scholarly journals Analisis Perbandingan Risiko Keuangan Bank Konvensional dengan Bank Syariah

2020 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 21-31
Author(s):  
Lulu Amalia Nusron

ABSTRACT             This study aims to compare financial risks in conventional banks with Sharia banks in Indonesia in the 2014-2018 period. The research object consisted of 8 banks, namely 4 conventional banks (BNI, BRI, BCA, and Mandiri) and 4 Islamic banks (BNIS, BRIS, BCAS, and Mandiri Syariah). The data ratio or source used is secondary data obtained from the official website IDX, in the form of the bank's 2014-2018 annual financial statements. The ratios used include: NPL / NPF for credit risk, LDR / FDR for liquidity risk, BOPO for operational risk, and NIM / NOM for market risk. This research uses t-test and Mann Whitney test different analysis techniques. Based on the results of data processing using the SPSS version 23 program, it is concluded that: 1) there is no difference in credit risk and liukidity risk conventional banks and Islamic banks.  2) there are differences in terms of operational risk and market risk a conventional bank and a sharia bank Keyword: financial risk, conventional banks, and Islamic banks.   ABSTRAK             Penelitian ini memiliki tujuan untuk membandingkan tentang risiko keuangan pada bank konvensional dengan bank Syariah di Indonesia periode tahun 2014-2018. Objek penelitian terdiri dari 8 bank, yaitu 4 bank konvensional (BNI, BRI, BCA, dan Mandiri) dan 4 bank syariah (BNIS, BRIS, BCAS, dan Mandiri Syariah). Sumber data berupa data rasio atau sekunder yang didapat dari web IDX., yang berupa laporan keuangan tahunan bank periode 2014-2018. Adapun rasio yang digunakan antara lain: NPL/NPF untuk risiko kredit, LDR/FDR untuk risiko likuiditas, BOPO untuk risiko operasional, dan NIM/NOM untuk risiko pasar. Penelitian ini menggunakan teknik analisis uji beda t-tes dan Mann Whitney. Berdasarkan hasil olah data menggunakan program spss versi 23, diperoleh kesimpulan bahwa: 1) tidak terdapat perbedaan dalam hal risiko kredit dan risiko likuiditas bank konvensional dan bank syariah 2) terdapat perbedaan dalam hal risiko operasional dan risiko pasar bank konvensional dengan bank syariah. Kata kunci: risiko keuangan, bank konvensional, dan bank syariah.

2019 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Adi Isa Ansori ◽  
Herizon Herizon

This study tried to determine the effect of liquidity risk measured by LDR and IPR, Credit risk measured by APB and NPL, market risk measured by IRR and PDN, operational risk measured by BOPO, and FBIR both simultaneously or partially. On Core CAR (TIER 1) in Bank group of book 3 and book 4. The sample was selected using purposive sampling technique, consisting of five banks such as PT Bank Negara Indonesia, PT Bank Maybank Indonesia, PT Bank Tabungan Negara, PT Pan Indonesia Bank, and PT Bank Permata. The secondary data were taken from published financial statements starting from first quarter 2010 until second quarter 2015. They were collected by documentation method and analyzed using linear analysis. The result shows that, partially, LDR, IPR, NPL, PDN, BOPO and FBIR have significant effect on Core CAR (TIER 1). Simultaneously, LDR, IPR, APB, NPL, IRR, PDN, BOPO, and FBIR, as represented by liquidity risk, credit risk, market risk, and operational risk partially have significant effect on Core CAR (TIER 1) in Bank group of book 3 and book 4.


Author(s):  
Normaizatul Akma Saidi Et.al

Banks play a significant role in financing the economy and take on risky financial activities based on information and trust as they specialized companies with their own specificities. This study was propelled to unravel the determinants that affect financial risk (liquidity risk and credit risk) for conventional and Islamic banks. The bank-level data of conventional and Islamic banks in the regions of Middle East, Southeast Asia, and South Asia between 2006 and 2014 were collected from the Bankscope, which is a commercial database produced by the Bureau van Dijk. Thus, for conventional banks the obtained results exhibited significantly positive relationship between regulatory quality towards liquidity risk. Then, the relationship between regulatory quality towards credit risk was negatively significant for conventional banks. Meanwhile, as for Islamic banks, the relationship between government effectiveness and regulatory quality towards financial risk was insignificant. Hence, the regulators or policymakers are able to identify specific mechanism to improve the risk management of these banks as well through this study.


