽  

The article discusses the prospects of building a contract system in Russia in the field of state defense orders in the broadest sense – as a system of civil law contractual relations with direct and indirect participation of public law entities; building a model of a similar system, including its legal support.


Author(s):  
Anatoliy Babaskin

Іintroduction. Despite the fact that a significant number of scientific publications by well-known Ukrainian authors are devoted to the issues of legal regulation of credit obligations, at the same time separate studies of banking legislation requirements on "acceptability of collateral" have not been conducted in Ukrainian civil science in recent years. This, taking into account the gradual alignment of banking legislation of Ukraine with the standards of Basel III, and Directive 2002/47 / EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 6 June 2002 on financial collateral mechanisms, necessitates such scientific research. The aim of the article. On the basis of the analysis of the legislation of Ukraine, the legislation of the European Union, scientific advances in the sphere of civil law and banking legislation, in the context of the analysis of the banking legislation of Ukraine, it is safe for creditors. In order to achieve this goal: 1. Conduct an analysis of civil and legal species for the protection of crops for the subject of іх possible delivery to “acceptable safety” and vrahuvannya banks when opening a credit card. 2. Significantly "quasi-security", as viewed by the banking legislation in the form of "acceptable security" for credit cards. 3. Zdіysniti analysis of the approaches to the legislation of the EU in the field of protection from credit denominations. Results. The methodological basis of the study is general scientific and special legal methods of scientific knowledge. In particular, the dialectical method, the method of analysis and synthesis, the comparative law method, the functional method, the modeling method, etc. Conclusions. First, the banking legislation does not consider as "acceptable collateral" such types of collateral as penalty, surety, deposit, retention. Secondly, the banking legislation considers as "acceptable collateral" not only those specified in Part 1 of Art. 546 of the Civil Code of Ukraine types of security for performance of obligations (pledge, right of trust ownership, guarantee), and other types of security for performance of obligations provided by law or contract (reserve letter of credit, performing the function of financial guarantee, guarantees of public entities, guarantee payment), but also contractual constructions which do not concern types of maintenance of performance of obligations (repo agreements). Thus, the banking legislation considers collateral in credit operations from the economic point of view, according to which "acceptable collateral" is only such liquid collateral that guarantees the rapid recovery of the property of the creditor bank, which suffered damage due to default or improper performance of the counterparty loan obligation, as well as "quasi-collateral", if such is referred by banking legislation to "acceptable collateral". Third, the existence of rules in the banking legislation on the acceptability of collateral in no way affects the right of banks to use any type of collateral provided by law or contract, if the application of such is possible in credit relations, taking into account the legal nature of the relevant types. software. Fourth, the set of regulations of the National Bank of Ukraine on the acceptability of collateral can be considered as an institution of banking law, which includes as rules of civil law governing the types of collateral, other rules of contract law governing other "quasi-collateral" contractual constructions, as well as public-law special norms of banking legislation, which establish additional regulatory requirements for banks to ensure credit operations and calculate credit risk.


2021 ◽  
Vol 17 (20) ◽  
pp. 1
Author(s):  
Khatuna Jinoria

Obtaining shares in a joint stock company grants the owner important rights and imposes several obligations on them. In the list of shareholders’ rights, one of the most important subjects is the right to sue the shareholder’s lawsuit. The right to bring in front of courts certain aspects of company-related activities is the legal mechanism of protecting the shareholders other rights. Shareholders’ lawsuit plays an important role in the protection of minority shareholders. Shareholders’ lawsuit also includes two types of legal actions: direct lawsuit and derivative lawsuit. Georgian case law is not very advanced in this area. When shareholders bring matters in front of courts, the number of precedents adhered to is rare. As for the derivative lawsuit, the relative novelty of this legal institution in Georgian legislation causes the lack of deeper understanding. Georgian doctrine does not provide thorough analysis of legal nature and divergence of shareholders’ lawsuits when it comes to case law. As mentioned above, it is quite scarce.


2021 ◽  
Vol 17 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Yury Alexandrovich Svirin ◽  
Anatoly Aleksandrovich Vlasov ◽  
Vladislav Petrovich Sorokin ◽  
Marina Andreevna Simanova ◽  
Catherina Aleksandrovna Kukhturskaya

The article studies the legal mechanism preventing and resolving a conflict of interest in civil law. The Russian public law pays much attention to the prevention of competitive interests but there are still no studies on a conflict of interest in private law. The authors have written this article to consider the relevant legal studies and draw their conclusions. Methods: The authors used the methods of comparative and systemic analysis, synthesis and scientific research to examine such a legal concept as a "conflict of interest in private law". The study aims at analyzing the category of competitive interests in relation to private law, determining its prerequisites, reasons and possible solutions. The authors have concluded that a conflict of interest often causes corporate conflicts among parties involved in corporate relations. Moreover, this type of conflicts arises due to the realization of individual property interests and the possibility of one person to influence the other, for example, a conflict between majority and minority shareholders.


2019 ◽  
Vol 16 (1 (3)) ◽  
pp. 185-198
Author(s):  
Sławomir Pawłowski

The subject of the discussion is the legal nature of restrictions on the use of real estate in relation to the protection of environmental resources. Art. 129 of Environmental Law can have the effect that the use of a property or its part is impossible or substantially reduced. In doctrine, the dominant view is that such public-law interference in the right of property assumes the form of restriction referred to in Art. 64, par. 3 of the Constitution of the Republic of Poland. Another interpretation is also possible. Since the depth of the interference with property rights can lead to the effect that this property will become, as the Ombudsman has pointed out recently, “useless” to the owner, it would be reasonable to consider whether or not such property is de facto being expropriated. In such a case, the standard of constitutional control would be Art. 21, sec. 2.


