scholarly journals Synergistic Efficacy of the Demethylation Agent Decitabine in Combination With the Protease Inhibitor Bortezomib for Treating Multiple Myeloma Through the Wnt/β-Catenin Pathway

Author(s):  
Yulong Jin ◽  
Li Xu ◽  
Xiaodong Wu ◽  
Juan Feng ◽  
Mimi Shu ◽  
...  
Blood ◽  
2008 ◽  
Vol 112 (11) ◽  
pp. 5138-5138
Author(s):  
Shiqiang Qu ◽  
Chengcheng Fu ◽  
Li Yao ◽  
Guanghua Chen ◽  
Jiannong Cen ◽  
...  

Abstract Objective: The expression and regulation of multidrug resistance protein ABCG2 in multiple myeloma (MM) is unclear, expression of ABCG2 mRNA and protein, promoter methylation regulation of ABCG2 in MM cell lines will be investigated. Methods After human MM cell lines 8226 AU266 and XG-7 were incubated in the demethylation agent 5’-AzaDC, the change of ABCG2 mRNA and protein expression were evaluated separately by using the Taqman probe-based real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction(RQ-RT-PCR) and flow cytometry. The percentage of methylated alleles was assayed by SYBR green based methylation-specific quantitative PCR (MSQ-PCR). The melting curve was then analyzed to judge the specificity of the PCR product. Results The three MM cell lines have different expression level of ABCG2 mRNA(Table 1) and protein but all much higher than normal PBMCs and in different promoter methylation status. The highest level of ABCG2 mRNA and protein were detected in the 8266 cell lines and the promotor region is in unmethylation status. Expression in the U266 cell lines was moderate and the methylated percentage is 61.55%±1.98%. Expression in the XG-7 is the least, the methylated percentage is 78.40%±2.46%. ABCG2 expression increased after exposure to demethylation agent 5’-AzaDC to 2 fold in U266 and 3.5 fold in XG-7 cell lines. After MSQ-PCR, the melting curve was analyzed. The Tm value of methylated product and the unmethylated product were 77°C and 75.5°C separately. Conclution: ABCG2 mRNA and protein expression in 3 MM cell lines were much higher than that in normal peripheral blood mononuclear cells. Demethylation of the promotor increased ABCG2 mRNA and protein expression. So expression of ABCG2 is partially regulated by promoter methylation in myeloma cell lines. The cell line with the more ABCG2 expression may have more potential to effluence the chemotherapy agents. SYBR green I based fluorescence quantitative PCR can calculate the percentage of the methylated alleles in genome.


Blood ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 120 (21) ◽  
pp. 2956-2956
Author(s):  
Christoph Driessen ◽  
Dagmar Hess ◽  
Thomas Pabst ◽  
Sarah R Haile ◽  
Markus Joerger ◽  
...  