2020 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. 69
Author(s):  
Marhanum Che Mohd Salleh ◽  
Lina Nugraha Rani

This study aimed to compare the productivity performance of Islamic and Conventional Banks in Indonesia with the Total Factor Productivity Index (TFPCH) indicator. The sample of this study was 14 banks consisting of 7 Islamic Banks and 7 Conventional Banks from 2011-2018. Secondary data were obtained from the annual financial statements of each sample. To measure the total factor productivity index (TFPCH), the Malmquist Productivity Index (MPI) was used as a measure of productivity. It found that the productivity of Conventional Banks was slightly superior compared to Islamic Banks, with contributions from Technical / Technological Change (TECHCH) being the most influential component in the TFPCH composition. Further, there was an indication of a technical increase in both types of banks during the period. The results of this study implied banking industry players to increase their efficiency particularly the usage of technology in providing efficient services to users.


2021 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
pp. 30-33
Author(s):  
Norazwa Ahmad Zolkifli ◽  
Zanita Ismail ◽  
Nurul Syamshida Mokhtar

The focus of this study on both Islamic and conventional banks is to consider the unique duality banking system in the countries. Data is obtained from annual reports and websites of selected banks. Financial statements for 10 years beginning from 2009 until 2018 were used for extracting data for analyzing the credit and operational risk using E-view software. Furthermore, panel data analysis were used in combination with time series and cross section. The findings reveal that the determinants of credit risk and operational risk are difference between banking in Malaysia and Bahrain. The banking system will have a solid risk management system that will assist Malaysia and Bahrain to develop a strong economy as well as the possible adoption of risk management by the international banking system.


2016 ◽  
Vol 8 (11) ◽  
pp. 193 ◽  
Author(s):  
Arfianti Novita Anwar

<p>This study aims to analyze the performance of Islamic banks and conventional banks before and after the implementation of Islamic Banking Act 2008. The performance will be measured using CAMEL ratio selected. This research is considered essential in examining the positive contribution of the application of the Act to improve the performance of Islamic banks in Indonesia. By using secondary data, this study compared the performance of Islamic banks with that conventional bank selected as samples during the study period. Data were analyzed using the Wilcoxon Signed Rank Test for inter-temporal and Mann-Whitney test for inter-bank. Inter-temporal Tests conducted on Islamic Banking showed that a significant difference was only seen in the NPF ratio of 2 years before and after implementation of Islamic Banking Act. As for conventional banks showed a more diverse ie for 1 year before and after the application of the Law on Islamic Banking there are significant differences for the ROA and ROE, two years before and after implementation of the Law Islamic banking there are significant differences for the CAR, ROA, ROE and NIM and for the overall test a significant difference to CAR, ROA, ROE, NIM and efficiency. Inter-bank testing showed that prior to the application of Islamic Banking Act there are significant differences between conventional banks and Islamic banks to CAR, ROA and efficiency. Furthermore, after the application of Islamic Banking Act there is a significant difference for the CAR and LDR / FDR.</p>


2019 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
pp. 104-113
Author(s):  
Imam Abrori ◽  
Siti Khobsoh

This study aims to identify and explain how the effect Inflation, Interest Rate Deposit, and Finance to Deposit Ratio Total Mudharabah deposits in Islamic banks. The method used is multiple linear regression. The object of research used in this research is PT. Bank Syariah Mandiri using secondary data from the publication of monthly financial statements starting from 2010-2014. The results showed that: The rate of inflation has a negative and significant effect on the amount of deposits Mudharabah. Furthermore, other results showed that the rate of interest did not affect positively and significantly to Total Deposit Mudharabah. While the results of Finance to Deposit Ratio has a positive and significant influence on the amount of deposits Mudharabah. The test is performed with a significance level of α = 0.1.


