A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF COMPLICATIONS OF MRM (MODIFIED RADICAL MASTECTOMY) VERSUS BCS (BREAST CONSERVATION THERAPY) IN EARLY INVASIVE BREAST CANCER. A RESULT FROM SAVERA CANCER AND MULTISPECIALITY HOSPITAL PATNA, BIHAR.
Background: Early breast cancer patients admitted in the surgical oncology department of Savera Cancer and Multispeciality Hospital. Patients were divided in two treatment arms; Arm A and Arm B. Arm A patient went through MRM and Arm B patients went through BCS. This study included prospective cases of 1 year from June 2019 to June 2020. Method: In all MRM group patients all breast tissue, skin, nipple areola complex and level 1, 2, 3 lymph nodes removed. In all BCS group patients lump was removed with an envelope of normal appearing breast tissue. In all resected specimens free surgical margin was ensured via histopathology reports (HPR). Patients were reviewed in early post operative period for complications and follow up done at the end of 1st, 3rd, 6th and 12th month for recurrence. In treatment Arm A (MRM) 08 patients developed arm ede Result: ma; 05 patients developed shoulder dysfunction; 07 patients developed ap necrosis; 07 patients developed arm dysesthesia. Whether in treatment ARM B (BCT) 04 patient had Seroma formation; 13 patients developed wound infection & wound contracture. Complications were reported in 35% of MRM group (35 out of 100 cases), while they were absent in 65% (65 out of 100). However, in the BCS group, complications were reported in 6.66% cases only (15 out of 100 cases), while were absent in 93.33% (75 out of 100). P value by statistical analysis being 0.283, the difference being statistically insignicant. Recurrence were present in 6.66% of MRM group (8/100) while they were absent in 92.34 % (92/100). However in BCS group recurrences were present in 3.33 % (3/100) and were absent in 97.67% (97/100). P value by statistical analysis being 1, the difference being statistically insignicant. Grading of complications has been captured from CTCAE Version 5.0 (Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events). Conclusion: There is slight signicant difference in the recurrence rate, whether the patient had undergone BCS or MRM based on our short term follow-up. However a long term follow-up is required.