Abstract Abstract 2956 Introduction: The HIV protease inhibitor nelfinavir has anti-myeloma activity in mice; it is approved at the 1250 mg bid dose for oral treatment of HIV. We performed a phase I dose escalation trial of nelfinavir in combination with bortezomib in patients with advanced hematologic malignancies. Methods: During cycle 1 (28 days), trial treatment consisted of 1 week nelfinavir monotherapy, followed by nelfinavir in combination with standard dose bortezomib (1.3 mg/m2i.v. day 8, 11, 15, 18), while cycles 2 and 3 (21 days each) consisted of 2 weeks nelfinavir in combination with bortezomib (day 1, 4, 8, 11). Non-progressing patients could continue therapy for up to 4 additional cycles with the same regimen as cycles 2 and 3. Nelfinavir dose was escalated in a 3+3 design over 3 dose levels (1250, 1875, 2500 mg bid). Dose limiting toxicity (DLT), the primary endpoint, was grade 3–4 non-hematological toxicity (excluding grade 3 bilirubin/alanine aminotransferase (ALT) or hyperlipidemia reversible within 2 weeks) or severe hematologic toxicity unrelated to the underlying disease during cycle 1. Secondary endpoints included pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic assessments during cycle 1 at baseline, nelfinavir monotherapy and after application of nelfinavir and bortezomib in combination, as well as signals for activity. Results: Twelve evaluable patients were registered (median age 58 years; 8 male; performance status 0–1 in 10/12 patients); 8 had multiple myeloma, 2 leukemia (1 acute myeloid, 1 acute lymphoblastic) and 2 lymphoma (1 diffuse large B-cell lymphoma, 1 mantle-cell (MCL)). All myeloma patients failed both prior bortezomib and lenalidomide-containing therapy; 7/8 had progressed under prior bortezomib. One patient (2500 mg bid dose) experienced a transient grade 4 elevated ALT, categorized as DLT, which resolved within 2 weeks. The patient continued the same regimen off study without recurrent hepatic toxicity. No further DLTs occurred, thus nelfinavir 2500 mg bid was established to be safe in combination with standard dose bortezomib. One patient with highly aggressive lymphoma died from cerebral vein thrombosis; a myeloma patient experienced a non-fatal pulmonary embolism. Elevated ALT (2 patients) was the only additional non-hematological toxicity grade 3/4 observed in >1 patient. Grade 3 febrile neutropenia and grade 4 thrombocytopenia were seen in 1 and 4 patients, respectively. Best treatment response was evaluated for 11 patients (1 not evaluable). Partial response was achieved in 3 patients (2 myeloma, 1 MCL) and stable disease for at least 2 cycles of therapy in 5 patients. Overall, 4/12 patients completed >=3 cycles of treatment. Assessment of proteasome activity in peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) from treated patients after 1 week nelfinavir monotherapy revealed inhibition of total proteasome activity in vivo by nelfinavir compared to baseline (mean inhibition, as determined by specific, quantitative intracellular affinity labeling of active proteasome subunits: 14.9 %, 95% confidence interval (CI): 8.8–23.5%, p=<0.001), including inhibition of the bortezomib-insensitive tryptic (β2-type) proteasome activity (mean inhibition: 17.7%, 95% CI: 8.0–27.4%, p=0.008). In addition, inhibition of pAKT, induction of the unfolded protein response and accumulation of polyubiquitinated protein in vivo was observed in PBMC after nelfinavir monotherapy. Mean intracellular proteasome inhibition after combination treatment with bortezomib and nelfinavir was 26.6 % (95% CI: 11.5–42%). Maximum nelfinavir plasma levels were observed at the 1875 mg bid dose level (Cmax mean 12.10 mM, trough mean 6.97 mM), matching the nelfinavir concentrations that mediate anti-myeloma activity in vitro. Conclusion: This is the first trial to report on the use of nelfinavir as an anti-neoplastic agent in patients with hematologic malignancies. It identifies nelfinavir as FDA approved, orally available drug with pan-proteasome inhibiting activity in vivo. Nelfinavir treament up to 2500 mg bid is safe as monotherapy and in combination with standard dose bortezomib. Bortezomib in combination with nelfinavir shows signals for clinical activity in individual myeloma patients that have failed bortezomib and lenalidomide-containing therapies. Nelfinavir warrants further clinical investigation in multiple myeloma, in particular in combination with proteasome inhibitors. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.


2005 ◽  
Vol 41 ◽  
pp. 205-218
Author(s):  
Constantine S. Mitsiades ◽  
Nicholas Mitsiades ◽  
Teru Hideshima ◽  
Paul G. Richardson ◽  
Kenneth C. Anderson

The ubiquitin–proteasome pathway is a principle intracellular mechanism for controlled protein degradation and has recently emerged as an attractive target for anticancer therapies, because of the pleiotropic cell-cycle regulators and modulators of apoptosis that are controlled by proteasome function. In this chapter, we review the current state of the field of proteasome inhibitors and their prototypic member, bortezomib, which was recently approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration for the treatment of advanced multiple myeloma. Particular emphasis is placed on the pre-clinical research data that became the basis for eventual clinical applications of proteasome inhibitors, an overview of the clinical development of this exciting drug class in multiple myeloma, and a appraisal of possible uses in other haematological malignancies, such non-Hodgkin's lymphomas.


2000 ◽  
Vol 111 (4) ◽  
pp. 1118-1121 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Bellahcene ◽  
I. Van Riet ◽  
C. de Greef ◽  
N. Antoine ◽  
M. F. Young ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document