2021 ◽  
Vol 17 (2) ◽  
pp. 45-53
Author(s):  
A. V. Pikalov

The essential features of the preferential right are revealed and the main approaches to understanding its legal nature are considered. According to the first approach, preferential rights are defined as cases when, under all equal conditions, the advantage is granted by law to a specific group of persons with some special characteristics. The second approach does not have a single idea: the authors focus on a certain aspect of preferential rights and propose to understand other preferential rights in the same way. The place of “preferential rights” among other exceptions in the law is determined, the relationship and difference from related legal categories are shown. Based on the results of carried out research, the author's definition of a preferential right is developed as an additional possibility based on the property (corporate) interest of its owner, established by law or contract, to demand from the subject-accomplice in the right or the party in respect of proper behavior in the form of providing advantages over third parties. This right is proposed to be considered an independent subjective right due to the obvious independence of its existence in objective law as a measure of possible behavior defined by law (by contract, constituent document), the presence of a construction corresponding to it of a legal obligation, its own mechanism for the implementation of this right, and for a number of other reasons set out in the work.


2021 ◽  
Vol 7 (3B) ◽  
pp. 286-291
Author(s):  
Viktoriia Piddubna ◽  
Anatoliy Stativka

The article analyses the characteristics of the participation of legal entities under public law in contractual relations. The concept of a legal entity under public law has not yet been developed. At the same time, the doctrine indicates the marks of legal entities under public law. The article discusses in more detail the agreement on the lease of the complex of full ownership of state property. The author analyzes the legal nature of the contract, the characteristics of the composition of the subject, the subject of the contract, essential conditions, questions of termination and termination of the contract. The legal nature of the rental right is mandatory, since the lease gives rise to legal relations of ownership and arises on the basis of a contract. Scientific approaches to the concept of "company" are investigated and, according to the author, the company should function as an object and not as a subject of law.


The present article touches upon the issue of negative obligation interpretation in civil law. The provisions of foreign civil legislature concerning negative obligations are reviewed in detail. The article gives a detailed analysis of main issues in the scientific literature concerning the legal nature of negative obligations: impossibility of negative obligations delays, impossibility of partial performance, impossibility of negative obligation termination because of failure to perform, impossibility to enforce debt assignment . The opportunity of negative obligation counter-performance is also stressed. It is concluded that negative obligation counter-performance is considered to be possible in case such obligations are interrelated. The author comes to the conclusion that the existence of counter-negative obligations is possible that are also exposed to counter-performance provided they are interrelated. The peculiarities of such negative obligations as distribution agreements and agency contracts are pointed out. The article goes on to say about the possibility of non-concurrence agreements conclusions under civil law of Ukraine. The author states that there are some legal obstacles to it: the correlation with the principle of freedom of contract, the limitations on active civil capacity, termination employment or contractual relationships termination with creditors. Domestic trial practice is given to illustrate the indicated positions. The author draws reader`s attention to the correlation of negative obligation with such definitions as «prohibition», « right restriction» and « waiver of the right». The author justifies that negative obligations can be considered neither as right restriction nor waiver of the right. Taking into account the fact that negative obligations imposes a prohibition on a debtor to commit certain actions but such a prohibition is provided by the agreement and works in favor of creditors it is considered to be a personal prohibition. The author also draws the line between negative obligations and negative servitude that is characterized by the burden of real estate as property rights and not by establishing the commitment in respect of a person.


Author(s):  
L.R. Miskevych

The scientific article is devoted to the study of problematic issues of acquiring the right to use water facilities under lease. It is noted that in the field of land, water, environmental relations, the water body and the land under it are separate objects, but in the field of property relations, which are governed by civil law, such objects are one whole both in the spectrum of regulation of property rights and contractual relations. However, the different sectoral affiliation of the water body and the corresponding land plot of the water fund inevitably affect the content of civil legal relations, supplementing the civil rights and obligations of the subjects of these legal relations with statutory requirements for the use of these natural resources. The significance of registration actions for the water body and the land plot of the water fund, which is transferred for use in the complex with the water body, is analyzed. The commission of such actions is aimed at establishing their identifying criteria and state recognition of these natural resources as objects of water and land relations, respectively. However, in the property turnover the public value is not the land plot of the water fund or the water object taken separately, but their tandem, which is perceived as an object of civil legal relations and, accordingly, the subject of the lease agreement. Given that the interests of the tenant are satisfied by the use of water space, the law states that the use of the contract provides a water body in a complex with a plot of land. However, such a legislative approach made it difficult to decide when the tenant acquired the right to use, as the law does not define a water body as property in respect of which the state registration of rights is carried out. Based on the analysis of the normatively established identifying criteria of a water body, it is concluded that the water body can be considered in the status of real estate in view of its legislative definition. Thus, when determining the moment of acquisition of the right to use water facilities under lease, it will be justified to apply the provisions of civil law. The novelty of the legislation is the priority of the land plot in the complex with which the water body is transferred and the automatic extension of the right to lease the land plot under the water body to such water body.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document