2019 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Muhammad Syafwan Hady

<p>This study aims to examine the role of the board of commissioners’ characteristics, managerial ownership, and financial performance on financial risk disclosure. The target population of this study was sharia banks registered in the Indonesian banking directory in 2012-2016. This study used secondary data in the form of annual financial statements obtained from the source sites of each bank. Using purposive sampling, 11 sharia banks in Indonesia were selected as the appropriate sample. This study employed a scoring technique to measure the level of financial risk disclosure. The results show that the independent variables including the board of commissioners size, independent board of commissioners proportion, profitability, and size as the control variable significantly influenced the variable of FRD. However, the variable of CAR, FDR, and managerial ownership had no effect on financial risk disclosure. The result of F test showed that independent variables included in the regression model simultaneously affected the dependent variable.</p>


2021 ◽  
Vol ahead-of-print (ahead-of-print) ◽  
Author(s):  
Mohsin Ali ◽  
Mudeer Ahmed Khattak ◽  
Nafis Alam

PurposeThe study of credit risk has been of the utmost importance when it comes to measuring the soundness and stability of the banking system. Due to the growing importance of Islamic banking system, a fierce competition between Islamic and conventional banks have started to emerge which in turn is impacting credit riskiness of both banking system.Design/methodology/approachUsing the system GMM technique on 283 conventional banks and 60 Islamic banks for the period of 2006–2017, this paper explores the important impact of size and competition on the credit risk in 15 dual banking economies.FindingsThe authors found that as bank competition increases credit risk seems to be reduced. On the size effect, the authors found that big Islamic banks are less risky than big conventional banks whereas small Islamic banks are riskier than small conventional banks. The results are robust for different panel data estimation models and sub-samples of different size groups. The findings of this paper provide important insights into the competition-credit risk nexus in the dual banking system.Originality/valueThe paper is specifically focused on credit risk in dual banking environment and tries to fill the gap in the literature by studying (1) do the Islamic and conventional banks exhibit a different level of credit risk; (2) does competition in the banking system impact the credit risk of Islamic and conventional banks and finally (3) do the big and small banks exhibit similar levels of credit risk.


Author(s):  
Mirela-Madalina Stoian ◽  
Rares-Gabriel Stoian

The present paper intends to serve as an introduction into the financial risk management universe. It starts with the basic assumption that performance of an organization is inseparable from the risks it is facing. Any organization should have in place the necessary tools to identify, assess and constantly measure the risks it is exposed to. The paper focuses in defining the basic principles in creating a viable risk management framework that keeps track of three major categories of identified financial risks: market risk, credit risk and liquidity risk. Emphasis is put on the models to measure these types of risks but also on the tools an organization can use in order to reduce them. The second part of the paper is dedicated to recent events that shaped and shocked financial markets and illustrate the consequences faced by organizations when risks are not properly assessed and the risk management models in place are based on dangerously unrealistic notions.


2020 ◽  
Vol 11 (8) ◽  
pp. 1555-1581 ◽  
Author(s):  
Adel Elgharbawy

Purpose This study aims to compare types and levels of risk and risk management practices (RMPs) including the recognition, identification, assessment, analysis, monitoring and control of risk in both Islamic and conventional banks. Design/methodology/approach A questionnaire survey was conducted among the Islamic and conventional banks in Qatar, together with an analysis of archival data extracted from the Thomson Reuters Eikon database for the period 2009-2018. Data were analysed using descriptive statistics, ANOVA and regression analysis. Findings Islamic banks encounter unique types and levels of risk that are not encountered by conventional banks. In Islamic banks, risks such as those of operation and Sharia non-compliance are perceived to be higher, while in conventional banks other risks such as those of credit and insolvency are higher; other risks, for example, liquidity risk, are faced by both. RMPs are determined by understanding risk and risk management, risk identification, risk monitoring and control and credit risk analysis, but not by risk assessment and analysis. However, the RMPs of the two types of bank are not significantly different, except in the analysis of credit risk. Research limitations/implications The study contributes to the debate in the literature by developing a better understanding of the dynamism of risk management in Qatari banks, which can be extended to similar contexts in the region. However, the relatively small sample size in only one country limits the possibility of generalizing the findings. The survey methodology is based on the perception of bankers rather than their actual actions and does not provide in-depth analysis for each type of risk, especially credit risk. However, using archival data, in addition to those from the survey, minimises the bias that would result from depending on one source of data. Practical implications The study provides valuable insights into the different types and levels of risk, as well as the RMPs in Islamic and conventional banks, which can help in guiding the future development and regulation of risk management in the banking sector of Qatar and its region. Originality/value The study helps to explain the mixed results of previous studies that compare types and levels of risk and RMPs in Islamic and conventional banks. Using different types of data and analysis, it provides evidence from one of the fastest growing economies in the world. It also addresses the concerns over RMPs in banks since the global financial crisis.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document